HE Rui-rui, XI Gang, LIU Kai, ZHAO Yan-yan
Department of Applied Physics,Institute of Science,Xi’an University of Technology,Xi’an 710048,China
Effect of Pulsed Electric Field on Drought Resistance of Maize Seedling Based on Delayed Fluorescence Induced with LED
HE Rui-rui, XI Gang*, LIU Kai, ZHAO Yan-yan
Department of Applied Physics,Institute of Science,Xi’an University of Technology,Xi’an 710048,China
Effect of pulsed electric field on the drought resistance of crops is an important topic in biological effect of electric field. The changes in the photosynthetic system of leaf cells can be sensitively reflected by the kinetics parameters of delayed fluorescence. In order to reveal the effect of pulsed electric field and its mechanism on drought resistance of crop seedling, the germinating maize seeds were treated by pulsed electric field with electric field strength 200 kV·m-1, frequency 1Hz and pulse width 80ms. Then, PEG-6000 solution with -0.1 MPa osmotic potential to was used to form physiological drought of maize seedlings, the changes of dry leaf mass and the kinetics parameters, induced by LED were studied in this paper. The result showed that the dry leaf mass gradually increased under drought stress after applied with the electric field, which was significantly higher than that without external field, the relative growth rate was 45.6% (p<0.01). Besides, during the processes, the relative growth rate was between 5.8%~18.7%, the difference was significant (p<0.05) when there was no electric field, which indicated that the pulsed electric field promoted the leaf growth of maize seedling. The analysis of delayed fluorescence kinetic about leaf of maize seedling showed that the value of delayed fluorescence kinetics parameters, initial photon numberI0, coherence timeτ, decay factorβand integral intensityI(T), under drought stress, showed fluctuation, These changes were response to drought stress made by leaf cells. The study also found that pulsed electric field increased delayed fluorescence kinetics parameters and the integrated intensity of leaf cells, which indicated that the pulsed electric field could improve the photosynthesis potential and the organize sequence of photosynthetic electron transport system in leaf cells, as the interaction between functional molecules was strengthened, the leaf photosynthetic capacity was enhanced under drought stress. The result of this study provides a reference to explain clearly the effect of the pulsed electric field on drought resistance of plants seedlings.
Delayed fluorescence; Electric field; Drought stress; Kinetics parameters; Maize leaf
The effect of electric field to crops drought resistance has been an important project in biological effects of electric field[1-2]. People estimate the effect of electric field with two methods: the first one is to study shape index, such as seedling size, root length, fresh mass, dry mass, seedling survival rate, and so on; the second is to study the change of physiological and biochemical indexes, such as cell membrane permeability, content of MDA, activity of superoxide dismutase, chlorophyll content and gene expression, etc[2-4]. However, the first method judges the drought conditions only after the shape index changed, so it cannot be applied for early diagnosis. The basic data of the latter comes from test tube experiments, separating the relationship of cell components, which has destructive effect, also the information between components and hierarchies was lost, so there is no reflection of the dynamic changes in crop cells under drought stress and the drought resistance of cells cannot be evaluated as a whole.
Delayed fluorescence is a luminescence phenomenon which emerges in life system after the external light stops. Its intensity of radiation is lower than fluorescence and phosphorescence, however, its relaxation time is longer than that of fluorescence[5]. The biological delayed fluorescence comes from excitation and decay of electrons inside the cooperating molecules, the long attenuation process reflects the molecular level related to spatial structure sequence. Therefore, biological delayed fluorescence is related to functional state of biological system, which can be a sensitive index of physiological state of cells. For now, the analysis technique has been applied to estimate the functional state in plant system and detect the environmental change[6-8].
In the research of biological effects of electric field, pulsed electric field has drawn a lot attention recently because of the following advantages: it can produce induced current within the cell to impact cellular activity; it change the chemical binding between chemical reaction rate molecules, it change the shape and structure of protein molecules by inducing the translation and rotation motion of dipole and charge, which affect the biological system directly or indirectly, on the other hand it has a strong impact on membrane, which can change the cell membrane penetrability. In particular, by coupling resonance with membrane potential[9-10], the extremely low frequency pulse electric field can cause a strong impact on physiological state of cells easily, thus, such field is worth to study.
