• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A comparison of the ballistic behaviour of conventionally sintered and additively manufactured alumina

    2020-05-23 07:08:58GrethJmesAppleyThomsKevinJnsluAmerHmeedJonthnPinterJmesShckelJulieRowley
    Defence Technology 2020年2期

    Greth Jmes Appley-Thoms , Kevin Jnslu , Amer Hmeed , Jonthn Pinter ,Jmes Shckel , Julie Rowley

    a Centre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield Defence and Security, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Swindon, SN6 8LA, UK

    b Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,Royal Military College of Canada,PO Box 17000,Station Forces,Kingston,Ontario,K7K 7B4,Canada

    Keywords:Additive manufacture Rapidly prototyped Body armour Ballistics Ceramics

    ABSTRACT Production of ceramic armour solutions on-demand/in-theatre would have significant logistical and military advantages. However, even assuming that such technologies could be successfully deployed in the field, such near net-shape manufacturing technology is relatively immature compared to conventional sintering of ceramics.In this study,the ballistic performance of a series of additively manufactured(AM)/rapidly-prototyped(RP)alumina tiles of 97.2%of the density of Sintox FA?were investigated using both forward- and reverse-ballistic experiments. These experiments, undertaken with compressed gasguns,employed the depth-of-penetration technique and flash X-ray as primary diagnostics to interrogate both efficiency of penetration and projectile-target interaction, respectively. The RP alumina was found to exhibit useful ballistic properties,successfully defeating steel-cored(AP)7.62×39 mm BXN rounds at velocities of up-to c.a. 850 m/s, while exhibiting comparable failure modes to conventionally sintered armour-grade Sintox FA?.However,where a<1%by vol.Cu dopant was introduced into the RP material failure modes changed dramatically with performance dropping below that of conventionally sintered alumina. Overall, the results from both sets of experiments were complimentary and clearly indicated the potential of such RP materials to play an active role in provision of real-world body armour solutions provided quality control of the RP material can be maintained.

    1. Introduction

    The high specific strength under impact of ceramics has led to their widespread adoption as armour materials against hardened rounds, both for personnel and for vehicles [1-7]. Such solutions are often composite in nature, with a compliant backing material employed to account for the inherently brittle nature of the hard ceramic facing(for additional detail in the body armour sphere,the reader is referred to a very complete recent review in Ref. [6]covering, in particular, ceramic strike-face materials, backing materials and cladding approaches). However, fitting a rigid armour solution to complex shaped structures (whether vehicles or even individuals, where significant variation in individual stature naturally occurs) is a crucial challenge. Further, such rigid systems-which may even need replacement in theatre(due to damage)-are inevitably relatively inefficient to transport due to a relatively high volume to density ratio. To this end, the ability to rapidly produce complex ceramic shapes in the field would be a significant advantage in terms of the continued deployment of ceramic armour to a wider range of applications.

    High purity alumina(Al2O3)has been widely adopted as a body armour material, primarily due to its useful combination of good ballistic properties, low costs and familiarity with associated manufacturing routes [4]. Other ceramics such as silicon carbide(SiC) and boron carbide (B4C) are stronger but are less widely employed due to both manufacturing and economic issues [3,4],although research into these materials is now very-much coming to the fore [6]. One of the main mechanisms governing ceramic armour response is that of overmatch of incident projectiles - leading to their erosion and subsequent defeat [8-10]. This process,known as dwell, only occurs below a certain threshold velocity,while above this threshold velocity,if the defect population caused by the initial impact of projectile is sufficiently high,a transition to penetration can occur [11,12]. This threshold velocity is known as the dwell-penetration transition velocity. Essentially, dwell will continue as long as the defect population in the target is low enough that its strength is not overcome. Importantly, however,dwell will only occur if the target is held under compression -arrival of tensile releases of sufficient magnitude will promote armour failure. Such release waves can be generated at interfaces of lower impedance such as the rear surface or edges of an armour tile and,on arriving back at the point of impact,may lead to consequent material failure.This response-and the consequent importance of ceramic confinement - is highlighted by the radical difference in tensile and compressive strengths of ceramics (e.g. 300 and 2620 MPa respectively for 99.9% pure Al2O3[13]).

