• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A comparison of the ballistic behaviour of conventionally sintered and additively manufactured alumina

    2020-05-23 07:08:58GrethJmesAppleyThomsKevinJnsluAmerHmeedJonthnPinterJmesShckelJulieRowley
    Defence Technology 2020年2期

    Greth Jmes Appley-Thoms , Kevin Jnslu , Amer Hmeed , Jonthn Pinter ,Jmes Shckel , Julie Rowley

    a Centre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield Defence and Security, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Swindon, SN6 8LA, UK

    b Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,Royal Military College of Canada,PO Box 17000,Station Forces,Kingston,Ontario,K7K 7B4,Canada

    Keywords:Additive manufacture Rapidly prototyped Body armour Ballistics Ceramics

    ABSTRACT Production of ceramic armour solutions on-demand/in-theatre would have significant logistical and military advantages. However, even assuming that such technologies could be successfully deployed in the field, such near net-shape manufacturing technology is relatively immature compared to conventional sintering of ceramics.In this study,the ballistic performance of a series of additively manufactured(AM)/rapidly-prototyped(RP)alumina tiles of 97.2%of the density of Sintox FA?were investigated using both forward- and reverse-ballistic experiments. These experiments, undertaken with compressed gasguns,employed the depth-of-penetration technique and flash X-ray as primary diagnostics to interrogate both efficiency of penetration and projectile-target interaction, respectively. The RP alumina was found to exhibit useful ballistic properties,successfully defeating steel-cored(AP)7.62×39 mm BXN rounds at velocities of up-to c.a. 850 m/s, while exhibiting comparable failure modes to conventionally sintered armour-grade Sintox FA?.However,where a<1%by vol.Cu dopant was introduced into the RP material failure modes changed dramatically with performance dropping below that of conventionally sintered alumina. Overall, the results from both sets of experiments were complimentary and clearly indicated the potential of such RP materials to play an active role in provision of real-world body armour solutions provided quality control of the RP material can be maintained.

    1. Introduction

    The high specific strength under impact of ceramics has led to their widespread adoption as armour materials against hardened rounds, both for personnel and for vehicles [1-7]. Such solutions are often composite in nature, with a compliant backing material employed to account for the inherently brittle nature of the hard ceramic facing(for additional detail in the body armour sphere,the reader is referred to a very complete recent review in Ref. [6]covering, in particular, ceramic strike-face materials, backing materials and cladding approaches). However, fitting a rigid armour solution to complex shaped structures (whether vehicles or even individuals, where significant variation in individual stature naturally occurs) is a crucial challenge. Further, such rigid systems-which may even need replacement in theatre(due to damage)-are inevitably relatively inefficient to transport due to a relatively high volume to density ratio. To this end, the ability to rapidly produce complex ceramic shapes in the field would be a significant advantage in terms of the continued deployment of ceramic armour to a wider range of applications.

    High purity alumina(Al2O3)has been widely adopted as a body armour material, primarily due to its useful combination of good ballistic properties, low costs and familiarity with associated manufacturing routes [4]. Other ceramics such as silicon carbide(SiC) and boron carbide (B4C) are stronger but are less widely employed due to both manufacturing and economic issues [3,4],although research into these materials is now very-much coming to the fore [6]. One of the main mechanisms governing ceramic armour response is that of overmatch of incident projectiles - leading to their erosion and subsequent defeat [8-10]. This process,known as dwell, only occurs below a certain threshold velocity,while above this threshold velocity,if the defect population caused by the initial impact of projectile is sufficiently high,a transition to penetration can occur [11,12]. This threshold velocity is known as the dwell-penetration transition velocity. Essentially, dwell will continue as long as the defect population in the target is low enough that its strength is not overcome. Importantly, however,dwell will only occur if the target is held under compression -arrival of tensile releases of sufficient magnitude will promote armour failure. Such release waves can be generated at interfaces of lower impedance such as the rear surface or edges of an armour tile and,on arriving back at the point of impact,may lead to consequent material failure.This response-and the consequent importance of ceramic confinement - is highlighted by the radical difference in tensile and compressive strengths of ceramics (e.g. 300 and 2620 MPa respectively for 99.9% pure Al2O3[13]).