Owing to the technical advantages of delayed fluorescence analytical method, low frequency pulse electric field was used to treat the germination of maize seeds, and drought stress was formed by PEG-6000. The change of delayed fluorescence of maize seedling leaf cells induced by LED was studied in this paper, by dynamically analyzing the fluorescence; the effect of extremely low frequency pulse electric field to drought resistance of maize seedling was illustrated.
1.1 Materials and training
Maize seeds of the same size and similar outlook called Yandan 8 were chosen as material whose surface were sterilized with 0.2% HgCl2for 2 min and thoroughly washed, and then put into distilled water to fully imbibe about 24 h then germinated for 48 h in 30 ℃ constant temperature box. The seeds were selected and divided into two groups one was applied by electric field, called control group another, without external field, was called treatment group, each group had 200 seeds.
1.2 Treatment of PEF
The output of system was at extremely low frequency whose amplitude can be continuously adjusted at the range of 6 to 20 kV and frequency from 0.1 to 15 Hz. Two copper plates with size 60 cm×60 cm was placed in the system sample room, Put the maize seeds between two copper plates electrodes in the sample room. According to the literature[11], field intensity was downwards. The seeds of treatment group were applied with field intensity 200 kV·m-1, frequency 1 Hz ELF-PEF and pulse width 80 ms, for 30 minutes each day, the process lasted for 5 days. At the same time, the similar seeds were chosen as control group under the same condition except that they were not applied with external field.
1.3 Drought stress
Remove the water of the test specimens after the sample treated with PEF, then add the PEG-6000 solution with the osmotic potential is -0.1 MPa, and measure the related metrics at a reasonable time.
1.4 Measurement of dry leaf mass of maize seedling
Maize seedlings were selected from control group and treatment group, their leaves were cut off. The oven was turned on before the experiment until temperature rose to 100 ℃. Snipped leaves of maize seedlings were filled into bag then the bag was put into oven for 10 min under 100 ℃, and then, the leaves were dried to a constant weight under 80 ℃. Took out the samples and cooled them down to room temperature then the dry leaves were weighed with electronic balance. Every group was repeated 3 times then average value was obtained.
1.5 The measurement method of spontaneous luminescence
BPCL ultra weak luminescence analyzer (made by Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science) was used for the measurement of spontaneous luminescence. After turned on, the instrument was warmed up for 1 h, and the sample cup was washed with absolute ethyl alcohol to avoid the influence of bacteria. The measure time, time interval, operating voltage and current temperature in the darkroom were set as 60 and 1 s, -1 100 V, 25 ℃, respectively. At the begin of the experiment, maize seedlings were selected from control group and treatment group, and the leaves were cut off then the surface was rubbed to dry, then removed into sample room. The samples were kept in dark for 5 min, then background of sample room was measured before experiment and then the spontaneous luminescence was measured which was the difference between the measured value and background value. The measurement was repeated 3 times then the average value was calculated.
1.6 The measurement method of delayed fluorescence
The measurement system and measurement method of delayed fluorescence could be found in literature[12], after turned on, the instrument was warmed-up for 1h, as what were did when spontaneous luminescence was measured, after the sample be illuminated 30 s by LED,the delayed fluorescence was measured . The measuring time, time interval, operating voltage and current temperature in the darkroom were set as 60 s, 1 s, -1 100 V, 25 ℃, respectively. Also, background value was subtracted. The measurement was repeated 3 times then the average value was calculated.
1.7 The dynamical analysis of delayed fluorescence
According to literature[12], the delayed fluorescence was fitted follow the below formula
(1)
In the formula,tis the measure time,I0,τandβare the fitting parameter, called initial photon number (counts·s-1), coherence time (s), decay factor (dimensionless parameter),ISLis the spontaneous luminescence of per unit time.
Delayed fluorescence integral intensityI(T) is calculated by the below formula
(2)
In the formula,Tis the measurement cycle.