    There have been a large number of studies focused on understanding ceramic armour,with the aim of either defeating systems or improving their performance [4-20]. While these have identified numerous factors (including individual ceramic strength and target construction) which effect armour performance, the importance of overmatch means that control of wave propagation within the armour following impact is of particular importance to maximise efficiency.

    Ceramic armour is typically manufactured via a pressuresintering route, with differences (for example in temperature)effecting the final grain size and consequent material properties[4].However, the ability to rapidly manufacture (3D print) ceramics is now slowly becoming more common-place. Several different routes exist; in particular, stereo lithography [21,22] (curing of photo-curable binder loaded ceramic pastes) and selective laser sintering [22,23] (involving laser sintering of green powder beds)are some of the more common approaches for ceramic materials,with other approaches including adapted forms of inkjet printing[24] and binder jetting [25].

    In a typical study,ceramic armour failure modes under ballistic attack were interrogated via a combination of high-speed photography, flash X-ray and computational modelling [14]. Projectile erosion was shown to aid in conoid formation in the impacted ceramics - thereby maximising the extent of distribution of the projectiles impact energy onto the tougher backing plates. Interestingly,the thickness of such backing plates was also shown to be important-with thicker plates found to prevent premature failure of the ceramic, further highlighting the fact that ceramic armour solutions are composite in nature [15]. This is consistent with recent research for conventionally manufactured (pressure sintered)Al2O3tiles which has linked ceramic performance with both the thickness and hardness of confining material[26-28].In these experiments, performance was found to improve with confinement,indicating the importance of boundaries in ceramic response.

    However, there is a relative paucity of information on the ballistic response of rapidly prototyped/3D printed ceramics. To this end,the authors have previously presented tentative evidence that the relative ballistic properties of a particular 3D printed and conventionally sintered alumina are broadly comparable [29]. In this study this previous work is extended to further highlight the potential application of such materials, manufactured commercially via a modified stereolithography process. In particular, potential limitations of 3D printed alumina are explored in greater depth - with a particular focus, via inclusion of new data, on the influence of dopants during manufacture. A combination of forward (depth of penetration) [26,30,31] and reverse [18,32,33] ballistics experiments were undertaken using both steel and WC-Co cored Armour Piercing (AP) ammunition with the aim of investigating not only 3D printed ceramic performance under ballistic attack,but also the underpinning material response(both projectile defeat and ceramic failure).

    2. Materials

    As detailed in Table 1, Sintox FA?(95.0% Al2O3- Morgan Advanced Materials) and a Rapid Prototyped (RP) ceramic (Technology Assessment and Transfer (T&AT) Inc., USA [21]), manufactured via a modified stereolithography process (which did not involve laser sintering),were investigated.In the latter case,a set of targets with <1% by volume Cu inclusions were also considered,with the Cu content determined in the final samples via EDX scanning and subsequent graphical analysis of metallographically prepared samples. Porosity was also measured using similar samples. In all cases micrographs were graphically analysed using the freely available software package ‘ImageJ’ [34]. Micrographs were turned into 8-bit images and made binary to highlight areas of porosity and/or pull-out as-required.

