Philippine Experts Urge Direct Talks with China

?

Philippine Experts Urge Direct Talks with China

Philippine experts on June 13 urged incoming president Rodrigo Duterte to proceed with direct talks with China on the South China Sea immediately， saying the new administration need not wait for the decision of a tribunal to kick-start the talks.

Rod Kapunan， a columnist for the newspaper The Standard， said it may not be wise for the incoming Duterte administration to wait for a decision from a tribunal in The Hague which China will not recognize anyway.

“Once the court comes out with a decision，our position to reach a direct and peaceful settlement of our dispute with China would become more difficult，” Kapunan told Xinhua in an interview.

“China has always been open for direct and peaceful negotiations but the conditions will not be the same aTher the decision，” he said，warning that the decision might even force Beijing to stay away from the negotiating table.

“If you are going to negotiate directly and peacefully with China aTher the arbitration decision comes out， China will surely insist that there must be no reference to the court's decision，” Kapunan said.

In 2013， the Philippines initiated an arbitration case against China over the South China Sea. China， which has declined to take part in the process， has said it will not recognize the court's decision.

For the direct talks to take off， Kapunan said the Duterte administration must scrap its Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement（EDCA） signed by the Philippines and the United States in 2014.

The expert also said that this pact “l(fā)ocks the Philippines in a situation where we would be permanently girding for war with China” and adopt a foreign policy that unmistakably serves the interest of the US in Asia and the Pacific.

“The best solution is first to scrap the EDCA and second to start the direct talks，” said Kapunan， adding that EDCA stands in the way“l(fā)ike a wall” between the Philippines and China.

A crew member taking part in a fire drill on China's largest and most advanced patrol vessel， Haixun 01， on the South China Sea on April 4

“For as long as we have foreign military bases in our soil， the country can never formulate its own independent foreign policy，”Kapunan said.

“As a lawyer， Duterte could see the implication in allowing the re-installation of the US bases. Other than providing no time limit for the Americans' stay， the agreement gave the US the blanket authority to select the place and the number with a premium that our Senate would have to ratify it as mandated by our Constitution，” Kapunan added.

Indeed， Kapunan said， “The abrogation of EDCA is the easiest way （for the Duterte administration） to escape the dilemma.”

He said， “President Benigno Aquino III knew that by bringing our dispute with China to the PCA （the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague） would give the US the leverage to continue its provocative patrol in the South China Sea.”

By doing that， “the perception about the naval presence of the US in the South China Sea can never be doubted because the Philippines being strategically adjacent to China would forever seek the protective cover of the US. In short， all these could lead the country to a possible proxy war with China，” Kapunan said.

This explains why， Kapunan said， Duterte would have difficulty redrawing the foreign policy under his administration.

He further said， “A decision to disallow the US bases or to unilaterally drop the case could antagonize the US because that would explode its continued presence in the South China Sea redundant. Nobody would believe that its continued patrol in the area is to secure the freedom of navigation. Rather， the whole military infrastructure it built would be exposed as a facade to contain China.”

Indeed， retired diplomat Alberto Encomienda told Xinhua in another interview that the new Duterte administration should proceed with talks with China on the sea disputes.

“You don't have to wait for the resolution of the arbitration case before starting conversations. You don't have to finish that arbitration. Nobody even knows when that will be finished，” Encomienda said.

Assistant Foreign Secretary Charles Jose has repeatedly said that the Philippines will really have to go back to bilateral talks， though he pins hope on the arbitration court handing down a favorable decision.

In a television interview， Jose said， “we are now in the tail-end of the arbitration process.”

Duterte， who will be sworn into office on June 30， has said he would wait for the final decision of the court， but at the same time said that he will pursue bilateral talks with China if current efforts do not progress. He even said that he might explore possible joint exploration in the disputed South China Sea.

Duterte also said that the Philippines is not going to give up its rights to the Scarborough Shoal， or Huangyan Island.

But before 1997， the Philippines had never claimed sovereignty over Huangyan Island， and the international community had never raised any objection to China's sovereignty over the island as well.

Source： Xinhua News Agency