    There have been a large number of studies focused on understanding ceramic armour,with the aim of either defeating systems or improving their performance [4-20]. While these have identified numerous factors (including individual ceramic strength and target construction) which effect armour performance, the importance of overmatch means that control of wave propagation within the armour following impact is of particular importance to maximise efficiency.

    Ceramic armour is typically manufactured via a pressuresintering route, with differences (for example in temperature)effecting the final grain size and consequent material properties[4].However, the ability to rapidly manufacture (3D print) ceramics is now slowly becoming more common-place. Several different routes exist; in particular, stereo lithography [21,22] (curing of photo-curable binder loaded ceramic pastes) and selective laser sintering [22,23] (involving laser sintering of green powder beds)are some of the more common approaches for ceramic materials,with other approaches including adapted forms of inkjet printing[24] and binder jetting [25].

    In a typical study,ceramic armour failure modes under ballistic attack were interrogated via a combination of high-speed photography, flash X-ray and computational modelling [14]. Projectile erosion was shown to aid in conoid formation in the impacted ceramics - thereby maximising the extent of distribution of the projectiles impact energy onto the tougher backing plates. Interestingly,the thickness of such backing plates was also shown to be important-with thicker plates found to prevent premature failure of the ceramic, further highlighting the fact that ceramic armour solutions are composite in nature [15]. This is consistent with recent research for conventionally manufactured (pressure sintered)Al2O3tiles which has linked ceramic performance with both the thickness and hardness of confining material[26-28].In these experiments, performance was found to improve with confinement,indicating the importance of boundaries in ceramic response.

    However, there is a relative paucity of information on the ballistic response of rapidly prototyped/3D printed ceramics. To this end,the authors have previously presented tentative evidence that the relative ballistic properties of a particular 3D printed and conventionally sintered alumina are broadly comparable [29]. In this study this previous work is extended to further highlight the potential application of such materials, manufactured commercially via a modified stereolithography process. In particular, potential limitations of 3D printed alumina are explored in greater depth - with a particular focus, via inclusion of new data, on the influence of dopants during manufacture. A combination of forward (depth of penetration) [26,30,31] and reverse [18,32,33] ballistics experiments were undertaken using both steel and WC-Co cored Armour Piercing (AP) ammunition with the aim of investigating not only 3D printed ceramic performance under ballistic attack,but also the underpinning material response(both projectile defeat and ceramic failure).

    2. Materials

    As detailed in Table 1, Sintox FA?(95.0% Al2O3- Morgan Advanced Materials) and a Rapid Prototyped (RP) ceramic (Technology Assessment and Transfer (T&AT) Inc., USA [21]), manufactured via a modified stereolithography process (which did not involve laser sintering),were investigated.In the latter case,a set of targets with <1% by volume Cu inclusions were also considered,with the Cu content determined in the final samples via EDX scanning and subsequent graphical analysis of metallographically prepared samples. Porosity was also measured using similar samples. In all cases micrographs were graphically analysed using the freely available software package ‘ImageJ’ [34]. Micrographs were turned into 8-bit images and made binary to highlight areas of porosity and/or pull-out as-required.