    Scanning electron micrographs of the materials investigated are presented in Fig.1. In order to determine whether any anisotropy was present(considered a potential issue for the RP material due to the manufacturing technique which incorporates an inherent directionality),perpendicular sections were considered in all cases.Grain boundaries are just discernible in the captured secondary electron images.Microstructurally,the RP materials were observed to be more refined and rounded;with the Sintox FA?grains more angular in nature. In general, consistent with their conventionally sintered nature, the grains in the Sintox FA?were similar in both the impact and perpendicular faces with an elongated form nominally 5 μm wide by 10 μm long. Whereas for the RP material,the ceramic grains appeared slightly more isotropic in form with a smaller size of around 2-3 μm(presumably the nominal size of the feedstock powder),with these grains agglomerated into groupings whose size was comparable to the Sintox grains.Interestingly,there was no significant difference in microstructure apparent between the perpendicular faces considered for the RP materials (Fig.1(a)/(b)and Fig.1(e)/(f))for the RP and RP(Cu)materials in terms of the impact face/side,respectively.This was reflected in a slightly higher hardness, despite the observed greater porosity, for both the RP(pure) and RP(Cu) (copper-doped) alumina cases (Table 1). The porosity values in Table 1 exclude the effect of pull-outs.In all three cases, based on optical analysis, overall porosity (voids) appeared relatively low at just a few percent-although their distribution is significantly coarser for the Sintox than for RP material. Further,once the relatively coarse regions of pull-out were excluded,it was evident that there was significantly lower porosity apparent in the pressure-sintered Sintox FA?- as shown by the close packing,away from large pull-out based voids, of individual grains in Fig.1(c) and (d). Interestingly, small copper contaminants can just be discerned in Fig.1(e)and(f),with the(highlighted by red dashed circles) brighter inclusions - representing regions were charging was occurring around the embedded copper particles (confirmed as such via EDX analysis)-sitting along alumina grain boundaries.Of particular note was that,despite a higher hardness,there was anotable difference in density of about 150 kg/m3(nominally 4%)between the RP(Cu) and the denser (pure) RP material. This appeared to be a real effect, although relatively small. Elastic properties in the form of longitudinal and shear sound speeds (cland csrespectively)and Youngs modulus(E)were also determined using Panametrics ultrasonic transducers operating at 5.0 MHz for the pure RP and Sintox and are presented in Table 1. It was noted that longitudinal and shear sound speeds were significantly closer in the (pure) RP material as opposed to the pressure-sintered Sintox. Overall, it was apparent that differences in processing route and resultant microstructure led to the RP material exhibiting slightly greater porosity and consequent lower stiffness compared to the conventionally sintered Sintox FA?; however, in contrast,the more refined microstructure of the RP material led to a slightly higher hardness.

    Table 1 Key target material properties.

    Fig.1. Scanning electron micrographs showing rapid-prototyped and Sintox FA? target ceramics(a) RP ceramic: impact face(b) RP ceramic: side(c) Sintox FA?: impact face(d)Sintox FA?:side(e)Cu-loaded RP ceramic:impact face(f)Cu-loaded RP ceramic:side;examples of Cu inclusions indicated by the bright regions highlighted in dashed red circles in(e) and (f).

    Differing hard and soft cored projectiles were used for forward and reverse-ballistics experiments,respectively,as shown in Fig.2.While these projectiles had fundamentally different failure modes,they were selected to provide as much information as possible in a given experiment. In the forward configuration, WC-Co cored armour-piercing (AP) FFV 7.62 mm rounds provided enhanced penetration-and therefore fidelity in terms of subsequent depthof-penetration measurements; whereas for reverse-ballistic experiments, the use of 7.62 mm steel-cored BXN Full Metal Jacket(FMJ) rounds encouraged dwell which was visible via flash X-ray.

    3. Methodology

    Fig.2. 7.62 mm rounds employed for(a)forward and(b)reverse-ballistics experiments:(i)whole bullet;(ii)core only,and;(iii)cross-section.(a)WC-Co cored FFV round(b)steelcored BXN Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) round.

    Both forward [26,30,31] and reverse [18,32,33] ballistic experiments were undertaken. Forward-ballistic experiments involved the use of a 30-mm smooth-bore single-stage compressed gas-gun to fire acetal-saboted WC-Co projectiles (Fig. 2(a)) into ceramic targets backed by a series of 100 mm2Al 6082 blocks, each of 25 mm thickness.Comparison of depths-of-penetration(DOP)into these backing plates allowed derivation of a metric known as‘mass efficiency’ - Em, to interrogate ballistic response. This approach,detailed later in Eq. (1) [3], allowed assessment of ballistic efficiency of the ceramic targets by comparing the depth-ofpenetration of a projectile into a series of witness Al blocks with and with-out the presence of ceramic armour. For all forwardballistic experiments the sabot was stripped from the projectiles just before impact, with velocity measured immediately prior to impact using a series of sequential light gates. This experimental arrangement is shown in Fig. 3.

    Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of forward-ballistic experimental arrangement.

    For the reverse ballistic experiments, ceramic ‘targets’ were accelerated towards stationary ‘projectiles’ using a 50 mm bore single-stage gas-gun,with impacts monitored via four channels of Scandiflash XT-300 flash X-ray arranged radially around the impact point. This approach ensured that impact occurred at the desired point in the centre of the flash X-ray's focal area and, further, that the relatively small projectile did not yaw and that impacts were as normal to the target surface as possible.For these experiments the softer steel-cored BXN Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) projectiles were employed - as shown in Fig. 2(b) - as only projectile/target interaction was of interest. These rounds were the same as those employed in reverse ballistic experiments conducted within a previous study by Crouch et al. [33] focused on the interaction of steel-cored projectiles with Boron carbide ceramics.While alumina was employed here, this similarity provides a useful point of reference for the results presented later in this paper. This experimental arrangement is shown schematically in Fig. 4(a), with a picture of the target chamber illustrating the radial flash X-ray head arrangement presented in Fig. 4(b).

    4. Results and discussion

    Key experimental results for the forward and reverse ballistic experiments are presented in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.While a limited number of samples were employed due to project constraints, target configurations were chosen to ensure that patterns in ballistic response (e.g. with sample thickness) would be apparent - ensuring that any general trends would be representative of real material response, even where experimental repetitions proved impractical. For the data in Table 2, mass efficiency(Em)values were calculated based on Eq.(1)[3],using an average of baseline(Al backing only)DOP values(35.0 and 42.0 mm,both at an impact velocity of 848 m/s). This approach was considered reasonable in all cases as even for the relatively thin (c.a. 5 mm thick) ceramic tiles, backings were present - providing a ‘semiinfinite’ target configuration.

    Fig. 4. Reverse ballistic experimental configuration: (a) schematic illustration; (b)external picture of target chamber with flash X-ray heads(silver tubes)arrayed around target position.

    Where: ρAland ρcare the density of the Al backing and ceramic facing respectively;P∞is the DOP into the backing Al which results when no ceramic facing is present;tcis the ceramic tile thickness,and;Pris the residual DOP which results in the Al backing when the ceramic (armour) tile is present.

    4.1. Forwards ballistics experiments

    Based on Table 2,the variation of calculated mass efficiency with impacted ceramic thickness is illustrated in Fig. 5.

    From Fig. 5 it is immediately apparent that for both RP and conventionally sintered alumina mass efficiency against the impacting AP FFV threat increases moving from 5 to 8 mm in ceramic thickness.Above this thickness,there is tentative evidence that the performance of the RP material is plateauing or even reducing.While this might suggest that the material's ballistic limit has been reached,there is insufficient data to draw any significant conclusions.It is notable,however,that at thicknesses of both 5 and 8 mm the RP material consistently shows a lower overall mass efficiency than the corresponding thickness Sintox FA?targets.This reduction in efficiency is attributed to the slightly greater porosity of the RP material (see Table 1) which results in a reduction in material strength under loading.This is despite a slight increase in RP material hardness over the conventionally sintered alumina.In a similar vein, it is also interesting to note the significantly lower mass efficiency of the Cu-doped sample considered as opposed to the corresponding (8-mm thick) pure RP sample. Essentially, a reduction in Emof nominally 43%occurs(relative to the Sintox)due to the small Cu addition as-opposed to just 18%moving from Sintox to pure RP material. This suggests, for the materials considered here, a significant relationship between RP ceramic purity and ballistic performance.

