• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Patients with culture negative pyogenic liver abscess have the same outcomes compared to those with Klebsiella pneumoniae pyogenic liver abscess

    2016-11-14 12:18:30VishalShelatQiaoWangClementLKChiaZhongkaiWangJeeKeemLowandWinstonWLWoon

    Vishal G Shelat, Qiao Wang, Clement LK Chia, Zhongkai Wang,Jee Keem Low and Winston WL Woon

    Singapore, Singapore

    Patients with culture negative pyogenic liver abscess have the same outcomes compared to those with Klebsiella pneumoniae pyogenic liver abscess

    Vishal G Shelat, Qiao Wang, Clement LK Chia, Zhongkai Wang,Jee Keem Low and Winston WL Woon

    Singapore, Singapore

    BACKGROUND: Etiologic organism is not frequently isolated despite multiple blood and fluid cultures during management of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA). Such culture negative pyogenic liver abscess (CNPLA) is routinely managed by antibiotics targeted to Klebsiella pneumoniae. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of such clinical practice.

    METHODS: All the patients with CNPLA and Klebsiella pneumoniae PLA (KPPLA) admitted from January 2003 to December 2011 were included in the study. A retrospective review of medical records was performed and demographic, clinical and outcome data were collected.

    RESULTS: A total of 528 patients were treated as CNPLA or KPPLA over the study period. CNPLA presented more commonly with abdominal pain (P=0.024). KPPLA was more common in older age (P=0.029) and was associated with thrombocytopenia (P=0.001), elevated creatinine (P=0.002), bilirubin(P=0.001), alanine aminotransferase (P=0.006) and C-reactive protein level (P=0.036). CNPLA patients tend to have anemia(P=0.015) and smaller abscess (P=0.008). There was no difference in hospital stay (15.7 vs 16.8 days) or mortality (14.0% vs 11.0%). No patients required surgical drainage after initiation of medical therapy.

    CONCLUSION: Despite demographic and clinical differences between CNPLA and KPPLA, overall outcomes are not different.

    (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2016;15:504-511)

    culture negative;

    Klebsiella pneumoniae;

    pyogenic liver abscess

    Introduction

    Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) is a potentially lifethreatening infection with mortality rate ranging from 4%-30%.[1-3]The pathogens for this condition are detected by culture of blood and/or pus drained from the abscess. Among all pathogens found in PLA,Klebsiella pneumoniae is the commonest and the features of Klebsiella pneumoniae PLA (KPPLA) have been widely described, particularly from Southeast Asian countries.[4-7]Absence of routine widespread application of advanced microbial detection techniques,[8,9]noncompliance to sepsis guidelines[10]and absence of routine testing for fungal infections result in inability to identify the etiologic microorganism. Such culture negative pyogenic liver abscess (CNPLA) deserves a special recognition as the selection of antibiotic is not standardized. The incidence of CNPLA varies from 15%-80%[11-13]and despite being commonly encountered, it has not received the same attention as KPPLA.[14]It is a common practice to empirically treat CNPLA patients with the same antibiotics which are commonly used for KPPLA patients. It remains unclear if this approach is safe. Furthermore,CNPLA is more common when an attempt to obtain pus culture by aspiration or drainage has not been done. It is evident that outcomes of patients whose PLA is nottreated by drainage are inferior compared to drainage.[15]Also, routinely patients with positive blood cultures are treated with minimum 10-14 days of intravenous antibiotics and it is possible that CNPLA patients are undertreated. We conducted this study to evaluate if CNPLA results in adverse outcomes comparable to KPPLA.

    Methods

    Patients

    A diagnosis of PLA was established based on clinical presentation and imaging. Patients with age <18 years,amoebic liver abscess, infected liver cyst, infected hydatid cyst, ruptured liver abscess requiring an urgent surgical intervention and culture positive for any bacteria other than Klebsiella pneumoniae were excluded. Constitutional symptom was defined collectively for vague presenting complains of weakness, fatigue, fever and feeling unwell. All patients with PLA had at least one set of blood culture taken prior to the initiation of empirical broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics. Patients underwent percutaneous drainage (or aspiration) of PLA when any of the following criteria was met: (1) size of PLA >4 cm, solitary or dominant; (2) presence of hemodynamic instability or need for inotropic support on admission;(3) gas within the abscess cavity regardless of size and(4) failure of antibiotic therapy for PLA <4 cm. Drain fluid was routinely sent for microbiology testing. Drains were flushed with 10 mL saline to prevent blockages and accurate logs were maintained for the quality and quantity of effluents. A contrast dye study via the drain was routinely obtained when the drain output was <10 mL/24 h for at least two days. The percutaneous drains were removed upon resolution of sepsis as evidenced by stable vital parameters, total white blood cell count and/ or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels down trending and<10 mL/24 h drain aspirates for at least two consecutive days.