1.8 Data processing
Origin9.0 was used to date processing after experiment, with SPSS software to judge the significance of variance,p<0.05 meant significantly, andp<0.01 meant extremely significant.
2.1 Effect of PEF on dry leaf mass of maize seedlings under osmotic stress
Leaf cells are a place for plant to carry out photosynthesis. The dry leaf mass can reflect the process of material synthesis, distribution and transport in leaves to some extent. Figure 1 showed the change of dry leaf mass in both group. From the figure 1, the dry leaf mass of maize seedling which was treated with PEF was higher than that in control group at the beginning of experiment, and the relative growth rate reached to 45.6%, the difference between groups was extremely significant (p<0.01). After that, with drought stress, the dry leaf mass of maize seedling increased a little at second day and third day in both group as time being. The dry mass in treated group was always higher than control group during the whole test, and the relative growth rate was between 5.8% and 18.7%, differences between two groups was significant (p<0.05). According to what have been discussed, growth of leaf was not stopped by PEG-6000 solution with the osmotic potential is -0.1 MPa. So PEF promoted the growth of leaf and increased the accumulation of dry matter.
Fig.1 Effect of PEF on dry leaf mass of maize seedlings under drought stress
Fig.2 Changes of the delayed fluorescence of maize seedling leavesunder drought stress
2.2 Effect of ELF-PEF on spontaneous luminescence of maize seedling leaves under drought stress
The dynamic changes of leaf cells and the effect of PEF in maize seedling leave under drought stress can be obtained by analysis the delayed fluorescence. Figure 2 was the decay curves of the delayed fluorescence at first day, second day, third day, fourth day and fifth day. As shown here, photon emission of maize seedling leaf followed a trend of decline after the external excitation light stopped,and the process of decline was about a few seconds. Thus, delayed fluorescence was different from general!fluorescence. To explain the characteristics and differences of delayed fluorescence quantitatively, the curves in figure 2 was fitted according to the formula (1), and the result showed in table 1 and table 2. According to table, the goodness (R2) was greater than 0.99, which indicated that the parametersI0,τandβshowed in table could describe the characteristic of dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence accurately.
Table 1 The kinetic parameters of delayed fluorescence from leaf cells of maize seedlings about control group
Osmoticstresstime/dI0/(counts·s-1)τ/sβR205348.051.0931.6330.99814287.211.4871.6620.99924636.172.2391.6070.99934774.011.4011.4310.99944255.551.6721.5270.99855010.241.8611.4580.999
Table 2 The kinetic parameters of delayed fluorescence from leaf cells of maize seedlings about treated group
Osmoticstresstime/dI0/(counts·s-1)τ/sβR206645.661.2711.7040.99816211.291.6231.7430.99825055.052.4111.7190.99935351.541.7161.5310.99944689.221.8491.5850.99856405.121.9741.5740.999
2.2.1 Effect of PEF on initial photon numberI0
To explain the change of delayed fluorescence curves in figure 2 quantitatively, the change rule of dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence from leaf cells of maize seedlings in table 1 and table 2 was analyzed.
在整體施工建設(shè)當(dāng)中作業(yè)人員是最主要的參與者,他們對于建設(shè)的總體效果是有著極為重要的影響的。在實(shí)施工程建設(shè)時(shí),可以適當(dāng)通過加大對作業(yè)人員安全教育的培訓(xùn)力度,使各個(gè)項(xiàng)目施工部門以及建設(shè)單位都能夠從根本上擁有一定的安全意識,由此提升作業(yè)人員安全管理意識,確保整個(gè)工程管理的有效進(jìn)行。在進(jìn)行安全教育與培訓(xùn)的時(shí)候要確保整個(gè)過程是具有一定目的的,并且要以此制定出來相應(yīng)的教育內(nèi)容,并記錄下來,保證各項(xiàng)組織活動的多樣性。除此以外還應(yīng)該要及時(shí)組織相關(guān)人員進(jìn)行施工規(guī)章以及規(guī)范的學(xué)習(xí),以此最大程度上提升自我保護(hù)意識與安全意識。
The effect of PEF on initial photon numberI0of dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence was illustrated in figure 3. From figure 3, at the beginning of the experiment, in control group, initial photon numberI0fell rapidly, later, there was fluctuation, and then there was a peak on third day. It also showed that the initial photon numberI0in treated group was higher than that in control group at the beginning of drought stress, and the relative growth rate reached to 24.2%. During the process of drought stress, initial photon numberI0in treated group has the same trend with control group, but the value was always higher, the relative growth rate was 44.87%, 9.03%, 12.09%, 10.20% and 27.84% on 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 d.