    4.2. Reverse ballistics experiments

    The variation of recovered core length with ceramic properties for the two nominal velocity regimes investigated is presented in Fig. 4 (with data taken from Table 3). In addition, selected results from previous similar reverse ballistics experiments conducted by Crouch et al.[33]are included for the purpose of comparison.These experiments involved identical projectiles to those employed here,but instead of alumina, Boron carbide ceramic discs of varying thicknesses were employed. Data is only included for tests which employed planar discs with no cladding (defined as ‘support condition A’ in Ref. [33]).

    Fig. 6 clearly shows that increased ceramic thickness leads to greater core erosion - e.g. enhanced projectile defeat. This is relatively unsurprising as a greater ceramic thickness will allow for a corresponding increase in projectile/target (armour) interaction time.This is the gap between generation of waves at the moment of impact in the target and their arrival back at the point of impact(as tensile waves) following reflection at the ceramics rear face (e.g. a free surface). The conventionally sintered alumina and pure RP material are observed to exhibit broadly comparable behaviours,with nominally similar resultant projectile erosion for a given thickness of tile.Interestingly,the Boron carbide data[33]-despite lower impact velocities - appears to overlap with the generaltrends observed; this is likely due to the higher strength of the Boron carbide leading to greater erosion at a given impact velocity than for the alumina tiles considered here. More generally, the consistent trends for the conventionally sintered alumina,pure RP materials and Boron carbide apparent in Fig.6 suggest that the pure RP alumina is behaving under impact in a comparable manner(exhibiting similar failure mechanisms)to other real-world armour ceramics despite differences in strength, increasing the applicability of the findings here. Overall in Fig. 6 projectile erosion appears to increase linearly with ceramic thickness.For the Sintox,it is notable that erosion is in all cases greater than that of comparable-thickness RP material.Further,for the 5 mm thick tiles,a higher velocity leads to greater erosion; this is likely due to the enhanced pressure induced on impact in the impacted ceramic/the corresponding increased apparent material strength(e.g.a steric or strain-rate hardening effect [30]).

    Table 2 Forward-ballistics experimental results.

    Table 3 Reverse-ballistics experimental results [Sintox FA/RP ceramic ? 45/48 mm respectively].

    Fig. 5. Variation of calculated mass efficiency with impacted ceramic thickness.

    Fig. 6. Variation of recovered core length with impacted ceramic thickness including data from Ref. [33] for Boron carbide.

    With the RP material a similar trend is again apparent, with increased tile thickness linearly scaling with enhanced projectile erosion.However,it is interesting to note that for 5 and 8 mm thick tiles the degree of erosion appears to be relatively consistent and thus independent of impact velocity. While tentative, given the small number of data points,this may suggest that elements of the rapidly prototyped material structure (e.g. porosity) are such that the steric-effect observed in the conventionally sintered Sintox is no longer apparent in these velocity regimes.This is backed by the fact that divergence between the lower and higher velocity RP data points increases with increasing ceramic target thickness. In particular,at a thickness of 10 mm the highest velocity impact leads to lower overall projectile erosion(from Table 3,projectile erosion for the RP material was 10.0 and 13.0 mm for impacts at 750 and 872 m/s respectively, based on a nominal initial BXN steel core length of 20 mm as shown in Fig. 2(b)).

    When the copper-doped alumina - RP(Cu) - is considered in Fig.6,however,a more complex response appears to occur.While a general increase in ability to erode the incident projectiles with increasing ceramic thickness is again apparent, in the majority of cases the RP(Cu) ceramic performs less effectively (e.g. less projectile erosion results) than the corresponding thicknesses of both(pure) RP and conventionally sintered alumina. This is accompanied by a significant increase in variability of the resultant recorded core lengths at higher impact velocities. On this front it is notable that unlike the RP material, at a thickness of 5 mm there is no discernible difference in core erosion between the lower and higher impact velocity cases for the RP(Cu)alumina.This lack of a velocity(and therefore pressure) dependant effect where the ceramic otherwise appears to be behaving in a consistent manner appears to suggest that the presence of the RP(Cu)is modifying the material failure mode. In particular, the observed variability in the 8 mm thick RP(Cu) ceramic 850 m/s + results in Fig. 6 may suggest that the copper-doped material has a lower transition threshold (from dwell to penetration for a given projectile). This supposition was backed by the captured flash X-rays gained during the reverseballistics experiments.

