• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Inf uence of chelator and near-infrared dye labeling on biocharacteristics of dual-labeled trastuzumab-based imaging agents

    2016-07-28 08:38:25XuejuanWangMelissaAldrichZhiYangNinaZhouQingXieChenLiuEvaSevickMuracaKeyLaboratoryofCarcinogenesisandTranslationalResearchMinistryofEducationBeijingDepartmentofNuclearMedicinePekingUniversityCancerHospitalInstituteBeijing
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research 2016年3期

    Xuejuan Wang, Melissa B Aldrich, Zhi Yang, Nina Zhou, Qing Xie, Chen Liu, Eva Sevick-MuracaKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 004, China;Center for Molecular Imaging, the Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston TX 77030, USA

    ?

    Inf uence of chelator and near-infrared dye labeling on biocharacteristics of dual-labeled trastuzumab-based imaging agents

    Xuejuan Wang1, Melissa B Aldrich2, Zhi Yang1, Nina Zhou1, Qing Xie1, Chen Liu1, Eva Sevick-Muraca21Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China;2Center for Molecular Imaging, the Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston TX 77030, USA

    Correspondence to: Xuejuan Wang. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing),Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100142,China. Email: xuejuan_wang@hotmail.com.

    Abstract

    Objective: To investigate the effect of fluorescent dye labeling on the targeting capabilities of111In-(DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)m.

    Methods: Trastuzumab-based conjugates were synthesized and conjugated with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) at molar ratios of 1, 2, 3 and 5 and with a fluorescent dye (IRDye 800CW) at molar ratios of 1, 3 and 5. Immunoreactivity and internalization were assessed on SKBR-3 cells, overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. The stability in human serum and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was evaluated. The biodistribution of dual-labeled conjugates was compared with that of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab in a SKBR-3 xenograft model to evaluate the effect of dye-to-protein ratio.

    Results: All trastuzumab-based conjugates exhibited a high level of chemical and optical purity. Flow cytometry results showed that increasing dye-to-protein ratios were associated with decreased immunoreactivity. Stability studies revealed that the conjugate was stable in PBS, while in human serum,increased degradation and protein precipitation were observed with increasing dye-to-protein ratios. At 4 h, the percentages of internalization of dual-labeled conjugates normalized by dye-to-protein ratio (m)were 24.88%±2.10%, 19.99%±0.59%, and 17.47%±1.26% for “m” equal to 1, 3, and 5, respectively. A biodistribution study revealed a progressive decrease in tumor uptake with an increase in the dye-to-protein ratios. The liver, spleen and kidney showed a marked uptake with increased dye-to-protein ratios, particularly in the latter.

    Conclusions: With non-specific-site conjugation of the fluorescent dye with a protein based on imaging agent, the increase in dye-to-protein ratios negatively impacted the immunoreactivity and stability, indicating a reduced tumor uptake.

    Keywords:Influence; near infrared dye; trastuzumab; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; duallabeled

    Submitted Dec 29, 2015. Accepted for publication May 23, 2016.

    View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.03.11

    Introduction

    Precision medicine, selecting appropriate and optimal therapies based on the context of a patient's genetic content or other molecular analysis, has become increasingly important in the treatment strategies of cancer (1). Nuclear medicine and optical f uorescence imaging techniques provide powerful non-invasive imaging capability for the assessment of biomarker overexpression in tumor cells, including tissues that may not be amenable to detect with conventional imaging modalities (2,3). However, the low spatial resolution at the cellular level limits the ability of nuclear medicine techniques to detect microscopic lesions. Furthermore, low penetration depth is a key limitation of optical imaging modalities (4). The use of dual-modality imaging probes confers an unprecedented leverage by harnessing the complementary advantages and outweighing the respective limitations of these techniques (5,6).

    Trastuzumab is a humanized anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody that is approved for the treatment of breast cancer (7,8). HER2 overexpression,reported in 25%—30% of all breast cancers, is associated with a poor prognosis and aggressive tumor attributes (9). The reported conservation and upregulation of HER2 make trastuzumab a promising therapeutic modality for targeting metastatic disease in patients with HER2(+) breast cancer (10).