    Groups and treatment

    The specimens obtained were processed for Gram stain, bacterial cultures (aerobic and anaerobic) and tests for antibiotic susceptibility [organism identification was performed using a mix of Microbact? 12A (Oxoid, UK),VITEK 2 system (bioMe'rieux), and the Bruker Biotyper(version 2.0) matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry system;susceptibility testing was performed using the VITEK 2 system (bioMe'rieux) and Kirby-Bauer method]. Antibiotic therapy was subsequently tailored to culture and sensitivity results. In KPPLA patients, either blood or pus culture was positive for Klebsiella penumoniae. CNPLA was defined when no organism was evident on any blood or pus samples. PLA patients were initially taken empirical broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, usually a combination of a third generation cephalosporin, such as ceftriaxone 1 g intravenous 8 hourly, along with metronidazole 500 mg intravenous 8 hourly. Total duration of antibiotic therapy varied according to the clinical and radiological response. Patient monitoring and blood investigations were done based on individual surgeons' preference. All the patients underwent a repeat radiologic imaging at 2-3 weeks interval to evaluate radiological response. Antibiotic therapy was switched from intravenous to oral based on clinical response and discontinued when there was a near complete to complete radiological resolution of abscess. Patients with positive blood culture were routinely treated with minimum 10-14 days of intravenous antibiotics before converting to oral. All patients with persistent sepsis were evaluated according to surviving sepsis guidelines with repeat imaging and culture directed escalation of antibiotic treatment. It is a local practice to escalate antibiotic treatment to either piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g intravenous 8 hourly or carbapenems in septic CNPLA patients who do not respond to first line treatment. In patients with negative cultures, metronidazole was discontinued at the time of switching intravenous antibiotics to oral amoxicillin clavulanate. The medical records of all patients were studied for demographic profile, co-morbidities, clinical features, laboratory and radiologic investigations, imaging characteristics of abscesses, treatment, hospital stay,and mortality. All the cut-off values of laboratory investigations were based on our hospital laboratory records except for CRP where an arbitrary cut-off value of 100 mg/L was determined. Total duration of antibiotic treatment was determined by adding the intravenous and oral days of all types of antibiotics prescribed. Mortality was defined as death due to any cause during hospitalization or within 30 days of diagnosis of PLA.

    Statistical analysis

    Data was analyzed using commercial statistical software (SPSS for Windows, version 14.0, Chicago, IL, USA). All continuous data were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by independent samples t-test. All categorical variables were described as percentage and compared by either Chi-square or Fisher's exact test based on the feature of the data. Multivariate analysis for mortality was processed by logistic regression using stepwise forward method, all factors analyzed in the single factor study were included as inputs. A P value of<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Results

    Baseline characteristics

    During January 2003 and December 2011, 635 patients were treated for PLA at Tan Tock Seng Hospital in Singapore. Fig. 1 demonstrates the patient selection. 528 patients were treated for CNPLA (264 patients) or KPPLA (264 patients). This equal number is purely coincidental. The mean age of patients was 60.7 years (range 15-99) and 322 (61.0%) patients were male. 191 (36.2%)patients had history of hepato-pancreatico-biliary diseases, in which, the majority was gallstones (74.3%). Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of patients with CNPLA and KPPLA. KPPLA patients had blood or pus culture done for a median of 4 times (range 2-13) and CNPLA patients had blood or pus culture taken for a median of 4 times (range 2-15).

