• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Physiological Mechanisms of Delaying Leaf Senescence in Maize Treated with Compound Mixtures of DCPTA and CCC

    2015-12-29 01:22:31WangYongchaoGuWanrongYeLefuSunYangLiLijieZhangHeLiJingandWeiShi

    Wang Yong-chao, Gu Wan-rong,, Ye Le-fu,, Sun Yang, Li Li-jie, Zhang He, Li Jing,, and Wei Shi,*

    1College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

    2The Observation Experiment Station of Ministry of Agriculture for Crop Cultivation Science in Northeast Area, Harbin 150030, China

    Physiological Mechanisms of Delaying Leaf Senescence in Maize Treated with Compound Mixtures of DCPTA and CCC

    Wang Yong-chao1, Gu Wan-rong1,2, Ye Le-fu1,2, Sun Yang1, Li Li-jie1, Zhang He1, Li Jing1,2, and Wei Shi1,2*

    1College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

    2The Observation Experiment Station of Ministry of Agriculture for Crop Cultivation Science in Northeast Area, Harbin 150030, China

    At the beginning of silking, maize production began to form, but leaves started senescence and photosynthetic capacity decreased at this time, all of those severely restricted the formation of the production. In order to study the effects of exogenous substances on the process of leaf senescence, 40 mg · L-1DCPTA and 20 mg · L-1CCC were mixed in the research. When the maize grew to the six expanded leaves stage, 10 mL compound mixtures (TR) were sprayed on both sides of leaves for per plant, and the control was treated with water (CK). Three plants were selected randomly for determination of physiological index at the 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 days after silking. The results showed that TR could increase the chlorophyll content significantly, Fv/Fm, Fv/F0and Y(II) values of TR were higher than those of CK while F0values were opposite. Compared with CK, TR increased SOD and POD activity and soluble protein content, reduced MDA content. Correlation analysis showed that chlorophyll content had negative correlation with F0, and MDA content had negative correlation with other indexes. Compared with CK, TR reduced the negative correlation effect between chlorophyll content and MDA, increased the positive correlation effect between chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm, SOD, POD, soluble protein. The study provided theoretical and experimental evidence for the application of the compound mixtures of DCPTA and CCC to the production.

    maize, plant growth regulator, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, senescence, DCPTA

    Introduction

    With the increasing population, the demand for grain is growing, but the gradually reduced arable land limits the increase of grain yield. Now, the harvest index and the transformation of plant type of most crops have reached the limit, therefore, to find new ways of increasing yield have became an urgent problem (Spano et al., 2003). Photosynthesis is the main way of accumulating organic matter of plant. Organic matter which is produced by photosynthesis accounts for about 95% of the total plant dry matter weight (Dong et al., 1997). After silking, the contribution rate of photosynthesis to yield is more than 90% and it has an effect for yield formation (Yamori et al., 2010). Therefore, the means by increasing photosynthetic efficiency and extending photosynthetic time of growing late stage were becoming the important ways for increasing yield.

    The silking stage is the key stage of yield formation. At this time, leaves begin to senescence and chlorophyll begin to be decomposed. As a result, it causes that the photosynthetic ability declines, which limits the accumulation of organic matter (Fischer, 2012). The main characteristic of leaf senescence is the disintegration of the photosynthetic system (Gunda et al., 2010). In addition, photosystem II (PSII) is considered as the primary site of injury of the photosynthetic apparatus in the aging process (Sharkey et al., 2010). The injury for PSII can cause a change in chlorophyll fluorescence. Therefore, chlorophyll fluorescence has been used as a reliable non-invasive and powerful method for evaluating the changes in function of PSII and for reflecting the primary photosynthetic processes (Hajiboland et al., 2010; Hazem et al., 2014). In the process of senescence, the damage of light system leads to an accumulation of excess reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxides. Plants have evolved complex enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant defense systems to regulate cellular oxidative damage. It is well known that superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidases (APX) are important ROS scavenging enzymes, and they have been well studied in different plants (Gill et al., 2010; Balazs et al., 2012). Therefore, it has the important significance to study antioxidant enzyme activity in the process of leaf senescence.

    Hormones and plant growth regulators play a crucial role in developmental processes as well as in the integration of environmental signals to plant development (Maes et al., 2011). Indeed, all the classical plant hormones have been described as playing a role in the regulation of leaf senescence (Prakash, 2013). For example, senescence is accelerated by ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA) and salicylic acid (SA), and delayed by auxin, gibberellic acid (GA) and cytokinins (CKs). Some studies showed compound regulator could increase GA3content and reduce ABA content, and these were conducive to delay the aging of cells and tissues, increase antioxidant enzyme activity and reduce MDA content in maize seeding (Gan, 2010; Shao et al., 2014). In addition, several reports had shown that abiotic stress could cause plant damage and senescence; plant growth regulators could alleviate damage and senescence. At the vegetative stage, severe heat stress can result in retarded growth, senescence, and even death (Wahid et al., 2007). Exogenous application of GABA had been implicated in some important roles in plant, such as a buffering mechanism in C and N metabolism, signal transduction (Kinnersley et al., 2000) and protection against oxidative stress (Harsh et al., 2014). As a result, GABA could alleviate the damage of heat stress. Drought stress can trigger an oxidative burst, accelerate the degradation of photosynthetic pigments and cell membrane damage, induce an array of antioxidant enzymes expression, and elicit membrane lipid accumulation (Zgallai et al., 2005; Ai et al., 2008). Exogenous application of silicon could alleviate the oxidative stress of wheat plant at later growth stages through modification of reactive species biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation of multiple defense pathways, such as antioxidant enzymes, ASC-GSH cycle, and flavonoid secondary metabolism (Ma et al., 2015).