2.2.2 Effect of PEF on coherence timeτ
Effect of PEF on coherence timeτof dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence was showed in figure 4. Figure 4 showed that coherence timeτgrew quickly after drought stress, and reached peak on the second day then started to fall, but it increased on the fourth day. On Figure 4, coherence timeτin treated group was also plotted, which was higher than that in control group at the beginning of the drought stress, and the relative growth rate reached to 16.3%. The two groups had the same trend, but coherence timeτin treated group was always higher. On the day of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 d the relative growth rate were 9.2%, 7.7%, 22.5%, 10.6% and 6.1%.
Fig.3 Changes of the initial photon numberI0 of delayed fluorescence
Fig.4 Changes of the coherence time τof delayed fluorescence
2.2.3 Effect of PEF on decay factorβ
Figure 5 showed the influence of PEF on the change of decay factorβ. on this figure,βhad a high value when there was no drought stress, after stress, increased slightly, then decreased and it had a minimal on third day, after this it began to rise.βhad a higher value in treated group without stress, the relative growth rate was 4.4%. After that,βwas always higher in treated group. The relative growth rate were 4.9%, 7.0%, 7.0%, 4.0% and 7.9% on 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 d respectively.
Fig.5 Changes of the decay factor βof delayed fluorescence
2.3 Effect of PEF on delayed fluorescence integral intensity I(T) of maize seedling leaves under drought stress
Delayed fluorescence integral intensity was defined as the area under the curve of delayed fluorescence, expressed asI(T), and the value of it could be calculated by formula (2). From formula (2),I(T) was decided byI0,τandβ, which could reflect the change of delayed fluorescence synthetically . delayed fluorescence integral intensityI(T) was obtained by Putting the dynamic parameters into the formula (2), and the result was showed on figure 6. According to the graph, the delayed fluorescence integral intensity showed a fluctuation, and theI(T) in treated was always higher than that in control group. On the 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 d, the relative growth rate were 32.3%, 38.1%, 10.4%, 19.1%, 13.3% and 17.8% respectively.
Fig.6 Changes of the delayed fluorescence integral intensity I(T)
In the formula of delayed fluorescence dynamics, initial photon numberI0, coherence timeτ, decay factorβwere the characterization of dynamic parameters. When light stopped, the electrons in different parts of the electron transport chain in photosynthesis were back to the photosynthetic reaction center PSⅡ, and produced excited state PSⅡ, the latter generate delayed luminescence when deexcitation[13]. Each component in electron transport chain had different nature and the different ability to storage and release electrons, the time of electron returned to PSⅡ from electron transport chain was different, which caused the a long attenuation of delayed luminescence[14]. Therefore, initial photon numberI0was relevant to the number of PSⅡ in the excited state when lighting, coherence timeτwas related to the time of electronic in electron transport chain back to PSⅡ. The more initial photon numberI0, the more PSⅡ in excited state, and the potential of photosynthesis in photosynthetic cells was better. The reduction of coherence timeτ, revealed that organize sequence of the electron transport chain had been destroyed, and the number of electron back to PSⅡ was reduced. Based on this understanding, in figure 3,I0in control group dropped rapidly at the beginning, and appeared a litter peak in third day, after this recovered on fourth day, which showed that drought stress caused the number of PSⅡ which could stay in excited state decreased, and photosynthesis in leaf cells was also weaken, but on fourth day, with the metabolism regulation and repair of cells, photosynthesis potential recovered . Figure 4 also showed that after drought stress, organize sequence of photosynthetic electron transport system in leaf cells raised quickly, reached to peak on second day, which indicated that photosynthetic electron transport system have been adjusted substantially, which was adaptive response of photoreceptor cell to drought stress.
