• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A comparison of the ballistic behaviour of conventionally sintered and additively manufactured alumina

    2020-05-23 07:08:58GrethJmesAppleyThomsKevinJnsluAmerHmeedJonthnPinterJmesShckelJulieRowley
    Defence Technology 2020年2期

    Greth Jmes Appley-Thoms , Kevin Jnslu , Amer Hmeed , Jonthn Pinter ,Jmes Shckel , Julie Rowley

    a Centre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield Defence and Security, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Swindon, SN6 8LA, UK

    b Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,Royal Military College of Canada,PO Box 17000,Station Forces,Kingston,Ontario,K7K 7B4,Canada

    Keywords:Additive manufacture Rapidly prototyped Body armour Ballistics Ceramics

    ABSTRACT Production of ceramic armour solutions on-demand/in-theatre would have significant logistical and military advantages. However, even assuming that such technologies could be successfully deployed in the field, such near net-shape manufacturing technology is relatively immature compared to conventional sintering of ceramics.In this study,the ballistic performance of a series of additively manufactured(AM)/rapidly-prototyped(RP)alumina tiles of 97.2%of the density of Sintox FA?were investigated using both forward- and reverse-ballistic experiments. These experiments, undertaken with compressed gasguns,employed the depth-of-penetration technique and flash X-ray as primary diagnostics to interrogate both efficiency of penetration and projectile-target interaction, respectively. The RP alumina was found to exhibit useful ballistic properties,successfully defeating steel-cored(AP)7.62×39 mm BXN rounds at velocities of up-to c.a. 850 m/s, while exhibiting comparable failure modes to conventionally sintered armour-grade Sintox FA?.However,where a<1%by vol.Cu dopant was introduced into the RP material failure modes changed dramatically with performance dropping below that of conventionally sintered alumina. Overall, the results from both sets of experiments were complimentary and clearly indicated the potential of such RP materials to play an active role in provision of real-world body armour solutions provided quality control of the RP material can be maintained.

    1. Introduction

    The high specific strength under impact of ceramics has led to their widespread adoption as armour materials against hardened rounds, both for personnel and for vehicles [1-7]. Such solutions are often composite in nature, with a compliant backing material employed to account for the inherently brittle nature of the hard ceramic facing(for additional detail in the body armour sphere,the reader is referred to a very complete recent review in Ref. [6]covering, in particular, ceramic strike-face materials, backing materials and cladding approaches). However, fitting a rigid armour solution to complex shaped structures (whether vehicles or even individuals, where significant variation in individual stature naturally occurs) is a crucial challenge. Further, such rigid systems-which may even need replacement in theatre(due to damage)-are inevitably relatively inefficient to transport due to a relatively high volume to density ratio. To this end, the ability to rapidly produce complex ceramic shapes in the field would be a significant advantage in terms of the continued deployment of ceramic armour to a wider range of applications.

    High purity alumina(Al2O3)has been widely adopted as a body armour material, primarily due to its useful combination of good ballistic properties, low costs and familiarity with associated manufacturing routes [4]. Other ceramics such as silicon carbide(SiC) and boron carbide (B4C) are stronger but are less widely employed due to both manufacturing and economic issues [3,4],although research into these materials is now very-much coming to the fore [6]. One of the main mechanisms governing ceramic armour response is that of overmatch of incident projectiles - leading to their erosion and subsequent defeat [8-10]. This process,known as dwell, only occurs below a certain threshold velocity,while above this threshold velocity,if the defect population caused by the initial impact of projectile is sufficiently high,a transition to penetration can occur [11,12]. This threshold velocity is known as the dwell-penetration transition velocity. Essentially, dwell will continue as long as the defect population in the target is low enough that its strength is not overcome. Importantly, however,dwell will only occur if the target is held under compression -arrival of tensile releases of sufficient magnitude will promote armour failure. Such release waves can be generated at interfaces of lower impedance such as the rear surface or edges of an armour tile and,on arriving back at the point of impact,may lead to consequent material failure.This response-and the consequent importance of ceramic confinement - is highlighted by the radical difference in tensile and compressive strengths of ceramics (e.g. 300 and 2620 MPa respectively for 99.9% pure Al2O3[13]).