    Scanning electron micrographs of the materials investigated are presented in Fig.1. In order to determine whether any anisotropy was present(considered a potential issue for the RP material due to the manufacturing technique which incorporates an inherent directionality),perpendicular sections were considered in all cases.Grain boundaries are just discernible in the captured secondary electron images.Microstructurally,the RP materials were observed to be more refined and rounded;with the Sintox FA?grains more angular in nature. In general, consistent with their conventionally sintered nature, the grains in the Sintox FA?were similar in both the impact and perpendicular faces with an elongated form nominally 5 μm wide by 10 μm long. Whereas for the RP material,the ceramic grains appeared slightly more isotropic in form with a smaller size of around 2-3 μm(presumably the nominal size of the feedstock powder),with these grains agglomerated into groupings whose size was comparable to the Sintox grains.Interestingly,there was no significant difference in microstructure apparent between the perpendicular faces considered for the RP materials (Fig.1(a)/(b)and Fig.1(e)/(f))for the RP and RP(Cu)materials in terms of the impact face/side,respectively.This was reflected in a slightly higher hardness, despite the observed greater porosity, for both the RP(pure) and RP(Cu) (copper-doped) alumina cases (Table 1). The porosity values in Table 1 exclude the effect of pull-outs.In all three cases, based on optical analysis, overall porosity (voids) appeared relatively low at just a few percent-although their distribution is significantly coarser for the Sintox than for RP material. Further,once the relatively coarse regions of pull-out were excluded,it was evident that there was significantly lower porosity apparent in the pressure-sintered Sintox FA?- as shown by the close packing,away from large pull-out based voids, of individual grains in Fig.1(c) and (d). Interestingly, small copper contaminants can just be discerned in Fig.1(e)and(f),with the(highlighted by red dashed circles) brighter inclusions - representing regions were charging was occurring around the embedded copper particles (confirmed as such via EDX analysis)-sitting along alumina grain boundaries.Of particular note was that,despite a higher hardness,there was anotable difference in density of about 150 kg/m3(nominally 4%)between the RP(Cu) and the denser (pure) RP material. This appeared to be a real effect, although relatively small. Elastic properties in the form of longitudinal and shear sound speeds (cland csrespectively)and Youngs modulus(E)were also determined using Panametrics ultrasonic transducers operating at 5.0 MHz for the pure RP and Sintox and are presented in Table 1. It was noted that longitudinal and shear sound speeds were significantly closer in the (pure) RP material as opposed to the pressure-sintered Sintox. Overall, it was apparent that differences in processing route and resultant microstructure led to the RP material exhibiting slightly greater porosity and consequent lower stiffness compared to the conventionally sintered Sintox FA?; however, in contrast,the more refined microstructure of the RP material led to a slightly higher hardness.

    Table 1 Key target material properties.

    Fig.1. Scanning electron micrographs showing rapid-prototyped and Sintox FA? target ceramics(a) RP ceramic: impact face(b) RP ceramic: side(c) Sintox FA?: impact face(d)Sintox FA?:side(e)Cu-loaded RP ceramic:impact face(f)Cu-loaded RP ceramic:side;examples of Cu inclusions indicated by the bright regions highlighted in dashed red circles in(e) and (f).

    Differing hard and soft cored projectiles were used for forward and reverse-ballistics experiments,respectively,as shown in Fig.2.While these projectiles had fundamentally different failure modes,they were selected to provide as much information as possible in a given experiment. In the forward configuration, WC-Co cored armour-piercing (AP) FFV 7.62 mm rounds provided enhanced penetration-and therefore fidelity in terms of subsequent depthof-penetration measurements; whereas for reverse-ballistic experiments, the use of 7.62 mm steel-cored BXN Full Metal Jacket(FMJ) rounds encouraged dwell which was visible via flash X-ray.

    3. Methodology

    Fig.2. 7.62 mm rounds employed for(a)forward and(b)reverse-ballistics experiments:(i)whole bullet;(ii)core only,and;(iii)cross-section.(a)WC-Co cored FFV round(b)steelcored BXN Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) round.

    Both forward [26,30,31] and reverse [18,32,33] ballistic experiments were undertaken. Forward-ballistic experiments involved the use of a 30-mm smooth-bore single-stage compressed gas-gun to fire acetal-saboted WC-Co projectiles (Fig. 2(a)) into ceramic targets backed by a series of 100 mm2Al 6082 blocks, each of 25 mm thickness.Comparison of depths-of-penetration(DOP)into these backing plates allowed derivation of a metric known as‘mass efficiency’ - Em, to interrogate ballistic response. This approach,detailed later in Eq. (1) [3], allowed assessment of ballistic efficiency of the ceramic targets by comparing the depth-ofpenetration of a projectile into a series of witness Al blocks with and with-out the presence of ceramic armour. For all forwardballistic experiments the sabot was stripped from the projectiles just before impact, with velocity measured immediately prior to impact using a series of sequential light gates. This experimental arrangement is shown in Fig. 3.

    Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of forward-ballistic experimental arrangement.

    For the reverse ballistic experiments, ceramic ‘targets’ were accelerated towards stationary ‘projectiles’ using a 50 mm bore single-stage gas-gun,with impacts monitored via four channels of Scandiflash XT-300 flash X-ray arranged radially around the impact point. This approach ensured that impact occurred at the desired point in the centre of the flash X-ray's focal area and, further, that the relatively small projectile did not yaw and that impacts were as normal to the target surface as possible.For these experiments the softer steel-cored BXN Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) projectiles were employed - as shown in Fig. 2(b) - as only projectile/target interaction was of interest. These rounds were the same as those employed in reverse ballistic experiments conducted within a previous study by Crouch et al. [33] focused on the interaction of steel-cored projectiles with Boron carbide ceramics.While alumina was employed here, this similarity provides a useful point of reference for the results presented later in this paper. This experimental arrangement is shown schematically in Fig. 4(a), with a picture of the target chamber illustrating the radial flash X-ray head arrangement presented in Fig. 4(b).

    4. Results and discussion

    Key experimental results for the forward and reverse ballistic experiments are presented in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.While a limited number of samples were employed due to project constraints, target configurations were chosen to ensure that patterns in ballistic response (e.g. with sample thickness) would be apparent - ensuring that any general trends would be representative of real material response, even where experimental repetitions proved impractical. For the data in Table 2, mass efficiency(Em)values were calculated based on Eq.(1)[3],using an average of baseline(Al backing only)DOP values(35.0 and 42.0 mm,both at an impact velocity of 848 m/s). This approach was considered reasonable in all cases as even for the relatively thin (c.a. 5 mm thick) ceramic tiles, backings were present - providing a ‘semiinfinite’ target configuration.

    Fig. 4. Reverse ballistic experimental configuration: (a) schematic illustration; (b)external picture of target chamber with flash X-ray heads(silver tubes)arrayed around target position.

    Where: ρAland ρcare the density of the Al backing and ceramic facing respectively;P∞is the DOP into the backing Al which results when no ceramic facing is present;tcis the ceramic tile thickness,and;Pris the residual DOP which results in the Al backing when the ceramic (armour) tile is present.

    4.1. Forwards ballistics experiments

    Based on Table 2,the variation of calculated mass efficiency with impacted ceramic thickness is illustrated in Fig. 5.

    From Fig. 5 it is immediately apparent that for both RP and conventionally sintered alumina mass efficiency against the impacting AP FFV threat increases moving from 5 to 8 mm in ceramic thickness.Above this thickness,there is tentative evidence that the performance of the RP material is plateauing or even reducing.While this might suggest that the material's ballistic limit has been reached,there is insufficient data to draw any significant conclusions.It is notable,however,that at thicknesses of both 5 and 8 mm the RP material consistently shows a lower overall mass efficiency than the corresponding thickness Sintox FA?targets.This reduction in efficiency is attributed to the slightly greater porosity of the RP material (see Table 1) which results in a reduction in material strength under loading.This is despite a slight increase in RP material hardness over the conventionally sintered alumina.In a similar vein, it is also interesting to note the significantly lower mass efficiency of the Cu-doped sample considered as opposed to the corresponding (8-mm thick) pure RP sample. Essentially, a reduction in Emof nominally 43%occurs(relative to the Sintox)due to the small Cu addition as-opposed to just 18%moving from Sintox to pure RP material. This suggests, for the materials considered here, a significant relationship between RP ceramic purity and ballistic performance.