Decay factorβwas an exponential factor; it was related to the property of the sample, nothing to do with excited action and the amount of sample, represented as the degree of interaction of functional molecules in excited state. Thus,βhad an important biological significance. Figure 5 showedβin control group has a high value without drought stress, with the time being, it rose for a while then reduced gradually, reached to minimal value on the third day, and then increased. Such change indicated that the interactions between functional molecules were stronger, due to drought stress, the interactions between functional molecules increased in the short run, then declined, and it reached minimum on third day, then gradually increased.
Delayed fluorescence integral intensityI(T) could reflect the characteristics of the delayed fluorescence dynamics, that could be regarded as the signature of the ability to photosynthetic capacity[15-16]. According to the biological significance of delayed fluorescence integral intensityI(T), under such stress, Photosynthesis ability first increased, then decreased, after that it increased again (see figure 6).
To sum up, during the process of drought stress, the dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence from leaf cells of maize seedlings all showed fluctuation, which reflected the reaction, adjustment and adaption of leaf cells . Initial photon numberI0, coherence timeτ, decay factorβcould be regarded as a probe to reflect the system of leaf cells in photosynthesis, they could also reflect the change of photosynthesis system sensitively from different perspectives, besides, these change could decide the functional state and photosynthesis ability, then the condition could be expressed by delayed fluorescence integral intensityI(T).
It was worth mentioning that there was a relatively slow increasing of dry leaf mass between the second day and third day in figure 1, and the dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence appeared the biggest change during this period, showed the strength of self-regulation of cell at this time, which caused dry leaf mass increasing.
This paper found that, by applying PEF, the dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence all increased, which indicated that, under drought stress, PEF improved the photosynthesis potential and promoted the organize sequence of photosynthetic electron transport system, and the interaction of functional molecules was also enhanced as well. The change of delayed fluorescence integral intensityI(T) suggested that both functional status of cells and photosynthetic capacity were improved. The reason of this effect maybe that the growth of maize seedling was promoted by the PEF, according to the result of this study, the dry leaf mass and dynamic parameters of delayed fluorescence in treated group was significantly greater than that in control group at the beginning of the experiment, and during the process of experiment, treated group always kept the advantage, thus had a stronger drought resistance.
(1) To treated group, dry leaf mass of maize seedling gradually increased under drought stress condition formed by PEG-6000 with -0.1 MPa osmotic potential, indicated that under drought stress, PEF could promote the growth of maize seedling leaf under.
(2) The analysis of delayed fluorescence dynamic about leaf showed that the value of delayed fluorescence dynamic parameters of the leaf cells such as initial photon numberI0, coherence timeτ, decay factorβand integral intensityI(T) rose and fell under drought stress, this change was the adaptive response to drought stress.
(3) The value of delayed fluorescence dynamic parameters and integral intensityI(T) all increased by applying PEF, showing that the photosynthesis potential, organize sequence and interaction between functional molecules in leaf cells were strengthened, besides the leaf photosynthetic capacity was enhanced.
[1] ZHANG Xin-hua,LI Fu-jun. Plant Physiology Communications,2005,41(6): 851.
[2] GAO Yu,XI Gang,YANG Yun-jing,et al. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2014,32(6): 82.
[3] CHEN Hua,WU Jun-lin. Research of Agricultural Modernization,2009,30(3): 381.
[4] LIU Xiang-yu,YANG Ti-qiang,HU Yan-fei,et al. Acta Bor. Boreal.-Occoden. Sin.,2014,34(12): 2425.
[5] Bókkon I,Vimal R L P,Wang C,et al. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology,2011,103(2): 192.
[6] Costanzo E,Gulino M,LanzanòL,et al. European Biophysics Journal With Biophysics Letters,2008,37(2): 235.
[7] Cifra M,Pospisil P. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology,2014,139(1): 2.
[8] Kato K,Iyoaumi H,Kageyama C,et al. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology,2014,139(1) : 54.
[9] LI Gun,YAN Ya-jing,HUANG Yong,et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2012,32(5): 1194.
[10] XI Gang,LIU Kai,YANG Yun-jing,et al. High Voltage Engineering,2013,39(1): 129.
[11] ZHANG Xiao-hui,ZHANG Zhi-xia,LI Yan-zhen,et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery,2014,45(4): 253.
[12] GAO Yu,XI Gang,LIU Kai,et al. Chinese Journal of Luminescence,2014,35(2): 243.
[13] Goltsev V,Zaharieva I,Chernev P,et al. Delayed fluorescence in Photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research,2009,101(2): 217.
[14] YANG Cheng,LI Peng-Min,ZHANG Zi-Shan,et al. Plant Physiology Journal,2013,49(12): 1277.
[15] Wang Jun-sheng,Xing Da,Zhang Ling-rui,et al. Biosensors and Bioelectronics,2007,22(12): 2861.
[16] Zhang Ling-rui,Xing Da. Photochemical and Photobiology Science,2008,7(3): 352.
*通訊聯(lián)系人
S132
A
LED誘導(dǎo)延遲熒光技術(shù)評價(jià)脈沖電場對玉米幼苗抗旱性的影響
賀瑞瑞,習(xí) 崗*,劉 鍇,趙燕燕
西安理工大學(xué)理學(xué)院應(yīng)用物理系,陜西 西安 710048
脈沖電場(pulsed electric field,PEF)對作物抗旱性的影響是電場生物學(xué)效應(yīng)研究的重要課題,作物葉片延遲熒光動力學(xué)參數(shù)可以從不同角度靈敏地反映葉片細(xì)胞光合系統(tǒng)發(fā)生的變化。為了從活體細(xì)胞角度揭示脈沖電場對作物幼苗抗旱性的影響及其機(jī)理,使用頻率為1 Hz、場強(qiáng)為200 kV·m-1、脈寬為80 ms的PEF處理萌發(fā)玉米種子,再采用滲透勢為-0.1 MPa的PEG-6000溶液形成干旱脅迫,研究了玉米幼苗生長過程中葉片干質(zhì)量和LED誘導(dǎo)的葉片延遲熒光動力學(xué)參數(shù)的變化。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),在-0.1 MPa的PEG-6000溶液形成的干旱脅迫下,玉米幼苗葉片干質(zhì)量逐漸增加,經(jīng)過PEF處理的玉米幼苗葉片干質(zhì)量大于對照,相對增長率在5.8%~18.7%之間(p<0.05)。葉片延遲熒光動力學(xué)分析顯示,干旱脅迫下玉米幼苗葉片延遲熒光動力學(xué)參數(shù)初始光子數(shù)I0、相干時(shí)間τ、衰減參數(shù)β和延遲熒光積分強(qiáng)度I(T)都發(fā)生了波動性的變化,這些變化是葉片細(xì)胞對干旱脅迫的適應(yīng)性反應(yīng),PEF處理使玉米幼苗葉片延遲熒光各動力學(xué)參數(shù)和延遲熒光積分強(qiáng)度均明顯大于對照組,表明PEF處理使玉米幼苗葉片細(xì)胞的光合潛力、組織序性和功能分子之間的相互作用都有所加強(qiáng),葉片綜合光合能力提高了。研究結(jié)果為闡明PEF對作物幼苗抗旱性的影響及其機(jī)理提供參考。
延遲熒光; 電場; 干旱脅迫; 動力學(xué)參數(shù); 玉米葉片
2015-03-22,
2015-07-04)
Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51277151 and 31471412)
10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)06-1959-07
Received: 2015-03-22; accepted: 2015-07-04
Biography: HE Rui-rui, female, (1991—), Department of Applied Physics,Institute of Science,Xi’an University of Technology, master e-mail: heruiruijy@163.com *Corresponding author e-mail: xig@xaut.edu.cn