    There have been a large number of studies focused on understanding ceramic armour,with the aim of either defeating systems or improving their performance [4-20]. While these have identified numerous factors (including individual ceramic strength and target construction) which effect armour performance, the importance of overmatch means that control of wave propagation within the armour following impact is of particular importance to maximise efficiency.

    Ceramic armour is typically manufactured via a pressuresintering route, with differences (for example in temperature)effecting the final grain size and consequent material properties[4].However, the ability to rapidly manufacture (3D print) ceramics is now slowly becoming more common-place. Several different routes exist; in particular, stereo lithography [21,22] (curing of photo-curable binder loaded ceramic pastes) and selective laser sintering [22,23] (involving laser sintering of green powder beds)are some of the more common approaches for ceramic materials,with other approaches including adapted forms of inkjet printing[24] and binder jetting [25].

    In a typical study,ceramic armour failure modes under ballistic attack were interrogated via a combination of high-speed photography, flash X-ray and computational modelling [14]. Projectile erosion was shown to aid in conoid formation in the impacted ceramics - thereby maximising the extent of distribution of the projectiles impact energy onto the tougher backing plates. Interestingly,the thickness of such backing plates was also shown to be important-with thicker plates found to prevent premature failure of the ceramic, further highlighting the fact that ceramic armour solutions are composite in nature [15]. This is consistent with recent research for conventionally manufactured (pressure sintered)Al2O3tiles which has linked ceramic performance with both the thickness and hardness of confining material[26-28].In these experiments, performance was found to improve with confinement,indicating the importance of boundaries in ceramic response.

    However, there is a relative paucity of information on the ballistic response of rapidly prototyped/3D printed ceramics. To this end,the authors have previously presented tentative evidence that the relative ballistic properties of a particular 3D printed and conventionally sintered alumina are broadly comparable [29]. In this study this previous work is extended to further highlight the potential application of such materials, manufactured commercially via a modified stereolithography process. In particular, potential limitations of 3D printed alumina are explored in greater depth - with a particular focus, via inclusion of new data, on the influence of dopants during manufacture. A combination of forward (depth of penetration) [26,30,31] and reverse [18,32,33] ballistics experiments were undertaken using both steel and WC-Co cored Armour Piercing (AP) ammunition with the aim of investigating not only 3D printed ceramic performance under ballistic attack,but also the underpinning material response(both projectile defeat and ceramic failure).

    2. Materials

    As detailed in Table 1, Sintox FA?(95.0% Al2O3- Morgan Advanced Materials) and a Rapid Prototyped (RP) ceramic (Technology Assessment and Transfer (T&AT) Inc., USA [21]), manufactured via a modified stereolithography process (which did not involve laser sintering),were investigated.In the latter case,a set of targets with <1% by volume Cu inclusions were also considered,with the Cu content determined in the final samples via EDX scanning and subsequent graphical analysis of metallographically prepared samples. Porosity was also measured using similar samples. In all cases micrographs were graphically analysed using the freely available software package ‘ImageJ’ [34]. Micrographs were turned into 8-bit images and made binary to highlight areas of porosity and/or pull-out as-required.

