• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Risk of malignancy in Caroli disease and syndrome: A systematic review

    2020-09-23 10:05:32RenFahrnerSandraGCDennlerDanielInderbitzin
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年31期

    René Fahrner, Sandra GC Dennler, Daniel Inderbitzin

    Abstract

    Key words: Malignancy; Caroli disease; Caroli syndrome; Tumor; Cholangiocarcinoma; Review

    INTRODUCTION

    Vachell first described Caroli disease (CD) in 1906[1]. The segmental dilatation of the intrahepatic biliary ducts in combination with renal cystic disease and liver fibrosis is named Caroli syndrome (CS)[2,3]. Due to focal inflammation, likely initiated by an intrauterine malformation of the bile ductal plate, the biliary tract is continuously destroyed over decades[4,5]. Consequently, the further progression of this destructive inflammatory state leads to recurrent episodes of cholangitis, the development of biliary stones and malignant transformation in some cases, and cholangiocarcinoma is described, but is rare overall with reports up to 14%[5-7]. However, the risk of developing intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma in CD or CS is increased 100-fold compared to healthy individuals[8]. The association between intrahepatic cystic lesions in CS or CD and cholangiocarcinoma was first published in 1968[9]. The distinct etiology of this association and malformation is not clear[8], but several theories are postulated: Carcinogenic component of the bile with prolonged effect during biliary stasis[8]; permanent stone irritation and formation of carcinogens[10]; and cellular predisposition for neoplastic change of the congenital cystic malformation of the biliary tract[8]. Unfortunately, the preoperative diagnosis of malignant transformation is difficult, and final diagnosis of the cholangiocarcinoma is typically made during pathological examination of the surgical specimen and less common in preoperative liver biopsies[6,11,12]. Furthermore, malignancy in CS or CD is suggested to be more likely in older patients[11], insufficient bile drainage[8]and long disease duration[8,10,12]. Therefore, the time span between the onset of first symptoms and definitive treatment is up to 60 mo in many cases[13,14]. The complaint symptoms may be unspecific and vary from pain, pruritus, fever, sepsis, recurrent cholangitis, abscesses, pancreatitis, weight loss, and adynamia[3,5,15-22]. Besides biliary drainage operations or interventions[7,22-24], liver resection[7,12,25]or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT)[7]are performed. The decision to perform a specific intervention depends on the extent of biliary pathology and hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension consecutively.

    The present systematic review (1) analyzed the existing literature on the current incidence of malignancy in CS or CD; (2) the potential risk factors for the development of malignancy in patients with CS or CD; (3) the postoperative outcome of CS or CD after liver resection or OLT; and (4) the best treatment options for patients with CS or CD and suspected malignancy.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    A systematic review of the literature until January 2019 was performed according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement[26]to identify studies reporting the incidence of tumors in patients with CS and CD underwent resection or liver transplantation. Therefore, a literature search was performed using Medline (PubMed) from January 1993 to January 2019. During screening process, non-English articles were excluded. Reports with less than five patients and review articles were excluded. The search was performed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms “caroli disease”, “caroli syndrome”, “tumor”, “malignant”, and “cholangiocarcinoma”. Only human studies were used for this systematic review. The titles and abstracts of the articles were screened first for scientific relevance of this review. The full article was reviewed for potential eligibility and reported incidence of malignancy in the next step. The flow-chart show the process of identification, screening and final inclusion of articles in Figure 1.

    The following parameters were extracted from each article: Year of publication, type of study, number of patients with CD or CS, incidence of malignant tumor, duration of symptoms (months), age in years, sex (femalesvsmales), used diagnostics (ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and percutaneous cholangiography), identification of tumor (preoperative biopsy or incidental finding), surgical therapy (liver resection, OLT), survival and tumor recurrence.

    RESULTS

    Included studies

    Twelve manuscripts were included in this systematic review (Table 1). All studies were of a retrospective nature. Most studies were single-center studies (n= 8), and four studies included data of an official registry (n= 2) or multicenter (n= 2) analysis. The study populations of each study were small, with only three studies including more than 100 patients and 75% of the studies included less than 45 patients, with a total of 561 patients. The reported incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patients treated for CS or CD varied from 2.7% to 37.5%, depending on the size of the study population. The overall incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in all included patients was 6.6% (n= 37).