    Clinical presentation and investigations

    Clinical features, biochemical results and imagingfeatures are shown in Table 2. Fever and constitutional symptoms were the most common clinical manifestations in both groups but significantly more in KPPLA patients (85.2% vs 68.6%, P=0.001, and 83.0% vs 68.9%,P=0.001, respectively). Abdominal pain was more common in CNPLA group (53.0% vs 43.2%, P=0.024). KPPLA patients showed evidence of organ dysfunction withmore patients having thrombocytopenia (platelet <150 × 109/L) (35.6% vs 15.5%, P=0.001), elevated creatinine(>130 μmoI/L) (32.2% vs 20.1%, P=0.002), elevated bilirubin (>22 μmol/L) (56.1% vs 41.7%, P=0.001), raised aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (>34 IU/L) (76.9% vs 67.8%, P=0.025) and raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (>44 IU/L) (65.2% vs 53.0%, P=0.006) level. High CRP level was also more common in KPPLA group(68.9% vs 60.2%, P=0.036). CNPLA patients tend to have anemia (17.0% vs 9.8%, P=0.015) and smaller abscesses(5.4 vs 6.2 cm, P=0.008). There was equal distribution of multiple lesions (29.9% vs 30.3%, P=0.992).

    Fig. 1. Flowchart of patient selection.

    Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with CNPLA and KPPLA

    Table 2. Clinical presentation and investigations of CNPLA and KPPLA patients

    Table 3. Management and clinical outcomes of CNPLA and KPPLA patients (n, %)

    Management and clinical outcomes

    KPPLA patients required percutaneous drainag (63.6% vs 34.8%, P=0.001) more frequently. No patients required surgical drainage after initiation of medical therapy. There was no difference in hospital stay (15.7 vs 16.8 days, P=0.397). Overall 30-day mortality of CNPLA and KPPLA patients(14.0% vs 11.0%, P=0.292) was similar. Mortality in patients with percutaneous drainage was 8.7% and 9.5%(P=0.825) and of those who were treated with antibiotics alone was 16.9% and 13.5% (P=0.474) for CNPLA and KPPLA groups, respectively (Table 3).

    CNPLA patients outcomes

    Those patients who had the abscess drained in the CNPLA group, were younger (P=0.05) with larger abscess (7.4 vs 4.2 cm, P<0.001) and fever (78.3% vs 63.4%,P=0.013) as common presenting complain. CNPLA patients treated with drainage also had deranged (>12 × 09/L or <4×109/L) white blood cells (71.7% vs 57.0%,P=0.018) and elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase(GGT) levels (89.1% vs 76.7%, P=0.014) compared to CNPLA patients treated with antibiotic alone. Mortality was lower in patients treated with drainage but not significant (8.7% vs 16.9%, P=0.069) (Table 4). The multivariate analysis showed that old age, absence of fever,elevated blood urea and coagulopathy as evidenced by elevated international normalized ratio (INR) predicted mortality in CNPLA patients (Table 5).

    Table 4. Demographic, clinical, radiological profile and outcomes of CNPLA patients treated with and without percutaneous drainage

    Discussion

    CNPLA is common but poorly studied and under reported. In this study involving 264 patients with CNPLA,we are the first to demonstrate that empirical treatment of CNPLA according to KPPLA is an acceptable clinical practice. This study also confirms that CNPLA patients with percutaneous drainage have better outcomes com-pared to those treated with antibiotics alone. This is the first study to report variables that predict mortality in CNPLA patients by performing a multivariate analysis on a large population.

    Table 5. Univariate and multivariate analysis of CNPLA patients for mortality

    Antibiotic treatment is a minimum universal requirement of all PLA patients. Ideally antibiotic therapy should be targeted to the culprit microorganism. In PLA patients, blood culture is the prime source for microbial identification. Chemaly et al[16]have found that the sensitivities of the blood cultures for any Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli present in PLA were 30% and 39% respectively, which means that PLA pathogens are usually underrepresented in blood cultures. Hence alternative means of microbial identification are important. Percutaneous aspiration or drainage provides pus which serves dual purpose of microbial isolation and therapeutic abscess drainage. Patients who have PLA aspiration or drainage will have pus available for bacteriology testing and hence will have opportunity of microbial isolation and targeted therapy. In our previous experience of managing 741 patients with PLA, only 60.1% (220/366)had positive pus cultures.[17]This is likely because antibiotics are almost always prescribed prior to drainage. Recently, advanced microbial detection techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been employed not only to enhance the diagnostic yield but also to facilitate early bacteriological diagnosis.[18]Microorganism detection rate of PCR along with routine culture meth-ods was significantly better compared to each modality alone.[18]Higher incidence of CNPLA in patients treated without percutaneous drainage is confirmed in our study. Also, in clinical practice, more sick patients are managed aggressively with repeated testing for bacteriology. This can enhance the bacterial yield in such patients. This is confirmed in our experience where more sick patients belong to KPPLA group. It is our routine practice to treat CNPLA patients empirically according to the treatment of the commonest pathogen i.e. Klebsiella pneumoniae. It is challenging that some patients may fail to respond to treatment, especially in the absence of bacteriology results. This could increase treatment failures and adverse outcomes in CNPLA patients. It is hence important to evaluate if local practice of empirical treatment of CNPLA patients according to KPPLA algorithm is acceptable. Fig. 2 shows the dilemma associated with CNPLA.