    Recent studies have evaluated dual-labeling of trastuzumab for nuclear imaging using positron emission tomography (PET)or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)radionuclides as well as for near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging at excitation wave lengths >750 nm (11-13). A comparison of the nuclear and NIR fluorescence images of xenografts following the administration of dual-labeled peptide and antibody showed comparable target-to-background ratios (indicative of comparable sensitivities and stable dual-labeling)but a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of NIR fluorescence,which is consistent with the increased photon count rates possible with fluorescence. However, the synthetic complexity and the effect of the fluorescent dye on the biodistribution of the imaging agent are two major challenges to the use of dualmodality imaging (14).

    Here, we describe a method for dual-labeling of an antibody with a NIR fluorophore, IRDye 800CW, and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) for the chelation of111In. The stearic effect of conjugation of a biomodal imaging tag to trastuzumab was investigated by altering the molar ratios of chelator/near-infrared dye to protein. The stability, binding affinity and targeting property of the dual-labeled imaging agent were assessed both in vitro and in vivo.

    Materials and methods

    Materials

    Trastuzumab (HerceptinTM, Genentech South, CA) was purchased from clinical pharmacy for research purposes. IRDye 800CW was purchased from LI-COR Bioscience (Lincoln,NE) and p-SCN-Bn-DTPA (Dallas, TX).111InCl3was obtained from Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences (Waltham, MA).

    Cell culture

    Human breast cancer SKBR-3 cells with a stable overexpression of HER2 (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (DMEM)/F-12 (Invitrogen) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) in a humidif ed incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

    Preparation of trastuzumab-based conjugate

    Conjugation of DTPA to trastuzumab

    Trastuzumab was dissolved in 50 mmol/L NaHCO3(pH 8.0) at a concentration of 20 mg/mL and incubated with p-SCN-Bn-DTPA at room temperature (RT) for 1 h in varying DTPA-to-trastuzumab molar ratios (1:1 to 10:1). The final molar ratio of DTPA to protein, “n”, was determined as described by Hnatowich et al. (15). Unbound DTPA was removed using ultrafiltration (molecular weight cut-off 50 kD, Millipore). Final protein concentrations were determined by ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nm.

    Conjugation of IRDye 800CW to DTPA-trastuzumab

    (DTPA)2-trastuzumab was conjugated with IRDye 800CW in varying IRDye 800CW-to-antibody molar ratios of 1:1 to 10:1 as per the instructions provided by LI-COR Biosciences. The number of final dye molecules per protein molecule (dye-toprotein ratio, “m”) and protein concentration were calculated by measuring absorbance with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter) at 280 nm and 780 nm (11).

    Assessment of purity of (DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)m

    Aliquots of 0.1—0.2 ng conjugates mixed with Laemmli sample buffer (without beta-mercaptoethanol) were loaded onto 4%—12% Tris-glycine acrylamide gels (Bio-Rad). Gels were run until the bromophenol blue reached approximately 10 mm from the bottom of gels, and subsequently imaged using a LICOR Odyssey infrared imaging system, and 16-bit tif files were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, MD). The identification of the region of interest (ROI) of a pre-defined pixel size foreach gel band and quantif cation of f uorescent intensity levels were performed.

    Flow cytometry

    In brief, 0.3×106SKBR-3 cells were incubated in 100 μL of culture medium that contained 5 μg of trastuzumab conjugate. After 30 min on ice, the cells were washed once with 4 mL of medium and incubated for an additional 30 min with f uorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse anti-human IgG antibody (BD Bioscience) on ice. After a final wash, the cells were resuspended in 2.5 μg/mL of 7-amino-actinomycin D solution. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was assessed with flow cytometry (FACS-Calibur, Becton Dickinson). As a control for specific binding, trastuzumab was tested at equivalent molar concentrations to provide the measurement of MFIpositive, whereas cells treated with phosphate-buf ered saline (PBS) served as a negative control for the measurement of MFInegative. The percentage of immunoreactivity was calculated as follows: [(MFIsample—MFInegative)/(MFIpositive—MFInegative)]×100%.111In labeling and serum stability