    Diagnostic preoperative work-up

    Only few studies reported a detailed preoperative diagnostic work-up for patients with CS and CD in general, and no study presented a work-up to identify cholangiocarcinoma within CS and CD (Table 2). Ultrasound of the liver, CT, MRI, and ERCP revealed the standard of preoperative diagnostics in most of the studies. Three studies reported percutaneous cholangiography to estimate the extent of biliary pathology.

    Patient demographics

    There was a slight predominance of female sex in all patients (53% females, Table 3).Patients suffering from CS or CD are younger than other populations undergoing liver resection, fore.g., liver cancer, the mean patient age ranged from 23 to 56 years old, with a total mean of 41.6 years old at the time point of surgery. Only five studies reported data on the duration of disease or symptoms. Patients reported at least 7 mo of mean duration of symptoms, but the most patients suffered from cholangitis, fever or abdominal pain for several years (Table 3). In most cases (89%), tumor identification was finally made in definitive histological assessment as an incidental finding. The diagnosis was suspected prior surgery or proven by preoperative biopsy only in less than five patients (14%).

    Table 1 Literature search results and analyzed manuscripts

    Table 2 Diagnostic work flow prior to surgery

    Tumor treatment and survival

    Patients with CS or CD were treated via liver resection or OLT (Table 4). The indication for the onco-surgical treatment (liver resection or OLT) was primarly basedon the extent of the biliary pathology and an additional alteration of the liver structure or function. Most of the tumors were incidental findings, and no exact proposal of liver resection or liver transplantation was possible on the basis of the data, but the proposed treatment of cholangiocarcinomas without CS or CD is likely applicable in these patients. In cases of tumor identification in histological assessment of the surgical specimen, no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was reported. Chemotherapy was administered in selected cases of tumor recurrence. Unfortunately, few data were available on the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification or grading of the tumors. Most tumors were localized within in the liver (pT1 or pT2), but local lymph node involvement or peritoneal seeding was described (Table 4). However, overall survival rates after one year were low at 36% in total. It was impossible to distinguish the effect of liver resection or liver transplantation due to the retrospective reports of both different surgical treatments. The reported recurrence rate during the observation

    period in 7 studies was high, at up to 75%.

    Table 4 Surgical treatment, tumor characteristics and survival

    Figure 1 Flow-chart of the identification, screening and final inclusion of articles.

    DISCUSSION

    Only a few reports investigated CS and CD and the development of cancer, and there was no suitable explanation for this fact in most of the publications. The present review analyzed the data of 561 patients included in 12 studies who were treated either with liver resection or OLT. Unfortunately, most of the studies were reports of less than 45 patients, and retrospective single or multicenter experiences were reported over several years in all cases. In addition, various case reports were not included in this systematic review.

    The total incidence of cancerous transformation or simultaneous cancer in CS and CD is approximately 7%, but it ranged from approximately 3% to almost 40% in the beginning of the 2000s depending on the cohort[19,27]. Over time this incidence did not change, and the latest publications during the last six years reported incidences between 5% to 33%[12,20,25]. There were no new aspects reported on the development of cancerous transformation, and biliary stasis[8], stone irritation[10], a cellular predisposition of the cystic congenital malformation[8]and a combination of these factors are possible pathways[28]. Most cases of cancer are cholangiocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma, and the biliary epithelium is propagated as the origin of the cancerous transformation[6]. As one trigger for the malignant transformation, chronic inflammation of the biliary epithelium during cholangitis with consecutive dysplasia and carcinogenesis is postulated[29]. Unfortunately, due to little data, the hypothesis of an increased incidence for malignant transformation in large bile ducts rather than in small peripheral ducts could not be proven in this review[14].

