• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Soil quality index as a tool for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) monoculture conversion planning on afforested, reclaimed mine land

    2014-10-18 03:31:08MarcinPietrzykowski
    Journal of Forestry Research 2014年1期

    Marcin Pietrzykowski

    Introduction

    Different components of mining activities including exploration,extraction, and processing impose extensive physical, chemical,and biological changes on the environment due to the nature and characteristics of the activities (Daniels and Stewart 2000; Hüttl and Weber 2001; Machaina 2001; Pietrzykowski and Krzaklewski 2007).

    Correct identification of habitat conditions at mining sites and planning species composition in afforestation both have a fundamental impact on the stability of reclaimed stands and developed forest ecosystems (Gale et al. 1991; Heinsdorf 1996; Burger and Kelting 1999; Knoche at al. 2002; Krzaklewski and Pietrzykowski 2007). Diagnosis and classification of habitats on mining soils reclaimed for forestry is of paramount importance for a proper selection of species composition in afforested sites.Proper selection of tree species means their ecological requirements are appropriately adjusted to habitat conditions (climate conditions, fertility and soil humidity).

    In Central Europe, a huge area of reclaimed post-mining sites,especially the Lusatia Mine District in Germany and in Central Poland, were afforested with a pine monoculture (Heinsdorf 1996; Knoche 2005; Baumann et al. 2006; Pietrzykowski 2010).This forest management and afforestation practice is based on the assumption that the initial habitats should follow primary succession and, during the first stage, the biotope is colonized by pioneers.

    The Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) is a very useful for reclamation and afforestation on post-mining sites due to its adaptability and tolerance of poor habitat (Knoche 2005; Baumann et al.2006; Pietrzykowski and Socha 2011). This species is native to Europe and Asia, ranging from Great Britain and Portugal in the west, Eastern Siberia in the east, the Caucasus Mountains in thesouth and as far north as well inside the Arctic Circle in Scandinavia (Farjon 2005). In the case of post-mining sites with more fertile deposits, there is a movement toward converting singlelayered Scots pine monocultures into mixed hardwood forests for increasing biodiversity, tree-stands resistant to demage caused by insects and fungi gradations and better habitats utility for hardwood species. Generally, the transformation of Scots pine monoculture on potentially fertile soils into close-to-nature mixed hardwood forests stands with deciduous species is an important forestry practice in Europe in last decades (Buczko et al. 2002).This practice accelerates better equilibrium between litter production and decomposition and eventually the distribution of humus stock in the organic layers and the mineral horizon(Fischer et al. 2002).

    In the case of developed ecosystems on post-mining sites, the most important issue is their biodiversity and stability, which are characteristic of mixed forests. Habitat classification is the basis for species selection and stand composition in forestry. In the case of post-mining sites afforested with pioneer species like the Scots pine, the soil quality index would be a good tool for planning monoculture conversion to mixed forests in the next generation of tree stands.

    When planning the reconstruction of species composition the best time to start is at the first generation stand, when the assessment of habitat conditions forming under dynamic ecosystem succession is possible (Knoche 2005). Carrying out soil quality assessments with regard to tree species selection before establishing the first forest stands on mining sites will also pay off in the long run (Pietrzykowski 2010).

    Methods of habitat productivity assessment, developed for“natural” forests are of little use in the classification of habitats on mining soils reclaimed for forestry (Pietrzykowski and Socha 2011). Mining and tipping result in the mixing of deposits differing in (Quaternary, Neogene, Carboniferous strata). This affects in diversity of soil texture (mixing sand, clay, silt), and in many other parameters (pH, soil fertility and nutrient status, trace elements, air-water properties) compare to “natural” soils. Thus the newly formed habitats are completely different from “natural”habitats.