    Scanning electron micrographs of the materials investigated are presented in Fig.1. In order to determine whether any anisotropy was present(considered a potential issue for the RP material due to the manufacturing technique which incorporates an inherent directionality),perpendicular sections were considered in all cases.Grain boundaries are just discernible in the captured secondary electron images.Microstructurally,the RP materials were observed to be more refined and rounded;with the Sintox FA?grains more angular in nature. In general, consistent with their conventionally sintered nature, the grains in the Sintox FA?were similar in both the impact and perpendicular faces with an elongated form nominally 5 μm wide by 10 μm long. Whereas for the RP material,the ceramic grains appeared slightly more isotropic in form with a smaller size of around 2-3 μm(presumably the nominal size of the feedstock powder),with these grains agglomerated into groupings whose size was comparable to the Sintox grains.Interestingly,there was no significant difference in microstructure apparent between the perpendicular faces considered for the RP materials (Fig.1(a)/(b)and Fig.1(e)/(f))for the RP and RP(Cu)materials in terms of the impact face/side,respectively.This was reflected in a slightly higher hardness, despite the observed greater porosity, for both the RP(pure) and RP(Cu) (copper-doped) alumina cases (Table 1). The porosity values in Table 1 exclude the effect of pull-outs.In all three cases, based on optical analysis, overall porosity (voids) appeared relatively low at just a few percent-although their distribution is significantly coarser for the Sintox than for RP material. Further,once the relatively coarse regions of pull-out were excluded,it was evident that there was significantly lower porosity apparent in the pressure-sintered Sintox FA?- as shown by the close packing,away from large pull-out based voids, of individual grains in Fig.1(c) and (d). Interestingly, small copper contaminants can just be discerned in Fig.1(e)and(f),with the(highlighted by red dashed circles) brighter inclusions - representing regions were charging was occurring around the embedded copper particles (confirmed as such via EDX analysis)-sitting along alumina grain boundaries.Of particular note was that,despite a higher hardness,there was anotable difference in density of about 150 kg/m3(nominally 4%)between the RP(Cu) and the denser (pure) RP material. This appeared to be a real effect, although relatively small. Elastic properties in the form of longitudinal and shear sound speeds (cland csrespectively)and Youngs modulus(E)were also determined using Panametrics ultrasonic transducers operating at 5.0 MHz for the pure RP and Sintox and are presented in Table 1. It was noted that longitudinal and shear sound speeds were significantly closer in the (pure) RP material as opposed to the pressure-sintered Sintox. Overall, it was apparent that differences in processing route and resultant microstructure led to the RP material exhibiting slightly greater porosity and consequent lower stiffness compared to the conventionally sintered Sintox FA?; however, in contrast,the more refined microstructure of the RP material led to a slightly higher hardness.

    Table 1 Key target material properties.

    Fig.1. Scanning electron micrographs showing rapid-prototyped and Sintox FA? target ceramics(a) RP ceramic: impact face(b) RP ceramic: side(c) Sintox FA?: impact face(d)Sintox FA?:side(e)Cu-loaded RP ceramic:impact face(f)Cu-loaded RP ceramic:side;examples of Cu inclusions indicated by the bright regions highlighted in dashed red circles in(e) and (f).

    Differing hard and soft cored projectiles were used for forward and reverse-ballistics experiments,respectively,as shown in Fig.2.While these projectiles had fundamentally different failure modes,they were selected to provide as much information as possible in a given experiment. In the forward configuration, WC-Co cored armour-piercing (AP) FFV 7.62 mm rounds provided enhanced penetration-and therefore fidelity in terms of subsequent depthof-penetration measurements; whereas for reverse-ballistic experiments, the use of 7.62 mm steel-cored BXN Full Metal Jacket(FMJ) rounds encouraged dwell which was visible via flash X-ray.

    3. Methodology

    Fig.2. 7.62 mm rounds employed for(a)forward and(b)reverse-ballistics experiments:(i)whole bullet;(ii)core only,and;(iii)cross-section.(a)WC-Co cored FFV round(b)steelcored BXN Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) round.

    Both forward [26,30,31] and reverse [18,32,33] ballistic experiments were undertaken. Forward-ballistic experiments involved the use of a 30-mm smooth-bore single-stage compressed gas-gun to fire acetal-saboted WC-Co projectiles (Fig. 2(a)) into ceramic targets backed by a series of 100 mm2Al 6082 blocks, each of 25 mm thickness.Comparison of depths-of-penetration(DOP)into these backing plates allowed derivation of a metric known as‘mass efficiency’ - Em, to interrogate ballistic response. This approach,detailed later in Eq. (1) [3], allowed assessment of ballistic efficiency of the ceramic targets by comparing the depth-ofpenetration of a projectile into a series of witness Al blocks with and with-out the presence of ceramic armour. For all forwardballistic experiments the sabot was stripped from the projectiles just before impact, with velocity measured immediately prior to impact using a series of sequential light gates. This experimental arrangement is shown in Fig. 3.

    Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of forward-ballistic experimental arrangement.

    For the reverse ballistic experiments, ceramic ‘targets’ were accelerated towards stationary ‘projectiles’ using a 50 mm bore single-stage gas-gun,with impacts monitored via four channels of Scandiflash XT-300 flash X-ray arranged radially around the impact point. This approach ensured that impact occurred at the desired point in the centre of the flash X-ray's focal area and, further, that the relatively small projectile did not yaw and that impacts were as normal to the target surface as possible.For these experiments the softer steel-cored BXN Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) projectiles were employed - as shown in Fig. 2(b) - as only projectile/target interaction was of interest. These rounds were the same as those employed in reverse ballistic experiments conducted within a previous study by Crouch et al. [33] focused on the interaction of steel-cored projectiles with Boron carbide ceramics.While alumina was employed here, this similarity provides a useful point of reference for the results presented later in this paper. This experimental arrangement is shown schematically in Fig. 4(a), with a picture of the target chamber illustrating the radial flash X-ray head arrangement presented in Fig. 4(b).

    4. Results and discussion

    Key experimental results for the forward and reverse ballistic experiments are presented in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.While a limited number of samples were employed due to project constraints, target configurations were chosen to ensure that patterns in ballistic response (e.g. with sample thickness) would be apparent - ensuring that any general trends would be representative of real material response, even where experimental repetitions proved impractical. For the data in Table 2, mass efficiency(Em)values were calculated based on Eq.(1)[3],using an average of baseline(Al backing only)DOP values(35.0 and 42.0 mm,both at an impact velocity of 848 m/s). This approach was considered reasonable in all cases as even for the relatively thin (c.a. 5 mm thick) ceramic tiles, backings were present - providing a ‘semiinfinite’ target configuration.

    Fig. 4. Reverse ballistic experimental configuration: (a) schematic illustration; (b)external picture of target chamber with flash X-ray heads(silver tubes)arrayed around target position.

    Where: ρAland ρcare the density of the Al backing and ceramic facing respectively;P∞is the DOP into the backing Al which results when no ceramic facing is present;tcis the ceramic tile thickness,and;Pris the residual DOP which results in the Al backing when the ceramic (armour) tile is present.

    4.1. Forwards ballistics experiments

    Based on Table 2,the variation of calculated mass efficiency with impacted ceramic thickness is illustrated in Fig. 5.

    From Fig. 5 it is immediately apparent that for both RP and conventionally sintered alumina mass efficiency against the impacting AP FFV threat increases moving from 5 to 8 mm in ceramic thickness.Above this thickness,there is tentative evidence that the performance of the RP material is plateauing or even reducing.While this might suggest that the material's ballistic limit has been reached,there is insufficient data to draw any significant conclusions.It is notable,however,that at thicknesses of both 5 and 8 mm the RP material consistently shows a lower overall mass efficiency than the corresponding thickness Sintox FA?targets.This reduction in efficiency is attributed to the slightly greater porosity of the RP material (see Table 1) which results in a reduction in material strength under loading.This is despite a slight increase in RP material hardness over the conventionally sintered alumina.In a similar vein, it is also interesting to note the significantly lower mass efficiency of the Cu-doped sample considered as opposed to the corresponding (8-mm thick) pure RP sample. Essentially, a reduction in Emof nominally 43%occurs(relative to the Sintox)due to the small Cu addition as-opposed to just 18%moving from Sintox to pure RP material. This suggests, for the materials considered here, a significant relationship between RP ceramic purity and ballistic performance.

    4.2. Reverse ballistics experiments

    The variation of recovered core length with ceramic properties for the two nominal velocity regimes investigated is presented in Fig. 4 (with data taken from Table 3). In addition, selected results from previous similar reverse ballistics experiments conducted by Crouch et al.[33]are included for the purpose of comparison.These experiments involved identical projectiles to those employed here,but instead of alumina, Boron carbide ceramic discs of varying thicknesses were employed. Data is only included for tests which employed planar discs with no cladding (defined as ‘support condition A’ in Ref. [33]).