    The111In labeling procedure was similar to that described by Lub-de Hooge et al. (16). In brief,111InCl3(0.1 mol/L sodium acetate, pH 7.0) was incubated with conjugate solution for 30 min at RT; 20 mmol/L DTPA in 0.1 mol/L sodium acetate was added to quench free111In. The resulting111In-DTPA was removed by ultrafiltration.111In radiolabeling yields were monitored by silica gel instant thin-layer chromatography (SGITLC, EMD Chemicals) using a Bioscan System 200 Imaging Scanner. The radiolabeling efficiency was calculated using WinScan software.

    Stability analysis was performed by adding 1 mCi111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)mto 1 mL of PBS or human serum (Millipore). The mixtures were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Aliquots at each time point were run on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) system described above. The radiochemical and fluorescent purity were analyzed using a Bioscan System 200 Imaging Scanner and a LI-COR Odyssey infrared imaging system, respectively.

    Lindmo assay

    The binding affinity of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)mand111In-(DTPA)2-transtuzumab was compared via the Lindmo assay as described previously (11). In brief, a fixed amount of trastuzumab-based conjugate (5 pmol) was added to increasing concentrations of SKBR-3 cells (from 0.1×106to 2×106in 0.5 mL) and incubated for 1 h. To determine nonspecific cell binding, aliquots of cells were incubated with radiolabeled conjugates in the presence of 0.5 μmol unlabeled trastuzumab. The cell pellets were measured using a gamma counter. Specific binding was calculated as the ratio of the cell bound to the total radioactivity applied minus nonspecific binding. The immunoreactive fraction was calculated using OriginLab Microcal software.

    Internalization studies

    In brief, approximately 2.5 pmol of trastuzumab-based conjugate was added to pretreated SKBR-3 cells with an overexpression of HER2 and incubated (in triplicate) for 4h and 24 h at 37 °C. A 1,000-fold excess of each blocking agent was used to determine nonspecific internalization. At each time point, the internalization was stopped by the removal of the medium followed by washing the cells with ice-cold 0.01 mol/L PBS (pH 7.4). The cells were then treated for 5 min (three times) with ice-cold glycine buffer (0.05 mol/L glycine solution, and pH adjusted to 2.8 with 1 mol/L HCl) to distinguish between cell surface-bound (acidreleasable) and internalized (acid-resistant) radiolabeled antibodies. The internalized fluorescence intensity was measured using Odyssey infrared imaging system and the results were plotted with ImageJ software.

    In vivo biodistribution of111In labeled trastuzumab-based conjugates

    All protocols followed for animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Female nude BALB/c (nu/nu) mice (age, 4—5 weeks) were subcutaneously implanted with 10 million SKBR-3 cells, and the tumor was allowed to grow to a size of approximately 5 mm diameter.

    The biodistribution profiles of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)2,111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3, and111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5were compared to that of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab. Groups of 3—4 athymic female nude mice bearing SKBR-3 cell tumors were used for all experiments. The mice were administered 20 μg of111In-labeled conjugates (approximately 1.48 mBq) in 0.1 mL of 0.9% NaCl via the lateral tail vein. For the determination of nonspecific uptake in the tumor tissue, another group of 3 mice were preinjected with 1 mg of trastuzumab dissolved in 0.1 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution, 1 h prior to the administration of the imaging agent. At 48 h after the administration of the imaging agent,mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (2.5%, 0.4 L/min oxygen) and subsequently euthanized using carbon dioxide. The organs of interest were collected, excess blood was rinsed of , weighed, and assessed on a gamma-counter together with injection standards. The percentage of injected per gram (%ID/ g) was calculated for each tissue. The tumor-to-tissue ratios were also determined.

    Data analysis

    All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software. The data are expressed as±s. Between-group differences were evaluated using Student's t test, and P<0.05 was considered statistically signif cant.