    The newly-formed soils are characterized by highly changeable chemical and physical properties and the consequential large spatial variability in habitat conditions. Characteristic features of reclaimed mine soils (RMS) include: lack of soil organic matter(SOM), nutrient deficiency (mainly of nitrogen and phosphorus);low pH-values due to acid mine drainage; unfavourable air-water properties; and salinity (Daniels at al. 1992; Burger at al. 1994;Andrews et al. 1998; Heinsdorf 1996; Katzur and Haubold-Rosar 1996; Daniels and Stewart 2000). However, elements’ deficiency in RMS is not the only problem as there may also be excessive concentrations of sulphur from pyrite oxidation and acid mine drainage on the Neogene strata (Katzur and Haubold-Rosar 1996). These features restrict harmonious nutritive conditions for trees in recreated forest ecosystems (Burger et al. 1994; Heinsdorf 1996; Knoche 2005; Knoche et al. 2002, Pietrzykowski 2008).

    An objective comparison of soil quality on the basis of quantitative indices (e.g., soil quality index SQI) is important for sustainable forest management and stability of the ecosystem, which also has protective and non-productive functions (connected with aesthetics and well-being). A uniform system of soil quality assessment based on the SQI is also important for monitoring the anthropogenic impact on the environment (Schoenholtz et al.2000) and is useful for universal assessment of potential forest soil productivity (Gale et al. 1991; Burger and Kelting 1999;Knoepp et al. 2000, Bro?ek et al. 2011). In practice, soil quality can be evaluated on the basis of its chemical, physical, and biological properties (Doran and Parkin 1996; Henderson 1995;Regenold and Palmer 1995; Harris et al. 1996; Nambiar 1997;Powers et al., 1998; Schoenholtz et al., 2000).

    An example of SQI used on reclaimed sites is an index developed by Gale et al. (1991) for the assessment of habitat conditions for the cultivation of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench)Voss.) and an index described in the work of Burger et al. (1994)developed for the assessment of habitat conditions on reclaimed sites in the Appalachian Mountains for the cultivation of pine(Pinus virginiana Mill).

    In this work, the Mine Soil Quality Index (MSQI) was proposed for the assessment of initial mining soils and classification of habitats on post-mining sites afforested with a monoculture of the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The MSQI may be useful as a tool for planning species composition, both for afforestation and pine monoculture conversion in the next generation of tree stands.

    Material and methods

    Study sites

    Field research was conducted on monoculture stands of the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), ranging from 12 to 30 years of age on the following reclaimed and afforested post-mining sites on different parent rocks (substrate), including dominant types in Central Europe (Quaternary, Neogene and Carboniferous strata).First, a total of 32 square research plots measuring 10 m × 10 m each were set up and from there, four replications × 8 RMS substrate (parent rock) variants were established on four mine sites:(1) the hilltop of an external waste heap at Be?chatów Lignite Mine; (2) a spoil heap of Smolnica hard coal mine; (3) the bottom of Szczakowa sand pit; and, 4) a waste heap of Piaseczno open-cast sulphur mine. Detailed site characteristics have been provided in Table1.

    Soil study

    As part of the soil studies soil profiles on all study plots (total 32 profiles) were exposed in pits to a depth of 110 cm. Additionally for composed soil sample preparation an extra 5 bore holes were made on each plot with a soil auger (Eijkelkamp set) on a grid.These composed soil samples were taken (1.0 kg mass of sample)to determine basic soil properties at depths of 0?8 cm (Ai – initial organic-mineral horizons); 8?50 cm and 50?110 cm (C -parent materials/rocky spoils). Independently, soil bulk density(BD) was sampled by the core method, using standard sharpened steel cylinders (250 cm3) (according to procedures in De Vos et al. 2005) with 3 replications for each layer (0?8; 8?50 and 50?110 cm deep) in the RMS pits (one soil pit for each soilsubstrate variant). In the lab, soil samples were dried and brushed through a 2.0 mm sieve. Samples of organic horizons OLf (annotated with FAO syntax where L = leaf; f = fermentation/fragmentation humus layers) were collected after litterfall from 1 m ×1 m quadrates with 3 replications for each 100 m2.

    Table1. Site characteristics

    Next, mixed samples of organic horizon for each plot were prepared for laboratory testing. The basic soil parameters were determined in the samples using laboratory procedures:

    · particle size distribution was determined by hydrometer analysis and sand fractions by sieving;

    · the pH of the soil was measured with a combination electrode in suspensions of 1.0 mol L-1KCl (pHKCl) (1:2.5 mass/volume ratio) after 24 hour equilibration;

    · basic exchangeable cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) were extracted with 1 mol L?1NH4OAc.

