Introducing nitazoxanide as a promising alternative treatment for symptomatic to metronidazole-resistant giardiasis in clinical isolates

Tahereh Mikaeili Galeh， Abdolhassan Kazemi， Mahmoud Mahami-Oskouei， Behzad Baradaran， Adel Spotin?， Seddigheh Sarafraz， Majid Karamat

1Immunology Research Center， Tabriz University of Medical Sciences， Tabriz， Iran

2Department of Parasitology and Mycology， Faculty of Medicine， Tabriz University of Medical Sciences， Tabriz， Iran

3East Azerbaijan Province Health Center， Tabriz Health Center， Tabriz， Iran

Introducing nitazoxanide as a promising alternative treatment for symptomatic to metronidazole-resistant giardiasis in clinical isolates

Tahereh Mikaeili Galeh1，2， Abdolhassan Kazemi2， Mahmoud Mahami-Oskouei1，2， Behzad Baradaran1， Adel Spotin1，2?， Seddigheh Sarafraz3， Majid Karamat2

1Immunology Research Center， Tabriz University of Medical Sciences， Tabriz， Iran

2Department of Parasitology and Mycology， Faculty of Medicine， Tabriz University of Medical Sciences， Tabriz， Iran

3East Azerbaijan Province Health Center， Tabriz Health Center， Tabriz， Iran

ARTICLE INFO

Article history:

Received 15 May 2016

Received in revised form 16 June 2016

Accepted 1 July 2016

Available online 20 September 2016

Giardia lamblia

Ferredoxin oxidoreductase

Nitroreductase

Nitazoxanide

Metronidazole

Objective: To identify the frequencies （F） of ferredoxin and nitroreductase mutations were identified on Iranian clinical isolates of Giardia lamblia in order to predict whether the nitazoxanide can be prescribed as suitable drug for symptomatic to metronidazoleresistant giardiasis. Methods: Forty Giardia lamblia isolates as of 38 symptomatic and two metronidazole-resistant patients were collected from Iran. DNAs were extracted and amplif i ed by targeting ferredoxin and GlNR genes. The amplicons were directly sequenced to determine gene mutations. Results: The various amino acid substitutions （F: 20%， Haplotype diversity: 0.891， Tajima’s D: -0.44013） were identif i ed by analyzing ferredoxin gene in four symptomatic and two resistant isolates. Only， two haplotypes （F: 5%， HD: 0.345； Tajima’s D: 0.77815）characterized in metronidazole-resistant isolates of GlNR， however， no point mutations was found in symptomatic isolates. Conclusions: Non-synonymous mutations of ferredoxin oxidoreductase gene reduce translational regulatory protein’s binding affi nity which concludes reduction of ferredoxin expression and its activity. This leads to decrease in metronidazole drug delivery into the cells. Mutations in these isolates may lead to their resistance to metronidazole. No to low synonymous mutations of GlNR demonstrates that nitazoxanide can be prescribed as promising alternative treatment for symptomatic to metronidazole-resistant giardiasis in Iranian clinical isolates.