    Typical flash X-rays for the four different reverse-ballistics cases detailed in Table 3 are shown in Fig. 7(a) to Fig. 7 (d) covering experiments 10 (Sintox - 3 frames only),12 (RP alumina),19 and 20(both Cu-loaded RP alumina), respectively. The general response shows flow of the jacketed rounds at/beneath the initial impact surface.This is consistent with behaviour observed by Crouch et al.[33]for Boron carbide ceramics,further reinforcing the suggestion that results presented here represent underlying mechanisms and are applicable to more than just alumina. From Fig. 7, an apparent marked difference in dwell - and subsequent penetration -mechanism between the 5 mm thick Sintox and RP(Cu)samples in Fig. 7(a) and (d), respectively, is of particular note. In terms of interpretation,it is also worth noting that for these reverse ballistic experiments,ceramic response will be a function of release arrival.Consequently, even if possible to neglect the rear interface by assuming that material around the point of impact is retained under compression by the impactor, releases from the outer edge of the impactor will have arrived as soon as 4.6 μs after impact(this is based on a nominal impactor diameter of 45 mm and elastic sound speed of 9.845 mm/μs - Tables 1 and 3, respectively). However,despite this limitation, these experiments still provide a direct indication of the ceramic/projectile interaction at impact and the nature of subsequent failure modes.The validity of this approach is reinforced by the fact that - as shown in Fig. 6 - even thinner ceramics have been employed in previous similar studies[33],with useful results still drawn out.

    Fig.7 presents flash X-rays detailing all three types of ceramicnamely Sintox, RP and RP(Cu) - investigated here. Considering each type of ceramic in turn:

    Sintox FATM:Fig. 7(a) illustrates the typical response of an armour ceramic [27-33]; the projectile is observed to deform on impact and by 7 μs after the initial frame material is flowing radially away from and just beneath the impact surface (e.g. at the compressed surface of the ceramic) - as shown by the red arrows/dashed line.This behaviour,known as dwell/surface defeat[8-12]occurs while the ceramic is under compression (under which conditions its strength exceeds that of the core, overmatching/eroding it).Dwell only ceases either once the compressive loading is released via rarefaction's from the ceramic edges or rear-most face (free surface), or if the defect accumulation in the ceramic caused by the projectile impact is such that its strength is overcome[12].In this manner,keeping the ceramic confined(in compression)maximises the opportunity for dwell.

    RP Ceramic:Broadly similar behaviour to that for the Sintox FA?in Fig.7(a)is apparent for the pure RP material in Fig.7(b).At 10 μs after the initial frame material flow(indicated by a red arrow)is apparent.Comparing the ceramic response at 20 μs to that for the Sintox FA? target at 17 μs in Fig. 7(a), the extent of projectile erosion as the core reaches the rear surface of the ceramic appears directly comparable, albeit with penetration taking slightly longer-something attributed here to the slightly lower impact velocity in the RP material case.Overall,this response appears to confirm the potential of 3D printed material to respond in a similar manner to conventionally sintered ceramics. Finally, at 30 μs in Fig. 7(b)bulging of the rear face of the ceramic is apparent - however,interestingly, this is slightly asymmetric, with its extent likely linked to the degree of core disruption.

    Fig.7. Flash X-ray radiographs illustrating the interaction of 7.62-mm steel-cored rounds impacted by ceramic-faced flyer plates.(a) Experiment 10:5.1-mm thick Sintox FATM at 853 m/s (three frames only as channel 4 miss-fired) (b) Experiment 12: 5.3-mm thick RP alumina at 765 m/s(c) Experiment 19: 10.0-mm thick RP(Cu) alumina at 700 m/s(d)Experiment 20: 5.0-mm thick RP(Cu) RP alumina at 850 m/s.