    Fig. 2. Dilemma of culture negative pyogenic liver abscess.

    CNPLA patients universally receive empirical antibiotics and selectively receive percutaneous aspiration/ drainage. Khan et al[14]have reported that predictive factors for aspiration of liver abscess included age ≥55 years,size of abscess ≥5 cm, involvement of both lobes of the liver, and duration of symptoms ≥7 days. Considerable success rate of needle aspiration of PLA, even in multiple abscesses, was reported in different series.[19]However,up to 40% of PLA patients require repeated aspiration sessions.[20]Percutaneous drainage is a safe intervention which is tolerated well by patients and thick pus can be drained more efficiently.[21,22]We do not perform percutaneous aspiration but offer percutaneous drainage in selected patients based on abscess size, sepsis severity,presence of gas in abscess cavity and failure of antibiotic treatment. A 4-cm size cut-off is widely recommended for acute colonic diverticular abscess and recently a new classification system is proposed based on this size criterion.[23]We have previously published 4 cm cut-off for consideration of percutaneous drainage of PLA.[24]Our results showed that KPPLA patients present with severe sepsis and larger abscess size compared to CNPLA patients. However due to retrospective nature of our study,the cause and effect relationship cannot be established as it is possible that more sick patients underwent aggressive management with repeated tests for bacteriology increasing the microbial isolation. Also patients with larger abscess size underwent more frequent percutaneous drainage providing additional source of microbial isolation and increasing yield. We do not consider large size as an indication of surgery and have reported that percutaneous drainage is safe and sufficient even in ≥10 cm PLA.[25]In our study, almost twice the number of patients received percutaneous drainage in the KPPLA group. Despite the lower proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous drainage in CNPLA group,the overall mortality was similar to KPPLA group. In a subgroup of patients treated with antibiotic alone, there was no difference in mortality among the two groups. Similarly in a subgroup of patients treated with drainage, there was no difference in mortality among the two groups either. However a subgroup analysis of CNPLA patients demonstrated that, in patients treated with antibiotics alone, mortality was higher compared to CNPLA patients treated with drainage. This may suggest a more liberal policy of drainage for therapeutic efficacy rather than simple aspiration for improving the microbial yield. Moreover, these results also suggest that a retroactive strategy of percutaneous drainage in cases of failure of antibiotic treatment could be a missed opportunity to improve outcomes by early drainage. Some reports show that Klebsiella pneumoniae is more likely to appear as single abscess[26]and uni-lobular involvements[27]than non-Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess, but this was not confirmed in our study and hence the outcomes are not determined by number and focality of PLA location. Prospective study is required to confirm these findings.