    DCPTA (2-diethylaminoethyl-3, 4-dichloro-phenylether) is one of the most representative tertiary compounds (Ren et al., 2003), which has been used in wheat and maize, especially in horticultural crops, such as cucumber and tomato (Dowens et al., 1998). DCPTA has various influences on physiological process in plants, which can regulate photosynthesis of the plants and the activity of antioxidant enzyme (Gausman et al., 1991). Some studies showed that DCPTA could speed up seedling growth, increase chlorophyll content, and improve photosynthesis in different plants, and these indicated that DCPTA participates in regulation of photosynthetic reaction (Gu et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2004). Chlorocholine chloride (2-chloro-N, N, N-trimethylethanaminium chloride; CCC; CAS No. 50-29-3) is a growth retardant, with its mechanism based on the restraint ofgibberellins biosynthesis in plant tissues. It is well known that CCC induces changes in the growth rate of grasses and the morphogenesis of potato plants cultured in vitro (Luoanen et al., 2002). 500 mg · L-1CCC can increase the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm), potential photochemical efficiency (Fv/F0), energy fluxes per excited cross-sections for absorption (ABS/ CS), trapping (TRo/CS) and electron transport (ETo/CS) of pistacia chinensis (Dong et al., 2012).

    To evaluate the role of exogenously applied compound mixtures of DCPTA and CCC in the process of leaf senescence, we investigated the changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in maize leaves treated with compound mixture and the effects of compound mixture on the oxidative response, that is, enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase) and nonenzymatic antioxidant (soluble protein) systems and lipid peroxidant (malondialdehyde). In addition, the relationship between these physiological indexes and chlorophyll content was also studied in the experiment. The study provided a guiding role about the compound mixtures of DCPTA and CCC for the growth of maize seeding, at the same time, provided new ideas for the development of other active substances.

    Materials and Methods

    Experimental site and cultivar

    The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin (126°73'E, 45°73'N), Heilongjiang Province, China, from 2011 to 2012. The soil was a typical black soil (typical hapludoll in USDA soil taxonomy), characterized by a deep, high organic matter content. The soil fertility level was determined before experiment (Table 1). The climate was a temperate continental monsoon in the region. The rainfall was variable with greater distribution in July and August. Maize was planted at mid-April and harvested at the early October.

    Table 1 Background data of productivity and soil fertility of experimental fields studied in 2011 and 2012

    A high-yielding commercial cultivar, Zhengdan 958 (ZD 958) was used for two years experiments, provided by Beijing Doneed Co., Ltd. The seeds (percentage germination≥85%) were treated with Tebuconazole (triazole fungicide) by the Rainsun Agrochemical Company Ltd., Qingdao, Shandong. In the study area, the growth periods and active accumulated temperature of ZD958 were about 128 days and above 2 850℃, respectively.

    Experiment design

    Two treatments were set, application with water and compound mixtures under the plant density of 67 500 plants · hm-2. The plot area was 56 m2for every treatment, set up eight ridges, the length and weight of each ridge was 10 m and 0.7 m, respectively. A randomized block design with three replications was used for the study.

    DCPTA (2-diethylaminminoethyl-3, 4-dichlorophenylether) and CCC (2-chloroethyltrimethylam monium chloride) were mixed together to be made compound mixtures which was liquid state. The concentrations of DCPTA and CCC were 40 mg · L-1and 20 mg · L-1, respectively. DCPTA was obtainedfrom Zheng Shi (Zhengzhou Zheng Shi Chemical Co., Ltd. China). CCC was obtained from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, St. Louis, MO, USA). When the maize grew to the six expanded leaves stage, 10 mL compound mixtures were sprayed on both sides of leaves for per plant (TR), control plants were treated with water (CK) (in order to increase the adhesion, 0.02% Tween-20 was added to compound mixtures). The spraying time was 16: 00-19: 00 in the afternoon. During processing and after, growing environment was good and there hasnot inclement weather, illumination, temperature and humidity were all appropriate.

    Field management

    Fertilizer application followed high yield practice with a base fertilizer gift of 75 kg N · hm-2, 75 kg P2O5· hm-2, 90 kg K2O · hm-2, and a top dressing with 150 kg · hm-2of urea at seven expanded leaves stage and 75 kg hm-2(46%) N at tassel stage (VT). Soils were plowed and harrowed when their mellowness was considered physically acceptable. Maize was sown on April 28, 2011and on April 29, 2012. By a mechanical ditcher, seeding furrows (5 cm deep and 0.7 cm wide) were directly formed. With manual planting cultivation methods, two seeds were sown into the prepared furrow per 21 cm spacing for the plant density (67 500 plants · m-2) treatment. The seeds were covered with moist soil from both sides of the furrow and compacted soil with feet.

    With manual thinning out the maize plant, one plant was remained per sowing point at the two-leaf stage. Other management practices, including insect and weed control were conducted according to local agronomic practices unless otherwise indicated.