    4.2. Reverse ballistics experiments

    The variation of recovered core length with ceramic properties for the two nominal velocity regimes investigated is presented in Fig. 4 (with data taken from Table 3). In addition, selected results from previous similar reverse ballistics experiments conducted by Crouch et al.[33]are included for the purpose of comparison.These experiments involved identical projectiles to those employed here,but instead of alumina, Boron carbide ceramic discs of varying thicknesses were employed. Data is only included for tests which employed planar discs with no cladding (defined as ‘support condition A’ in Ref. [33]).

    Fig. 6 clearly shows that increased ceramic thickness leads to greater core erosion - e.g. enhanced projectile defeat. This is relatively unsurprising as a greater ceramic thickness will allow for a corresponding increase in projectile/target (armour) interaction time.This is the gap between generation of waves at the moment of impact in the target and their arrival back at the point of impact(as tensile waves) following reflection at the ceramics rear face (e.g. a free surface). The conventionally sintered alumina and pure RP material are observed to exhibit broadly comparable behaviours,with nominally similar resultant projectile erosion for a given thickness of tile.Interestingly,the Boron carbide data[33]-despite lower impact velocities - appears to overlap with the generaltrends observed; this is likely due to the higher strength of the Boron carbide leading to greater erosion at a given impact velocity than for the alumina tiles considered here. More generally, the consistent trends for the conventionally sintered alumina,pure RP materials and Boron carbide apparent in Fig.6 suggest that the pure RP alumina is behaving under impact in a comparable manner(exhibiting similar failure mechanisms)to other real-world armour ceramics despite differences in strength, increasing the applicability of the findings here. Overall in Fig. 6 projectile erosion appears to increase linearly with ceramic thickness.For the Sintox,it is notable that erosion is in all cases greater than that of comparable-thickness RP material.Further,for the 5 mm thick tiles,a higher velocity leads to greater erosion; this is likely due to the enhanced pressure induced on impact in the impacted ceramic/the corresponding increased apparent material strength(e.g.a steric or strain-rate hardening effect [30]).

    Table 2 Forward-ballistics experimental results.

    Table 3 Reverse-ballistics experimental results [Sintox FA/RP ceramic ? 45/48 mm respectively].

    Fig. 5. Variation of calculated mass efficiency with impacted ceramic thickness.

    Fig. 6. Variation of recovered core length with impacted ceramic thickness including data from Ref. [33] for Boron carbide.

    With the RP material a similar trend is again apparent, with increased tile thickness linearly scaling with enhanced projectile erosion.However,it is interesting to note that for 5 and 8 mm thick tiles the degree of erosion appears to be relatively consistent and thus independent of impact velocity. While tentative, given the small number of data points,this may suggest that elements of the rapidly prototyped material structure (e.g. porosity) are such that the steric-effect observed in the conventionally sintered Sintox is no longer apparent in these velocity regimes.This is backed by the fact that divergence between the lower and higher velocity RP data points increases with increasing ceramic target thickness. In particular,at a thickness of 10 mm the highest velocity impact leads to lower overall projectile erosion(from Table 3,projectile erosion for the RP material was 10.0 and 13.0 mm for impacts at 750 and 872 m/s respectively, based on a nominal initial BXN steel core length of 20 mm as shown in Fig. 2(b)).

    When the copper-doped alumina - RP(Cu) - is considered in Fig.6,however,a more complex response appears to occur.While a general increase in ability to erode the incident projectiles with increasing ceramic thickness is again apparent, in the majority of cases the RP(Cu) ceramic performs less effectively (e.g. less projectile erosion results) than the corresponding thicknesses of both(pure) RP and conventionally sintered alumina. This is accompanied by a significant increase in variability of the resultant recorded core lengths at higher impact velocities. On this front it is notable that unlike the RP material, at a thickness of 5 mm there is no discernible difference in core erosion between the lower and higher impact velocity cases for the RP(Cu)alumina.This lack of a velocity(and therefore pressure) dependant effect where the ceramic otherwise appears to be behaving in a consistent manner appears to suggest that the presence of the RP(Cu)is modifying the material failure mode. In particular, the observed variability in the 8 mm thick RP(Cu) ceramic 850 m/s + results in Fig. 6 may suggest that the copper-doped material has a lower transition threshold (from dwell to penetration for a given projectile). This supposition was backed by the captured flash X-rays gained during the reverseballistics experiments.