    Results

    Preparation of dual-labeled imaging conjugate

    A series of (DTPA)n-trastuzumab and (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)mwere successfully prepared as described in this section. The chelator-to-trastuzumab ratios used for (DTPA)n-trastuzumab were 1.03, 2.12, 3.05 and 5.18; the dyeto-protein ratios used for (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)mwere 1.06, 3.03 and 4.71.

    Purity of (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)m

    The relative amount of unconjugated IRDye 800CW was determined via SDS-PAGE and fluorescence imaging system. The location of free IRDye 800CW in the gel (approximately 1 kD)was similar to that of bromophenol blue (approximately 0.5 kD). The purity of (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)1, (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3and (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5is presented in Figure 1, no free dye band was observed in the purified conjugates, and <3% of the fluorescent signal was associated with larger molecules (>250 kD).

    Radiolabeling and stability

    The radiolabeling yield of trastuzumab-based radiotracers ranged between 85% and 100% at a specific activity of approximately 370—740 mBq per mg protein as demonstrated by SG-ITLC analysis. After the purification of radiotracers, no free radioactive band was detected on gel scanning with Bioscan System (Figure 2), and a main radioactive band (approximately 150 kD) was displayed for each radiolabeled trastuzumab-based conjugate.

    Figure 1 (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)mwith varying dye to protein ratios for purified conjugates. Fluorescence intensity of SDS-PAGE gels was imaged using a LI-COR Odyssey infrared imaging system. The gel to the left is a molecular weight ladder in kD. After purification, the band for each dual-labeled conjugate was found in approximately 145 kD. No free dye bands are observed in the purified conjugates. M, protein molecular weight ladder.

    Figure 2 Radioactive purity of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)mwith varying dye to protein ratios. The gel to the left represents the molecular weight ladder in kD. The band for each dual-labeled conjugate was found in approximately 145 kD. No radioactive band was found in the f nal dual-labeled conjugates. M,protein molecular weight ladder.

    The optical stability of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)min PBS and human serum was demonstrated using a LICOR Odyssey near-infrared imaging system. The IRDye 800signal remained constant in PBS after 24 h but not in human serum (Figure 3). After 24 h, large proteins (>150 kD) were found on the gel for all three conjugates (Figure 3). Similar results were obtained on scanning of SDS-PAGE gels with the Bioscan system (Figure 4). The extra radioactive peak, which corresponded to the higher molecular weight proteins, can be observed in the histograms of dual-labeled conjugates. The larger the dye-to-protein ratio, the greater the amount of >150 kD proteins were found in the conjugate solution.

    Immunoreactivity assay

    The FACS histogram for SKBR-3 cells incubated with (DTPA)1-trastuzumab, (DTPA)2-trastuzumab, (DTPA)3-trastuzumab and (DTPA)5-trastuzumab at the same concentration was comparable to that of trastuzumab, which suggests that the DTPA-to-trastuzumab ratios of 1 to 5 had minimal ef ect on immunoreactivity (Figure 5).

    Figure 3 SDS-PAGE/Odysse analysis of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)m, m=1, 3 and 5, at 24 h after incubation in PBS (A—C) and human serum (D—F) at 37 °C. The ladder on the right represents the molecular weight. M, protein molecular weight ladder; (A, D)111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)1; (B, E)111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3; (C, F)111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5.

    Figure 4 Representative histograms indicating radioactivity of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)mat different m values (0, 1, 3 and 5),after incubation with human serum at 37 °C for 24 h. The larger the dye-to-protein ratio, the greater the amount of >150 kD proteins that were found in the conjugate solution. (A)111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)1; (B)111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3; (C)111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5.

    Figure 5 FACS histogram of trastuzumab-based conjugates showing counts vs. the mean fluorescent intensity using anti-human IgG as a secondary antibody. (A) The histogram to the left represents SKBR-3 cells incubated without trastuzumab. The overlaying peaks represent FACS histograms of SKBR-3 cells incubated with 5 μg of trastuzumab (DTPA)n-trastuzumab with n=1, 2, 3, and 5; (B) Cytofluorimetric comparison of cultured SKBR-3 cells without trastuzumab and after treatment with 5 μg of (DTPA)2-trastuzumab, (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)1, (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3and (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5.