    Data collection

    Date were collected for chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, SOD and POD activity, MDA and soluble protein content in 2011 and 2012. From silking stage, three plants were randomly selected and listed for measuring chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in each trial plot. At 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 days after silking, three plants were randomly selected for determination of physiological indices respectively in each trial plot. Ear leaf of plant was cut, treated with liquid nitrogen and stored in -80℃.

    Chlorophyll content

    Ear leaf that had been removed the veins was cut, mixed and weighed 0.2 g. The leaves were soaked for 72 h at 4℃ by 10 mL 80% acetone in dark. The absorbance values of extracting solution were determined with UV-1601 UV-spectrophotometer by colorimetric method at wavelength of 649 nm and 665 nm (Porra, 2002).

    Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

    Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of the middle part of ear leaves were determined with PAM-2500 chlorophyll fluorescence analyzer (WALZ, Germany) between 9:00 and 12:00 in sunny. After a 20 min dark adaptation period, the initial (F0) and maximum fluorescence (Fm) were determined. Light intensity was set 600 μmolm ·-2· s-1for determining maximum fluorescence (Fm'), initial fluorescence (F0'), steadystate fluorescence (Fs). Maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII Fv/Fm=(Fm-F0)/Fm, potential photochemical efficiency Fv/F0= (Fv/Fm)/(1-Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency of PSII in the light Y(II)=(Fm'-Fs)/Fm' (Demming-Adams et al., 1996).

    SOD and POD activities

    SOD activity was determined according to Giannopolitis's method (Giannopolitis, 1997). 20 uL enzyme solution was drawn and mixed with 3 mL SOD enzyme solution (pH 7.8 phosphate buffer 1.5 mL, 750 mol · L-1NBT 0.3 mL, 130 mmol · L-1Met 0.3 mL, 20 mol · L-1FD 0.3 mL, 100 mol · L-1EDTA-Na20.3 mL, distilled water 0.3 mL). Control and enzyme solution were placed for 30 min in 4 000 lx light. The blank was placed in dark for zero, compared in 560 nm. POD activity was determined according to Hernandez's method (Hernandez, 2000). 20 uL enzyme solution was drawn and mixed with 3 mL POD enzyme solution (1.4 uL guaiacol, 0.85 uL 30% H2O2and 0.1 mol · L-1pH 6.0 phosphate buffer). The absorbancevalues were recorded once every 30 s in 470 nm.

    MDA and soluble protein content 2 mL enzyme solution was drawn and mixed with 0.67% TBA 2 mL, than water-bath heating for 30 min in 100℃, centrifuged after cooling down. The supernatant was determined respectively in 450 nm, 532 nm and 600 nm (Zhang, 2011). Soluble protein concentration was measured with coomassie brilliant blue G-250 staining (Li and Chen, 1998).

    Date analysis

    Experimental data were expressed as mean with standard error. The average of two-year data was used in the correlation and path coefficient analyses. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 and Excel 2007 and all means were carried out using LSD Fischer test at a significance level of p<0.05. Microsoft Excel 2007 was used to chart.

    Results

    Chlorophyll content in ear leaf

    The chlorophyll content of ear leaf showed a decreasing trend. The chlorophyll content of TR was significantly higher than that of CK in 2011 and similar changes were observed from 30 to 50 days after silking in 2012. Though there was no significantly difference between 10 and 20 days, compared with CK, the chlorophyll content of TR improved 4.76% and 4.03%, respectively. Two-year experiments were with the consistent tendency of chlorophyll content (Fig. 1).

    Fig. 1 Chlorophyll content (A) in maize plant leaves treated (TR) or not (CK) with compound mixtures2011 and 2012 represent planting years. CK represents leaves treated with water, TR represents leaves treated with 40 mg · L-1DCPTA+20 mg · L-1CCC. Bars are means ± standard error of three replicates. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between TR and CK by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test.

    Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in ear leaf

    With the increase of days after silking, F0values of ear leaf showed an upward trend, Fv/Fm, Fv/F0and Y(II) were downward trend. F0values represented for fluorescence yield, which was completely open in the reacting centre of photosystem II (PSII) and it could measure the degree of permanent damage for PSII in leaves. Compared with CK, TR reduced F0values and the rate of increase (Fig. 2-A). Fv/Fmrepresented for maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII, and its values would significantly reduce when stress or senescence occurred. Fv/Fmvalues were increased by TR; TR reduced the rate of decline in the late growing stage (Fig. 2-B). Fv/F0represented for potential photochemical efficiency of PSII. TR of Fv/F0was higher than that of CK and Fv/F0values of TR declined more slowly than those of CK in 40 to 50 days after silking (Fig. 2-C). Y(II) was actual quantum yield of PSII in light, which represented for the actual photosynthetic capacity. TR significantly increased actual quantum yield of PSII (Fig. 2-D), made ear leaves keep relatively highphotosynthetic capacity in late growing stage and those provided a guarantee for yield formation. Two years experiments showed the same trend for chlorophyll fluorescence parameters.

    Fig. 2 Primary fluorescence, Fo(A), maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry; Fv/Fm, potential photochemical efficiency; Fv/Fo(C), actual quantum yield of PSII in light; Y(ⅠⅠ) (D), in maize plant leaves treated (TR) or not (CK) with compound mixtures2011 and 2012 represent planting year. CK represents leaves that treated with water, TR represents leaves treated with 40 mg · L-1DCPTA+20 mg · L-1CCC. Bars are means ± standard error of three replicates. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between TR and CK by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test.