1. Introduction

Giardia lamblia （G. lamblia） （syn. Giardia intestinalis or Giardia duodenalis） as a microaerophilic gastrointestinal parasitic protest is a causative agent of steatorrhea affecting one billion people worldwide with annual incidence of （200--300） million cases［1，2］. Approximately， 15% of Giardia infections are explicitly occur among children （0-24） months in the developing countries［3］ andcontributes to the second-leading cause of death in children under fi ve years old［4，5］. Based on type of parasitic assemblage and its sensitivity/resistance to treatment， giardiasis may be manifested to chronic and acute symptoms including nausea， diarrhea，vomiting， bloating， dehydration， malabsorption syndrome and failure to thrive［1］. On the one hand G. lamblia has been also attributed in the etiology of typeⅡdiabetes， obesity and irritable bowel syndrome［6，7］. Giardiasis treatment is currently restricted to nitroheterocyclic （Metronidazole； efficacy 73%-100%，nitazoxanide and furazolidone） and benzimidazoles （Albendazole；effi cacy 79%-100% and mebendazole） compounds ［8，9］. A number of drugs such as paromomycin and quinacrine because of their low efficacy and high toxicity are infrequently prescribed［8］. However， one of the global difficulties （particularly in Iranianclinical isolates） concerning first line treatment of G. lamblia is initial treatment failure to metronidazole in symptomatic clinical isolates. The inactive form （oxide） of metronidazole enters the cell through passive dif f usion into G. lamblia and is reduced by pyruvateferredoxin oxidoreductase （PFOR） in mitochondria organelle and nitrogen is converted to toxic radicals［10，11］. Ferredoxin oxidoreductase gene mutations of G. lamblia can reduce translational regulatory protein’s binding affinity which leads to reduction of ferredoxin expression and its resistance to metronidazole. However，it is not easy to distinguish between cure followed by re-infection or other disorders such as lactose intolerance. A number of studies have been evaluated resistance to dif f erential regulation of oxidoreductase enzymes in mRNA expression levels on nitroheterocyclic resistance laboratory lines （WB， 106， and 713 isolates）［12-19］， however， no comprehensive study has conducted on nitroheterocyclic resistance of clinical isolates of G. lamblia in replication （DNA） level yet. One of the major problems in treatment of metronidazole-resistant clinical isolates is attributed to metronidazole permeability that does not af f ect on the respiration of encysting trophozoites and mature cysts，also it do not has signif i cant changes in cyst production at lower concentrations［20］. On the other hand， the numerous side ef f ects of metronidazole have been extensively proven among users. Therefore，using an ef f ectual alternative drug with more cytotoxic activity on both trophozoites and mature cysts and lowest adverse ef f ects should be noticed［21］. In 2004， the nitrothiazolide nitazoxanide （Alinia） as an alternative option has been approved for the pediatric treatment of giardiasis in the USA ［22］. This drug compromises the integrity of the cell by causing lesions in the ventral cell membrane and inducing vacuolization［22］. G. lamblia nitroreductase （GlNR） has known as a nitazoxanide-binding protein in drug resistant. In this study， the frequencies （F） of ferredoxin and nitroreductase mutations were identif i ed on Iranian clinical isolates of G. lamblia in order to predict whether the nitazoxanide can be prescribed as suitable treatment for symptomatic to metronidazole-resistant giardiasis.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Sampling， cyst purification and DNA extraction

During Feb 2014 to March 2015， forty Giardia positive-microscopic human fecal samples were collected from northwest Iran （East Azerbaijan and Ardabil provinces）. A total of 38 patients had various range of symptoms including nausea， bloating， dehydration and steatorrhea （fatty diarrhea）. Also， based on tracking of clinical and microscopic investigations， two patients did not have any ef f ective treatment to metronidazole in one last year. The collected specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol and stored at 4 ℃ until molecular analysis. Specimens， especially cysts， were purif i ed and concentrated by fl otation on sucrose with specif i c gravity of 0.85 M. The purif i ed cyst was stained by trichrome staining （Figure 1）. The genomic DNA of G. lamblia isolates was extracted through the freeze-thawing technique ［10 cycles of freezing （10 min at liquid nitrogen） and thawing （10 min at 95 ℃）］. Also， 200 μL of Giardia cyst suspension were combined with an equal volume of glass beads followed by vortexing for （ 8-10） min. After adding 30 μL of proteinase K，the suspension was incubated at 60 ℃ for one overnight. DNA extraction was done using Stool DNA Isolation mini kit （Yekta Tajhiz Azma， Iran） following the manufacturer’s instructions with some modif i cations. All extracted DNA was stored at -20 ℃.

Figure 1. The stained Giardia lamblia cyst by trichrome staining （1 000× magnif i cation）.