    KPPLA is reported to have a mortality rate of 4%-12%[4-7]and there is limited data for CNPLA. Khan et al[14]reported 2.3% mortality rate in a series of 966 patients including 661 (68%) of patients with amoebic etiology. In our series, the overall mortality rate was 11.0% and 14.0% for KPPLA and CNPLA groups, respectively. Khan's study predominantly included young patients (71% were <55 years), only 17.5% incidence of diabetes and none patient with PLA having cholangitis. Advanced age, presence of sepsis, underlying malignancy,poor physiological state and co-morbidities, are predictors of mortality in PLA.[2,11,28-30]In our study, various factors had been analyzed to reveal the risk of mortality for patients with CNPLA. Multivariate analysis revealedold age, fever, coagulopathy and elevated urea predict mortality in CNPLA patients. These results emphasize the fact that elderly patients who are unable to mount a febrile response to sepsis are vulnerable and high index of suspicion with prompt diagnosis and management are recommended. Elevated urea has been shown to be a predictor of poor outcomes including mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis, acute cholecystitis and perforated peptic ulcer.[31-33]Blood urea nitrogen is a surrogate marker of intravascular volume status and provides valuable feedback with regards to fluid resuscitation. Coagulopthy is a marker of organ dysfunction in severe sepsis and has been shown to be associated with mortality in PLA.[34]It is possible that percutaneous drainage is delayed until the coagulopathy is artificially corrected. In a study of 103 elderly patients with acute cholecystitis,we have shown that early percutaneous cholecystostomy improves outcomes.[35]While this large single institution study provides novel information on under reported and poorly studied disease of CNPLA, it is limited by retrospective nature.

    In conclusion, KPPLA and CNPLA have several demographic and clinical differences. CNPLA patients are less likely to present with severe sepsis and renal dysfunction. CNPLA patients are also more likely to have a smaller abscess size which is less likely to be drained. There is an increased mortality in CNPLA patients who did not receive percutaneous drainage. The overall outcomes of CNPLA patients are equivalent to KPPLA patients and hence it is justified to treat CNPLA patients with empirical antibiotics targeted to Klebsiella pneumoniae.

    Contributors: SVG proposed the study. WQ and CCLK performed the research and wrote the first draft. WQ collected and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. SVG and WQ contributed equally to this study. SVG is the guarantor.

    Funding: None.

    Ethical approval: This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Tan Tock Seng Hospital.

    Competing interest: No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    1 Alvarez Pérez JA, González JJ, Baldonedo RF, Sanz L, Carre?o G, Junco A, et al. Clinical course, treatment, and multivariate analysis of risk factors for pyogenic liver abscess. Am J Surg 2001;181:177-186.

    2 Lee KT, Wong SR, Sheen PC. Pyogenic liver abscess: an audit of 10 years' experience and analysis of risk factors. Dig Surg 2001;18:459-466.

    3 Ruiz-Hernández JJ, León-Mazorra M, Conde-Martel A, Marchena-Gómez J, Hemmersbach-Miller M, Betancor-León P. Pyogenic liver abscesses: mortality-related factors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;19:853-858.

    4 Cerwenka H. Pyogenic liver abscess: differences in etiology and treatment in Southeast Asia and Central Europe. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:2458-2462.

    5 Pang TC, Fung T, Samra J, Hugh TJ, Smith RC. Pyogenic liver abscess: an audit of 10 years' experience. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1622-1630.

    6 Chan DS, Archuleta S, Llorin RM, Lye DC, Fisher D. Standardized outpatient management of Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscesses. Int J Infect Dis 2013;17:e185-188.

    7 Lederman ER, Crum NF. Pyogenic liver abscess with a focus on Klebsiella pneumoniae as a primary pathogen: an emerging disease with unique clinical characteristics. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:322-331.

    8 Liao CH, Huang YT, Chang CY, Hsu HS, Hsueh PR. Capsular serotypes and multilocus sequence types of bacteremic Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates associated with different types of infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014;33:365-369.

    9 Orosz E, Perkátai K, Kapusinszky B, Farkas A, Kucsera I. Realtime PCR assay for rapid qualitative and quantitative detection of Entamoeba histolytica. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2012;59:451-460.

    10 Berg GM, Vasquez DG, Hale LS, Nyberg SM, Moran DA. Evaluation of process variations in noncompliance in the implementation of evidence-based sepsis care. J Healthc Qual 2013;35:60-69.

    11 Meddings L, Myers RP, Hubbard J, Shaheen AA, Laupland KB,Dixon E, et al. A population-based study of pyogenic liver abscesses in the United States: incidence, mortality, and temporal trends. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:117-124.

    12 Zibari GB, Maguire S, Aultman DF, McMillan RW, McDonald JC. Pyogenic liver abscess. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2000;1:15-21.

    13 Mangukiya DO, Darshan JR, Kanani VK, Gupta ST. A prospective series case study of pyogenic liver abscess: recent trands in etiology and management. Indian J Surg 2012;74:385-390.