    Senescence physiology in ear leaf

    The active oxygen metabolism was imbalance in the process of leaf senescence; hazardous substances such as MDA were continuous accumulation, as a result, the function of cells was affected. In the early senescence, plants would clear the harmful substances by improving the activity of antioxidant enzymes, such as reactive oxygen species. SOD and POD were the main antioxidant enzymes which played an important role in retarding the process of senescence. With the increase of days after silking, MDA content of ear leaf gradually increased, and the rate appeared a tendency to slow down after. Two-year experiments showed the same trend. Compared with CK, TR reduced the accumulation of MDA content, and it declined 28.09% and 39.81%, respectively in 40 days after silking of 2011 and 2012 years (Fig. 3-A). Different trends occurred in SOD and POD activities with the increase of days after silking. SOD and POD showed reverse 'V'shape and 'M' shape respectively, and two years showed the same trend. From 30 to 50 days after silking, SOD and POD activity were significantly increased by TR. Though there was no significant difference between TR and CK, enzymatic activity of TR was higher than those of CK (Fig. 3-B, C). With the increase of days after silking, the content of soluble protein showed a downward trend after the first rose in ear leaf and the extent of the decline rose in 40 to 50 days after silking. Soluble protein content of TR was higher than CK, and the difference was significant without 20 days in 2011 and 50 days in 2012 after silking (Fig. 3-D).

    Fig. 3 Malonaldehyde content, MDA (A), superoxide dismutase; SOD (B), peroxidase; POD (C), soluble protein content; (D), in maize plant leaves treated (TR) or not (CK) with compound mixtures2011 and 2012 represent planting years. CK represents leaves treated with water, TR represents leaves reated with 40 mg · L-1DCPTA+20 mg · L-1CCC. Bars are means ± standard error of three replicates. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between TR and CK by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test.

    Relationship between chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

    In order to study the relationship between chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of TR and CK in the process of leaf senescence, the research analyzed the changed trend of F0, Fv/Fm, Fv/F0and Y(II) with the decline of chlorophyll content(Fig. 4). Fv/Fm, Fv/F and Y(II) declined with the reduction of chlorophyll content; in addition, the declining rate of TR was faster than that of CK. F0values rose with the reducing of chlorophyll content, the declining rate of TR was slower than that of CK. The results showed that Fv/Fm, Fv/F0and Y(II) of TR declined faster than those of CK when chlorophyll content reduced same degree, and F0was converse. Two-year experiments showed the same trend.

    Fig. 4 Relationship between chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters(A), relationship between chlorophyll content and Fo; (B), relationship between chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm; (C), relationship between chlorophyll content and Fv/Fo; (D), relationship between chlorophyll content and Y(II). 2011 and 2012 represent planting years. CK represent leaves treated with water; TR represents leaves treated with 40 mg · L-1DCPTA+20 mg · L-1CCC. Dashed and solid lines represent the linear trend of CK and TR, respectively. yCKand yTRrepresent linear regression equation of CK and TR, respectively.

    Relationship between chlorophyll content and senescence

    In order to study the relationship between decline of chlorophyll and senescent indexes of leaf, the research analyzed the changed trend of MDA, soluble protein content, SOD and POD activity along with the decline of chlorophyll content (Fig. 5). The results showed that MDA content appeared upward trend, and SOD, POD activities and soluble protein content appeared downward trend with the decline of chlorophyll content. When the chlorophyll content decreased,the rising rate of MDA content about TR was slower than that of CK; the declining rate of soluble protein content about TR was faster than that of CK. The result indicated MDA content of TR rose slower than that of CK when chlorophyll content reduced same degree, and soluble protein content of TR was faster than that of CK. Two years experiments had the same trend. The relationship between chlorophyll content and activity of SOD and POD was opposite in two years experiments. With the chlorophyll content declined, the declining rates of SOD and POD activities about TR was faster than those of CK in 2012 year, and the declining rate of TR was similar with that of CK in 2011 year. In summary, the closer relationship between senescent indexes and chlorophyll content appeared by TR.

    Fig. 5 Relationship between chlorophyll content and senescence physiology(A), relationship between chlorophyll content and MDA content; (B), relationship between chlorophyll content and SOD activity; (C), relationship between chlorophyll content and POD activity; (D), relationship between chlorophyll content and soluble protein content. 2011 and 2012 represent planting year. CK represent leaves treated with water, TR represents leaves treated with 40 mg · L-1DCPTA+20 mg · L-1CCC. Dashed and solid lines represent the linear trend of CK and TR, respectively. yCKand yTRrepresent linear regression equation of CK and TR, respectively.

    Correlation analysis of the various indexes

    Table 2 showed that chlorophyll content of CK had extremely significant negative correlation with F0 and MDA content, and it had extremely significant positive correlation with Fv/Fm, Fv/F0, Y(II) and SOD activity, while it had been uncorrelated with POD activity and soluble protein. TR showed the same trend with CK, but the chlorophyll content of TR had significant positive correlation with soluble protein content and the correlative coefficient was 0.84*. Compared with CK, TR reduced the correlation between chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and SOD activity, and the correlation between MDA content with chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Therefore, TR could mitigate the extent of leaf senescence by decreasing the reduced degree of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. The comparison of various senescent indexes showed the correlation of SOD, POD, MDA and soluble protein was improved under TR. The more closer of the correlation between these index, the faster of the physiological response of plant in the process of leaf senescence.