2.2. Primer designing and PCR amplification

Given that the earlier used primers had a short length in order to identify unknown mutations （haplotypes）， the target primers of PFOR and G1NR genes were designed by Oligo Analyzer 3.1 tool based on reference accession numbers of XM001708650（NR ） and L27221 （PFOR）. In the PCR reaction， ferrodoxin gene was amplified using the forward primer （PFOR-F） 5'-GCCAGCTCCTTCTTGTCTT-3' and the reverse primer（PFOR-R ） 5'-CACGACGATCAGGTC TC TCG-3'. Also ，G1NR gene was amplified using the forward primer （NR-F） 5'-CGAGACAAAGGTAGTGGCGT-3' and the reverse primer（NR-R） 5'-GCCACAGCAGCTAAGAGGAA-3'. The efficacy of the designed primers was tested by standard positive control. The PCR amplif i cation was carried out in 25 μL reaction volumes containing 0.3 μL （5 U/μL） of Taq DNA polymerase （Cinnagen， Iran）， 2.5 μL of 10×X PCR buffer （Cinnagen， Iran）， 0.9 μL （50 mM） MgCl2（Cinnagen， Iran）， 0.5 μL （10 mM） of dNTP Mix （Cinnagen， Iran），（10-13） μL deionized distilled water， 1 μL of each forward and reverse primers （10 pmol）， （3-4） μL of bovine serum albumin 0.1% as enhancer， and 4 μL of DNA template. Reactions were performed in a thermal cycler PCR System （Eppendorf-Germany）. The thermal cycling protocol for both PFOR and GlNR genes included an initial cycle of 95 ℃ for 10 min， followed by 40 cycles of 94 ℃ for 30 s，60 ℃ for 45 s， 72 ℃ for 1 min and a final extension of 72 ℃ for 10 min. The PCR products were electrophoresized on 1% （W/V）agarose gel stained with DNA safe stain.

2.3. Sequencing， haplotype network and phylogenetic analysis

The all amplicons of PFOR and G1NR genes were purified using Gel Purification Kit （BiONEER， South Korea） according to manufacturer’s instructions. The final DNA concentration was estimated by comparing with DNA Ladder Marker （Promega） in 1.5% agarose gel. Amplicons were directly sequenced by targeting ferrodoxin and GlNR genes by ABIPRISMTM 3 130 Genetic Analyzer automated sequencer （Appliealed Biosystem， USA）. Ambiguous sites were coded using the standard IUPAC codes for combinations of two or more bases. Contigs （overlapped sequences）of all samples were aligned and edited visually at consensus positions compared to GenBank sequences using Sequencher TM v.4.1.4 and BioEdit softwares［23］. The number of novel haplotypes，diversity indices （Haplotype diversity； Hd and Nucleotide diversity: π） and neutrality indices （Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs tests） were estimated by DnaSP software version 5.10［24］. A haplotype network based on mitochondrial concatenate sequences of PFOR and GlNR genes was drawn by PopART software in order to distribute identif i ed haplotypes［25］. Also， the phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA 5.05 software based on maximum likelihood algorithm and circle model to show topology of distinct isolates compared to same isolates［26］. The accuracy of phylogenetic tree was evaluated by 1000 bootstrap re-sampling.

Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products.A: PF1-PF7: G. lamblia isolates amplif i ed based on ferrodoxin gene （PF）. B: NR1-NR7: G. lamblia isolates amplif i ed based on Nitroreductase gene （NR）+Ve: Positive control， -Ve: Negative control， M: 100 bp DNA size marker.

Eight novel haplotypes （F: 20%） were identified by analyzing ferredoxin gene which among of them， two （PFOR2: accession no: KX181715 and PFOR3: KX181716） and six （PFOR4-PFOR9: accession nos: KX181717-KX181722） haplotypes were belonged to resistant and symptomatic isolates respectively （Figure 3）.

3. Results

The PFOR （nearly 980 bp） and GlNR （nearly 552 bp） genes were successfully amplified from all 40 isolates （Figure 2）. Only，two haplotypes NR2 （accession number； KX181723） and NR3（accession number； KX181724） （Transition model； Cytosin converted to thymine， F: 5%） were identified in metronidazole resistant isolates of GlNR （Figure 3） whilst， no point mutations was found in symptomatic isolates.

Figure 3. A haplotype network according on mitochondrial concatenate sequences of ferrodoxin and GlNR genes in metronidazole resistant Giardia isolates （PFOR2， 3 and NR2， 3） and symptomatic specimens.

Table 1Diversity and neutrality indices of Giardia lamblia based on nucleotide sequences of Pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase and Nitroreductase genes.