    However, the FACS histogram of (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)1showed a slight reduction in f uorescent intensity,which indicates reduced immunoreactivity as compared to that of (DTPA)2-trastuzumab. In contrast, the immunoreactivity of (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5was moderately impaired, as evidenced in the clear shift of the histogram toward the negative control population of SKBR-3 cells. The immunoreactivity of (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3was in between those of the other two conjugates. Immunoreactive fractions of trastuzumab conjugates corresponding to “m”values of 0, 1, 3 and 5 were 99.74%±4.56%, 83.14%±1.43%,63.96%±4.00% and 57.71%±4.41%, respectively.

    The Lindmo assay was performed to determine the immunoreactivity fraction of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)m. A linear relationship between TA/SB and 1/cells was established. The average fraction of immunoreactivity of the radiolabeled conjugates corresponding to “m” values of 0, 1,3 and 5 was 90.72%±3.77%, 80.42%±2.28%, 60.74%±5.41% and 50.71%±1.45%, respectively.

    Internalization study

    Figure 6 illustrates the specific internalization of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)minto SKBR-3 cells, the NIR fluorescence signals associated with internalized IRDye 800 were detected on 12-well plates. No f uorescence was observed in the case of SKBR-3 cells pretreated with111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab. The three-dimensional surface plot showed that the total fluorescence intensity of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5was higher than that of the other two. However,the percentages of internalization corresponding to “m” values of 1, 3 and 5 after the normalization of the total fluorescence intensities of dual-labeled conjugates by the dye-to-protein ratio were 24.88%±2.10%, 19.99%±0.59% and 17.47%±1.26% at 4 h, respectively.

    The intensity of internalized radioactivity corresponding to “m” values of 0, 1, 3 and 5 was comparable to the results presented above, i.e., 26.34%±0.03%, 23.87%±0.02%,21.07%±0.01% and 20.45%±0.01% at 4 h, respectively.

    Biodistribution study

    The biodistribution of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)min SKBR-3 tumor-bearing nude mice was assessed at 48 h, and the data are summarized in Table 1 as %ID/g tissue. Variable tumor uptake was observed with respect to the different “m” values. Tumor accumulation of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5(6.77±1.73 %ID/g) was much less than that of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab (15.76±2.61 %ID/g) and also less than the other two conjugates with lower “m” values,i.e., 9.96±1.05 %ID/g for111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3and 8.84±1.85 %ID/g for111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab (IRDye 800)2, respectively. The uptake was specific to HER2(+)tumors, which was demonstrated by the lack of tumor retention in mice pre-injected with unlabeled trastuzumab.

    Figure 6 Internalization of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)m, m=1, 3 and 5, into SKBR-3 cells after incubation for 4 h at 37 °C. (A) SKBR-3 cells in wells were scanned with LI-COR Odyssey near-infrared imaging system; (B) Fluorescence intensity surface plot of SKBR-3 cells with radioconjugate uptake at 4 h.

    Table 1 Biodistribution of111In-labeled trastuzumab-based agents in SKBR-3 tumor-bearing nude mice at 48 h after injection

    The excretion of dual-labeled conjugates was largely via the kidney and liver, particularly the former. The renal uptake of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5was 28.37±4.55 %ID/g, which is much higher than that of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab (5.43±2.42 %ID/g), and the liver uptake of both conjugates was comparable (approximately 8 %ID/g at 48 h post-injection).

    Discussion

    Dual-labeling of targeting moieties with nuclear andfluorescent entities provides a non-invasive modality for the localization of lesions with the use of highly penetrative, shortlived radionuclides and then uses the fluorescence signals from optical molecular probes allowing for disease monitoring over prolonged periods of time to guide surgical resection (5,13). Furthermore, the use of dual-labeled targeting tracer effectively avoids issues related to the use of agents with differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that may otherwise affect image fusion and its interpretation (17). However, the development of dual-labeled targeting pharmaceuticals is a multistep and technically more challenging technique that requires complex design considerations such as careful selection of nuclear and optical tracers to minimize physical-chemical interference between various molecular components. Thus, the modification of the moiety to the maximum extent possibly whilst ensuring that the modif cation does not compromise bioactivity is of considerable interest (15,18). In our studies, we have used trastuzumab as a targeting moiety that is covalently linked to IRDye 800CW, a NIR fluorescent dye, and DTPA, a chelator of111In, to develop a dual-labeled imaging agent to trace HER-positive primary breast lesions and metastases.