    RP Ceramic-copper-doped:Similar behaviour to that for the Sintox and (pure) RP material in Fig. 7(a) and (b), respectively, is apparent for the thicker RP material detailed in Fig. 7(c), with surface defeat apparent at 10 μs(indicated by the red line/arrows).Although it is interesting to note that failure(via flexure)appears to have occurred at the rear of the ceramic at 35 μs- a time period consistent with that for failure in the thinner 5 mm case in Fig.7(b).This is consistent with the data from Fig. 6 which suggested that under the impact conditions in question the RP material was potentially reaching a nominal limiting thickness in terms of performance at around 8-10 mm. A substantially different response occurs with the RP(Cu) alumina in Fig. 7(d), however. In this case at the elevated impact velocity in question (850 m/s as opposed to 700 m/s in Fig. 7(c)), only very limited projectile flow occurs on impact.Instead,by 7 μs after the initial frame the core has passed relatively un-damaged through the impacting ceramic flyer-essentially a ‘plugging’-like failure mode.While there is evidence of some core erosion in subsequent flash X-rays,this was measured post-shot to be just 1.9 mm(experiment 20,Table 3).This compares to 6.7 and 9.3 mm in the comparable 5 mm thick (pure) RP and conventionally sintered (Sintox) alumina experiments (experiments 15 and 10, Table 3), respectively. This difference in ballistic response of the RP(Cu)as opposed to the RP material may be linked to the observed enhanced hardness which resulted from the presence of the copper dopant(Table 1), with the copper particles dispersed at the alumina grain boundaries, shown in Fig.1(e) and(f), potentially acting as initiation sites for a more brittle failure mode. Overall, the difference in response (an 80% reduction in projectile erosion compared to the conventional alumina as opposed to a drop-off of 28% for the pure RP ceramic case) clearly illustrates the significant effect of even the observed relatively small <1 wt% copper-doping, emphasising the importance of quality control.

    5. Conclusions

    A combination of forward- and reverse-ballistics experiments have provided insight into the potential application of RP ceramics to body armour applications. Both conventionally sintered and RP materials exhibited broadly similar microstructures and material properties, with observed differences in (surface) porosity and hardness attributed to a slightly more refined microstructure in the RP case. Experimental results suggest that where care is taken in quality control during manufacture the RP material can produce a slightly less effective, but overall broadly comparable, ballistic response against hardened/AP threats as opposed to conventionally sintered alumina (Sintox). Further, comparison to data from the literature[33]suggested that the behaviour of the pure RP material was broadly consistent with other armour ceramics, suggesting similar underlying projectile defeat/ceramic failure mechanisms.Overall, this is a useful result given the relatively limited body of existing work on armour-relevant RP ceramic materials in the literature, suggesting a potential future application for the RP alumina considered here.

    Interestingly, however, forwards ballistics data suggested that the RP material has a slightly lower ballistic limit than the Sintox FA?(evidenced by an apparent plateau in calculated mass efficiency as tile thickness increased from 8 to 10 mm). This suggests that there are some subtle differences in material response under impact linked to the manufacturing route/resultant material microstructure. This finding was reinforced by comparison of recovered projectile cores post-shot, as well as flash X-ray images captured during reverse ballistic experiments. The flash X-ray images clearly indicated that projectile defeat involves a similar mechanism (namely that of dwell) for both the RP and conventionally sintered ceramics.While a notable change in failure mode was observed where Cu additions were present, such behaviour was not apparent when un-doped/pure RP targets were considered.

    Overall,while the experimental work presented in this study is based on a limited number of experiments, the presence of clear trends in data provided reassurance that key conclusions were valid. The results presented clearly highlight the importance of quality control if RP ceramics are to be deployed in critical areas such as body armour. Despite this, and while not considering the practicality of deploying 3D printers in-theatre(something beyond the scope of this study),the findings of this paper clearly illustrate the potential for use of such 3D printed materials in armour applications in the future.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are grateful to Andrew Roberts of Cranfield University for aid in the experimental work presented in this paper.In addition,the authors would like to acknowledge the data presented herein is taken from a recent Explosives Ordnance Engineering MSc project conducted by one of the current authors at Cranfield University's Shirvenham Campus, Miss Julie Rowley. Finally, the authors would like to dedicate this work to their colleague,Dr Michael Gibson,who sadly passed away while the paper was being written.