Figure 4. Comparison of protein sequences of ferrodoxin oxidoreductase gene of G. lamblia in metronidazole resistant isolates （PFOR2**， PFOR3**） and symptomatic specimens compared to wild type （PFOR1）.

Various amino acid substitutions were characterized at dif f erent codons （76， 97， 116， 134， 172， 224， 238， 245， 248， 250 and 276）of resistant isolates （PFOR2 and PFOR3）. Moreover， amino acid replacement identif i ed at various codons （28， 29， 76， 97， 99， 116，134， 172， 245， 250 and 276） of some symptomatic isolates （PFOR4，5， 8 and 9） （Figure 4）.

However， no new mutation （haplotypes） was found in the rest sequences of ferredoxin gene compared to wild type （PFOR1， Ref L27221）. According to the analysis of molecular variance （AMOVA）test， the high Hd value of ferrodoxin （0.891） was shown the principal pattern of the total genetic variability within Giardia populations whilst nucleotide diversity was low in both genes （ππ； 0.000 93 to 0.006 79） （Table 1）. Unlike GlNR gene， the neutrality indices of the ferredoxin oxidoreductase were shown negative values （-0.440 13 for Tajima’s D to -1.046 for Fu’s Fs statistic） （Table 1）. The status of metronidazole-resistant isolates and other sequences were shown in Figure 5 which isolates PFOR2， 3， 8， 9 and NR2， 3 have placed in distinct branches.

Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of G. lamblia ferrodoxin oxidoreductase and GlNR sequences in metronidazole resistant isolates （PFOR2， 3 and NR2，3） and symptomatic specimens using maximum likelihood algorithm with kimura 2-parameter model and 1 000 bootstrap re-sampling.

4. Discussion

In this investigation， for the fi rst time the various ranges of PFORand GlNR mutations were amplif i ed and identif i ed in symptomatic to metronidazole resistant Iranian clinical isolates of G. lamblia by sequencing and AMOVA analysis. The mechanisms of metronidazole resistance have been extensively negotiated during the last 40 years， although the approaches are often contradictory to put into viewpoint.

The majority clinical investigations on chemotherapy of giardiasis reveal that， despite the drug used， cure rates are below 100%. Apart from drug refractory， other predisposing factors can also be accountable for treatment failure， covering sequestration of parasite in the gallbladder or the pancreas， re-infection， inadequate amounts of drug administered and immune def i ciency ［27］.

It is noteworthy that G. lamblia isolated from patients with resistant giardiasis do not regularly show drug resistance in vitro ［28］. It can be justif i ed by some immune-physiological inf l uences of the human host on the success of a given chemotherapy.

Several studies have been shown a strong association between down regulation of PFOR gene and drug resistance on cell lines （in vitro）， bacteria and Trichomonas vaginalis in translation and mRNA expression levels［17， 29-31］. Reduction of ferredoxin oxidoreductase translation in resistant strains enhances this assumption that by the decrease of the cells’ ability to regenerate metronidazole into cytotoxic free radicals. In addition， it is hypothesized that mutations of ferredoxin gene reduce the activity of PFOR. However， there is no associated study between correlation of ferrodoxin mutation and drug resistance on clinical isolates of G. lamblia in replication level. In this study， 20% mutant strains of ferrodoxin gene containing various codon substitution and high haplotype diversity （0.891）was unequivocally identif i ed among all resistant isolates （n=2） and six symptomatic specimens. This fact can be described by nonsynonymous mutations of ferredoxin reduce translational regulatory protein’s binding affi nity which conclude reduction of ferredoxin expression and its activity. This leads to decrease in metronidazole drug delivery into the cells. Mutations in these isolates may lead to resistance of them to metronidazole.

On the other hand， 5% mutant strains of GlNR gene without any codon substitution and low haplotype diversity （0.345） was only recognized in resistant isolates （n=2）. This no to low synonymous mutations of GlNR exhibits that nitazoxanide can be potentially used as an alternative treatment in symptomatic to metronidazoleresistant Iranian clinical isolates. Unlike metronidazole drug， so far no evidence has been found for any teratogenic or mutagenic activity of nitazoxanide， in addition the last drug has more ef f ectual cytotoxic activity on trophozoites and mature cysts in encystations process［22，32］.