    Samples were then mixed with a small portion of extractant and equilibrated. After 24 hours, the suspensions were filtered,the soils were washed with additional extractant, and the total volume was made up to 100 mL (Jackson, 1958). The concentration of cations was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) with a Varian Spectrophotometer. Phosphorus in the form available to plants (Pav) was assayed using the Egner-Riehm method in calcium lactate extract ((CH3CHOHCOO)2Ca)acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH 3.6 and using the colorimetric method (Ostrowska et al. 1991) with VARIAN Inc., Cary 300 UV-Vis Spectrophotometers.

    Plant community studies

    Vegetation coverage on the study plots was determined using the Braun-Blanquette method (100 m2phytosociological surveys on each experimental plot, total of 32) (Wikum and Shanholtzer 1978). Next, ecological indicators of moisture (M) and fertility(F) for the forest floor species composition were calculated based on ecological numbers of vascular plants in Europe (Ellenberg 2009). In the analyzed cases, an 5-grade scale was used where the intensity of particular factors increases from (0) 1 to 5 (6)(Zarzycki et al. 2002).

    As is widely known many plant species are good indicators of habitat conditions. Detailed studies conducted 60 years ago allowed tocalibrate many plant species with reference to habitat conditions; Ecological indicator values for Central Europe(Ellenberg 2009) have been used successfully by many authors(Dzwonko 2001). In most cases, a 5-grade scale was used where the intensity of particular factors increases from (0) 1 to 5 (6)(Zarzycki et al. 2002). Here, to calculate the values of the given indices, the species abundance index according the Braun-Blanquette scale was converted into numerical values: cover above 75% corresponds to "5", cover range from 50%?75% to"4", 25%–50% to "3"; very abundant or 5%–25% to "2";numerous individuals but not abundant to "1"; rare and not abundant to "0.5"; few individuals to "0.2" and very rare (one)corresponds to "0.1". Calculations were made as a weighted average of ecological indicator values, first for an individual phytosociological survey on each plot and later for mean values for substrate type (variants) on the sites.

    Forest floor vegetation biomass was determined using the harvest method on 96 sample sub-plots (1 m2× 3 replications distributed along the diagonal of each of 32 soil study plots measured 10 m × 10 m) in the middle of the vegetation season(July). Mixed samples of vegetation (aboveground biomass of herbaceous and shrubs, Biom H+S) were collected to determine the water content (%) and calculate dry mass in the laboratory.

    Statistical procedures

    Data were analyzed with Statistica 9.1 software (StatSoft Inc.Software, 2009). Significant differences between the mean values of basic soil characteristics and MSQI from differing groups of soil-substrate (parent rock) variants were tested by an ANOVA test, preceded by a Shapiro-Wilk test of normality, and Levene’s test of variance homogeneity. The ANOVA test was followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using Tukey's HSD(honestly significant difference) post-hoc test. Based on the results of Tukey's HSD test homogeneous subsets in terms of index values MSQI were distinguished. Correlation analysis between MSQI and plant features for the validation model was performed using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient r (at the significance level p=0.05).

    The development and calculation of mine soil quality index(MSQI)

    Following the studies and concepts presented by Gale et al.(1991), Burger and Kelting (1999), Bro?ek et al. (2011) some assumptions were made to develop the MSQI index. The components of the soil assessment index include basic soil properties contributing to its fertility such as soil texture, nutrient availability, acidity converted into volumetric units, and sub-indices.Furthermore, each of the sub-indices was weighted with consideration of its estimated impact on the final assessment and standardised according to absolute values ranging from 0.0 to 1.0.Each feature was standardised using a linear function, taking into account three approaches: first, more (increase in feature value)is worse; second, more of a given index is better for the plant;third, at first more is better, then there is an optimum, and further increase is worse.