    14 Khan R, Hamid S, Abid S, Jafri W, Abbas Z, Islam M, et al. Predictive factors for early aspiration in liver abscess. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:2089-2093.

    15 Cheng HP, Siu LK, Chang FY. Extended-spectrum cephalosporin compared to cefazolin for treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae-caused liver abscess. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:2088-2092.

    16 Chemaly RF, Hall GS, Keys TF, Procop GW. Microbiology of liver abscesses and the predictive value of abscess gram stain and associated blood cultures. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;46:245-248.

    17 Lo JZ, Leow JJ, Ng PL, Lee HQ, Mohd Noor NA, Low JK, et al. Predictors of therapy failure in a series of 741 adult pyogenic liver abscesses. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015;22:156-165.

    18 Pletz MW, Wellinghausen N, Welte T. Will polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics improve outcome in septic patients? A clinical view. Intensive Care Med 2011;37:1069-1076.

    19 Giorgio A, de Stefano G, Di Sarno A, Liorre G, Ferraioli G. Percutaneous needle aspiration of multiple pyogenic abscesses of the liver: 13-year single-center experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1585-1590.

    20 Zerem E, Hadzic A. Sonographically guided percutaneous catheter drainage versus needle aspiration in the managementof pyogenic liver abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:138-142.

    21 Liao WI, Tsai SH, Yu CY, Huang GS, Lin YY, Hsu CW, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess treated by percutaneous catheter drainage: MDCT measurement for treatment outcome. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:609-615.

    22 Yu SC, Ho SS, Lau WY, Yeung DT, Yuen EH, Lee PS, et al. Treatment of pyogenic liver abscess: prospective randomized comparison of catheter drainage and needle aspiration. Hepatology 2004;39:932-938.

    23 Sartelli M, Moore FA, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Coccolini F,Griffiths EA, et al. A proposal for a CT driven classification of left colon acute diverticulitis. World J Emerg Surg 2015;10:3.

    24 Shelat VG, Chia CL, Yeo CS, Qiao W, Woon W, Junnarkar SP. Pyogenic liver abscess: does Escherichia coli cause more adverse outcomes than Klebsiella pneumoniae? World J Surg 2015;39:2535-2542.

    25 Ahmed S, Chia CL, Junnarkar SP, Woon W, Shelat VG. Percutaneous drainage for giant pyogenic liver abscess--is it safe and sufficient? Am J Surg 2016;211:95-101.

    26 Yang CC, Yen CH, Ho MW, Wang JH. Comparison of pyogenic liver abscess caused by non-Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2004;37:176-184.

    27 Alsaif HS, Venkatesh SK, Chan DS, Archuleta S. CT appearance of pyogenic liver abscesses caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Radiology 2011;260:129-138.

    28 Alkofer B, Dufay C, Parienti JJ, Lepennec V, Dargere S, Chiche L. Are pyogenic liver abscesses still a surgical concern? A Western experience. HPB Surg 2012;2012:316013.

    29 Chen SC, Huang CC, Tsai SJ, Yen CH, Lin DB, Wang PH, et al. Severity of disease as main predictor for mortality in patients with pyogenic liver abscess. Am J Surg 2009;198:164-172.

    30 Lok KH, Li KF, Li KK, Szeto ML. Pyogenic liver abscess:clinical profile, microbiological characteristics, and management in a Hong Kong hospital. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2008;41:483-490.

    31 Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Conwell DL, Banks PA. Early changes in blood urea nitrogen predict mortality in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2009;137:129-135.

    32 Ransohoff DF, Miller GL, Forsythe SB, Hermann RE. Outcome of acute cholecystitis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:829-832.

    33 Menekse E, Kocer B, Topcu R, Olmez A, Tez M, Kayaalp C. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. World J Emerg Surg 2015;10:7.

    34 Chu KM, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Wong J. Pyogenic liver abscess. An audit of experience over the past decade. Arch Surg 1996;131:148-152.

    35 Yeo CS, Tay VW, Low JK, Woon WW, Punamiya SJ, Shelat VG. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2016;23:65-73.

    Accepted after revision May 12, 2016

    Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value.