    Typical flash X-rays for the four different reverse-ballistics cases detailed in Table 3 are shown in Fig. 7(a) to Fig. 7 (d) covering experiments 10 (Sintox - 3 frames only),12 (RP alumina),19 and 20(both Cu-loaded RP alumina), respectively. The general response shows flow of the jacketed rounds at/beneath the initial impact surface.This is consistent with behaviour observed by Crouch et al.[33]for Boron carbide ceramics,further reinforcing the suggestion that results presented here represent underlying mechanisms and are applicable to more than just alumina. From Fig. 7, an apparent marked difference in dwell - and subsequent penetration -mechanism between the 5 mm thick Sintox and RP(Cu)samples in Fig. 7(a) and (d), respectively, is of particular note. In terms of interpretation,it is also worth noting that for these reverse ballistic experiments,ceramic response will be a function of release arrival.Consequently, even if possible to neglect the rear interface by assuming that material around the point of impact is retained under compression by the impactor, releases from the outer edge of the impactor will have arrived as soon as 4.6 μs after impact(this is based on a nominal impactor diameter of 45 mm and elastic sound speed of 9.845 mm/μs - Tables 1 and 3, respectively). However,despite this limitation, these experiments still provide a direct indication of the ceramic/projectile interaction at impact and the nature of subsequent failure modes.The validity of this approach is reinforced by the fact that - as shown in Fig. 6 - even thinner ceramics have been employed in previous similar studies[33],with useful results still drawn out.

    Fig.7 presents flash X-rays detailing all three types of ceramicnamely Sintox, RP and RP(Cu) - investigated here. Considering each type of ceramic in turn:

    Sintox FATM:Fig. 7(a) illustrates the typical response of an armour ceramic [27-33]; the projectile is observed to deform on impact and by 7 μs after the initial frame material is flowing radially away from and just beneath the impact surface (e.g. at the compressed surface of the ceramic) - as shown by the red arrows/dashed line.This behaviour,known as dwell/surface defeat[8-12]occurs while the ceramic is under compression (under which conditions its strength exceeds that of the core, overmatching/eroding it).Dwell only ceases either once the compressive loading is released via rarefaction's from the ceramic edges or rear-most face (free surface), or if the defect accumulation in the ceramic caused by the projectile impact is such that its strength is overcome[12].In this manner,keeping the ceramic confined(in compression)maximises the opportunity for dwell.

    RP Ceramic:Broadly similar behaviour to that for the Sintox FA?in Fig.7(a)is apparent for the pure RP material in Fig.7(b).At 10 μs after the initial frame material flow(indicated by a red arrow)is apparent.Comparing the ceramic response at 20 μs to that for the Sintox FA? target at 17 μs in Fig. 7(a), the extent of projectile erosion as the core reaches the rear surface of the ceramic appears directly comparable, albeit with penetration taking slightly longer-something attributed here to the slightly lower impact velocity in the RP material case.Overall,this response appears to confirm the potential of 3D printed material to respond in a similar manner to conventionally sintered ceramics. Finally, at 30 μs in Fig. 7(b)bulging of the rear face of the ceramic is apparent - however,interestingly, this is slightly asymmetric, with its extent likely linked to the degree of core disruption.

    Fig.7. Flash X-ray radiographs illustrating the interaction of 7.62-mm steel-cored rounds impacted by ceramic-faced flyer plates.(a) Experiment 10:5.1-mm thick Sintox FATM at 853 m/s (three frames only as channel 4 miss-fired) (b) Experiment 12: 5.3-mm thick RP alumina at 765 m/s(c) Experiment 19: 10.0-mm thick RP(Cu) alumina at 700 m/s(d)Experiment 20: 5.0-mm thick RP(Cu) RP alumina at 850 m/s.