    MSQI takes account of the following features (Table2): the stock of soil texture fractions; nutrient availability, acidity (pH)and biological activity (expressed by Corg-to-Ntratio). The value of each feature was first defined for particular horizons, i.e.: 0-8 cm (organic mineral initial horizons Ai); 8?50 cm (parent rock C horizon, a layer most intensively penetrated by tree root systems in mine soils); and 50?110 cm (parent rock C horizon, approximate root range). The index referring indirectly to the decay rate of precipitate in the form of organic matter and soil biological activity (i.e., the Corg-to-Ntratio), was defined only for the forest litter and partially decomposed humus layers (OLf).

    The developed MSQI index is the sum of sub-indices weighted with a relevant validity coefficient factor (wt) provided for a given feature, where the maximum value of 1.0 corresponds to 100%.

    Finally, a general equation was applied to calculate the MSQI(Equation 1):

    where:

    wt is weight as a validity coefficient factor for individual sub-index;Ist is sub-index of soil texture, which is the sum of Isi, the silt sized fraction stock (SFS, 0.05–0.002-mm fraction) and Icl, the clay sized fraction stock (CFr, <0.002-mm fraction) calculated according to the total stock of these fractions in soil up to 110 cm profile deep(Mg·ha?1·110-cm-1). However, the value of this sub-index is reduced by the Is skeletal sub-index defined according to the % of coarse fragment (CFr, >2.0 mm) components (Equation 2):

    however, Ist ≥0 because with extreme values (small share of silt and clay sized fraction with very high coarse fragment CFr share, i.e., >35 % ) the Ist sub-index would be negative and so in such cases Ist is assumed to be 0.0, wt = 0.3;

    Ina – nutrient availability index refers to the nutrient content in soil volume (ECS, exchangeable cation form stock Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+up to 110 cm soil profile deep), wt = 0.3; IP – available phosphorus sub-index based on Available Phosphorus Stock (APS) in soil volume (Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1), wt = 0.1; Iac - acidity sub-index based on hydrogen stock (H+S) in soil volume (in units in kg·ha-1·110-cm-1);however H+S has been calculated based on pHKCl, which constitutes a measure of hydrogen ions in soil water solution ratio 1:2.5. Such a manner of determining acidity allowed the researchers to avoid taking the arithmetic mean of pH from soil horizons (pH is a logarithmic value); wt = 0.2; Iba – soil biological activity index based on Corg-to-Ntratio in OLf horizon, wt = 0.1;

    To automate the calculation of MSQI based on a scale of valuation, the IF function was used to perform logic tests on values and formulas in an Excel MS Office (2007) spreadsheet.

    Evaluation of individual MSQI variants at different wt for subindices was validated by the best correlations with plant community characteristics affected by natural succession, including aboveground biomass of forest floor plant and ecological indicator of vascular plants (moisture M and fertility F). In this work,the tree stand characteristics were not considered for validationof MSQI, because they heavily depended on the age of trees,which varied from 12 to 30 years at the post-mining site (Table1).

    The best results (at a significance level of p=0.05) were at“wt” value respectively: 0.3 for Ist and Ina, 0.2 for Iac, and 0.1 for IP and Iba. In this case, the values of MSQI correlated significantly with the ecological indicators: moisture (M) (r =0.39)and fertility (F) (r =0.42) (Fig.1 a, b). The values of MSQI correlated significantly (at p =0.05), as well, with aboveground biomass of forest floor species (herbaceous and shrub vegetation,Biom H+S, r =0.39) (Fig.1, c).

    Fig.1. Correlations between mine soil quality index MSQI and ecological indicators of Fertility F (a), Moisture M (b) and aboveground forest floor species community biomass (herbaceous and shrub vegetation Biom H+S) (c) in a validation model. According to Pearson’s test with n = 32, at p =0.05 the statistical correlation at 0.3 = < rxy< 0.5 is average.

    Table2. Scale and list of individual partial index ranges which constitute the mine soil quality evaluation according to MSQI formula.

