• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of axial length and anterior chamber depth on the peripheral refraction profile

    2021-02-03 09:26:26MasoudKhorramiNejadRahaMoradiAlirezaAkbarzadehBaghbanBahramKhosravi

    Masoud Khorrami-Nejad, Raha Moradi, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Bahram Khosravi

    1Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1336616351, Ⅰran

    2School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1616913111, Ⅰran

    3Proteomics Research Center, Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1971653313, Ⅰran

    Abstract

    ● AlM: To evaluate the effect of axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) on peripheral refractive profile in myopic patients compared to emmetropic participants.

    ● METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in right eyes of 58 participants of whom 38 were emmetropic and 20 were myopic. Central and peripheral refraction were measured at 10°, 20°, and 30° eccentricities in nasal and temporal fields using an open-field autorefractor. The Lenstar LS900 was used to measure ACD and AL. The participants were divided into three groups of short (<22.5 mm), normal (22.5-24.5 mm), and long eye (>24.5 mm) according to AL and three groups of low ACD (<3.00 mm), normal ACD (3.00-3.60 mm), and high ACD (>3.60 mm) according to ACD.

    ● RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 22.26±3.09y (range 18-30y). The peripheral mean spherical refractive error showed a hypermetropic shift in myopic and emmetropic groups although this shift was more pronounced in the myopic group. The results showed significant changes in the spherical equivalent, J0, and J45 astigmatism in all gazes with an increase in eccentricity (P<0.001). The pattern of refractive error changes was more noticeable in long and short eyes versus normal AL eyes. Moreover, the pattern of peripheral refractive changes was much more prominent in the high ACD group versus the normal ACD group and in the normal ACD group versus the low ACD group.

    ● CONCLUSlON: Peripheral refraction changes are greater in participants with AL values outside the normal

    range and deeper ACD values compared to participants with normal AL and ACD.

    ● KEYWORDS: anterior chamber depth; axial length; peripheral refraction

    INTRODUCTION

    The fovea and the mechanism involved in the image focus on the visual axis are very important in development of refractive errors[1]. The visual signals coming from the fovea play the dominant role in increasing refractive errors[1-3].

    However, the fovea comprises a small part of the whole retina and recent studies have shown that the peripheral retinal and the pattern of peripheral refractive errors may affect the final refractive error of the eye[2-5]. Furthermore, visual signals of the peripheral retina may have a role in the axial length (AL) growth and increased central refractive errors[2-4].

    Measuring the pattern of peripheral refraction changes makes it possible to detect participants at risk of myopia progression in early stages[1]. Peripheral refraction is determined by the anterior chamber optics and geometric shape of the eye[6-7]. Previous studies on peripheral refraction suggest that the pattern of peripheral refraction changes varies in people with different refractive errors[8-9].

    During progression of myopia, the role of the optical components of the eye should be taken into account, including AL, anterior chamber depth (ACD), vitreous depth in addition to corneal power and crystalline lens (as the main determinant of refractive errors)[10-11]. Myopia develops when AL increases relative to the focal point of the ocular refractive components[12,8]. Ⅰn other words, AL has the largest contribution to refractive errors compared to all other factors[11]. However, there are few reports of the role of AL in peripheral refraction changes in normal participants and patients with refractive errors.

    The relationship between optical components of the eye and paraxial or on-axis image is well established while few studies have investigated the role of refractive components in off-axis image formation[7]. An image that is projected on the retina is affected by four important refractive surfaces, including the anterior and posterior surfaces of the crystalline lens and cornea[7]. Ⅰn addition, the distance between these two refractive surfaces,i.e., the ACD, also plays an important role in the formation and quality of the retinal image[10]. Although ACD has a very small refractive power, it plays a role in the final refractive error[7]. Some studies suggest that the reasons for AL changes due to defocus are changes in the scleral growth and choroidal thickness[2-3,8]and there are no reports of the relationship between defocus changes and ACD as one of the AL parameters. Considering the important role of the anterior segment in image formation on the retina and the effect of AL and ACD in determining refractive errors, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of ACD and AL on the peripheral refractive profile in myopic and emmetropic participants.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Ethical ApprovalThis study was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science approved its protocol.

    This cross-sectional study was conducted in the right eyes of 58 participants aged 18-30y in 2019.

    The convenience non-random sampling method was used, which included all optometry students in the school of rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Ⅰran. The participants were divided into two groups of emmetropia (n=38, right eye=-0.25 to 0.75 D) and myopia (n=20, right eye≤-0.50 D) according to the central refractive error.

    The inclusion criteria were a best-corrected distance visual acuity of zero or better using the logMAR chart and a cylindrical refractive error of less than or equal 1.25 D in both groups. The exclusion criteria were a history of any ocular disease including active ocular pathologies like glaucoma, retinal pathologies, diseases of the anterior segment and cornea like keratoconus, ocular infections, use of any ocular or systemic drugs, history of ocular surgery like refractive surgery, use of hard contact lenses in the past four weeks, and use of soft contact lenses in the past two weeks. Central and peripheral refractive errors were determined using an openfield autorefractor (Shin Nippon NVision-K 5001, Ajinomoto Trading, Ⅰnc., Tokyo, Japan), which is a reliable tool for peripheral refraction measurement[4]. Central and peripheral refractive errors were only measured in the right eyes of the participants and the left eyes were patched during all measurements. Peripheral refraction was measured at least five times at each angle and averaged.

    Refraction measurement was done in a room with minimum photopic conditions (30 lx) to have a pupil diameter of at least 4 mm (using pupil measuring specific ruler with 0.5 mm graduations) for successful peripheral refraction measurement at peripheral angles[9]. The measurements were done along the horizontal axis and the patient was instructed to fixate on a non-accommodative red star-shaped target (recommended by the manufacturer) at a fixed distance of 4 m from the corneal vertex while the patient’s head was completely fixed. Refractive errors were measured in the central gaze as well as 10°, 20°, and 30° eccentricities in the nasal and temporal fields. Peripheral refraction was measured in all gaze positions, and the difference in the mean refractive error between the primary gaze and peripheral gazes was determined. The Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit AG Koeni, Switzerland) was used to measure ACD and AL. After measuring the ACD and AL, the participants were divided into three groups of short eye (<22.5 mm), normal (22.5-24.5 mm), and long eye (>24.5 mm) according to AL[13-15], and three groups of low ACD (<3.00 mm),normal ACD (3.00-3.60 mm), and high ACD (>3.60 mm) according to ACD[16-17]. All measurement was performed by corresponding author (Moradi R).

    Statistical AnalysisSPSS 24 was used for data analysis. Normal data distribution was tested by Shapiro-Wilk and according to normal distribution of the data, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc analysis test was administered for between-group comparison. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the amount of peripheral refractive change with AL and ACD. Ⅰndependentt-test was used to compare the mean values of variables between the two groups. Linear regression methods were applied to find correlation between several parameters.Pvalues <0.05 were considered significant.

    RESULTS

    This cross-sectional study was performed in 58 eyes of 58 patients (30 males and 28 females). The mean age of the patients was 22.26±3.09y (range 18-30y). Descriptive statistics of emmetropic and myopic patients such as age, flat K, steep K, spherical refractive error, cylindrical refractive error, spherical equivalent, J45, and J0 in the central gaze are presented in Table 1.

    Table 2 shows the mean spherical equivalent, J0, and J45 values in emmetropia and myopia groups in different gazes.

    Figure 1 shows the pattern of spherical component changes as a function of retinal eccentricity in emmetropic and myopic groups.

    The patient divided into three groups according to AL: short eye [AL<22.50 mm,n=4 patients with a mean age of 24±4.08y (range 21-30y)], normal eye [AL=22.50-24.50 mm,n=37 patients with a mean age of 22±2.52y (range 19-30y)], long eye [AL>24.50 mm,n=17 patients with a mean age of 22.41±3.97y (range 18-30y)].

    Table 1 Descriptive statistics of emmetropia and myopia groups in central gaze

    Table 2 Spherical equivalent, J0, and J45 in different groups

    The mean spherical component in the central gaze was 0±0.56, -0.63±1.62, and -2.04±1.90 D in short, normal, and long eyes, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent in the central gaze was -0.18±0.46, -0.84±1.63, -2.33±1.98 D in short, normal and long eyes, respectively.

    Table 3 shows the mean difference in the spherical refractive error between short, normal, and long eyes in different gazes and Figure 2 presents the pattern of spherical component changes as a function of retinal eccentricity in short, normal, and long eyes.

    The patients were divided into three groups according to ACD: low ACD [ACD<3.00 mm,n=10 patients with a mean age of 22.80±4.13y (range 18-30y)], normal ACD [ACD=3.00-3.60 mm,n=32 patients with a mean age of 22.22±2.83y (range 19-30y)], and high ACD [ACD>3.60 mm,n=16 patients with a mean age of 22.00±3.03y (range 19-30y)]. The mean spherical component in the central gaze was -0.67±1.70, -0.83±1.77, and -1.54±1.82 D in low, normal, and high ACD eyes, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent in the central gaze was -0.91±1.74, -1.03±1.84, and -1.82±1.83 D in low, normal, and high ACD eyes, respectively (Figure 3).

    Table 4 shows the mean difference in the spherical refractive error between low, normal, and high ACD eyes in different gazes and Figure 2 presents the pattern of spherical component changes as a function of retinal eccentricity in these groups. Multiple linear regressions for peripheral refraction with the spherical refractive error at the center, 30° nasal and 30° temporal as the dependent variables are shown in Table 5.Ⅰn all patients, the mean amount of peripheral refractive change at 30° nasal and 30° temporal were +0.75 and +2.10 D, respectively. Ⅰn the myopia group, they were +1.26 and +3.15 D,respectively. Ⅰn all patients, the amount of hyperopic shift at 30° temporal had a significant correlation with the amount of AL (r=0.302;P=0.039). However, there was no significant correlation between the amount of hyperopic shift at 30° nasal and the amount of AL (r=0.078;P=0.602). The amount of hyperopic shift at 30° temporal was nearly significantly correlated with the amount of ACD (r=0.225;P=0.080). Ⅰn contrast, there was no significant correlation between the amount of hyperopic shift at 30° nasal and the amount of ACD (r=0.008;P=0.955).

    Table 3 Multiple comparisons of spherical component (D) as a function of retinal eccentricity between short (<22.5 mm), normal (22.5-24.5 mm) and long eyes (>24.5 mm)

    Table 4 Multiple comparisons of spherical component (D) as a function of retinal eccentricity between low (<3.00 mm), normal (3.00-3.60 mm) and high ACD (>3.60 mm) groups

    Table 5 Multiple linear regressions for peripheral refraction with the spherical refractive error at the center, 30° nasal, and 30° temporal as the dependent variables

    Figure 1 Changes in spherical component (D) as a function of retinal eccentricity.

    Figure 2 Spherical component (D) changes as a function of retinal eccentricity in short (<22.5 mm), normal (22.5-24.5 mm) and long eyes (>24.5 mm).

    Figure 3 Spherical component changes as a function of retinal eccentricity between low (<3.00 mm), normal (3.00-3.60 mm) and high ACD (>3.60 mm) groups.

    DISCUSSION

    The relationship between two ocular biometric parameters (AL and ACD) and peripheral refractive profile was assessed in this study. The results showed a larger difference between central and peripheral refractive error in participants with longer ALs (>24.5 mm) and deeper ACDs (>3.60 mm); in fact, the pattern of peripheral refraction changes was larger in this group compared to those with shorter ALs and ACDs.

    According to the results, with increased eccentricity, the refractive profile changed less in emmetropic participants, compared to myopic participants such that there was no marked difference between the spherical equivalent of the peripheral and central refractive error and a slight refractive shift was observed from emmetropia to relative hyperopia in the temporal field compared to the central gaze in emmetropic participants. However, in myopic patients, peripheral refraction changes had a steeper shift and an overall shift was observed towards relative hyperopia, which was consistent with the results of previous studies[4,18]. Similar to the emmetropic group, the shift of the refractive changes was larger in the temporal versus the nasal field in myopic patients; moreover, marked changes were observed at 20? eccentricity in the temporal field in both groups due to the optic disc, which was in line with the results of other studies[4].

    According to the results of the present study, relative hyperopia shift and peripheral refraction changes were larger in participants with longer ALs, indicating that the mechanisms affecting AL may also influence the pattern of refraction changes[19]. Several studies have shown that the amount of myopia progression usually corresponds to AL changes[7,20-22]. The results confirmed the role of ACD in peripheral refraction and showed larger peripheral refraction changes in participants with deeper ACDs. Most of the studies investigating the correlation of refractive changes and ocular parameters evaluated the relationship between ocular components and refraction along the visual axis, especially the correlation of on-axis refraction and central corneal curvature and A-scan components, indicating the effect of axial parameters on refractive error changes[7,23]. However, these studies did not address the values of ACD, vitreous depth, AL, and corneal curvature as factors influencing myopic changes or peripheral refraction changes. Ⅰn fact, these studies only provide limited information about the posterior segment shape and its correlation with central and peripheral refractive errors[7].

    Muttiet al[12]studied the relationship between anterior segment components and relative peripheral refraction in myopic and emmetropic participants. Similarly, they also found that a deeper ACD and longer AL were associated with more hyperopic relative peripheral refraction; however, the above study was conducted only in children using A-scan ultrasound while the Lenstar was used in the present study. Ⅰt has been reported that ACD measurements using interferometry methods are more reliable and more accurate[20], and ultrasound usually provides smaller values compared to non-contact methods[19]. Ⅰn addition, the validity, repeatability, and clinical utility of optical and image analysis methods used to evaluate ocular biometric parameters are better than ultrasound methods[24].

    Several researchers studied the refractive error profile in the retinal periphery. The results of the present study showed a higher relative hyperopic shift in myopic eyes versus emmetropic eyes. Furthermore, in this study, as expected and in line with previous studies[20,25], a significant difference was observed in ACD between myopic and non-myopic participants and the ACD was significantly deeper in myopic patients. Therefore, the relationship between ACD and central refraction may indicate the tendency of the longer eyes towards having deeper ACDs to enable more active modulations[19]because the refractive effect of a deeper anterior chamber is away from myopia.

    The results of the present study showed that the amount of refractive error change with increased retinal eccentricity was significant and different in three AL groups. A relative hyperopic shift was observed in all three groups, which was steeper and in long and short eyes compared to normal eyes. Ⅰn fact, refraction changes indicated more peripheral hyperopia with an increase in eccentricity in participants with AL values outside the normal range. Ⅰn the normal AL group, the profile of refractive error showed less change, presenting a rather flat with a slight relative hyperopia beyond 20? eccentricity in the temporal field. Ⅰn the long AL group, as expected, the profile of refractive error changes showed more relative hyperopia with increased eccentricity; these changes could be detected in both the temporal and nasal fields. The results of this study showed that the pattern of refractive changes was much more prominent in short (<22.5 mm) and long (>24.5 mm) AL groups compared to the normal AL group.

    No marked differences were observed in peripheral refraction (except more than 20? eccentricity) in low and normal ACD groups. However, refraction changed considerably with an increase in eccentricity in the high ACD group compared to the two other groups, indicating a correlation between ACD changes and peripheral refraction changes. According to the results of this study, the pattern of peripheral refractive changes was much more noticeable in the high ACD group versus the normal ACD group and in the normal ACD group compared to the low ACD group.

    Ⅰn this study, a temporal-nasal asymmetry was seen in all AL and ACD groups which was more prominent beyond 20? eccentricity. This finding was consistent with the results of other studies[26-27]and indicated that the temporal-nasal asymmetry was not associated with central refractive error[26]. According to previous studies, this asymmetry is mainly driven by differences in J0 astigmatism since significantly more astigmatism is measured in the temporal retinal versus the nasal retina. One possible explanation for J0 astigmatism difference is alpha angle, which occurs because the fovea is slightly displaced temporally compared to the pupillary axis[26].The limitations of this study included its small sample size, not evaluating hyperopic cases, and not assessing other ocular biometric parameters and corneal topography in the samples. Since variation in the quality of the images formed on the retinal periphery causes different patterns of peripheral refractive errors and ocular growth and because off-axis refraction is affected by corneal asphericity and geometric shape and optics of all anterior segment parameters, further research is necessary to study these parameters as important determinants of refractive error development. Since previous studies showed a weak correlation between corneal curvature and central refraction[19], it is recommended that the relationship between corneal curvature and peripheral refraction be investigated in future studies.

    The results of this study showed that the pattern of refractive changes in long and short eyes were much more prominent that normal AL eyes. Moreover, the pattern of peripheral refractive changes was much more prominent in the high ACD group versus the normal ACD group and in the normal ACD group compared to the low ACD group.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Conflicts of Interest: Khorrami-Nejad M,None;Moradi R,None;Akbarzadeh Baghban A,None;Khosravi B,None.

    长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 色吧在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 黄色配什么色好看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 免费av不卡在线播放| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲av二区三区四区| av卡一久久| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 精品久久久噜噜| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 色播亚洲综合网| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 日日撸夜夜添| 只有这里有精品99| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产色婷婷99| 日本三级黄在线观看| 人妻系列 视频| 一本久久精品| 日本免费a在线| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日韩中字成人| 波多野结衣高清无吗| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 欧美97在线视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 简卡轻食公司| 丝袜美腿在线中文| or卡值多少钱| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 色网站视频免费| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产在视频线在精品| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 欧美性感艳星| 国产成人福利小说| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精华一区二区三区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 美女黄网站色视频| 日韩中字成人| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产在线男女| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日本黄色片子视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| videos熟女内射| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 老司机影院成人| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| videossex国产| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日本免费a在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 变态另类丝袜制服| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 91av网一区二区| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲18禁久久av| 99久国产av精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 美女国产视频在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 我要搜黄色片| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 高清毛片免费看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 少妇高潮的动态图| av天堂中文字幕网| 插逼视频在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| www.色视频.com| 国产av不卡久久| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久久色成人| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 欧美97在线视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 日本色播在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 精品午夜福利在线看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| av天堂中文字幕网| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 69人妻影院| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 99热全是精品| av线在线观看网站| 国产淫语在线视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| 小说图片视频综合网站| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲av成人av| 69人妻影院| 老司机影院成人| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 只有这里有精品99| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| videossex国产| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产在视频线在精品| 亚洲无线观看免费| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美3d第一页| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲av一区综合| 简卡轻食公司| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 丰满少妇做爰视频| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| av专区在线播放| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 综合色丁香网| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久6这里有精品| a级毛色黄片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 九色成人免费人妻av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产黄片美女视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产成人福利小说| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 中文字幕制服av| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲18禁久久av| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产在线男女| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 天堂√8在线中文| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产黄片美女视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 69av精品久久久久久| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美bdsm另类| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 如何舔出高潮| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 成人三级黄色视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 美女大奶头视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 久久久精品大字幕| 日本黄大片高清| 国产精品三级大全| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产三级中文精品| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 人妻系列 视频| 特级一级黄色大片| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 久久草成人影院| 女人久久www免费人成看片 | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 免费看日本二区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲av一区综合| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 热re99久久国产66热| tube8黄色片| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 如何舔出高潮| 色94色欧美一区二区| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 赤兔流量卡办理| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 咕卡用的链子| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 美女国产视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 深夜精品福利| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 黑人高潮一二区| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 一级a做视频免费观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 在线天堂中文资源库| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产成人精品一,二区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 考比视频在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久av网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 色吧在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 777米奇影视久久| av黄色大香蕉| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品一区二区三卡| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 观看av在线不卡| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 韩国av在线不卡| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美另类一区| 国产淫语在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲国产色片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 嫩草影院入口| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久久国产网址| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| av在线app专区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 少妇精品久久久久久久| av免费在线看不卡| videos熟女内射| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 午夜福利视频精品| 在线观看人妻少妇| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 一级片免费观看大全| 免费看av在线观看网站| 观看av在线不卡| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日本av免费视频播放| 婷婷色av中文字幕| av播播在线观看一区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美成人午夜精品| 大香蕉久久成人网| 在线观看www视频免费| 一区二区三区精品91| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 香蕉精品网在线| 日韩伦理黄色片| 高清毛片免费看| 国产麻豆69| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 色吧在线观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 免费看不卡的av| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 大话2 男鬼变身卡| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 嫩草影院入口| 全区人妻精品视频|