    RP Ceramic-copper-doped:Similar behaviour to that for the Sintox and (pure) RP material in Fig. 7(a) and (b), respectively, is apparent for the thicker RP material detailed in Fig. 7(c), with surface defeat apparent at 10 μs(indicated by the red line/arrows).Although it is interesting to note that failure(via flexure)appears to have occurred at the rear of the ceramic at 35 μs- a time period consistent with that for failure in the thinner 5 mm case in Fig.7(b).This is consistent with the data from Fig. 6 which suggested that under the impact conditions in question the RP material was potentially reaching a nominal limiting thickness in terms of performance at around 8-10 mm. A substantially different response occurs with the RP(Cu) alumina in Fig. 7(d), however. In this case at the elevated impact velocity in question (850 m/s as opposed to 700 m/s in Fig. 7(c)), only very limited projectile flow occurs on impact.Instead,by 7 μs after the initial frame the core has passed relatively un-damaged through the impacting ceramic flyer-essentially a ‘plugging’-like failure mode.While there is evidence of some core erosion in subsequent flash X-rays,this was measured post-shot to be just 1.9 mm(experiment 20,Table 3).This compares to 6.7 and 9.3 mm in the comparable 5 mm thick (pure) RP and conventionally sintered (Sintox) alumina experiments (experiments 15 and 10, Table 3), respectively. This difference in ballistic response of the RP(Cu)as opposed to the RP material may be linked to the observed enhanced hardness which resulted from the presence of the copper dopant(Table 1), with the copper particles dispersed at the alumina grain boundaries, shown in Fig.1(e) and(f), potentially acting as initiation sites for a more brittle failure mode. Overall, the difference in response (an 80% reduction in projectile erosion compared to the conventional alumina as opposed to a drop-off of 28% for the pure RP ceramic case) clearly illustrates the significant effect of even the observed relatively small <1 wt% copper-doping, emphasising the importance of quality control.

    5. Conclusions

    A combination of forward- and reverse-ballistics experiments have provided insight into the potential application of RP ceramics to body armour applications. Both conventionally sintered and RP materials exhibited broadly similar microstructures and material properties, with observed differences in (surface) porosity and hardness attributed to a slightly more refined microstructure in the RP case. Experimental results suggest that where care is taken in quality control during manufacture the RP material can produce a slightly less effective, but overall broadly comparable, ballistic response against hardened/AP threats as opposed to conventionally sintered alumina (Sintox). Further, comparison to data from the literature[33]suggested that the behaviour of the pure RP material was broadly consistent with other armour ceramics, suggesting similar underlying projectile defeat/ceramic failure mechanisms.Overall, this is a useful result given the relatively limited body of existing work on armour-relevant RP ceramic materials in the literature, suggesting a potential future application for the RP alumina considered here.

    Interestingly, however, forwards ballistics data suggested that the RP material has a slightly lower ballistic limit than the Sintox FA?(evidenced by an apparent plateau in calculated mass efficiency as tile thickness increased from 8 to 10 mm). This suggests that there are some subtle differences in material response under impact linked to the manufacturing route/resultant material microstructure. This finding was reinforced by comparison of recovered projectile cores post-shot, as well as flash X-ray images captured during reverse ballistic experiments. The flash X-ray images clearly indicated that projectile defeat involves a similar mechanism (namely that of dwell) for both the RP and conventionally sintered ceramics.While a notable change in failure mode was observed where Cu additions were present, such behaviour was not apparent when un-doped/pure RP targets were considered.

    Overall,while the experimental work presented in this study is based on a limited number of experiments, the presence of clear trends in data provided reassurance that key conclusions were valid. The results presented clearly highlight the importance of quality control if RP ceramics are to be deployed in critical areas such as body armour. Despite this, and while not considering the practicality of deploying 3D printers in-theatre(something beyond the scope of this study),the findings of this paper clearly illustrate the potential for use of such 3D printed materials in armour applications in the future.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are grateful to Andrew Roberts of Cranfield University for aid in the experimental work presented in this paper.In addition,the authors would like to acknowledge the data presented herein is taken from a recent Explosives Ordnance Engineering MSc project conducted by one of the current authors at Cranfield University's Shirvenham Campus, Miss Julie Rowley. Finally, the authors would like to dedicate this work to their colleague,Dr Michael Gibson,who sadly passed away while the paper was being written.

    在线a可以看的网站| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 97超碰精品成人国产| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| av一本久久久久| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 三级经典国产精品| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 毛片女人毛片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久99精品国语久久久| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 丰满少妇做爰视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 免费观看在线日韩| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 大码成人一级视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产成人a区在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 日韩av免费高清视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 伦精品一区二区三区| av专区在线播放| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 91精品国产九色| 久久精品夜色国产| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| www.av在线官网国产| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 色哟哟·www| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产高潮美女av| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 美女国产视频在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 熟女av电影| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲在线观看片| 在线观看人妻少妇| videos熟女内射| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产成人aa在线观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久久久网色| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 在线观看国产h片| 男女国产视频网站| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 少妇丰满av| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 草草在线视频免费看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 一区二区av电影网| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 精品久久久久久电影网| 美女国产视频在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 天堂网av新在线| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 97超碰精品成人国产| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| www.av在线官网国产| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 午夜福利高清视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| av播播在线观看一区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 观看美女的网站| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 99热网站在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 色播亚洲综合网| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 在线观看人妻少妇| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产老妇女一区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜撸| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久久大av| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产精品三级大全| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 日日啪夜夜撸| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 婷婷色综合www| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲av.av天堂| 欧美性感艳星| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一级毛片我不卡| 人妻系列 视频| tube8黄色片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 永久免费av网站大全| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产男女内射视频| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产毛片在线视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 久久99精品国语久久久| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产av国产精品国产| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 高清毛片免费看| 亚洲精品一二三| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 色哟哟·www| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 少妇的逼好多水| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 只有这里有精品99| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产乱来视频区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 高清av免费在线| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 舔av片在线| 久久久久网色| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 少妇的逼好多水| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 街头女战士在线观看网站| xxx大片免费视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 内射极品少妇av片p| 中文天堂在线官网| 日本wwww免费看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产毛片在线视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| av免费观看日本| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 日韩电影二区| 在线看a的网站| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| av.在线天堂| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 老司机影院成人| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 久久久久网色| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 毛片女人毛片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| av在线亚洲专区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产在线男女| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 日韩成人伦理影院| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产高潮美女av| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品.久久久| 七月丁香在线播放| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚州av有码| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 色网站视频免费| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 两个人的视频大全免费| 免费大片18禁| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 综合色丁香网| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| av网站免费在线观看视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 永久免费av网站大全| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 91久久精品电影网| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 尾随美女入室| av免费在线看不卡| 久久久久性生活片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一本久久精品| 国产毛片在线视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 成人国产av品久久久| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 老司机影院毛片| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 大香蕉久久网| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日本wwww免费看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产成人91sexporn| 免费看av在线观看网站| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 青春草国产在线视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 免费av观看视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| av国产免费在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲在久久综合| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 高清欧美精品videossex| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产综合精华液| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚州av有码| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 色视频www国产| 午夜福利高清视频| 毛片女人毛片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | av专区在线播放| 精品午夜福利在线看| av在线app专区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲最大成人中文| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 免费av观看视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 99热这里只有是精品50| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久热精品热| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 22中文网久久字幕| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 在线 av 中文字幕| 1000部很黄的大片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲精品第二区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 色视频www国产| av免费观看日本| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 成年av动漫网址| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| kizo精华| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| av有码第一页| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| av电影中文网址| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲av福利一区| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 9色porny在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 中文字幕制服av|