Up to now， nitazoxanide resistance has been merely observed in the laboratory ［16］. In a study， a nitazoxanide-resistant cell line was robustly resistant to metronidazole， while a cell line with induced metronidazole resistance was susceptible to nitazoxanide ［16］. In consistent with our findings， this indicates that cross resistance between both drugs is not essentially reciprocal. In a study on the nitazoxanide resistant cell line illustrated chaperone proteins Hsp 70 and Hsp 90 to be up-regulated in expression［17］. Several research papers have been revealed that NR1 and NR2 have crucial role in the metabolism of metronidazole in G. lamblia. Down-regulation of NR1 is lead to metronidazole-resistant laboratory cell line whereas NR2 was found to be up-regulated in metronidazole-resistant［18，21］.

In conclusion， we showed that a high frequency range of ferrodoxin mutations including amino acids/haplotypes are unambiguously circulating among resistant metronidazole patients and some symptomatic giardiasis in Iran. This is an alert that a number of symptomatic specimens are potentially converting to resistant isolates. No to low synonymous mutations of GlNR demonstrates that nitazoxanide as promising alternative drug can be prescribed to treatment symptomatic to metronidazole-resistant Iranian clinical isolates. Taken together， although treatment failures and drug resistance in Giardia can be problematic， but hopeful novel drugs and combination therapy may be af f ected in promising treatment strategies.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Immunology Research Center， Tabriz University of Medical Sciences， Tabriz， Iran. This article is derived from the master’s thesis of the fi rst author （Thesis No. 93/2-4/12）.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conf l ict of interests.

［1］ Ansell BR， McConville MJ， Ma’'ayeh SY， Dagley MJ， Gasser RB， Sv?rd SG， Jex ARet al. Drug resistance in Giardia duodenalis. Biotechnol Adv 2015； 1； 33（6）: 888-901.

［2］ Lane S， Lloyd D. Current trends in research into the waterborne parasite Giardia. Crit Rev Microbiol 2002； 28: 123-147.

［3］ McCormick BJ. Frequent symptomatic or asymptomatic infections may have long-term consequences on growth and cognitive development. In: Heitdt PJ， Lang D， Riddle MS， Walker RI， Rusch V， （eds.）. OldHerborn University seminar monographs. Herborn， Germany: Institute for Microbiology und Biochemistry； 2014.

［4］ Kosek M， Bern C， Guerrant RL. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease，as estimated from studies published between 1992 and 2000. Bull World Health Organ 2003； 81: 197-204.

［5］ Savioli L， Smith H， Thompson A. Giardia and cryptosporidium in the‘neglected diseases initiative’. Trends Parasitol 2006； 22: 203-208.

［6］ Verdu EF， Riddle MS. Chronic gastrointestinal consequences of acute infectious diarrhea: evolving concepts in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012； 107: 981-989.

［7］ M?rch K ， Hanevik K ， Rivenes AC ， B?dtker JE， N? ss HN， Stubhaug B， Wensaas KA， Rortveit G， Eide GE， Hausken T， Langeland Net al. Chronic fatigue syndrome 5 years after giardiasis: dif f erential diagnoses，characteristics and natural course. BMC Gastroenterol 2013； 13: 1-1.

［8］ Escobedo AA ， Cimerman S. Giardiasis: a pharmacotherapy reviews. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007； 8: 1885-1902.

［9］ Wright JM， Dunn LA， Upcroft P. Efficacy of antigiardial drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2003； 2: 529-541.

［10］ Edwards DI. Nitroimidazole drugs-action and resistance mechanisms.ⅠI. Mechanisms of action. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993； 31: 9-20.

［11］ Leitsch D， Schlosser S， Burgess A， Duchêne M. Nitroimidazole drugs vary in their mode of action in the human parasite Giardia lamblia. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2012； 2: 166-167.

［12］ Gillin FD， Reiner DS. Effects of oxygen tension and reducing agents on sensitivity of Giardia lamblia to metronidazole in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol 1982； 31: 3694-3697.

［13］ Tejman-Yarden N ， Millman M ， Lauwaet T， Davids BJ， Gillin FD，Dunn L， Upcroft JA， Miyamoto Y， Eckmann Let al. Impaired parasite attachment as fitness cost of metronidazole resistance in Giardia lamblia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011； 55: 4643-4651.