    Fig. 6 clearly shows that increased ceramic thickness leads to greater core erosion - e.g. enhanced projectile defeat. This is relatively unsurprising as a greater ceramic thickness will allow for a corresponding increase in projectile/target (armour) interaction time.This is the gap between generation of waves at the moment of impact in the target and their arrival back at the point of impact(as tensile waves) following reflection at the ceramics rear face (e.g. a free surface). The conventionally sintered alumina and pure RP material are observed to exhibit broadly comparable behaviours,with nominally similar resultant projectile erosion for a given thickness of tile.Interestingly,the Boron carbide data[33]-despite lower impact velocities - appears to overlap with the generaltrends observed; this is likely due to the higher strength of the Boron carbide leading to greater erosion at a given impact velocity than for the alumina tiles considered here. More generally, the consistent trends for the conventionally sintered alumina,pure RP materials and Boron carbide apparent in Fig.6 suggest that the pure RP alumina is behaving under impact in a comparable manner(exhibiting similar failure mechanisms)to other real-world armour ceramics despite differences in strength, increasing the applicability of the findings here. Overall in Fig. 6 projectile erosion appears to increase linearly with ceramic thickness.For the Sintox,it is notable that erosion is in all cases greater than that of comparable-thickness RP material.Further,for the 5 mm thick tiles,a higher velocity leads to greater erosion; this is likely due to the enhanced pressure induced on impact in the impacted ceramic/the corresponding increased apparent material strength(e.g.a steric or strain-rate hardening effect [30]).

    Table 2 Forward-ballistics experimental results.

    Table 3 Reverse-ballistics experimental results [Sintox FA/RP ceramic ? 45/48 mm respectively].

    Fig. 5. Variation of calculated mass efficiency with impacted ceramic thickness.

    Fig. 6. Variation of recovered core length with impacted ceramic thickness including data from Ref. [33] for Boron carbide.

    With the RP material a similar trend is again apparent, with increased tile thickness linearly scaling with enhanced projectile erosion.However,it is interesting to note that for 5 and 8 mm thick tiles the degree of erosion appears to be relatively consistent and thus independent of impact velocity. While tentative, given the small number of data points,this may suggest that elements of the rapidly prototyped material structure (e.g. porosity) are such that the steric-effect observed in the conventionally sintered Sintox is no longer apparent in these velocity regimes.This is backed by the fact that divergence between the lower and higher velocity RP data points increases with increasing ceramic target thickness. In particular,at a thickness of 10 mm the highest velocity impact leads to lower overall projectile erosion(from Table 3,projectile erosion for the RP material was 10.0 and 13.0 mm for impacts at 750 and 872 m/s respectively, based on a nominal initial BXN steel core length of 20 mm as shown in Fig. 2(b)).

    When the copper-doped alumina - RP(Cu) - is considered in Fig.6,however,a more complex response appears to occur.While a general increase in ability to erode the incident projectiles with increasing ceramic thickness is again apparent, in the majority of cases the RP(Cu) ceramic performs less effectively (e.g. less projectile erosion results) than the corresponding thicknesses of both(pure) RP and conventionally sintered alumina. This is accompanied by a significant increase in variability of the resultant recorded core lengths at higher impact velocities. On this front it is notable that unlike the RP material, at a thickness of 5 mm there is no discernible difference in core erosion between the lower and higher impact velocity cases for the RP(Cu)alumina.This lack of a velocity(and therefore pressure) dependant effect where the ceramic otherwise appears to be behaving in a consistent manner appears to suggest that the presence of the RP(Cu)is modifying the material failure mode. In particular, the observed variability in the 8 mm thick RP(Cu) ceramic 850 m/s + results in Fig. 6 may suggest that the copper-doped material has a lower transition threshold (from dwell to penetration for a given projectile). This supposition was backed by the captured flash X-rays gained during the reverseballistics experiments.