    There are only few data on the structured preoperative work-up of patients with CS and CD regarding the used method. Ultrasound was used in most studies to identify cystic lesions within the liver and potential altered liver structure, such as liver cirrhosis[21,30]. To further evaluate the biliary tract, ERCP or percutaneous cholangiography was used in selected cases in some of the studies[3,13,19,27]. However, the use of invasive biliary diagnostics should be avoided and performed only in selected patients because they are often associated with an increased risk for infections[19]. If reported, CT or MRI scans were used to investigate the nature of the cysts, identify possible malignant transformation, and plan and assess the surgical resectability[20,21,27]. The tumor markers Ca-19-9 is often elevated in cases of benign biliary obstruction or cholangitis, and higher levels may mislead the correct diagnosis[7]. Overall, the diagnosis of malignancy in CS and CD is difficult, and the tumor identification was an incidental finding in most of the reports in this review, which was made during the final histological assessment of the surgical specimen, because the preoperative identification of a tumor within a dilated cystic bile tract is almost impossible[3,8,11,13,25]. Therefore, the value of screening patients with CS and CD for malignancy is quite inaccurate, and definite treatment should be sought, because delayed diagnosis and widespread tumor are associated with a poor prognosis[18]. In the future, a more aggressive diagnostic work-up including endoscopic ultrasound, puncture of suspected segments within the biliary tract, cholangioscopy (percutaneously) should be used, with the goal to detect more frequently patients with malignant transformation and therefore avoiding delay of definite surgical treatment.

    The initial treatment of CS and CD is often nonsurgical and supportive therapy using analgesia, antibiotics in case of biliary infections and ursodeoxycholic acid[31,32]. Surgical or interventional drainage procedures may be performed to remove biliary tract obstructions and improve biliary passage to decrease the risk and burden of cholangitis[33,34]. Beside this conservative treatment, the final diagnosis of CS or CD often takes months or years until the patient is referred for definite surgical treatment. During that time, patients suffer recurrent infections, sepsis, hepatic abscesses, portal hypertension, and the risk of malignant transformation without solving the problem of the dilated and cystic biliary tract[30,35-38]. There are reports that malignant transformation does not depend on the disease duration, because cancer occurred in patients with symptomatic CS or CD of two months to two decades. Therefore, it has been postulated that there are likely more aggressive subgroups in CS or CD with increased potential for malignancy[30]. Due to a lack of data, there is no explanation or postulated pathway for this fact.

    As a conclusion for this observation, surgical treatment with liver resection or OLT should be offered to patients with CS or CD as soon as possible to avoid recurrent sepsis and primarily malignant transformation[3,25,30]. In cases of conservative treatment, even asymptomatic patients should be regularly screened clinically and radiologically for malignancy[30]. To obtain the best treatment and surveillance, an interdisciplinary management team, including surgeons, gastroenterologists, hepatologists, radiologists, pediatrician and specialists in infectious diseases, is needed. Therefore, these patients are often treated in transplant centers. Overall, a high suspicion for potential malignant transformation is needed, and early treatment should be intended.

    After one year, the survival rate of all tumor patients was 35%, which is low and much lower than in hepatocellular carcinoma patients[39-41]or selected surgical treated cholangiocarcinoma patients[42-45]. At least 32% had tumor recurrence during the observation period, but five studies did not report any data about recurrence. Therefore, the incidence may be even higher, and some patients likely died before the detection of any tumor recurrence probably due to the high mortality rate. In some studies, a high morbidity and in-house mortality was reported after OLT due to infectious complications and therapy-resistant sepsis[17,21]. The general treatment suggestion is to perform liver resection in defined and localized cystic degeneration and evaluate OLT in diffuse cystic affection with structural hepatic changes[3,25,27,30].

    On the basis of the data, no adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in cases of cholangiocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma. There were only a few reports of chemotherapy in cases of recurrence when surgery was no longer an option. This result is comparable to patients with cholangiocarcinoma without CS or CD, where chemotherapy is used only in nonresectable and extended tumors or recurrence[46].

    The studies were not comparable. For example, TNM staging was available only in a few studies. The extent of cystic degeneration and underlying structural liver changes greatly influences the choice of treatment as mentioned previously. In cases of cancer in CS patients treated with OLT, the long-term survival rate was 0%[17,27], and recurrence rates were high, which are comparable to studies of OLT and cholangiocarcinoma without CS or CD[47]. Patients with localized and small cholangiocarcinoma likely benefit from OLT, although little current data exist[7].

    The following limitations of this systematic review must be addressed. Overall, there were predominantly small, retrospective cohort studies with nonhomogeneous patient collectives treated with liver resection or OLT. Therefore, it was not possible to identify specific risk factors indicating the risk for malignant transformation in CS or CD, because these two entities were not reported separately. Another aspect was that most of the tumors were incidental findings, so a specific work-up algorithm is likely not possible to define. Further prospective and multicenter studies or databases with the specific goal to identify risk factors for malignant transformation are needed.

    In conclusion, there were only few retrospective studies of patients treated with surgery in cases of CS and CD. Therefore, it was not possible to identify valuable risk factors for the malignant transformation in these patients. On the other hand, the previously postulated factors for the development of malignancy could neither be proven nor rebutted. Overall, the incidence of simultaneous malignancy in CS or CD is low, but high tumor rates to almost 40% were reported depending on the investigated cohort. Because a high proportion of malignant tumors were incidental findings, the definite surgical treatment should be offered as soon as possible to avoid septic complications and the development of carcinoma. Surgical treatment should include liver resection in localized affection (primarily CD) and OLT in diffuse affection and structural liver changes, such as liver fibrosis (CS). In proven malignant transformation, small tumors may be treated with OLT successfully, but extensive tumors are mostly associated with an inferior outcome,e.g., due to tumor recurrence. Overall, the postoperative results are associated with a high rate of mortality and tumor recurrence. Therefore, patient selection and the timing of surgery are of high importance. On the basis of the current literature, there are no optimal screening methods described to identify patients with malignant transformation early and safely. Therefore, a high suspicion of malignancy is needed to find the exact time point for surgery and avoid delay in definite surgical treatment. Finally, new screening tools are needed to increase the rate of tumor identification during long-term surveillance of patients with CS or CD.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Congenital intrahepatic bile duct dilatation without fibrosis is called Caroli disease (CD), and is called Caroli syndrome (CS) when it has fibrotic and cirrhotic liver morphology. The development of intrahepatic carcinoma is described in both conditions, but the reported incidence varies extensively. Furthermore, there are no valid guidelines how to treat and diagnose malignant transformation in these patients.

    Research motivation

    So far no valid potential risk factors for the malignant transformation were described. Furthermore, conservative or surgical treatment is performed depending on the extent of cystic malformation, hepatic dysfunction and structural hepatic changes, but little is known about which treatment should be offered to patients with CD or CS and especially cancer.

    Research objectives

    We performed a systematic review of the current literature to investigate specific conditions for malignant transformation in patients with CD and CS and to identify potential risk factors and recommendations regarding diagnosis and surgical treatment.

    Research methods

    A systematic review of the current literature until January 2019 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. During screening process, non-English articles and reports with less than five patients were excluded. The search was performed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms “caroli disease”, “caroli syndrome”, “tumor”, “malignant”, and “cholangiocarcinoma”. Only human studies were used for this systematic review.

    Research results

    Twelve retrospective studies reporting the courses of 561 patients (53% females) were included in this systematic review. The patients’ mean age was 41.6 years old (range 23 to 56 years old), therefore patients were younger than other populations undergoing liver surgery. The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma varied from 2.7% to 37.5% with an overall incidence of 6.6%. There were only few detailed reports about preoperative diagnostic work-up. Disease duration was variable with up to several years. In most cases tumor detection was an incidental finding of the surgical specimen as tumor detection in preoperative diagnostics was often impossible. Surgical treatment depended on the extent of the biliary pathology and additional alterations of the liver structure or function. No adjuvant chemotherapy was reported. Overall survival rates after one year were low at 36% and a high recurrence rate of up to 75% during the observation period was seen.

    Research conclusions

    Only few retrospective studies are available and reported a low tumor incidence. On the basis of these studies distinct suggestions regarding diagnosis and treatment are impossible to define. Despite the high rate of mortality and tumor recurrence, definite surgical treatment should be offered as soon as possible.

    Research perspectives

    Further prospective multicenter investigations regarding patient surveillance, diagnostic tools, time point of surgery and risk factors of malignant transformation are needed.

