Hif-1α/Hsf1/Hsp70 signaling pathway regulates redox homeostasis and apoptosis in large yellow croaker(Larimichthys crocea) under environmental hypoxia

Sheng-Yu Luo, Jing-Qian Wang, Cheng Liu, Xin-Ming Gao, Yi-Bo Zhang, Jie Ding, Cong-Cong Hou, Jun-Quan Zhu,＊,Bao Lou, Wei-Liang Shen, Xiong-Fei Wu, Chun-Dan Zhang, Dao-Jun Tang

1 Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biotechnology by the Ministry of Education, School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo,Zhejiang 315211, China

2 Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China

3 State Key Laboratory of Large Yellow Croaker Breeding, Ningbo Academy of Oceanology and Fishery, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315012, China

ABSTRACT

Oxygen is an essential molecule for animal respiration, growth, and survival.Unlike in terrestrial environments, contamination and climate change have led to the frequent occurrence of hypoxia in aquatic environments, thus impacting aquatic animal survival.However, the adaptative mechanisms underlying fish responses to environmental hypoxia remain largely unknown.Here, we used large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) and large yellow croaker fry (LYCF) cells to investigate the roles of the Hif-1α/Hsf1/Hsp70 signaling pathway in the regulation of cellular redox homeostasis, and apoptosis.We confirmed that hypoxia induced the expression of Hif-1α, Hsf1, and Hsp70 in vivo and in vitro.Genetic Hsp70 knockdown/overexpression indicated that Hsp70 was required for maintaining redox homeostasis and resisting oxidative stress in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.Hsp70 inhibited caspase-dependent intrinsic apoptosis by maintaining normal mitochondrial membrane potential, enhancing Bcl-2 mRNA and protein expression, inhibiting Bax and caspase3 mRNA expression, and suppressing caspase-3 and caspase-9 activation.Hsp70 suppressed caspaseindependent intrinsic apoptosis by inhibiting nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and disturbed extrinsic apoptosis by inactivating caspase-8.Genetic knockdown/overexpression of Hif-1α and dual-luciferase reporter assay indicated that Hif-1α activated the Hsf1 DNA promoter and enhanced Hsf1 mRNA transcription.Hsf1 enhanced Hsp70 mRNA transcription in a similar manner.In summary, the Hif-1α/Hsf1/Hsp70 signaling pathway plays an important role in regulating redox homeostasis and anti-apoptosis in L.crocea under hypoxic stress.

Keywords: Hypoxia; Larimichthys crocea;Apoptosis; Redox homeostasis; Hif-1α/Hsf1/Hsp70

INTRODUCTION

The large yellow croaker (Larimichthyscrocea), which is primarily cultured in offshore cages, is an important economic mariculture fish in China.In recent years, however, climate change and environmental pollution have led to the frequent occurrence of marine hypoxia (Breitburg et al., 2018; Diaz &Rosenberg, 2008).Hypoxia in marine culture areas has become an unfavorable factor affecting the healthy and sustainable development of theL.croceabreeding industry(Liu et al., 2018).Therefore, studying the effects of hypoxic stress on fish and exploring the adaptative mechanisms ofL.croceato hypoxia are critical.

Hypoxic stress can induce excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in aerobic organisms (Leonarduzzi et al., 2010).In response to the increase in ROS, organisms are equipped with a defense system consisting of antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidant small molecules that regulate cellular redox homeostasis (Guérin et al., 2001; Ming et al., 2019).The inability of the antioxidant defense system to neutralize excessive ROS will lead to an imbalance in intracellular redox homeostasis, with excess ROS attacking lipids, proteins, and DNA to produce malondialdehyde (MDA),protein carbonyl (PCO), and 8-hydroxy-2 deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), respectively, leading to oxidative stress (Klein &Ackerman, 2003).The effects of hypoxic stress on redox homeostasis have been reported inMicropogoniasundulatus(Rahman & Thomas, 2011) andLeiostomusxanthurus(Cooper et al., 2002), but studies on the responses ofL.croceaunder hypoxic stress remain scarce.In our previous study, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT)activity in the liver ofL.croceawas significantly higher than that in the normoxic group after 96 h of acute hypoxic stress(Wang et al., 2017), implicating the involvement of the antioxidant defense system ofL.croceain response to hypoxic stress.We further showed that hypoxic stress can induce ROS overproduction and oxidative stress inL.croceaand large yellow croaker fry (LYCF) cells, whereas the ROS scavenger N-acetylcysteine (NAC) can significantly reduce ROS levels and attenuate oxidative stress in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress (Luo et al., 2021).Hypoxia can also induce apoptosis through the intrinsic (mitochondrial) and extrinsic(death receptor) pathways (Grilo & Mantalaris, 2019;Lohberger et al., 2016; Pan et al., 2014).The effects of hypoxic stress on apoptosis in fish have also been reported forM.undulatus(Ondricek & Thomas, 2018),Daniorerio(Williams et al., 2017), andIctaluruspunctatus(Yuan et al.,2016).However, studies on the impact of stress conditions on apoptosis inL.croceaare limited.Wang et al.(2020) reported on the effects of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on oxidative stress and apoptosis in large yellow croaker head kidney cells and we recently found that hypoxic stress can induce apoptosis inL.croceavia the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways (unpublished data).

Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) is an inducible stress protein that is highly conserved in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and plays a significant role in maintaining intracellular environmental homeostasis (Azad et al., 2011; Diao et al.,2012).In particular, Hsp70 exerts antioxidative stress effects by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity, e.g., SOD,glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and CAT (Broome et al., 2006;Gu et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2018), binding and antagonizing polymerized glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase(GAPDH) (Lazarev et al., 2016), promoting SOD2 transport to mitochondria (Afolayan et al., 2014), maintaining glutathione(GSH) levels in cells (Broome et al., 2006), and regulating nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX)enzymatic activity (Chen et al., 2012; Troyanova et al., 2015).The antioxidative stress effects of Hsp70 have been explored in humans (Homosapiens) (Afolayan et al., 2014; Jiang et al.,2020; Yurinskaya et al., 2017), rats (Rattusnorvegicus)(Lazarev et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2015), mice (Musmusculus)(Broome et al., 2006; Hernández-Santana et al., 2014),chickens (Gallusgallus) (Gu et al., 2012), and fruit flies(Drosophilamelanogaster) (Gupta et al., 2007).To date,however, regulation of redox homeostasis by Hsp70 in fish under stressful conditions has only been reported in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchusmykiss) (Zeng et al., 2014).Hsp70 is also known to play a regulatory role in the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways.For example, it is reported that Hsp70 can inhibit the activation of caspase-3/9 (Giffard et al.,2008; Ueng et al., 2013), prevent the translocation of Bcl2 associated X (Bax) proteins from the cytoplasm to mitochondria (Saini & Sharma, 2018; Stankiewicz et al.,2005), up-regulate the expression of Bcl-2 (Yenari et al., 2005)and maintain its stability (Jiang et al., 2011), and inhibit the nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF)(Ravagnan et al., 2001), thus regulating mitochondriamediated apoptosis.In addition, Hsp70 can bind to the death receptor and inhibit formation of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), thus inhibiting extrinsic apoptosis (Gao et al.,2015; Guo et al., 2005).The anti-apoptotic role of Hsp70 in fish under stressful conditions has been reported inMugil cephalus(Padmini & Tharani, 2014),O.mykiss(Zeng et al.,2014),Acanthopagrusschlegelii(Deane et al., 2012),Sparus sarba(Deane et al., 2006, 2012), andProchilodusargenteus(Domingos et al., 2013).However, its role in the maintenance of redox homeostasis and regulation of apoptosis inL.croceaunder stress remains unclear.

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (Hif-1α), a regulatory subunit of Hif-1, is essential for maintaining normal cellular function under hypoxic stress (Bruick & McKnight, 2002).As a transcription factor, Hif-1 regulates the transcription of various target genes (Ema et al., 1999), which are involved in the regulation of biological processes such as energy metabolism,erythropoiesis, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, extracellular matrix formation, and apoptosis (Semenza, 2004; Wenger et al., 2005; Zhong et al., 2002).Under hypoxic stress, Hsp70 expression is closely correlated with that of Hif-1α (Tsuchida et al., 2014).Research has indicated that Hif-1 indirectly regulates the expression ofHsp70inDrosophilamelanogasterKc167tissue culture cells (Baird et al., 2006) andCrassostrea gigas(Kawabe & Yokoyama, 2011) under hypoxic stress by activating the transcription of heat shock factor 1 (Hsf1)mRNA.Moreover, Hif-1α is reported to bind to the hypoxia response element (HRE) in theHsp70promoter and activateHsp70transcription expression in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) cells under hypoxic stress (Xia et al., 2009).However,the mechanism underlying Hif-1α-induced regulation of Hsp70 in fish, especially marine fish, under hypoxic stress has not yet been elucidated.

Given that Hif-1α can enhance the transcription of theHsp70gene through Hsf1 in fish under hypoxic stress and that Hsp70 has antioxidative and anti-apoptotic functions in other animals, we hypothesized that Hif-1α may regulateHsp70expression via Hsf1 to maintain cellular redox homeostasis and enhance anti-apoptotic ability, thereby improving the adaptation ofL.croceato hypoxic stress.To test this hypothesis, we explored the regulatory role of Hsp70 in redox homeostasis and apoptosis in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress and investigated the transcriptional regulatory relationships among Hif-1α, Hsf1, and Hsp70.This study provides basic biological information for elucidating the hypoxia-response mechanism ofL.croceaand provides a theoretical basis for the selective breeding of hypoxia-tolerantL.crocea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fish experiments and sample collection

Large yellow croakers (length, 15.90±1.52 cm; body weight,63.61±6.63 g) were provided by Fufa Aquatic Products Co.,Ltd.(Ningde, China).All fish were subjected to 2 weeks of acclimation in aerated natural seawater (dissolved oxygen(DO), 7.8±0.5 mg/L; salinity, 29; temperature, 22±0.5 °C; pH,8.1).Briefly, 240 fish were randomly divided into six tanks(800 L per tank; three tanks each for hypoxic and normoxic groups).For the hypoxia experiment, the DO in each tank was maintained at 2.0±0.1 mg/L for 96 h using a HACH DO probe system (HACH LDO II, HACH, USA) to control the duration and dose of the nitrogen injection in real time.Liver samples were collected after 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h of hypoxic stress.The dissected liver samples were stored at ?80 °C.All sampling method principles and procedures were conducted in strict accordance with the requirements of the Governing Regulation for the Use of Experimental Animals in Zhejiang Province (Zhejiang Provincial Government Order No.263,released on 17 August 2009, effective from 1 October 2010)and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Ningbo University.

Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of full-length cDNA of LcHif-1α and LcHsp70

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen,China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.Firststrand cDNA was synthesized using a SMARTer? RACE 5'/3'kit (Takara, Japan) as per the manufacturer’s protocols.Genespecific primers (Supplementary Table 1) were designed based on genome assembly data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).The desired PCR products were cloned into the pMD19-T simple vector (Takara, Japan) and sequenced at GENEWIZ(China).

The deduced amino acid (aa) sequence was analyzed using the Expert Protein Analysis System (http://www.expasy.org/).Conserved domains were searched using the respective NCBI module (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi).Multiple sequence alignment was performed using Vector NTI software (Invitrogen, USA).Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA v5.0(Tamura et al., 2011).

Cell culture and hypoxia challenge

The LYCF cell line was kindly provided by Dr.You-Hua Huang(South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou).The LYCF cells were cultured in Leibovitz’s-15 Medium (Gibco, USA)supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA)and 200 μg/mL penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco) at 27 °C.For the hypoxic challenge, LYCF cells were cultured in a MIC-101 modular incubator (Billups Rothenberg Inc., USA) with 1% O2and 99% N2for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h.

Reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

The expression levels ofLcHif-1α,LcHsp70,LcBax,LcBcl-2,andLccaspase3were assessed by RT-qPCR using a LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche, Switzerland).The primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table 1.cDNA synthesis and RT-qPCR analysis were performed as described previously (Luo et al., 2019).

Prokaryotic expression and preparation of mouse anti-LcHsp70 polyclonal antibodies

The ATPase domain (located at 1–1 326 bp of the open reading frame (ORF)) ofLcHsp70was amplified using specific primers (Supplementary Table 1).The amplified PCR products were ligated into the pEASY-Blunt E1 expression vector(TransGen Biotech, China).The recombinant plasmid was sequenced to confirm the insert and then transformed intoEscherichiacoliRosetta (DE3) (TransGen Biotech, China).Subsequently, bacteria were induced with 1 mmol/L isopropylβ-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG, Solarbio, China).The obtained target proteins were purified as described in our previous study (Gao et al., 2019).Purified recombinant proteins were renatured according to the method described in Lu et al.(2017).Mouse immunization was performed as described previously (Lv et al., 2015).Antisera were extracted for subsequent experiments.

Western blotting

RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; Beyotime, China) was used to isolate total proteins from tissues and cells.The proteins were then subjected to 10% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (20 μg of protein per lane) and electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF, Solarbio, China) membranes.After blocking with 5% non-fat dry milk, the membranes were sequentially incubated with the AIF rabbit polyclonal antibody(1:1 000; Beyotime, China), Bcl-2 rabbit polyclonal antibody(1:1 000; Dia-An Biotech, China),LcHsp70 mouse polyclonal antibody (1:1 000), and Actin mouse monoclonal antibody(1:1 000; Abmart, China) overnight at 4 °C.The membranes were then washed thrice with Tris-buffered saline with Tween(TBST; 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.05% Tween-20) and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:2 000; Beyotime, China) or HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:2 000; Beyotime, China)second antibodies for 1 h at 37 °C.Membranes were visualized using a chemiluminescence imaging analysis system (Tanon 5 200, Tanon, China).Data were normalized to the level of the Actin protein.

Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated RNA silencing in vitro

Specific siRNAs targetingLcHif-1α(siLcHif-1α) andLcHsp70(siLcHsp70) (Supplementary Table 1) were synthesized by Genepharma (China) and dissolved in RNase-free water(20 μmol/L).Small interfering negative control (siNC) RNA,which was not homologous to any gene in theL.croceagenome, was used as a negative control.Both siRNA (1.5 μL)and siRNA-mate transfection reagent (Genepharma, China)were mixed and added to each well of a 24-well plate containing 500 μL of LYCF cells, then cultured for an additional 24 h.

Overexpression vector construction and transfection

The ORFs ofLcHif-1α,LcHsp70, andLcHsf1were amplified using specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) and ligated into pcDNA3.1 to construct the oeLcHif-1α, oeLcHsp70, and oeLcHsf1overexpression vectors, respectively.The LYCF cells were seeded into 6-well plates and cultured at 27 °C for 12 h prior to transfection.For overexpression analysis, the LYCF cells were transfected with the overexpression vectors using the Lipo6000? agent (Beyotime, China).Cells transfected with an empty pcDNA3.1 vector served as the negative control.

Measurement of intracellular ROS and superoxide

The levels of intracellular ROS and superoxide in LYCF cells were assayed using 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFHDA, Sigma, USA) and a superoxide assay kit (Beyotime,China), respectively.

Determination of oxidative stress markers MDA, PCO, and 8-OHdG

The levels of MDA, PCO, and 8-OHdG were measuredinvivoandinvitrousing an MDA kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Bioengineering, China), PCO content detection kit (Solarbio,China), and fish 8-OHdG ELISA kit (Chenglinbio, China),respectively, in accordance with the manufacturers’instructions.

Annexin V apoptosis assay

LYCF cells were stained using an Annexin V-FITC-PI apoptosis detection kit (Beyotime, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and immediately photographed under a laser confocal microscope (LSM880, Carl Zeiss,Germany) or subjected to flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson,USA) to detect apoptotic rates.The acquired data were analyzed using FlowJo v10 software (Ashland, USA).

Detection of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in LYCF cells

The MMP of LYCF cells was measured using the potentiometric dye tetramethyl rhodamine methyl ester(TMRM; MedChem Express, USA) at a final concentration of 0.5 μmol/L for 20 min at 27 °C.

Measurement of caspase-3, -8, and -9 activities

The activities of caspase-3, -8, and -9 in LYCF cells were assessed using caspase-3, -8, and -9 activity assay kits(Beyotime), respectively, as per the manufacturer’s protocols.

Nucleoplasm distribution of AIF

Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins of LYCF cells were separated using a nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction kit (Beyotime, China) and subjected to western blot analysis to identify the nucleoplasmic distribution of AIF.

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

The promoter fragments of theLcHsf1(Gene ID: 104931900)andLcHsp70(Gene ID: 104926754) genes were amplified with specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) using genomic DNA as a template and ligated into a pGL3-basic vector to construct luciferase reporter vectors pGL3-prom-LcHsf1and pGL3-prom-LcHsp70, respectively.The LYCF cells were cotransfected with the pGL3-promoter vectors (or pGL3 basic), pRL-TKRenillaluciferase vector, andsiLcHif-1α/siNC(or pcDNA3.1-Hif-1α/pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1-Hsf1/pcDNA3.1)using Lipo6000? agent (Beyotime, China).After 24 h, the cells were harvested and subjected to measurement of luciferase activity using a dual-luciferase reporter gene assay kit (Yeasen, China).

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean(SEM).All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software (v21.0; IBM, USA).Significant differences between two groups were determined using the two-tailed independent samplest-test.Significant differences among three or more groups were determined using one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA), followed by Tukey’sposthoctest.In all figures, line charts, and histograms, “＊” and “＊＊” indicate significant differences (P＜0.05) and extremely significant differences(P＜0.01) compared with another set of data.

RESULTS

Hypoxic stress induced LcHif-1α, LcHsf1, and LcHsp70 expression in vivo and in vitro

We obtained the full-length cDNA ofLcHif-1α(GenBank accession No.: MZ197829) andLcHsp70(GenBank accession No.: MZ197830) using the RACE technique.The respective sequences and bioinformatic characteristics are detailed in Supplementary Text.We observed that theHif-1α,Hsf1, andHsp70mRNA and Hsp70 protein expression levels initially increased and then decreased in the liver ofL.croceafollowing 96 h of hypoxic stress (Figure 1A–C, G) and in LYCF cells following 48 h of hypoxic stress (Figure 1D–F, H).Interestingly, levels were significantly higher than those in the normoxic group after 3 h of hypoxic stress, reaching a peak after 6 h of hypoxic stress.

Figure 1 Expression patterns of LcHif-1α, LcHsf1, and LcHsp70 in Larimichthys crocea liver and LYCF cells under hypoxic stress

LcHsp70 reduced ROS levels and attenuated oxidative stress in LYCF cells exposed to hypoxia

After 24 h of hypoxic stress, theLcHsp70mRNA and protein expression levels decreased by 45% (Figure 2A) and 30%(Figure 2B), respectively, in the siLcHsp70group compared with the siNC group.After 24 h of hypoxic stress, theLcHsp70mRNA and protein expression levels in the oeLcHsp70group increased 4.26-fold (Figure 2C) and 1.43-fold (Figure 2D),respectively, compared with levels in the oepcDNA3.1 group.In addition, the ROS (Figure 2E), superoxide (Figure 2F),MDA (Figure 2I), PCO (Figure 2J), and 8-OHdG levels(Figure 2K) were significantly higher in the siLcHsp70group compared with the siNC group but were lower in the oeLcHsp70group compared with the oepcDNA3.1 group(Figure 2G, H, L, M).

Figure 2 Changes in ROS and oxidative stress levels in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress following knockdown/overexpression of Hsp70

LcHsp70 played an anti-apoptotic role in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress

The apoptotic rate of LYCF cells in the siLcHsp70group(64.37%) was significantly higher than that in the siNC group(41.26%) (Figure 3A, B).In contrast, the apoptotic rate of cells in the oeLcHsp70group (20.30%) was significantly lower than that in the oepcDNA3.1 group (37.20%) (Figure 3C, D).

Figure 3 LcHsp70 suppresses LYCF cell apoptosis under hypoxic stress

LcHsp70 suppressed caspase-dependent intrinsic apoptosis in LYCF cells exposed to hypoxia

Based on laser confocal microscopy analysis, the MMP (red fluorescence intensity) of cells in the siLcHsp70group was significantly lower than that in the siNC group (Figure 4A),whereas the MMP of cells in the oeLcHsp70group was significantly higher than that in the oepcDNA3.1 group(Figure 4D).In addition, flow cytometry analysis revealed that the relative mean fluorescence intensity (TMRM) of cells was reduced by 50% in the siLcHsp70group compared with the siNC group (Figure 4B) but increased by 89% in the oeLcHsp70group compared with the oepcDNA3.1 group(Figure 4C).These results indicate thatLcHsp70is involved in maintaining normal MMP in LYCF cells exposed to hypoxia.

Figure 4 Changes in MMP of LYCF cells after interference/overexpression of LcHsp70 and hypoxic stress for 24 h

Results also showed that theLcBax/LcBcl-2 mRNA ratio,Lccaspase-3mRNA expression level, and caspase-3 and -9 activities increased 2.92-fold (P＜0.01) (Figure 5A), 1.48-fold(P＜0.01) (Figure 5B), 1.36-fold (P＜0.01) (Figure 5C), and 1.42-fold (P＜0.01) (Figure 5D), respectively, in the siLcHsp70group relative to the siNC group.In contrast, Bcl-2 protein expression significantly declined by 45% (P＜0.01)(Figure 5I).

Furthermore, theLcBax/LcBcl-2 mRNA ratio,Lccaspase-3mRNA expression level, and caspase-3 and -9 activities decreased by 74% (P＜0.01) (Figure 5E), 49% (P＜0.01)(Figure 5F), 42% (P＜0.01) (Figure 5G), and 35% (P＜0.01)(Figure 5H), respectively, in the oeLcHsp70group relative to the siNC group.In contrast, Bcl-2 protein expression significantly increased by 1.69-fold (P＜0.01) in the oeLcHsp70group compared with the oepcDNA3.1 group (Figure 5J).

LcHsp70 repressed caspase-independent intrinsic apoptosis and inhibited extrinsic apoptosis in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress

Compared with the siNC group, the AIF protein expression level was significantly reduced in the cytoplasm (P＜0.01) and significantly increased in the nucleus (P＜0.01) (Figure 5K) of the LYCF cells under hypoxic stress in the siLcHsp70group.These findings indicated that knockdown ofLcHsp70expression promoted nuclear translocation of the AIF protein in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.Conversely, enhancing the expression ofLcHsp70resulted in a decrease in the nuclear translocation of the AIF protein in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress (Figure 5L).These results suggest thatLcHsp70 represses the caspase-independent intrinsic apoptosis pathway in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.

Our results also showed that caspase-8 activity was 1.30-fold higher in the siLcHsp70group compared with the siNC group (P＜0.01) (Figure 5M).Caspase-8 activity declined by 39% in the oeLcHsp70group relative to the oepcDNA3.1 group (P＜0.01) (Figure 5N).These findings indicate thatLcHsp70 inhibits the extrinsic apoptosis pathway in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.

Figure 5 LcHsp70 up-regulates Bcl-2 mRNA and protein expression, down-regulates Bax and caspase-3 mRNA expression, inhibits caspase-3, -9, and -8 activity, and prevents AIF translocation in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress

LcHif-1α activated LcHsf1 DNA promoter and initiated LcHsf1 mRNA transcription in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress

TheLcHif-1αmRNA expression level was reduced by 44% in the siLcHif-1agroup relative to the siNC group (P＜0.01)(Figure 6A).Likewise, theLcHsf1mRNA expression level also decreased by 37% in the siLcHif-1agroup (P＜0.01)(Figure 6B).In addition, theLcHif-1αandLcHsf1mRNA expression levels were 3.78-fold (P＜0.01) (Figure 6D) and 3.14-fold (P＜0.01) (Figure 6E) higher, respectively, in the oeLcHif-1αgroup than in the oepcDNA3.1 group.The dualluciferase reporter gene assay revealed thatLcHsf1promoter activity decreased by 38% (P＜0.01) afterLcHif-1α-interference(Figure 6C) but increased by 7.09-fold (P＜0.01) afterLcHif-1αoverexpression (Figure 6F) in LYCF cells under hypoxic conditions.These results indicate thatLcHif-1α enhancesLcHsf1DNA promoter activity and promotesLcHsf1mRNA transcription in LYCF cells exposed to hypoxia.

LcHsf1 activated LcHsp70 DNA promoter and initiated LcHsp70 mRNA transcription in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress

After 24 h of hypoxic stress, theLcHsf1mRNA expression level was 5.56-fold higher (P＜0.01) in the oeLcHsf1group compared with the oepcDNA3.1 group (Figure 6G).In addition, theLcHsp70mRNA expression level was 3.21-fold higher in the oeLcHsf1group relative to the oepcDNA3.1 group (P＜0.01) (Figure 6H).Furthermore, compared with the negative control,LcHsp70promoter activity increased significantly by 9.57-fold afterLcHsf1overexpression in LYCF cells under hypoxic conditions (P＜0.01) (Figure 6I).These findings suggest that enhancement ofLcHsf1expression results in an increase inLcHsp70DNA promoter activity and facilitation ofLcHsp70mRNA transcription.

Figure 6 LcHif-1α activates LcHsf1 DNA promoter and initiates LcHsf1 mRNA transcription, which activates LcHsp70 DNA promoter and initiates LcHsp70 mRNA transcription in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress

DISCUSSION

Effects of hypoxic stress on Hif-1α, Hsf1, and Hsp70 expression

Hif-1α is a hypoxic stress-induced nuclear transcription factor that regulates the transcription of many target genes(Semenza, 2009).In higher animals, Hif-1α enhances adaptation to hypoxia by regulating the expression of genes related to biological processes, such as energy metabolism,erythropoiesis, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, extracellular matrix formation, and apoptosis (Semenza, 2004; Wenger et al., 2005; Zhong et al., 2002).Several studies have reported variations in the expression patterns of theHif-1αgene in fish under hypoxic stress.For instance, Rimoldi et al.(2012) found thatHif-1αmRNA expression is significantly increased in the brain and liver ofPercafluviatilisunder hypoxic stress.Likewise, Mohindra et al.(2013) reported that theHif-1αmRNA level is significantly increased in the brain, liver, and kidney ofClariasbatrachusunder short-term hypoxic stress and in the spleen under long-term hypoxic stress.Yang et al.(2017) found thatHif-1αmRNA expression is significantly elevated in the liver, gills, and brain of largemouth bass(Micropterussalmoides) under acute hypoxic stress.Thus,these studies suggest that the significant increase inHif-1αmRNA expression in fish under hypoxic stress may be an adaptative strategy of the organism to such stress.In this study, theLcHif-1αmRNA expression level in the liver ofL.croceainitially showed an increasing trend, with a peak at 6 h,and then a decreasing trend over the 96 h of hypoxic stress.Nevertheless, compared with the normoxic group,LcHif-1αexpression was significantly higher in the livers of the hypoxic group over the stress period.Likewise, theLcHif-1αmRNA expression levels in the LYCF cells showed an increasing and then decreasing trend over the 48 h of hypoxic stress, highly consistent with theinvivoexperimental results.Thus, the elevatedHif-1αmRNA expression levels may be a common response to hypoxic stress in fish, resembling its function in higher animals.Therefore, Hif-1α may play a key role in the adaptation of fish to hypoxia.

The molecular chaperone Hsp70 plays a key role in maintaining intracellular environmental homeostasis under stressful conditions (Evans et al., 2010; Mashaghi et al.,2014).The expression ofHsp70is dependent on Hsf1, which binds to the promoter region of theHsp70gene and enhances its transcription (Calderwood et al., 2010; Wu, 1995).Interestingly, both Hsf1 and Hsp70 play a protective role in organisms in response to stressful conditions (Doubrovin et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2016; Peng et al., 2010; Yang et al.,2020).Accordingly, several studies have evaluated the changes in Hsf1 and Hsp70 expression in model animals under hypoxic stress.Michaud et al.(2011) showed thatHsp70mRNA expression is significantly increased inSarcophagacrassipalpisunder hypoxic stress, whereas Baird et al.(2006) found that the Hsf1 protein andHsp70mRNA expression levels are significantly increased in Kc167cells under hypoxic stress.Baek et al.(2001) showed that both Hsf1 transcriptional activity and Hsp70 protein expression are significantly increased in radiation-induced murine fibrosarcoma tumor cells under hypoxic stress, while Park et al.(2003) found that the ability of Hsf1 to bind to DNA and theHsp70mRNA and protein expression levels are significantly increased in colon cancer clone A cells under hypoxic stress.However, relatively few studies on changes in Hsf1 and Hsp70 expression have been studied in aquatic organisms under hypoxic stress.Kawabe & Yokoyama (2011) reported a significant increase inHsf1andHsp70mRNA expression in the gills of Pacific oysters under hypoxic stress, suggesting this may be a common adaptative mechanism of organisms in response to such stress.In the present study, the expression patterns ofHsf1andHsp70mRNA in theL.crocealiver and LYCF cells under hypoxic stress were highly consistent.Both showed an initial upward trend, reached a peak at 6 h, and then showed a downward trend.Nevertheless, compared with the normoxic group, theHsf1andHsp70mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in the liver of the hypoxic group over the stress period, suggesting that Hsf1 and Hsp70 may function in the adaptation ofL.croceato hypoxia.In addition,we found that the Hsp70 protein expression in theL.crocealiver and LYCF cells under hypoxic stress initially increased and then decreased to a significantly lower level than that in the normoxic group.Based on this, we assumed that shortterm hypoxic stress (＜6 h) may induce a rapid increase in Hsp70 protein expression inL.croceato facilitate adaptation to hypoxic stress, whereas prolongation of stress time (＞6 h)led to a continuous disruption of the internal environmental homeostasis of the organism, eventually resulting in a significant decrease in the level of Hsp70 due to excessive depletion.Of note, the expression patterns of Hsf1 and Hsp70 under hypoxic stress were consistent with those of Hif-1α in our study.Therefore, Hif-1α, Hsf1, and Hsp70 may exhibit synergistic effects in the response ofL.croceato hypoxia.

Role of Hsp70 in regulating redox homeostasis

Interestingly, Hsp70 plays various roles in the regulation of cellular redox homeostasis (Afolayan et al., 2014; Broome et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2012; Gu et al., 2012; Lazarev et al.,2016; Troyanova et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2018).The role of Hsp70 in maintaining redox homeostasis and inhibiting oxidative stress in organisms and cells under stressful conditions has been reported in several higher animals and model organisms.Yurinskaya et al.(2017) found that endotoxin can induce an increase in ROS levels in cultured human macrophages, but the addition of exogenous recombinant human Hsp70 results in a significant reduction.Jiang et al.(2020) showed that cytoplasmic exosome-induced Hsp70 significantly reduces ROS levels in mice with cerebral ischemia/reperfusion, thereby attenuating cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury.Similarly, Russo et al.(2001)found that Hsp70 significantly attenuates the effects of alcohol-induced oxidative stress in rat astrocytes.Hernández-Santana et al.(2014) found that Hsp70 significantly reduces the level of oxidative stress in H2O2-treated C2C12 skeletal muscle cells, while Yurinskaya et al.(2015) showed that Hsp70 protects human neuroblastoma cells from amyloid isoAsp7-Aβ(1-42)-induced oxidative stress.Gu et al.(2012)found that enhanced Hsp70 expression significantly reduces the level of MDA in the intestines of chickens under acute high-temperature stress.To date, however, studies on the regulation of redox homeostasis by Hsp70 in aquatic animals under stressful conditions remain limited.Zeng et al.(2014)reported a significant increase in the levels of ROS in the rainbow trout gill epithelial cell line (RTgill-W1) following 2-phenylethynesulfonamide (PES) treatment after inhibition of Hsp70 expression.In our study, the levels of ROS,superoxide, MDA, PCO, and 8-OHdG were significantly increased in the LYCF cells afterLcHsp70-interference and hypoxic stress for 24 h, indicating that knockdown ofLcHsp70expression significantly increased the levels of ROS, causing oxidative stress in LYCF cells under hypoxia.In contrast,overexpression ofLcHsp70significantly decreased the levels of ROS, superoxide, MDA, PCO, and 8-OHdG in the LYCF cells after hypoxic stress for 24 h, indicating that enhancingLcHsp70expression may significantly attenuate oxidative stress-induced changes.Thus, we suggest that Hsp70 may be involved in the hypoxic response ofL.croceathrough regulation of redox homeostasis and prevention of oxidative stress; however, the specific mechanism underlying this regulation requires further investigation.

Anti-apoptotic effects of Hsp70

Under normal physiological conditions, apoptosis plays an important role in cellular self-renewal and maintenance of homeostasis; however, excessive apoptosis under stressful or pathological conditions can lead to a significant reduction in the number of cells in an organism (Majno & Joris, 1995).In mammals, Hsp70 inhibits apoptosis in multiple ways.For instance, Hsp70 inhibits the apoptosis of H2O2-treated C2C12 cells by up-regulating Bcl-2 protein expression and decreasing caspase-3 activity (Jiang et al., 2011).Ueng et al.(2013)found that Hsp70 prevents chondrocyte apoptosis by inhibiting the activation of caspase-3 in chondrocytes subjected to nitric oxide (NO) stress.In 293T and Jurkat T-lymphoma cells,Hsp70 directly binds to Apaf-1, preventing apoptosome assembly and inhibiting procaspase-9 activation, thus inhibiting apoptosis (Beere et al., 2000).However, only a few studies have explored the regulation of apoptosis by Hsp70 in aquatic organisms under stressful conditions.In one such study, Padmini & Tharani (2014) showed that up-regulation of Hsp70 in the hepatocytes ofM.cephalusinhabiting contaminated waters suppresses apoptosis signal-regulated kinase 1 (Ask-1) protein expression, thus suggesting that Hsp70 is involved in the regulation of apoptosis of hepatocytes under stressful conditions through suppression of Ask-1.Zeng et al.(2014) reported that PES treatment in rainbow trout RTgill-W1 cells results in a significant decrease in Hsp70 protein expression, significant increase in the apoptotic rate,significant decrease in MMP, and significant increase in caspase-3 and -9 activities.Accordingly, the authors speculated that Hsp70 may play an inhibitory role in the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in RTgill-W1 cells under stressful conditions.In this study,Hsp70knockdown led to a significant increase in the apoptotic rate of LYCF cells under hypoxic stress, whereasHsp70overexpression significantly decreased the apoptotic rate of the LYCF cells, indicating the anti-apoptotic effects of Hsp70 in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.In addition,Hsp70knockdown in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress resulted in a significant decrease in MMP,significant increase inBax/Bcl-2mRNA ratio, significant decrease in Bcl-2 protein expression, significant increase incaspase-3mRNA expression, and significant increase in caspase-3 and -9 activities, whereasHsp70overexpression showed the opposite effects.These results indicate that Hsp70 may inhibit the caspase-dependent mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress by maintaining normal MMP, enhancingBcl-2mRNA and protein expression, inhibitingBaxandcaspase-3mRNA expression,and inhibiting caspase-3 and -9 activation.

AIF is a caspase-independent apoptosis “executor”.Upon enhanced MMP, AIF translocates from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm and then to the nucleus, where it promotes the condensation of chromatin and fragmentation of genomic DNA(Susin et al., 1999).Ravagnan et al.(2001) demonstrated that Hsp70 directly binds to the AIF proapoptotic factor and inhibits its nuclear translocation, thereby inhibiting caspaseindependent apoptosis in a cell-free system.To date,however, no studies have been reported on the regulation of AIF protein-mediated apoptosis by Hsp70 in fish under stressful conditions.Our study is the first to explore the regulatory role ofLcHsp70 in AIF protein-mediated apoptosis in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.Our results showed thatLcHsp70knockdown significantly increased the nuclear translocation of the AIF protein in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress, whereasLcHsp70overexpression inhibited the nuclear translocation of AIF.These results suggest that Hsp70 may inhibit the caspase-independent mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress via inhibition of AIF nuclear translocation.

Of note, Hsp70 can also bind to the death receptor and inhibit the death-inducing signaling complex, and thus indirectly inhibit the procaspase-8 cleavage and downstream apoptotic cascade response (Gao et al., 2015; Guo et al.,2005).Several studies have reported on the regulation of caspase-8 activation by Hsp70 in higher animals under stressful or pathological conditions.For example, Matsumori et al.(2006) found thatHsp70overexpression significantly reduces the active caspase-8 subunit (cleaved-caspase-8) in rats after hypoxic/ischemic treatment.In addition, Gao et al.(2015) reported that overexpression ofHsp70inhibits caspase-8 activity in norepinephrine-treated rat cardiomyocytes (H9C2), while Kong et al.(2016) found that overexpression ofHsp70significantly reduces cleavedcaspase-8 levels in H2O2-treated Buffalo rat liver (BRL) cells.However, as no studies have reported on the regulation of caspase-8 activation by Hsp70 in fish under stressful or pathological conditions, we explored this in the current study.We found thatLcHsp70knockdown in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress resulted in a significant increase in caspase-8 activity, whereasLcHsp70overexpression had the opposite effect.These findings indicate thatLcHsp70may inhibit the extrinsic apoptosis pathway in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress via inhibition of caspase-8 activity.

Involvement of Hif-1α/Hsf1 in transcriptional regulation of Hsp70

The expression of Hsp70 under hypoxic stress is closely related to that of Hif-1α.In human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) under hypoxic stress, Hif-1α expression is significantly inhibited after treatment with the Hif-1α-specific inhibitor 3-(5'-hydroxymethyl-2'-furyl)-1-benzylindazole (YC-1)orHif-1α-specific siRNA, with concomitant down-regulation of the Hsp70 protein (Xia et al., 2009).In human articular chondrocytes under hypoxic stress, Hif-1α induces a significant increase in the expression of both Hsp70 mRNA and protein (Tsuchida et al., 2014).The transcription ofHsp70mRNA is primarily mediated by Hsf1 (Doubrovin et al., 2012;Lin et al., 2016; Peng et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2020).Accordingly, several studies have explored the transcriptional regulation of Hif-1α, Hsf1, and Hsp70 under hypoxic stress.Baird et al.(2006) reported that the Hif-1α, Hsf1, and Hsp70 protein expression levels are significantly increased in Kc167cells under hypoxic stress but are significantly decreased after Hif-1α knockdown, indicating Hif-1α-induced regulation of Hif-1α and Hsp70 expression in Kc167cells under hypoxic stress.Knockdown of Hsf1 under hypoxic stress is also reported to reduce Hsp70 protein expression, thus suggesting Hsf1-induced regulation of Hsp70 expression in Kc167cells under hypoxic stress.Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis has also shown that, under hypoxic stress, Hif-1α directly binds to the HRE in the Hsf1 promoter, suggesting that Hif-1α activates its expression in Kc167cells under hypoxic stress, with Hsf1 acting as a transcription factor to further activate Hsp70 expression (Baird et al., 2006).Kawabe & Yokoyama (2011)showed that the transcription of Hsp70 in Pacific oysters under hypoxic stress is regulated by the Hif-1/Hsf1 pathway.In contrast, Xia et al.(2009) found that Hif-1α directly binds to the HRE in the Hsp70 promoter independent of Hsf1 and activates the transcription of Hsp70 in HCC cells under hypoxic stress.In this study,LcHif-1αknockdown significantly reduced the expression ofLcHsf1mRNA and activity of theLcHsf1DNA promoter in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress,whereasLcHif-1αoverexpression had the opposite effect,indicating that Hif-1α positively regulates Hsf1 transcription in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.Likewise,LcHsf1overexpression significantly increasedLcHsp70mRNA expression andLcHsp70DNA promoter activity in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress, suggesting Hsf1-induced positive regulation of Hsp70 transcription in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.Thus, in agreement with our proposed hypothesis, Hif-1α appears to enhanceHsp70gene transcription inL.croceaunder hypoxic stress via Hsf1.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, hypoxic stress induced the expression levels of Hif-1α, Hsf1, and Hsp70 inL.crocea.Notably, Hsp70 was involved in maintaining redox homeostasis and resistance to oxidative stress in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress.Hsp70 inhibited the caspase-dependent mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in LYCF cells under hypoxic stress by maintaining normal MMP, enhancing Bcl-2 mRNA and protein expression,inhibitingBaxandcaspase3mRNA expression, and suppressing caspase-3 and -9 activation.In addition, Hsp70 inhibited the caspase-independent mitochondrial and extrinsic apoptosis pathways of LYCF cells under hypoxic stress by inhibiting AIF nuclear translocation and caspase-8 activity,respectively.Of note, in the LYCF cells under hypoxic stress,Hif-1α activated theHsf1DNA promoter and enhanced the transcription ofHsf1mRNA, whereas Hsf1 promoted the transcription ofHsp70mRNA by binding to and activating its promoter.Conclusively, the Hif-1α/Hsf1/Hsp70 signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of redox homeostasis and anti-apoptosis inL.croceaunder hypoxic stress(Figure 7).

Figure 7 Regulation mode of Hif-1α/Hsf1/Hsp70 on redox homeostasis and apoptosis under hypoxic stress

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data to this article can be found online.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

S.Y.L., J.Q.Z., and B.L.designed the research.S.Y.L., J.Q.W.,C.L., Y.B.Z., J.D., C.D.Z., and D.J.T.performed the research.S.Y.L., C.L., and X.M.G.analyzed the data.S.Y.L.and J.Q.Z.wrote the paper.S.Y.L., X.M.G., C.C.H., X.F.W., B.L., and W.L.S.modified the manuscript.All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Dr.You-Hua Huang for providing the LYCF cell line.The authors would also like to thank Editage(www.editage.cn) for English language editing.