    Typical flash X-rays for the four different reverse-ballistics cases detailed in Table 3 are shown in Fig. 7(a) to Fig. 7 (d) covering experiments 10 (Sintox - 3 frames only),12 (RP alumina),19 and 20(both Cu-loaded RP alumina), respectively. The general response shows flow of the jacketed rounds at/beneath the initial impact surface.This is consistent with behaviour observed by Crouch et al.[33]for Boron carbide ceramics,further reinforcing the suggestion that results presented here represent underlying mechanisms and are applicable to more than just alumina. From Fig. 7, an apparent marked difference in dwell - and subsequent penetration -mechanism between the 5 mm thick Sintox and RP(Cu)samples in Fig. 7(a) and (d), respectively, is of particular note. In terms of interpretation,it is also worth noting that for these reverse ballistic experiments,ceramic response will be a function of release arrival.Consequently, even if possible to neglect the rear interface by assuming that material around the point of impact is retained under compression by the impactor, releases from the outer edge of the impactor will have arrived as soon as 4.6 μs after impact(this is based on a nominal impactor diameter of 45 mm and elastic sound speed of 9.845 mm/μs - Tables 1 and 3, respectively). However,despite this limitation, these experiments still provide a direct indication of the ceramic/projectile interaction at impact and the nature of subsequent failure modes.The validity of this approach is reinforced by the fact that - as shown in Fig. 6 - even thinner ceramics have been employed in previous similar studies[33],with useful results still drawn out.

    Fig.7 presents flash X-rays detailing all three types of ceramicnamely Sintox, RP and RP(Cu) - investigated here. Considering each type of ceramic in turn:

    Sintox FATM:Fig. 7(a) illustrates the typical response of an armour ceramic [27-33]; the projectile is observed to deform on impact and by 7 μs after the initial frame material is flowing radially away from and just beneath the impact surface (e.g. at the compressed surface of the ceramic) - as shown by the red arrows/dashed line.This behaviour,known as dwell/surface defeat[8-12]occurs while the ceramic is under compression (under which conditions its strength exceeds that of the core, overmatching/eroding it).Dwell only ceases either once the compressive loading is released via rarefaction's from the ceramic edges or rear-most face (free surface), or if the defect accumulation in the ceramic caused by the projectile impact is such that its strength is overcome[12].In this manner,keeping the ceramic confined(in compression)maximises the opportunity for dwell.

    RP Ceramic:Broadly similar behaviour to that for the Sintox FA?in Fig.7(a)is apparent for the pure RP material in Fig.7(b).At 10 μs after the initial frame material flow(indicated by a red arrow)is apparent.Comparing the ceramic response at 20 μs to that for the Sintox FA? target at 17 μs in Fig. 7(a), the extent of projectile erosion as the core reaches the rear surface of the ceramic appears directly comparable, albeit with penetration taking slightly longer-something attributed here to the slightly lower impact velocity in the RP material case.Overall,this response appears to confirm the potential of 3D printed material to respond in a similar manner to conventionally sintered ceramics. Finally, at 30 μs in Fig. 7(b)bulging of the rear face of the ceramic is apparent - however,interestingly, this is slightly asymmetric, with its extent likely linked to the degree of core disruption.

    Fig.7. Flash X-ray radiographs illustrating the interaction of 7.62-mm steel-cored rounds impacted by ceramic-faced flyer plates.(a) Experiment 10:5.1-mm thick Sintox FATM at 853 m/s (three frames only as channel 4 miss-fired) (b) Experiment 12: 5.3-mm thick RP alumina at 765 m/s(c) Experiment 19: 10.0-mm thick RP(Cu) alumina at 700 m/s(d)Experiment 20: 5.0-mm thick RP(Cu) RP alumina at 850 m/s.

    RP Ceramic-copper-doped:Similar behaviour to that for the Sintox and (pure) RP material in Fig. 7(a) and (b), respectively, is apparent for the thicker RP material detailed in Fig. 7(c), with surface defeat apparent at 10 μs(indicated by the red line/arrows).Although it is interesting to note that failure(via flexure)appears to have occurred at the rear of the ceramic at 35 μs- a time period consistent with that for failure in the thinner 5 mm case in Fig.7(b).This is consistent with the data from Fig. 6 which suggested that under the impact conditions in question the RP material was potentially reaching a nominal limiting thickness in terms of performance at around 8-10 mm. A substantially different response occurs with the RP(Cu) alumina in Fig. 7(d), however. In this case at the elevated impact velocity in question (850 m/s as opposed to 700 m/s in Fig. 7(c)), only very limited projectile flow occurs on impact.Instead,by 7 μs after the initial frame the core has passed relatively un-damaged through the impacting ceramic flyer-essentially a ‘plugging’-like failure mode.While there is evidence of some core erosion in subsequent flash X-rays,this was measured post-shot to be just 1.9 mm(experiment 20,Table 3).This compares to 6.7 and 9.3 mm in the comparable 5 mm thick (pure) RP and conventionally sintered (Sintox) alumina experiments (experiments 15 and 10, Table 3), respectively. This difference in ballistic response of the RP(Cu)as opposed to the RP material may be linked to the observed enhanced hardness which resulted from the presence of the copper dopant(Table 1), with the copper particles dispersed at the alumina grain boundaries, shown in Fig.1(e) and(f), potentially acting as initiation sites for a more brittle failure mode. Overall, the difference in response (an 80% reduction in projectile erosion compared to the conventional alumina as opposed to a drop-off of 28% for the pure RP ceramic case) clearly illustrates the significant effect of even the observed relatively small <1 wt% copper-doping, emphasising the importance of quality control.

    5. Conclusions

    A combination of forward- and reverse-ballistics experiments have provided insight into the potential application of RP ceramics to body armour applications. Both conventionally sintered and RP materials exhibited broadly similar microstructures and material properties, with observed differences in (surface) porosity and hardness attributed to a slightly more refined microstructure in the RP case. Experimental results suggest that where care is taken in quality control during manufacture the RP material can produce a slightly less effective, but overall broadly comparable, ballistic response against hardened/AP threats as opposed to conventionally sintered alumina (Sintox). Further, comparison to data from the literature[33]suggested that the behaviour of the pure RP material was broadly consistent with other armour ceramics, suggesting similar underlying projectile defeat/ceramic failure mechanisms.Overall, this is a useful result given the relatively limited body of existing work on armour-relevant RP ceramic materials in the literature, suggesting a potential future application for the RP alumina considered here.

    Interestingly, however, forwards ballistics data suggested that the RP material has a slightly lower ballistic limit than the Sintox FA?(evidenced by an apparent plateau in calculated mass efficiency as tile thickness increased from 8 to 10 mm). This suggests that there are some subtle differences in material response under impact linked to the manufacturing route/resultant material microstructure. This finding was reinforced by comparison of recovered projectile cores post-shot, as well as flash X-ray images captured during reverse ballistic experiments. The flash X-ray images clearly indicated that projectile defeat involves a similar mechanism (namely that of dwell) for both the RP and conventionally sintered ceramics.While a notable change in failure mode was observed where Cu additions were present, such behaviour was not apparent when un-doped/pure RP targets were considered.

    Overall,while the experimental work presented in this study is based on a limited number of experiments, the presence of clear trends in data provided reassurance that key conclusions were valid. The results presented clearly highlight the importance of quality control if RP ceramics are to be deployed in critical areas such as body armour. Despite this, and while not considering the practicality of deploying 3D printers in-theatre(something beyond the scope of this study),the findings of this paper clearly illustrate the potential for use of such 3D printed materials in armour applications in the future.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are grateful to Andrew Roberts of Cranfield University for aid in the experimental work presented in this paper.In addition,the authors would like to acknowledge the data presented herein is taken from a recent Explosives Ordnance Engineering MSc project conducted by one of the current authors at Cranfield University's Shirvenham Campus, Miss Julie Rowley. Finally, the authors would like to dedicate this work to their colleague,Dr Michael Gibson,who sadly passed away while the paper was being written.