    Path coefficient analysis between chlorophyll content and various indexes

    The correlation analysis only reflected the relationship of various indexes, not really reflected direct or intrinsic effect between various index and chlorophyll content. Path coefficient analysis not only studied the direct effect of independent variables on dependent variable, but also compared their relative importance by stepwise regression. Direct path coefficient and indirect path coefficients were obtained by calculation of correlation coefficient and decomposition. The results of path coefficient analysis showed that the absolute value ranking of direct path coefficient was Y(II)>F0>Fv/Fm>Fv/F0, MDA>SOD>POD>soluble protein under CK. TR was Fv/F0>Fv/Fm>F0>Y(II), soluble protein>POD>SOD>MDA, and the larger absolute value represented the greater effect on chlorophyll content. The above results showed TR mainly affected the direct effect of Fv/F0, Y(II), soluble protein and MDA content with chlorophyll, thus, these affected chlorophyll content (Table 3).

    Table 2 Correlation analysis of the various indicators

    In addition to the direct effect, various indexes also affected chlorophyll content by indirect effects of each other. Under CK, the total indirect effect of Fv/Fm, Fv/ F0, MDA, POD, SOD and soluble protein was more than direct effect, and the situation of TR was F0, Fv/Fm, Y(II), SOD, POD and MDA. The reasons of indirect effect was more than direct effect were that various indexes of CK had larger indirect effects to chlorophyll content by Y(II), and TR did this by Fv/F0. After the superposed of these direct and indirect effects of various indexes each other, path coefficient between F0and MDA was negative number, and this result showed that these two indexes had negative effects on chlorophyll content, both years had the same trend (Table 3).

    Table 3 Path coefficient analysis between chlorophyll content and various indicators

    Discussion

    Chlorophyll content

    Chlorophyll is a class of the important pigment related with photosynthesis; therefore, it is essential to the growth of plants. It has been documented that the large remobilization for the early stage of leaf senescence is mainly attributed by the degradation of stromal proteins (especially Rubisco) accumulated in chloroplasts (Avice et al., 2014). In the aging process, chlorophyll content reduced gradually. As the result, photosynthetic capacity decreased. 5-aminolevuliniccacid (ALA) was found to be accumulated in leaf tissues in the presence of different C-labeled protochlorophyllide and levulinic acid (Richter et al., 2010). Recently, some studies had been made in improving plant growth and yield using ALA as an exogenous agent in different crop plants. It was well established that ALA improved chlorophyllcontent, but there was still a large knowledge gap to fill regarding the mechanism of action of ALA and what type of genes were activated/inactivated during chlorophyll synthesis (Nudrat et al., 2013). Exogenous spermidine (Spd) pretreatment could increase the content of chla, chlb and chl (a+b) under drought stress (Li et al., 2015). DCPTA could increase the content of chla, chlb in maize and soybean (James et al., 1991), but the further study showed that the increase of chlorophyll content after the treatment was the result of the volume increase of chlorophyll, not the increasing synthesis of chla and chlb (Shen et al., 1999). Be similar with DCPTA, the research showed that CCC could make the leaf color deepen, leaf thickness increase, chlorophyll content rise, photosynthesis increase. The research showed compound mixtures could significantly improved chlorophyll content of ear leaf after silking and reduced the reductive rate of chlorophyll content. The regulation of DCPTA and CCC on chlorophyll content may be carried out by the different metabolic pathways; diverse regulatory pathways were more stable and better than single pathway.

    Chlorophyll fluorescence

    In the process of leaf senescence, not only the chlorophyll content declined, but also photosynthetic system was also destroyed (Per et al., 2013). Fv/Fmvalue under optimal growth conditions was around 0.85 in many plants, but it markedly declined during stress (Bjokman et al., 1987). Under drought stress, compared with the control, Fv/Fmvalues were increased in Me-JA and COR-treated plants, and the difference was significant (Wu et al., 2012). With regard to the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, we found that application of 40 mg · L-1DCPTA on maize seedling caused the increase in Fm, Fv/Fm, and Fv/Fo. The results showed that the light transformation efficiency increased in the reaction centre of PSII and the primary reaction of the photosynthesis was promoted and promoted the excited energy transformation from LHC II to PSII after spraying optimum concentration DCPTA on plants (Gu et al., 2014). 500 mg · L-1CCC increased Fv/Fmand Fv/Fovalues in Pistacia chinensis leaves, and compared with control, the significant was difference (Dong et al., 2012). Exogenous 1 mmol · L-1GSH treatment and excess-S could improve photosynthesis and growth under salt stress (Fatma et al., 2014; Matsufuji et al., 2013). The study was similar to previous studies, compound mixtures could increase Fv/Fmand Fv/F0values and reduce F0 values. Previous studies had showed that DCPTA and CCC could improve chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in different degrees, but these studies focused on the regulation under stress conditions. Our study focused on the effects of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics by compound mixtures in the process of leaf senescence. Senescence is a program of plants' own processes, rather than being caused by external stimuli, therefore, the regulation mechanism might differ from adversity. In our study, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and chlorophyll content were highly significant correlation, so the compound mixtures of DCPTA and CCC might affect chlorophyll fluorescence parameters by affecting chlorophyll content.

    Antioxidant enzymes

    In the process of leaf senescence, chlorophyll resolved continually, and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics were destroyed. As the result, light system is damaged. Excessive light energy could cause the accumulation of H2O2and MDA. For removing harmful substances, the plants would improve their antioxidant enzyme activity, thereby reducing damage. Accumulation of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants had a substantial role in plant growth and developmental events by regulating ROS production under non stress as well as stress conditions (Ashraf, 2009; Akram et al., 2012; Perveen et al., 2010). The activities of antioxidant enzymes such as POD and SOD increased in ALA-treated pakchoi leaf tissues. It also has been demonstrated that exogenous spermidine (Spd) was effective in enhancing the activity ofperoxidase to lessen in this way the oxidative stress (Roychoudhury et al., 2011). Exogenously applied spermidine could increase SOD, POD, CAT activity and reduce MDA content under drought stress in creeping bentgrass (Zhou et al., 2015). Other studies had shown that DCPTA could reduce the accumulation of MDA and increase SOD and POD activities (Ma et al., 2011). Our studies were similar to previous studies, compound mixtures could increase SOD and POD activities in maize leaves; increase the content of soluble protein; and reduce the accumulation of MDA. POD activity appeared upward trend at 30 to 40 days after silking, which was different from previous studies. A possible reason was that the gene that could increase POD activity was started, and intermediate products of POD catalyzed corresponding substrate oxidation caused oxidation and decomposition of chlorophyll. In these studies, the declining rate of chlorophyll content was faster than other phases at 30 to 40 days after silking, and the direct effect of POD on the chlorophyll content was negative in path coefficient analysis. Above results showed it had a certain relationship between POD activity and chlorophyll breakdown.

    Conclusions

    Leaves began to aging and chlorophyll content decreased with the increase of days after silking. The chlorophyll content of TR was higher than that of CK. TR reduced the amount of decomposition of chlorophyll and increased the time for photosynthesis.

    F0values rose; Fv/Fm, Fv/F0and Y(II) declined with the increase of days after silking. TR was lower than CK in F0values and higher in Fv/Fm, Fv/F0and Y(II). TR could alleviate the damage that caused by senescence of excess light energy to leaves by increasing the utilization of light energy.

    In the process of leaf senescence, reactive oxygen species increased, thus causing damage to leaves. Compared with CK, TR could increase SOD and POD activities, reduced the damage of reactive oxygen species to leaves, thus reducing MDA accumulation.

    TR increased the correlation between chlorophyll content and POD, soluble protein and reduced the correlation between chlorophyll content and MDA content.

    Path coefficient analyses showed that TR mainly affected the direct effects among chlorophyll and Fv/F0, Y(II), soluble protein and MDA content, thus affecting the chlorophyll content.

    Ai L, Li Z H, Xie Z X, et al. 2008. Coronatine alleviates polyethylene glycol-induced water stress in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. J Agron Crop Sci, 194, 360-368.

    Akram NA, Ashraf M, Al-Qurainy F. 2012. Aminolevulinic acid induced regulation in some key physiological attributes and activities of antioxidant enzymes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under saline regimes. Sci Hortic, 142, 143-148.

    Ashraf M. 2009. Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnol Adv,27: 84-93.

    Avice JC, Etienne P.2014. Leaf senescence and nitrogen remobilization efficiency in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). J Exp Bot,65: 3813-3824.

    Balazs Varga, Tibor Janda, Emese Laszlo, et al. 2012. Influence of abiotic stresses on the antioxidant enzyme activity of cereals. Acta Physiol Plant,34: 849-858.

    Bjokman O, Demming B.1987. Photon yield of O2evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta, 70, 489-504.

    Buchanan-Wollaston V. 1997. The molecular biology of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot,48: 181-1991.

    Demmig A B, Adams W W, Baker D H, et al. 1996. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiol Plant, 98, 253-264.

    Dong Q, Wang J, Pang M, et al. 2012. Effects of Growth Regulations on Photosynthetic and Physiological Indices and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters of Pistacia chinensis. Acta Bot Boreal,32: 484-490.

    Dong S T, Gao R Q, Hu C H, et al. 1997. Study of canopy photosynthesis property and high yield potential after anthesis in maize. Acta Agron Sin,23: 318-325.

    Dowens B P, Crowell D N. 1998. Cytokinin regulates the expression ofa soybean β-expansingene by a post-transcriptional mechanism. Plant Mol Biol,37: 437-444.

    Fatma M, Asgher M, Masood A, et al. 2014. Excess sulfur supplementation improves photosynthesis and growth in mustard under salt stress through increased production of glutathione. Environ Exp Bot,107: 55-63.

    Fischer A M. 2012. The complex regulation of senescence. Crit Rev Plant Sci,31: 124-147.

    Gan SS.2010. The Hormonal Regulation of Senescence. Plant Hormones, 597-617.

    Gausman H W, Quisenberry J E, Yokoyama H. 1991. Introduction to effects of plant biochemical regulators. In: Gausman H W. Plant biochemical regulator, Marcel Dekker. Inc., New York. pp. 1-16.

    Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K. 1977. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol,59: 309-314.

    Gill S S, Tuteja N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem,48(12): 909-930.

    Gunda S E, Titus F A, Mosisa W, et al. 2010. Photosynthesis and leafnitrogen dynamics during leaf senescence of tropical maize cultivars in hydroponics in relation to N efficiency in the field. Plant Soil,330: 313-328.

    Gu W R, Li Z H, Zhai Z X. 2008. Regulation of tertiary amine bioregulator on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of corn leaves. Acta Agriculture Boreali-Sinica, 23: 85-89.

    Gu W R, Meng Y, Zhang J B, et al. 2014. Regulation of foliar application DCPTA on growth and development of maize seedling leaves in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University,21: 1-11.

    Hajiboland R, Aliasgharzadeh N, Laiegh S F, et al. 2010. Colonization woth arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. Plant Soil,331: 313-327.

    Harsh N, Ramanpreet K, Simranjit K, et al. 2014. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) imparts partial protection from heat stress injury to rice seedlings by improving leaf turgor and upregulating osmoprotectants and antioxidants. J Plant Growth Regul,33: 408-419.

    Hazem M K, Gert S, Richard J L. 2014. Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues. Photosynth Res,122: 121-158.

    Hernandez J A, Jimenez A, Mullineaux P, et al. 2000. Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defenses. Plant Cell Environ,23: 853-862

    James H, Keithly J H, Yokoyama H. 1991. Regulation of crop growth and yield by tertiary amine bioregulators. In: Gausman H W. Plant biochemical regulator. Marcel Dekker. Inc., New York. pp: 223-246.

    Kinnersley AM, Lin F.2000. Receptor modifiers indicate that γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a potential modulator of ion transport in plants. Plant Growth Regul,32: 65-76.

    Li H S, Chen C L. 1998. Principle and technology of physiological and biochemical experiments in plants. Huazhong Agricultural University Press, Wuhan. (in Chinese)

    Li Z, Zhou H, Peng Y, et al. 2015. Exogenously applied spermidine improves drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass associated with changes in antioxidant defense, endogenous polyamines and phytohormones. Plant Growth Regul,76: 71-82.

    Luoanen J, Rikala R, Aphalo P J. 2002. Effect of CCC and daminozide on growth of silver birch container seedlings during three years after spraying. New Forest,23: 71-80.

    Maes L, Zhang Y, Reed D W, et al. 2011. Dissection of the phytohormonal regulation of trichome formation and biosynthesis of the antimalarial compound artemisinin in Artemisia annua plants. New Phytol, 189, 176-189.

    Ma D Y, Sun D X, Wang C Y, et al. 2015. Silicon application alleviates drought stress in wheat through transcriptional regulation of multiple antioxidant defense pathways. J Plant Growth Regul, DOI 10.1007/ s00344-015-9500-2.

    Ma Q H, Tan X H, Liang L, et al. 2011. Effects of plant growth regulators DA-6 and DCPTA on reactive oxygen species and related physiological. Food Science,32: 296-299.

    Matsufuji Y, Yamamoto K, Yamauchi K, et al. 2013. Novel physiological roles for glutathione in sequestering acetaldehyde to confer acetaldehyde tolerance in Saccharomycescerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechno,197: 297-303.

    Nudrat A A, Muhammad A. 2013. Regulation in plant stress tolerance by a potential plant growth regulator, 5-Aminolevulinic Acid. J Plant Growth Regul,32: 663-679.

    Per LG, Andrea C, Luca B, Karin K. 2013. Plant senescence and crop productivity. Plant Mol Biol,82: 603-622.

    Perveen S, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M. 2012. Regulation in gas exchange and quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) in salt-stressed and nonstressed wheat plants raised from seed treated with triacontanol. Pak J Bot,42: 307-308.

    Ping H E, Mitsuru O, Masako T, et al. 2002. Changes of photosyntheticcharacteristics in relation to leaf senescence in two maize hybrids with different senescent appearance. Photosynthetica,40: 547-552.

    Porra R J. 2002. The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophyll a and b. Photosynthesis Research,73: 149-156.

    Prakash P. Kumar. 2013. Regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses by plant hormones. Plant Cell Rep,32: 943.

    Roychoudhury A, Basu S, Sengupta D N. 2011. Amelioration of salinity stress by exogenously applied spermidine or spermine in three varieties of indica rice differing in their level of salt tolerance. J Plant Physiol,168: 317-328.

    Richter A, Peter E, Lorenzen S, et al. 2010. Rapid dark repression of 5-aminolevulinic acid synthesis in green barley leaves. Plant Cell Physiol,51: 670-681.

    Shao R X, Li J, Chen J H, et al. 2014. Effects of compound regulator seed dressing on endogenous hormones and lipid peroxidation of membrane system during aging process of maize. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences,28: 1142-1147. (in Chinese)

    Sharkey T D, Zhang R. 2010. High temperature effects on electron and proton circuits of photosynthesis. J Integr Plant Biol,52: 712-722.

    Shen M S, Lin Y J, Chen M C. 1999. Studies on influence of DTA-6 regulation on leaf cells ultrastructure in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Sugar Crops of China 4, 1-3.

    Spano G, Di Fonzo N, Perrotta C, et al. 2003. Physiological characterization of stay green mutants in durum wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany,54: 1415-1420.

    Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, et al. 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot,61: 199-223.

    Wu H L, Wu X L, Li Z H, et al. 2012. Physiological evaluation of drought stress tolerance and recovery in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) seedlings treated with methyl jasmonate and coronatine. J Plant Growth Regul,31: 113-123.

    Yamori W, Noguchi K O, Hikosaka K, et al. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity in photosynthetic temperature acclimation among crop species with different cold tolerances. Plant Physiol,52: 388-399.

    Zgallai H, Steppe K, Lemeur R. 2005. Photosynthetic, physiological and biochemical responses of tomato plants to polyethylene glycolinduced water deficit. J Integr Plant Biol,47: 1470-1478.

    Zhang Z L. 2001. Experimental guide of plant physiology. Higher Education Press, Beijing.

    Zhou L, Hui Z, Yan P, et al. 2015. Exogenously applied spermidine improves drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass associated with changes in antioxidant defense, endogenous polyamines and phytohormones. Plant Growth Regul,76: 71-82.

    Zhou T, Hu Y J, Zhou X M. 2004. Effect of DTA-6 on seedling photosynthesis and growth of wild barely. Pratacul Science,21(4): 31-34.

    Zhu X C, Song F B, Liu S Q, et al. 2011. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on photosynthesis and water status of maize under high temperature stress. Plant Soil,346: 189-199.

    S512.1

    A

    1006-8104(2015)-03-0001-15

    Received 1 June 2015

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Youth Science Foundation (31201164); Northeast Agricultural University Doctor Started Foundation (2012RCB01); China Postdoctoral Foundation (2012M511434); Project of National Non-profit Institute Fund (BSRF201405)

    Wang Yong-chao (1987-), male, Ph. D, engaged in the research of maize cultivation physiology and stress regulation. E-mail: wangyongchao723@163. com

    *Corresponding author. Wei Shi, professor, supervisor of Ph. D student, engaged in the research of crop yield and physiology, the macro agriculture. E-mail: weishi5608@163.com

    国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产精品影院久久| 99久久人妻综合| 身体一侧抽搐| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 日韩高清综合在线| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 搡老岳熟女国产| 1024香蕉在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲av熟女| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲av美国av| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 丝袜美足系列| 在线观看www视频免费| 免费少妇av软件| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 91字幕亚洲| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 午夜免费激情av| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲九九香蕉| 免费不卡黄色视频| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产成人精品无人区| 三级毛片av免费| av电影中文网址| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久精品影院6| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 午夜a级毛片| 成在线人永久免费视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久9热在线精品视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 黄色视频不卡| 国产黄色免费在线视频| xxx96com| 老司机靠b影院| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 看免费av毛片| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 窝窝影院91人妻| 在线观看www视频免费| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 中文欧美无线码| 高清av免费在线| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 久久久久久大精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 日本wwww免费看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 香蕉国产在线看| xxx96com| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 又大又爽又粗| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 久久中文看片网| 日本a在线网址| a在线观看视频网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 中国美女看黄片| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| av网站免费在线观看视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 天天添夜夜摸| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 精品电影一区二区在线| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 性少妇av在线| 岛国在线观看网站| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜老司机福利片| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 久久久久久久久中文| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 久久99一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 在线观看一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 在线看a的网站| www.精华液| 亚洲成人久久性| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 久久国产精品影院| 长腿黑丝高跟| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产av又大| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 露出奶头的视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 日本免费a在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲av美国av| 在线av久久热| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 麻豆av在线久日| 午夜免费鲁丝| 免费看a级黄色片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 久久性视频一级片| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 黄色女人牲交| 国产精品成人在线| 91在线观看av| 国产高清激情床上av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 精品福利永久在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久久亚洲真实| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 中文欧美无线码| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美日韩av久久| 成人三级黄色视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 手机成人av网站| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久久久久久久中文| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| av网站在线播放免费| 一区二区三区激情视频| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 在线播放国产精品三级| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 久久中文看片网| 国产亚洲欧美98| av免费在线观看网站| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| av中文乱码字幕在线| 又大又爽又粗| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产高清videossex| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 深夜精品福利| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 免费少妇av软件| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲九九香蕉| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲五月天丁香| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 美女福利国产在线| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲全国av大片| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 咕卡用的链子| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 一夜夜www| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久中文看片网| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日韩免费av在线播放| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 久久精品影院6| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产麻豆69| 999精品在线视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 88av欧美| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 色播在线永久视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 两个人免费观看高清视频| www国产在线视频色| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产三级在线视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 91字幕亚洲| 中文欧美无线码| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| www.999成人在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 宅男免费午夜| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 级片在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 欧美大码av| 久热这里只有精品99| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 午夜福利免费观看在线| av网站在线播放免费| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日本三级黄在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产在线观看jvid| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 色在线成人网| 国产麻豆69| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 嫩草影院精品99| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日本wwww免费看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 很黄的视频免费| 免费少妇av软件| 91大片在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久狼人影院| 高清av免费在线| 99re在线观看精品视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| avwww免费| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 操美女的视频在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 91成人精品电影| 久久草成人影院| 搡老岳熟女国产| 一级片'在线观看视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 高清欧美精品videossex| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产熟女xx| 日韩高清综合在线| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 三级毛片av免费| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av熟女| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 在线视频色国产色| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 咕卡用的链子| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 午夜视频精品福利| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 成人手机av| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 黄色成人免费大全| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 99久久人妻综合| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 长腿黑丝高跟| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | e午夜精品久久久久久久| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产色视频综合| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 色综合婷婷激情| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美在线黄色| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 91成年电影在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 正在播放国产对白刺激| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 久久青草综合色| 午夜福利,免费看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 99re在线观看精品视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线|