［14］ Upcroft JA， Mitchel R， Chen N， Upcroft P. Albendazole resistance in Giardiais correlated with cytoskeletal changes but not with a mutation at amino acid 200 in beta tubulin. Microb Drug Resist 1996； 2: 303-308.

［15］ M üller J， Sterk M， Hemphill A， Mü ller N. Characterization of Giardia lamblia WB C6 clones resistant to nitazoxanide and to metronidazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007； 60: 280-287.

［16］ M ü ller J， Wastling J， Sanderson S ， M üller N ， Hemphill A. A novel Giardia lamblia nitroreductase， GlNR1， interacts with nitazoxanide and other thiazolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007； 51: 1979-1986.

［17］ M ü ller J， Ley S ， Felger I， Hemphill A， M ü ller N. Identification of differentially expressed genes in a Giardia lamblia WB C6 clone resistant to nitazoxanide and metronidazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008； 62: 72-82.

［18］ M ü ller J， Schildknecht P， M ü ller N. Metabolism of nitro drugs metronidazole and nitazoxanide in Giardia lamblia: characterization of a novel nitroreductase （GlNR2）. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013； 68: 1781-1789.

［19］ M ü ller J， Rout S ， Leitsch D ， Vaithilingam J， Hehl A ， M ü ller N. Comparative characterization of two nitroreductases from Giardia lamblia as potential activators of nitro compounds. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2015； 5: 37-43.

［20］ Paget TA ， Kelly ML， jarroll EL ， Lindmark DG， Lloyd D. The effects of oxygen on fermentation in Giardia lamblia. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1993； 57: 65-71.

［21］ Nillius D ， JJ M ， Muller N. Nitroreductase （GlNR1 ） increases susceptibility of Giardia lamblia and Escherichia coli to nitro drugs. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011； 66: 1029-1035.

［22］ Müller J， Rühle G， Müller N， Rossignol JF， Hemphill A. In vitro ef f ects of thiazolides on Giardia lamblia WB clone C6 cultured axenically and in coculture with Caco2 cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006； 50: 162-170.

［23］ Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999； 41: 95-98.

［24］ Rozas J， Sanchez-DelBarrio JC ， Messeguer X ， Rozas R. DnaSP，DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 2010； 19: 2496-2497.

［25］ Bandelt H， Forster P， R?hl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecif i c phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 1999； 16（1）: 37-48.

［26］ Tamura K ， Peterson D， Peterson N， Stecher G， Nei M ， Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood， evolutionary distance， and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011； 28: 2731-2739.

［27］ Nash TE. Treatment of Giardia lamblia infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001； 20: 193-195.

［28］ Smith PD， Gillin FD， Spira WM， Nash TE. Chronic giardiasis: studies on drug sensitivity， toxin production， and host immune response. Gastroenterology 1982； 83: 797-803.

［29］ Heidari S， Bandehpour M， Seyyed-Tabaei SJ， Valadkhani Z， Haghighi A， Abadi A， Kazemi Bet al. Ferredoxin gene mutation in Iranian Trichomonas vaginalis isolates. Iranian J Parasitol 2013； 8（3）: 402.

［30］ Argü ello-García R ， Cruz-Soto M， Romero-Montoya L ， Ortega-Pierres G. In vitro resistance to 5-nitroimidazoles and benzimidazoles in Giardia duodenalis: variability and variation in gene expression. Infect Genet Evol 2009； 9: 1057-1064.

［31］ Townson SM ， Upcroft JA ， Upcroft P. Characterization and purification of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase from Giardia duodenalis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1996； 79: 183-193.

［32］ Escobedo AA， Cimerman S. Giardiasis: a pharmacotherapy review. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007； 8: 1885-1902.

10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.07.013

Tahereh Mikaeili Galeh， Immunology Research Center， Tabriz University of Medical Sciences， Tabriz， Iran.

?Corresponding author: Adel Spotin， Immunology Research Center， Tabriz University of Medical Sciences， Tabriz， Iran.

Tel: +98-41-33373745

E-mail: adelespotin@gmail.com