    久久久久国产网址| 午夜精品在线福利| av播播在线观看一区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 精品一区二区三卡| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 99热全是精品| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产视频内射| 高清毛片免费看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 永久网站在线| 免费观看在线日韩| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 午夜免费激情av| 韩国av在线不卡| 午夜久久久久精精品| 99久久人妻综合| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产高清三级在线| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 成人二区视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 天堂网av新在线| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 老女人水多毛片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | ponron亚洲| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产永久视频网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 欧美激情在线99| 在线免费十八禁| 极品教师在线视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲无线观看免费| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 尾随美女入室| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 成人二区视频| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产综合精华液| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 舔av片在线| 色吧在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| av卡一久久| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 免费看a级黄色片| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品.久久久| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日本一本二区三区精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 精品午夜福利在线看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 久久久久国产网址| 国产极品天堂在线| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 春色校园在线视频观看| 免费看日本二区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 高清av免费在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 人妻系列 视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久草成人影院| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 色网站视频免费| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产 精品1| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 欧美人与善性xxx| 午夜日本视频在线| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 伦精品一区二区三区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 1024香蕉在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 97在线视频观看| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 高清av免费在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产成人欧美| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 一区二区三区精品91| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 老司机影院成人| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| a级毛片黄视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 电影成人av| 有码 亚洲区| 我的亚洲天堂| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| xxx大片免费视频| 五月天丁香电影| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 五月天丁香电影| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 香蕉国产在线看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产精品一国产av| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 在线 av 中文字幕| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 另类精品久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 成人手机av| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 色播在线永久视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产麻豆69| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 色网站视频免费| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 久久久久久伊人网av| 成人二区视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 大香蕉久久网| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 老熟女久久久| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 999精品在线视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 性色avwww在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 午夜影院在线不卡| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产av国产精品国产| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 有码 亚洲区| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品一区二区免费观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 大码成人一级视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲第一av免费看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 午夜av观看不卡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 永久网站在线| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久青草综合色| 99九九在线精品视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲精品第二区| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 曰老女人黄片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 老熟女久久久| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久99精品国语久久久| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产片内射在线| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 色网站视频免费| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 成年动漫av网址| av福利片在线| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 中文字幕制服av| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲伊人色综图| 色94色欧美一区二区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 看免费成人av毛片| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 飞空精品影院首页| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 在现免费观看毛片| 性色av一级| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 中文字幕色久视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 精品亚洲成国产av| 中文欧美无线码| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产成人精品福利久久| 夫妻午夜视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日本色播在线视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 免费av中文字幕在线| videos熟女内射| 街头女战士在线观看网站| www日本在线高清视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | av不卡在线播放| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 日韩视频在线欧美| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 黄片小视频在线播放| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 飞空精品影院首页| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 1024香蕉在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 看免费av毛片| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲成色77777| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲人成电影观看| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久久久伊人网av| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 久久久久精品性色| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 中国国产av一级| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲综合色惰| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲精品在线美女| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产探花极品一区二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| videos熟女内射| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 成人影院久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 人妻一区二区av| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久久久精品性色| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜福利,免费看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 91成人精品电影| 国产成人91sexporn| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 永久免费av网站大全| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 午夜福利,免费看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 少妇的逼水好多| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久狼人影院| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 欧美另类一区| av视频免费观看在线观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 成年动漫av网址| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产又爽黄色视频| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久免费观看电影| 午夜激情av网站| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产精品 国内视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 免费观看av网站的网址| 性色avwww在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 蜜桃在线观看..| 免费av中文字幕在线| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 香蕉精品网在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产麻豆69| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 午夜激情av网站| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 欧美另类一区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 成人国产av品久久久| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久影院123| 欧美人与善性xxx| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 满18在线观看网站| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 1024视频免费在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产在线视频一区二区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲第一青青草原| 精品第一国产精品| 国产探花极品一区二区| 午夜福利视频精品| 在线天堂最新版资源| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久久久视频综合| 看免费成人av毛片| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲伊人色综图| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲国产av新网站| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 成年av动漫网址| 人人妻人人澡人人看| videos熟女内射| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产精品免费大片| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| av.在线天堂| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 久久热在线av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 伦精品一区二区三区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲国产色片| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 男女国产视频网站| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 嫩草影院入口| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 高清欧美精品videossex| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲精品在线美女|