    日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 少妇丰满av| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 最好的美女福利视频网| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产高潮美女av| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 午夜久久久久精精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 嫩草影院入口| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 嫩草影院新地址| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 一夜夜www| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 小说图片视频综合网站| 久久中文看片网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲18禁久久av| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 永久网站在线| 精品午夜福利在线看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久人人爽人人片av| av专区在线播放| 亚洲成人久久性| 变态另类丝袜制服| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 1000部很黄的大片| 嫩草影院精品99| 一级黄片播放器| 99热这里只有是精品50| ponron亚洲| 长腿黑丝高跟| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产午夜精品论理片| 97碰自拍视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲不卡免费看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 综合色丁香网| 日本三级黄在线观看| 精品福利观看| 深夜精品福利| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产精品无大码| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲四区av| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 色综合站精品国产| 国产成人影院久久av| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 午夜影院日韩av| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲色图av天堂| av免费在线看不卡| 在线看三级毛片| 国产成人freesex在线 | 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| a级毛片a级免费在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 91狼人影院| 美女免费视频网站| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产高清三级在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 免费av观看视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 少妇的逼水好多| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美人与善性xxx| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| www日本黄色视频网| 成人无遮挡网站| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产高清三级在线| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日本在线视频免费播放| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 极品教师在线视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | or卡值多少钱| 国产高清三级在线| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 亚洲图色成人| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成年版毛片免费区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产三级在线视频| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 午夜免费激情av| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产精华一区二区三区| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 色综合站精品国产| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 直男gayav资源| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产老妇女一区| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 97在线视频观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| a级毛片a级免费在线| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日韩欧美免费精品| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 69av精品久久久久久| 免费av观看视频| 免费高清视频大片| 观看免费一级毛片| 热99在线观看视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 直男gayav资源| 搡老岳熟女国产| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 嫩草影视91久久| 日韩高清综合在线| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久久色成人| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 51国产日韩欧美| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 乱人视频在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| av在线观看视频网站免费| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| av天堂中文字幕网| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 日韩高清综合在线| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 露出奶头的视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产成人福利小说| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 老司机福利观看| 深夜a级毛片| 99热全是精品| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久精品夜色国产| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| av福利片在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 尾随美女入室| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 看免费成人av毛片| 69av精品久久久久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 精品福利观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久精品91蜜桃| 俺也久久电影网| 在线天堂最新版资源| 性色avwww在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产成人影院久久av| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 日本a在线网址| 内射极品少妇av片p| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 免费观看人在逋| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 日本a在线网址| 在线播放无遮挡| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 99久国产av精品| 少妇丰满av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 极品教师在线视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 在线免费观看的www视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲无线观看免费| av视频在线观看入口| 三级经典国产精品| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产亚洲欧美98| av国产免费在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 老司机影院成人| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 少妇丰满av| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 成人av在线播放网站| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 身体一侧抽搐| 一a级毛片在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 91狼人影院| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 午夜久久久久精精品| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 成人国产麻豆网| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 在线观看66精品国产| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产综合懂色| 一级毛片电影观看 | 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 午夜福利18| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 春色校园在线视频观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲色图av天堂| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲av一区综合| 在线a可以看的网站| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 三级经典国产精品| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产精品无大码| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 51国产日韩欧美| www.色视频.com| 在线国产一区二区在线| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 精品午夜福利在线看| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美+日韩+精品| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 日韩中字成人| 成人精品一区二区免费| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久热精品热| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产乱人视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 九色成人免费人妻av| 在线观看66精品国产| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久精品影院6| .国产精品久久| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| av福利片在线观看| 成人二区视频| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 九九在线视频观看精品| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 99久国产av精品| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕|