• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional status before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 170 patients with hematological diseases

    2016-04-28 05:01:00PengLiuBoshiWangXiaYanJingjingCaiYuWang
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research 2016年6期

    Peng Liu, Boshi Wang, Xia Yan, Jingjing Cai, Yu Wang

    1Department of Clinical Nutrition;2Department of Hematology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional status before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 170 patients with hematological diseases

    Peng Liu1*, Boshi Wang1*, Xia Yan2, Jingjing Cai1, Yu Wang1

    1Department of Clinical Nutrition;2Department of Hematology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

    Objective:To investigate the nutritional status of patients before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and explore optimal methods for assessing nutritional status in patients with hematological diseases.

    Nutritional risk screen; nutritional assessment; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; hematological diseases

    View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.06.09

    Introduction

    In recent years, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been widely used as a primary treatment for malignant cancers of blood system and some solid tumors (1). Patients with hematological diseases must receive multiple high-dose chemical and/or systemic radiation treatments prior to transplantation, which often leads to digestive dysfunctions that cause moderate to severe malnutrition in patients at nutritional risk. Good nutrition is significant for immune and bone marrow reconstitution following HSCT (2). Whether the nutritional status of patients before and during HSCT affects immune reconstitution after transplantation is of great concern to the clinicians, patients and their relatives. Therefore, an accurate and timely nutritional assessment of the patients with hematological diseases, before and after transplantation, is critical to develop a nutritional support regimen and assure successful completion of HSCT, immune reconstitution after transplantation, reduced risks of infection and graft-versus-host disease, and increased quality of life.

    By now, there are few studies on nutritional assessment of hematological patients before and after HSCT, and additionally, most rely on one single assessment method. Nutritional risk screening and assessment tools widely used in clinic include Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tools (MUST), etc. Due to the particularity of blood cancer treatments, all the above assessment tools have obvious limitations such as low specificity, and low detection and predictive values as a singular nutritional screening and assessment method (3-5). Therefore, this study will use these four methods, in combination with body measurements, to assess the nutritional status of patients with hematological diseases before and after HSCT, and prospectively, aim to explore the best assessment regimen and provide theoretical and scientific basis for the nutrition therapy of patients with hematological diseases.

    Patients and methods

    Patients

    This cohort study enrolled 170 patients who were diagnosed with hematological diseases and underwent allogeneic HSCT in the Department of Hematology, Peking University People’s Hospital between May 2011 and April 2013. The cohort, including 116 males and 54 females, with a median age of 30 (range, 12–56) years, comprised 63 cases of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), 65 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 14 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), 22 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 3 lymphoma and 3 aplastic anemia. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

    The inclusion criteria included: 1) patients who were diagnosed with hematological diseases and would receive HSCT at the Department of Hematology, Peking University People’s Hospital; 2) age ≥6 years old; 3) without severe heart, liver, brain, or kidney failure; 4) did not participate in other clinical trials within 4 weeks; and 5) signed informed consent.

    The exclusion criteria included: 1) patients diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); 2) patients suffering from malignant tumors other than blood diseases; 3) chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis; 4) serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥1.5 times ULN; 5) recent or large abdominal surgery such as gastrectomy (surgeries without long-term side effects, such as appendectomy, cholecystectomy, polypectomy, etc., may not be excluded); 6) infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and active tuberculosis; 7) poorly controlled hypertension; or 8) pregnant or lactating women.

    Nutritional assessment methods

    Using fixed-point continuous sampling, all patients received nutritional assessment by four methods (NRS-2002, MNA, SGA and MUST), in combination with body measurements, before entering laminar air flow rooms for HSCT and after leaving laminar air flow rooms.

    Human body measurements

    Height, weight, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC) and hand grip strength were measured routinely (6,7). Body mass index (BMI) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) were calculated according to the following formulas: BMI = body weight (kg)/[height (m)]2and WHR = WC/HC. Skinfold thickness measurements included triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), subscapular skinfoldthickness (SSF), and suprailiac skinfold thickness. The average daily water intake was recorded in a scale.

    Nutritional risk screening and assessment

    Assessment method of NRS-2002 was developed by the Danish Association of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (DAPEN), and was recommended by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). This method was established on evidence-based medicine and was easy to implement. The core issues include: 1) the severity of the effect of primary disease on nutritional status; 2) recent (1 to 3 months) changes in body weight; 3) dietary intake changes in the most recent week; 4) BMI; and 5) an extra score point is added to the nutritional risk score of patients ≥70 years. Nutritional risk is assessed by the scoring method, and a score of ≥3 was used as a criterion for the presence of nutritional risk. Considering the differences in height and weight between the Eastern and Western populations, the assessment of BMI is according to the classification recommended by Chunming Chen for Chinese adults (8), wherein the adult malnutrition criteria are: BMI <18.5 kg/m2for nutritional deficiencies, BMI ≥24.0 kg/m2for overweight and BMI ≥28.0 kg/m2for obesity.

    In the early 1990s, Vellaset al. developed a new method, MNA, for the assessment of human nutritional status (9,10). MNA questionnaire consists of 18 items in four categories, 30 points in total. MNA score ≥24 indicates normal nutritional status; 17≤ MNA score ≤23.5 indicates a potential risk of malnutrition; MNA score <17 is considered as malnourished.

    SGA was proposed by Canadian scholars as a clinical nutritional evaluation method in 1981, and was recommended by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). SGA assessment is based on medical history and clinical examination, and includes 8 indicators: weight changes, dietary intake, gastrointestinal symptoms, functional capacity evaluation, stress, muscle wasting, TSF and the presence of edema. Each indicator is divided into three grades: A, B and C (11). When there are 5 or more C-grades among the 8 indicators, the overall rating is C (severe malnourishment); with 5 or more B-grades, or some C-grades but less than 5, the overall rating is B (mild to moderate malnourishment); when the B-and C-grades are less than 5, the overall rating is A (normal nutrition). The evaluation of low, moderate and severe stress (corresponding to A, B, C levels) is based on the mental status of patients after bone marrow transplantation. If low mood or depression with tendency of mental disorders is evident, the stress level is C (severe stress), otherwise, recorded as B (moderate stress) due to the expected stress from the transplantation procedure.

    MUST method was developed by the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN). It is primarily used for screening protein-energy malnutrition and its incidence risk, including estimation of the following three criteria: BMI, body weight loss and disease-induced food intake reduction (12,13). Total score is equal to the sum of the three criteria. Score 0 represents no or low nutritional risk, indicating that a replicate screening may be required after a certain time interval. Score 1 represents moderate nutritional risk, indicating that food intake should be monitored for 3 d and recorded for further evaluation. Score 2 represents high nutritional risk, indicating that patients should be referred to a dietitian for nutrition guidance or therapy.

    Quality control

    All the patients were evaluated on the day they entered the laminar air flow room for HSCT, and 109 were evaluated on the day they left the room because 61 patients could not be evaluated due to some unexpected circumstances and were therefore excluded. Two experienced dietitians performed the evaluation. A uniform dietary survey was used for screening and evaluation. Patients’ height was measured without shoes; body weight was measured under fasting condition with hospital gown and without shoes, using a body-weight scale (RGZ-120, Changzhou Wujin Weighing Apparatus Co., Ltd, China). The grip strength was measured with a hand-dynamometer (EH101, Guangdong Senssun Weighing Apparatus Group Ltd., China). Height measurement error adjustment was ±0.5 cm and body weight measurement error adjustment was ±0.2 kg. Skinfold thickness was measured by a skinfold caliper manufactured by the China National Sports Commission, and body circumferences were measured using a standard flexible ruler with an accuracy of 0.1 mm.

    Statistical analysis

    All data were imported and managed using Epi-Data software program (the EpiData Association, Denmark). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Measurement data were expressed asand analyzed by pairedt-test.Enumeration data were expressed as percentages, and analyzed by the Pearson’s Chi-squared test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Results

    All patients received nutritional assessment on the day of entering laminar air flow room; 109 patients received the nutritional assessment within 48 h after leaving laminar air flow room; and 102 patients participated in the human body measurements both before and after transplantation. Mean laminar air flow room treatment time was 30.0±2.1 d.

    Anthropometry

    The height of patients was 1.69±0.08 m, wherein the male was 1.73±0.07 m, and the female was 1.62±0.05 m. The body weight and grip strength of patients pre- and posttransplantation are shown inTable 1andTable 2. The results showed that the body weight, HC, WHR, calf circumference, mid-upper arm circumference and suprailiac skinfold thickness of the patients decreased dramatically after transplantation. The average body weight loss was 4 kg and 3 kg for males and females, respectively, although there was no statistical significance. The grip strength of both hands, WC, TSF and SSF did not show obvious changes. After transplantation, daily water intake increased significantly, and HC and midupper arm circumference decreased slightly, but there was no statistical significance.

    NRS-2002 evaluation

    Before HSCT, only 36 cases among the total patients involved in this study had nutritional risk, but all the 109 patients evaluated after HSCT had nutritional risk, wherein 29 (26.6%) got a score of 3, 13 (11.9%) scored 4–5, and 67 (61.5%) scored 6. All patients involved in this study got a score of 3 for the item of “severity of the impact of primary diseases on nutritional status”. Fifty-five patients (50.5%) lost more than 5% of their body weight during treatment in the laminar air flow room. Twenty-six (23.9%) showed a reduction in food intake (60% less than pre-HSCT), while 19 (17.4%) showed increased food intake than before.

    MNA evaluation

    Before HSCT, most patients with hematological diseases had good nutritional status. Males showed better nutritional status than females; 86.20% of the males had good nutritional status, while 74.07% for the females. After HSCT, only 10.09% of the patients had good nutritional status, and 70.64% of the patients showed potential malnutrition. As shown inTable 3, the percentage of malnutrition for females after HSCT was significantly higher than that for males.

    SGA evaluation

    Among 170 patients, before transplantation, there were nopatients with severe malnutrition and only 3 (1.76%) had moderate malnutrition. The rest had normal nutritional status. After HSCT, 90 patients (82.6%) developed moderate or severe malnutrition. Among those, no female patients suffered from severe malnutrition, while 27 females (84.4%) had moderate malnutrition; 63 male patients (81.8%) developed moderate or severe malnutrition, wherein only one had severe malnutrition. After transplantation, 87.1% of patients experienced muscle wasting, among which, 9.3% had severe muscle wasting. The results from assessment of TSF were consistent with muscle wasting.

    Table 1 Anthropometric comparisons of patients with hematological diseases, pre- and post-HSCT (N=102)

    MUST evaluation

    Before and after transplantation, no patient developed other severe diseases or complications, and no patient experienced fasting for more than 5 d. Before transplantation, only 2.94% of all patients had recent weight loss of more than 10%, while 55 patients (50.46%) experienced weight loss of more than 10% during treatment in the laminar air flow room (Table 4). MUST evaluation showed that 20 patients (11.76%) had high nutritional risk before transplantation, and after HSCT, 65 patients (59.63%) had high nutritional risk (Table 5).

    Discussion

    Domestic and foreign literature shows that 25%–60% of hospitalized patients suffer from malnutrition (14,15). In clinical practice, nutritional support and nutrition therapyare always delayed. Although doctors understand the importance of nutrition in the course of treatment, intervention is rare in patients without severe malnutrition or capable of self-feeding. In case severe malnutrition, cachexia, graft-versus-host disease, oral ulcers, infections and other complications occur, patients begin to receive nutrition therapy. However, due to poor implementation, the survival rate and quality of life of patients are seriously affected. Therefore, treatment of patients with hematological diseases should initiate from the correct nutritional evaluation.

    Table 4 MUST evaluation in patients with hematological disease, pre- and post-HSCT

    Table 5 MUST assessment in patients with hematological diseases, pre- and post-HSCT

    In this study, before transplantation, the average BMI and the average body circumference measurements (WC, mid-upper arm circumference and calf circumference) of males were higher than that of females, and the average skinfold thickness of females was higher than that of the males, which is consistent with the results of adult epidemiological survey in China (16). After HSCT, the anthropometric results showed that the patients have significant reduction in weight, HC, WHR, calf circumference, mid-upper arm circumference, and suprailiac skinfold thickness compared to pre-HSCT measurements. Specifically, male patients on an average lost 4 kg and female patients lost 3 kg, but these changes have no statistical significance. Male patients had 5 cm, 4 cm, and 2 cm reductions in hip, calf and mid-upper arm circumferences, respectively. Female patients had modest and statistically insignificant decreases in hip and midupper arm circumferences. The measurements of body circumference and skinfold thickness are simple and convenient with small error, and thus suitable for bedridden patients who cannot undergo weight measurements, or patients with excessive fluid accumulation such as hydrothorax and ascites. In addition, significant reduction (2–5 cm) of these indicators after HSCT is sensitive enough to assess the nutritional status of patients, which should be paid great attention.

    This study employed combined nutritional status assessment in patients with hematological diseases, by different nutrition evaluation methods at different stages of transplantation, and indicated that: 1) Evaluation results from NRS-2002 only represent whether the patient is at risk for malnutrition, but its efficacy in estimating the grade of malnutrition is relatively weak; 2) Comparative analysis of nutritional assessment screening in post-transplantation patients using MUST revealed significantly different results from those obtained using NRS-2002; and 3) In malnutrition diagnosis among post-transplantation patients, SGA assessment indicated that 83.3% of patients have moderate to severe malnutrition, while MNA evaluated 19.27% of patients as affected by malnutrition, which is probably due to over-subjectivity of SGA, thus leading to an increase in the probability of malnutrition. Regardless of which evaluation method or single measurement indicator is used, the evidence shows that the patients with hematological diseases suffer from significantly deteriorated nutritional status after transplantation, and are at relatively high nutritional risk.

    Results from this study showed that in order to perform comprehensive analysis, we need to employ different evaluation methods based on the stages of the disease in treating complex diseases such as hematological diseases, which would ensure more objective, rigorous and accurate evaluation of the nutritional status of patients. Before HSCT, some patients already had nutritional risk or nutritional deficiencies, and prompt and close nutritionalscreening or assessment should be performed. The nutritional status of patients after transplantation was generally deteriorated compared with that before transplantation. Body measurements should be taken more frequently during the subsequent treatment window in the laminar air flow rooms. After HSCT, it is recommended to combine MNA and SGA to evaluate the overall nutritional status of patients, and thus provide timely and reasonable nutritional treatment.

    Conclusions

    Appropriate nutritional support protocol originates from timely and accurate nutritional assessment. Combined nutritional evaluation methods should be used before and after HSCT. In the future, we will perform exploratory research on the nutritional support strategy for HSCT patients at different treatment stages, which may provide scientific evidence for patient-specific nutritional support and treatment strategy.

    Acknowledgements

    None.

    Footnote

    Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

    1.Huang XJ. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: current status and prospects. Am J Blood Res 2011;1:90-7.

    2.Martin-Salces M, de Paz R, Canales MA, et al. Nutritional recommendations in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Nutrition 2008;24:769-75.

    3.Wang B, Yan X, Cai J, et al. Nutritional assessment with different tools in leukemia patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Chin J Cancer Res 2013;25:762-9.

    4.Liu P, Zhang ZF, Cai JJ, et al. NRS2002 assesses nutritional status of leukemia patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Chin J Cancer Res 2012;24:299-303.

    5.Liu P, Yan X, Wang BS, et al. Three methods assess nutritional status of leukemia patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:440-3.

    6.Wang X, Yin T, Liu J, et al. Evaluation methods for human body nutritional status. Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Press, 1982.

    7.Shi H, Li W, Qi Y, et al. Nutritional screening and evaluation. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2014.

    8.Cooperative Meta-Analysis Group of the Working Group on Obesity in China, International Life Sciences Institute, Focal Point in China. The recommendation of Chinese adult body mass index classification. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi (in Chinese) 2001;35:349-50.

    9.Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, et al. The mini nutritional assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition 1999;15:116-22.

    10.Rullier L, Lagarde A, Bouisson J, et al. Nutritional status of community-dwelling older people with dementia: associations with individual and family caregivers’ characteristics. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013;28:580-8.

    11.Hanisah R, Suzana S, Lee FS. Validation of screening tools to assess appetite among geriatric patients. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16:660-5.

    12.Isenring EA, Banks M, Ferguson M, et al. Beyond malnutrition screening: appropriate methods to guide nutrition care for aged care residents. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:376-81.

    13.Stratton RJ, Hackston A, Longmore D, et al. Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and inpatients: prevalence, concurrent validity and ease of use of the‘malnutrition universal screening tool’ (‘MUST’) for adults. Br J Nutr 2004;92:799-808.

    14.Jiang ZM, Chen W, Zhang ST. Malnutrition risk screening in 5, 303 inpatients from 11 metropolitan general hospitals and 6 specialty clinics (midterm summary abstract). Zhongguo Lin Chuang Ying Yang Za Zhi (in Chinese) 2006;14:263.

    15.Konturek PC, Herrmann HJ, Schink K, et al.Malnutrition in hospitals: it was, is now, and must not remain a problem! Med Sci Monit 2015;21:2969-75.

    16.Zhang R, Xue C, Wang W, et al. Assessment of anthropometric measurements in 988 healthy adults of Han nationality. Ying Yang Xue Bao (in Chinese) 2000; 22:179-82.

    Cite this article as: Liu P, Wang B, Yan X, Cai J, Wang Y. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional status before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 170 patients with hematological diseases. Chin J Cancer Res 2016;28(6):626-633. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604. 2016.06.09

    10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.06.09

    *These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Peng Liu. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University People’s Hospital, No. 44 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100044, China. Email: liupengpku@163.com.

    Methods:This cohort study enrolled 170 patients who were diagnosed with hematological diseases and underwent allogeneic HSCT in the Department of Hematology, Peking University People’s Hospital between May 2011 and April 2013. We used fixed-point continuous sampling and four nutritional screening tools, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tools (MUST), in combination with body measurements, to extensively screen and evaluate nutritional risks and status in patients receiving HSCT before entering and after leaving laminar air flow rooms.

    Results:After HSCT, patients had significant reduction in weight, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, calf circumference, mid-upper arm circumference, and suprailiac skinfold thickness compared with pre-HSCT measurements. Before HSCT, NRS-2002 identified that 21.2% of patients were at nutritional risks, compared with 100% after HSCT. MUST indicated that before HSCT, 11.77% of patients were at high nutritional risk, compared with 59.63% after HSCT. MNA assessed that 0.06% of patients were malnourished before HSCT, compared with 19.27% after HSCT. SGA identified that before HSCT, 1.76% of patients had mild to severe malnutrition, which increased to 83.3% after HSCT. There is a significant increase in the nutritional risk and malnutrition in patients who received HSCT.

    Conclusions:Before HSCT, some patients already had nutritional risk or nutritional deficiencies, and prompt and close nutritional screening or assessment should be performed. The nutritional status of patients after HSCT was generally deteriorated compared with that before transplantation. Body measurements should be taken more frequently during the subsequent treatment window in the laminar air flow rooms. After HSCT, it is recommended to combine MNA and SGA to fully evaluate the nutritional status, and thus provide timely and reasonable nutritional support.

    Submitted Sep 15, 2016. Accepted for publication Dec 11, 2016.

    老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 看黄色毛片网站| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 在线a可以看的网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 久久热精品热| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产高清三级在线| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| av专区在线播放| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲精品在线美女| 91久久精品电影网| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| avwww免费| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| www.www免费av| 成人av在线播放网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 怎么达到女性高潮| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲av美国av| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 午夜久久久久精精品| 熟女电影av网| 露出奶头的视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 九色成人免费人妻av| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产午夜精品论理片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲av熟女| 波多野结衣高清作品| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 中国美女看黄片| a在线观看视频网站| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 97超视频在线观看视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| av黄色大香蕉| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 久久香蕉精品热| eeuss影院久久| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产日本99.免费观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | av国产免费在线观看| 久久亚洲真实| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| av黄色大香蕉| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| av专区在线播放| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 在线播放无遮挡| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 俺也久久电影网| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久久久久九九精品影院| eeuss影院久久| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 一本一本综合久久| 久久久久性生活片| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产单亲对白刺激| 欧美日本视频| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日本 av在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| a在线观看视频网站| 直男gayav资源| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美3d第一页| 国产免费男女视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 日本成人三级电影网站| 精品午夜福利在线看| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 永久网站在线| 午夜a级毛片| 久久午夜福利片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 不卡一级毛片| 亚州av有码| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 色在线成人网| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美区成人在线视频| www.999成人在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 身体一侧抽搐| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 午夜精品在线福利| 丁香六月欧美| 一区二区三区激情视频| 宅男免费午夜| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日本与韩国留学比较| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 99热只有精品国产| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 一本一本综合久久| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| av福利片在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久久久国内视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产高潮美女av| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 色吧在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 91字幕亚洲| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产美女午夜福利| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 18+在线观看网站| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 1000部很黄的大片| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 欧美性感艳星| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲av成人av| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产精品一及| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 少妇丰满av| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久国产乱子免费精品| a级毛片a级免费在线| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲片人在线观看| 青草久久国产| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲无线观看免费| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产高清激情床上av| 很黄的视频免费| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 久久6这里有精品| 脱女人内裤的视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 91久久精品电影网| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产色婷婷99| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 精品国产亚洲在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产在视频线在精品| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 一夜夜www| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 欧美3d第一页| 国产黄片美女视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日本 av在线| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 精品国产三级普通话版| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 美女大奶头视频| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 精品久久久久久,| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 精品人妻1区二区| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 一a级毛片在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久人妻av系列| 97超视频在线观看视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 99热这里只有是精品在线观看 | 高清在线国产一区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 直男gayav资源| 丰满的人妻完整版| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 天堂动漫精品| 看黄色毛片网站| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 1024手机看黄色片| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 成年免费大片在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| www.色视频.com| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 成年免费大片在线观看| avwww免费| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| netflix在线观看网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 美女免费视频网站| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲激情在线av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美bdsm另类| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 色播亚洲综合网| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| xxxwww97欧美| 久久香蕉精品热| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| eeuss影院久久| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| av天堂中文字幕网| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 亚洲第一电影网av| eeuss影院久久| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲成人久久性| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 长腿黑丝高跟| 一本综合久久免费| 久久午夜福利片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久草成人影院| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品野战在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 一a级毛片在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| a级毛片a级免费在线| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 日本与韩国留学比较| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 看黄色毛片网站| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 悠悠久久av| 一级av片app| 亚州av有码| 亚洲无线观看免费| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 久久伊人香网站| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久久久久久久成人| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产高潮美女av| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产探花极品一区二区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 91av网一区二区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 一夜夜www| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲国产色片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 看黄色毛片网站| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 日本五十路高清| 午夜久久久久精精品| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 熟女电影av网| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 精品午夜福利在线看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 日本 av在线| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 日韩欧美免费精品| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一级av片app| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲 国产 在线| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 99热这里只有精品一区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 黄色日韩在线| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久中文看片网| 免费看光身美女| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 色5月婷婷丁香| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 此物有八面人人有两片| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 日本三级黄在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 免费观看人在逋| 午夜福利高清视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 婷婷亚洲欧美| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲精品在线美女| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看|