    91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久99久视频精品免费| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 在线a可以看的网站| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 九草在线视频观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 99热这里只有是精品50| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美3d第一页| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 麻豆成人av视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美97在线视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 七月丁香在线播放| 一级a做视频免费观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 久久久色成人| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 久久草成人影院| 中文字幕久久专区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲图色成人| 又爽又黄a免费视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 岛国毛片在线播放| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 禁无遮挡网站| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产91av在线免费观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 大香蕉久久网| av在线亚洲专区| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日韩中字成人| 一级毛片电影观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 尾随美女入室| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 欧美另类一区| 高清av免费在线| 日本免费a在线| 嫩草影院入口| 老司机影院成人| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| freevideosex欧美| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产午夜精品论理片| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 一夜夜www| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产永久视频网站| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 欧美潮喷喷水| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 免费看不卡的av| 只有这里有精品99| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久精品夜色国产| 欧美潮喷喷水| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日日啪夜夜撸| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| .国产精品久久| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲av成人av| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久久成人免费电影| 久久久精品94久久精品| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | av专区在线播放| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产综合懂色| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 午夜精品在线福利| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 免费看不卡的av| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 欧美日本视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产精品无大码| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日本黄色片子视频| 麻豆成人av视频| 美女大奶头视频| 一夜夜www| 一级片'在线观看视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产综合精华液| 成人二区视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产成人精品久久久久久| 免费av毛片视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 直男gayav资源| 只有这里有精品99| 毛片女人毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产美女午夜福利| 日本黄大片高清| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 91狼人影院| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产精品无大码| 简卡轻食公司| 免费观看av网站的网址| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久久国产一区二区| av线在线观看网站| eeuss影院久久| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| www.av在线官网国产| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 成人二区视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 全区人妻精品视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 午夜日本视频在线| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲av成人av| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲成色77777| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲av成人av| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲18禁久久av| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产av在哪里看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲最大成人av| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 少妇丰满av| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 秋霞伦理黄片| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产淫语在线视频| 色哟哟·www| 免费少妇av软件| 久久久久久久久大av| 成年av动漫网址| av免费观看日本| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 久久久久国产网址| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | xxx大片免费视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图| videossex国产| 三级经典国产精品| 一级毛片我不卡| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲性久久影院| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产成人freesex在线| 一夜夜www| 亚洲最大成人中文| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 成年版毛片免费区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 内射极品少妇av片p| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产高潮美女av| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久久久久久久大av| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美zozozo另类| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 美女黄网站色视频| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲综合精品二区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 97超碰精品成人国产| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 熟女电影av网| 久久久久精品性色| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本wwww免费看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| kizo精华| 69人妻影院| 黄色日韩在线| 久久久久网色| 只有这里有精品99| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 七月丁香在线播放| 午夜免费观看性视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 午夜福利高清视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产老妇女一区| 久久久久网色| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 麻豆成人av视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 春色校园在线视频观看| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美激情在线99| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产三级在线视频| av在线播放精品| av卡一久久| 国产淫语在线视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久97久久精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 精品久久久久久久末码| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 嫩草影院精品99| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 熟女电影av网| 色播亚洲综合网| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| av免费观看日本| 简卡轻食公司| 99热这里只有精品一区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品一区二区三卡| 一级a做视频免费观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲在线观看片| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 免费看日本二区| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 一级av片app| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日韩中字成人| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产在线男女| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 大香蕉久久网| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产成人精品婷婷| 大香蕉久久网| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲精品一二三| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久97久久精品| ponron亚洲| 高清毛片免费看| 夫妻午夜视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 人妻系列 视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日日啪夜夜爽| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚州av有码| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 久久这里只有精品中国| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 91av网一区二区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| ponron亚洲| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 看十八女毛片水多多多| 99热全是精品| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产成人freesex在线| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 精品一区二区免费观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产成人一区二区在线| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲国产av新网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲综合色惰| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 51国产日韩欧美| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 高清av免费在线| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产单亲对白刺激| 色综合站精品国产| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产高潮美女av| videos熟女内射| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产av在哪里看| 国产淫语在线视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片|