    Previous studies have demonstrated dimer and polymer formation with an increase in the DTPA anhydride to antibody ratio, which resulted in a decreased biological affinity of the conjugate relative to the unlabeled antibody (15). However, Forrer et al. found no significant difference in the immunoreactivity between (DOTA)4-rituximab immunoconjugate and a commercially available rituximab on lymphoma cell line LVB1 (19). Our FACS results showed no signif cant dif erence in immunoreactivity between trastuzumab and the singly labeled DTPA conjugates up to a chelator-toprotein ratio of 5:1. Furthermore, a 1:1 molar ratio of DTPA to protein was not suf cient for prompt labeling with the needed amount of111In (e.g., approximately 370-740 mBq per mg of antibody). Based on radiolabeling yields, specific radioactivity,solubility and immunoreactivity, we employed a molar DTPA-to-trastuzumab coupling ratio of 2:1 in this study.

    As with radionuclide conjugation, dye-to-protein ratio is also liable to impact in vivo signal levels. A low dye-to-antibody ratio will reduce f uorescence intensity, while over-conjugation on non-specific sites of the protein may cause self-quenching of the dye as well as the loss of biological activity. Gee et al. synthesized (Cy5.5)m-trastuzumab with molar ratios of the dye to protein ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 (20). A molecular dye to antibody ratio of 1.1 was found to be optimal based on the binding affinity. The use of higher dye-to-antibody ratios was found to decrease immunoreactivity, while a probe containing a lower dye-to-antibody ratio (0.5) was associated with reduced f uorescence intensity.

    We synthesized (DTPA)2-trastuzumab, (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)1, (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)3and (DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5to investigate the influence of dye-to-protein ratios on the affinity, stability and the in vivo targeting potential for near-infrared fluorescence imaging. The binding affinity of the immunoconjugates was tested in HER2-overexpressing SKBR-3 tumor cells and immunoreactivity assessed using FACS. The representative histogram shows a decrease in MFI corresponding to an increase in the dye-to-protein ratios. The successive percentage of immunoreactivity fell from 100% (without any dye on the antibody) to 83%, at a molar dye-toprotein ratio of 1:1, which demonstrates a high af nity of the duallabeled conjugate for binding to HER2 on breast cancer cells. At molar dye-to-protein ratios of 5:1, a 42% loss of immunoreactivity was observed. Furthermore, the formation of large proteins (>150 kD) was observed with all three dual-labeled conjugates after incubation with human serum for 24 h. The larger the dye-toprotein ratio, the greater the amount of >150 kD proteins found in the conjugate solution.

    To the best of our knowledge, the relationship between the dye-to-protein ratio and specific binding affinity has only been investigated in vitro, because quantitative measurement of tissue fluorescence is liable to be affected by variability in tissue absorption properties and scattering of f uorescent signals. Li et al. compared the biodistribution of111In-labeled c (KRGDf) peptide and dual-labeled c (KRGDf) peptide, both of which targeted ανβ3 integrin in melanoma xenografts, with a 1:1 molar ratio of chelator and f uorophore, using tissue radioactivity measurements (21). We evaluated the relationship of the dye-to-protein ratio with specif c targeting using nuclear medicine techniques.

    As compared to the biodistribution of111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab, the percentage of HER2(+) tumor accumulation also decreased significantly (P<0.05) with increasing dyeto-protein molar ratios, which is consistent with our in vitro findings. Tumor uptake decreased from 15.76±2.61 %ID/g for111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab to 6.77±1.73 %ID/g for111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5, which represents an approximate 57% reduction. Furthermore, the renal uptake increased from 5.43±2.42 %ID/g for111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab to 28.37±4.55 %ID/g for111In-(DTPA)2-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800)5, which is partly attributable to the decreased conjugate stability.