    —Albert Einstein

    December 2, 2105

    Author Affiliations: Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore (Shelat VG, Low JK and Woon WWL);Ministry of Health Holdings Pte Ltd., Singapore 099253, Singapore(Wang Q, Chia CLK and Wang Z)

    Vishal G Shelat, FRCS, FEBS, Consultant, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433,Singapore (Tel: +65-635-77807; Fax: +65-635-77809; Email: vgshelat@ gmail.com)

    ? 2016, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. All rights reserved.

    10.1016/S1499-3872(16)60127-3

    Published online August 25, 2016.

    性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| av在线老鸭窝| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 中国美女看黄片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 午夜免费鲁丝| av一本久久久久| bbb黄色大片| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 乱人伦中国视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久热在线av| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 中国美女看黄片| 免费观看人在逋| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 欧美人与善性xxx| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 99国产精品99久久久久| av在线播放精品| 搡老乐熟女国产| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 午夜激情av网站| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 少妇人妻 视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 色播在线永久视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 青草久久国产| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| avwww免费| 亚洲国产看品久久| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 成人影院久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品久久久久久电影网| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 操出白浆在线播放| bbb黄色大片| 操美女的视频在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 性少妇av在线| av片东京热男人的天堂| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| cao死你这个sao货| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 午夜av观看不卡| 制服诱惑二区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久9热在线精品视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 成人手机av| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 一级毛片电影观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 国产99久久九九免费精品| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| av在线老鸭窝| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久99一区二区三区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 男人操女人黄网站| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 曰老女人黄片| 99九九在线精品视频| 一级黄片播放器| 久久这里只有精品19| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 成人国语在线视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 中文字幕制服av| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 成人手机av| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| kizo精华| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品一二三| 99久久综合免费| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 不卡av一区二区三区| kizo精华| 97在线人人人人妻| xxx大片免费视频| 中国美女看黄片| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 一本综合久久免费| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 丁香六月天网| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 无限看片的www在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产成人欧美| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 大型av网站在线播放| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 日本五十路高清| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久热在线av| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久狼人影院| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产男女内射视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 视频区图区小说| 久久99一区二区三区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产精品免费视频内射| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日本五十路高清| 黄色 视频免费看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 国产在线免费精品| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产麻豆69| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久9热在线精品视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 久久香蕉激情| 在线观看日韩欧美| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 一区福利在线观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 日韩免费av在线播放| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产av又大| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 欧美黑人精品巨大| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 女警被强在线播放| 大香蕉久久成人网| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 看黄色毛片网站| 一本精品99久久精品77| 1024视频免费在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 日本成人三级电影网站| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产免费男女视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产av不卡久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久久久九九精品影院| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 色在线成人网| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 黄片小视频在线播放| 男人舔奶头视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 不卡一级毛片| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 黄色成人免费大全| 手机成人av网站| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产单亲对白刺激| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 91老司机精品| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 黄片播放在线免费| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 久久性视频一级片| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 九色国产91popny在线| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 99国产精品99久久久久| av电影中文网址| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 69av精品久久久久久| 两性夫妻黄色片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 免费看十八禁软件| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 午夜免费激情av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品,欧美在线| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久性视频一级片| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 美女午夜性视频免费| videosex国产| 久久久久九九精品影院| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产成人影院久久av| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产成人av教育| 99久久国产精品久久久| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 青草久久国产| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 女警被强在线播放| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 免费看十八禁软件| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 久久性视频一级片| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| av视频在线观看入口| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 又大又爽又粗| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 精品高清国产在线一区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久精品成人免费网站| 成人18禁在线播放| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| www.www免费av| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 一区二区三区精品91| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 熟女电影av网| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 曰老女人黄片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 在线免费观看的www视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 999精品在线视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 中国美女看黄片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 深夜精品福利| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲av美国av| 88av欧美| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久草成人影院| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 午夜福利高清视频| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产区一区二久久| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一a级毛片在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产三级在线视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| av在线播放免费不卡| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 久久香蕉国产精品| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 香蕉丝袜av| 青草久久国产| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 999久久久国产精品视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产成人欧美| 成在线人永久免费视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 色在线成人网| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 在线视频色国产色| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲片人在线观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| av福利片在线| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| xxxwww97欧美| 午夜两性在线视频| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 成年版毛片免费区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 美国免费a级毛片| 此物有八面人人有两片| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 一本精品99久久精品77| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 日本免费a在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看|