    Conclusions

    Dual-labeled trastuzumab conjugates were successfully coupledwith DTPA and IRDye 800CW. Increasing dye-to-protein ratios decreased immunoreactivity and serum stability, and lowered tumor accumulation.

    Acknowledgements

    Funding: This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7132037) and the National Cancer Institute Network for Translational Research U54 CA136404-01.

    Footnote

    Conf icts of Interest: The authors have no conf icts of interest to declare.

    References

    1. Lu YF, Goldstein DB, Angrist M, et al. Personalized medicine and human genetic diversity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2014;4:a008581.

    2. Maeda A, Bu J, Chen J, et al. Dual in vivo photoacoustic and fluorescence imaging of HER2 expression in breast tumors for diagnosis, margin assessment, and surgical guidance. Mol Imaging 2014;13.

    3. Sevick-Muraca EM, Rasmussen JC. Molecular imaging with optics: primer and case for near-infrared f uorescence techniques in personalized medicine. J Biomed Opt 2008;13:041303.

    4. Zanzonico P. Principles of nuclear medicine imaging: planar, SPECT, PET, multi-modality, and autoradiography systems. Radiat Res 2012;177:349-64.

    5. Houston JP, Ke S, Wang W, et al. Quality analysis of in vivo near-infrared fluorescence and conventional gamma images acquired using a dual-labeled tumor-targeting probe. J Biomed Opt 2005;10:054010.

    6. Puthenveetil S, Musto S, Loganzo F, et al. Development of solid-phase site-specific conjugation and its application toward generation of dual labeled antibody and fab drug conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 2016;27:1030-9.

    7. Carter P, Presta L, Gorman CM, et al. Humanization of an anti-p185HER2 antibody for human cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:4285-9.

    8. Hudis CA. Trastuzumab--mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2007;357:39-51.

    9. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science 1989;244:707-12.

    10. Ignatov T, Eggemann H, Burger E, et al. Hormone receptor status does not alter the effect of trastuzumab in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2016 Mar 23. pii:ERC-16-0084. [Epub ahead of print]

    11. Wang X, Aldrich MB, Marshall MV, et al. Preclinical characterization and validation of a dual-labeled trastuzumab-based imaging agent for diagnosing breast cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2015;27:74-82.

    12. Sampath L, Kwon S, Hall MA, et al. Detection of cancer metastases with a dual-labeled near-infrared/positron emission tomography imaging agent. Transl Oncol 2010;3:307-217.

    13. Sampath L, Kwon S, Ke S, et al. Dual-labeled trastuzumabbased imaging agent for the detection of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1501-10.

    14. Paulus A, Desai P, Carney B, et al. Development of a clickable bimodal fluorescent/PET probe for in vivo imaging. EJNMMI Res 2015;5:120.

    15. Hnatowich DJ, Childs RL, Lanteigne D, et al. The preparation of DTPA-coupled antibodies radiolabeled with metallic radionuclides: an improved method. J Immunol Methods 1983;65:147-57.

    16. Lub-de Hooge MN, Kosterink JG, Perik PJ, et al. Preclinical characterisation of111In-DTPA-trastuzumab. Br J Pharmacol 2004;143:99-106.

    17. Sun L, Ding J, Xing W, et al. Novel Strategy for Preparing dual-modality optical/PET imaging probes via photo-click chemistry. Bioconjug Chem 2016;27:1200-4.

    18. Schellenberger EA, Sosnovik D, Weissleder R, et al. Magneto/optical annexin V, a multimodal protein. Bioconjug Chem 2004;15:1062-7.

    19. Forrer F, Chen J, Fani M, et al. In vitro characterization of177Lu-radiolabelled chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and a preliminary dosimetry study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1443-52.

    20. Gee MS, Upadhyay R, Bergquist H, et al. Human breast cancer tumor models: molecular imaging of drug susceptibility and dosing during HER2/neu-targeted therapy. Radiology 2008;248:925-35.

    21. Li C, Wang W, Wu Q, et al. Dual optical and nuclear imaging in human melanoma xenografts using a single targeted imaging probe. Nucl Med Biol 2006;33:349-58.

    Cite this article as: Wang X, Aldrich M, Yang Z, Zhou N,Xie Q, Liu C, Sevick-Muraca E. Influence of chelator and near-infrared dye labeling on biocharacteristics of duallabeled trastuzumab-based imaging agents. Chin J Cancer Res 2016;28(3):362-369. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.03.11

    doi:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.03.11

    亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| h视频一区二区三区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 夫妻午夜视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 老熟女久久久| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲av男天堂| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日日啪夜夜爽| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日日啪夜夜爽| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 超碰成人久久| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 国产 精品1| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 精品少妇内射三级| 在线观看人妻少妇| 免费观看av网站的网址| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| av在线app专区| 天天添夜夜摸| 视频区图区小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 中文字幕制服av| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 精品一区在线观看国产| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 另类亚洲欧美激情| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| h视频一区二区三区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 九草在线视频观看| 国产成人91sexporn| av电影中文网址| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| av网站在线播放免费| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 在线天堂最新版资源| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产成人精品无人区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| www.av在线官网国产| 成人国产麻豆网| netflix在线观看网站| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 91老司机精品| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 夫妻午夜视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| av福利片在线| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 精品亚洲成国产av| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲伊人色综图| 大陆偷拍与自拍| xxx大片免费视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 观看美女的网站| 久久久久久人妻| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 在线观看国产h片| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久久久久久国产电影| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美在线黄色| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲国产欧美网| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| or卡值多少钱| 日本在线视频免费播放| 老司机靠b影院| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲中文av在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 久久国产精品影院| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 成人18禁在线播放| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 美女免费视频网站| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美大码av| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 黄频高清免费视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| av天堂在线播放| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 美女大奶头视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 久久香蕉激情| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| av天堂在线播放| a在线观看视频网站| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美成人午夜精品| 色播亚洲综合网| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久青草综合色| 午夜福利欧美成人| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲成人久久性| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 天堂√8在线中文| 午夜老司机福利片| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| av有码第一页| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 午夜福利,免费看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| av网站免费在线观看视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲第一电影网av| 成人三级黄色视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 久久中文字幕一级| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 天堂动漫精品| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美成人午夜精品| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久中文看片网| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| bbb黄色大片| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲国产欧美网| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲第一av免费看| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲伊人色综图| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 美国免费a级毛片| 欧美午夜高清在线| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 色综合婷婷激情| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| av电影中文网址| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 成人三级做爰电影| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 99久久国产精品久久久| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 性欧美人与动物交配| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久热这里只有精品99| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 日韩欧美三级三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 香蕉久久夜色| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 午夜免费观看网址| 在线观看日韩欧美| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人国语在线视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 九色国产91popny在线| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 露出奶头的视频| 久久伊人香网站| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 不卡av一区二区三区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 午夜免费观看网址| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久热爱精品视频在线9| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| av电影中文网址| 黄片小视频在线播放| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| avwww免费| 国产亚洲欧美98| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美大码av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产1区2区3区精品| 黄片小视频在线播放| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| www.999成人在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 咕卡用的链子| 免费高清在线观看日韩| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产精品九九99| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲精品在线美女| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 天堂影院成人在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 天天添夜夜摸| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 操美女的视频在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 9色porny在线观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 性少妇av在线| 在线视频色国产色| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 无限看片的www在线观看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲av成人av| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 香蕉丝袜av| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 久久精品91蜜桃| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| www.999成人在线观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 一本久久中文字幕| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产片内射在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久香蕉精品热| 精品国产一区二区久久| av视频免费观看在线观看| 成人精品一区二区免费| 色播亚洲综合网| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 91精品三级在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 不卡av一区二区三区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 一本综合久久免费| 久久九九热精品免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 午夜视频精品福利| 在线播放国产精品三级| or卡值多少钱| 国产精品免费视频内射| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 久热这里只有精品99| 咕卡用的链子| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 精品福利观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| www日本在线高清视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 成人手机av| 99re在线观看精品视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 老司机靠b影院| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 女人被狂操c到高潮|