    Results

    Plant characteristics

    The mean plant ground cover abundance was varied and ranged from 2 (SCZ-QS) to 56 % (SMOL-CF); the mean number of undergrowth species of vascular plants ranged from 13 (PIASQLS) to 45 (SMOL-NCF). In total, 131 plant species were identified in the post-mining sites, 29 of which were classified as forest species, 80 as ruderal and 22 as grassland, respectively.The dominant species in the communities were: Calamagrostis epigejos, Cardaminopsis arenosa, Cirsium arvense, Dactylis glomerata, Deschampsia flexuosa, Festuca ovina, Festuca rubra,Hieracium pilosella, Poa compressa, Tussilago farfara, Vaccinium myrtillus respectively depending on the substrate (Table3).However, the remaining species had no clear phytosociological relation or were characteristic for various other vegetation types.The value of the ecological indicator of moisture (M) ranged from 2.60 (BEL-NS) to 3.18 (PIAS-QS+NC) and the value of the fertility indicator (F) ranged from 2.35 (SMOL-CF) to 3.43(PIAS-QS+NC) (Table3). The forest floor plant aboveground biomass (Biom H + S) ranged from 0.13 (SCZ-QS) to 0.345(Mg·ha-2) (SMOL-CF) (Table3).

    Table3. Selected plant community features

    Basic soil properties

    The properties of the investigated RMS are rather varied(statistical differences of basic soil parameters are given in Table4). The percentage of silt-sized fraction (0.05?0.002 mm) ranged from 2.0% to 36.0% and clay sized was (<0.002 mm) between 1.0 and 25.0%. Organic carbon (Corg) and nitrogen Ntcontents in the Ai horizon (0-8 cm depth) varied from 2.3 to 166.1 g·kg-1and 0.15 to 4.04 g·kg-1, respectively and Corg-to-Ntratio in the OLf horizon between 29.3 and 83.6. Soil pH in 1 M KCl ranged from 3.13 to 7.50. The samples also differed considerably in terms of their cation exchange properties. The total exchangeable bases(TEB) were from 1.20 to 27.41 cmol(c)·kg-1, cation exchangeable capacity (CEC) from 2.18 to 28.0 cmol(c)·kg-1and base saturation(BS) from 25.96 to 98.14%. The content of available phosphorus(Pav) ranged from 0.10 to 2.68 g·kg-1(Table4).

    Value of transformed soil properties for MSQI calculation

    Depending on the silt fraction content in the horizons of the investigated soils, the average stock of this fraction (SFS) ranged from 343 (SCZ-QS) to over 4827 Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1(BEL-QL)(Table5). The clay fraction stock (ClFS) in the investigated soils ranged from 263 (SCZ-QS) to 2775 Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1(SMOLCF) of the profile (Table5). For the investigated RMS, the mean value of Isi ranged from 0.10 to 0.45 and Icl stock ranged from 0.05 to 0.5 (Table5). The coarse fragment fraction CFr (fragments of rocks, stones, gravel of >2.0 mm in diameter) in RMS ranged from 0.0% (in most soils) to 80.0% (SMOL-CF). Eventually the mean value of Ist index (according to equations 2)ranged from 0.20 (SCZ-QS and PIAS-QLS) to 0.60 (BEL-QL)(Table5). Exchangeable cation form stock (ECS) include: calcium Ca2+, magnesium Mg2+, potassium K+and sodium Na+of investigated soil ranged from 2.8 (SZC-QS) to 99.2 Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1(BEL-QL) (Table5).

    In the investigated RMS, as in most natural soils, calcium(Ca2+) was the predominant nutrient. Available phosphorus stock(APS) in the investigated mining soils ranged from 0.0025 Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1in soils forming on Carboniferous unfertilized sediments (SMOL-NCF) to 0.4800 Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1in soils forming on acidic, sulphurous neogene sands, neutralised by bog lime (BEL-NS) (Table4). The mean value of IP in investigated RMS ranged from 0.30 (for soils in SMOL-NCF) to 1.0 (BELQL and BEL-NS) (Table5).

    The acidity of the investigated soils expressed by hydrogen stock in terms of volume (H+S) ranged on average from 0.0013(BE-QL) to over 43.5250 kg·ha-1·110-cm-1(Table5). The mean Iac for investigated soil substrate ranged from 0.2 (SMOL-CF and SMOL-NCF) to 1.0 (SCZ-QLS and SCZ-QS). The mean value of Corg-to-Ntratio in OLf horizons of the investigated soils ranged from 31.5 (SMOL-CF and SMOL-NCF) to 83.6 (BEL-NS) (Table2), and Iba sub-index for investigated soils ranged respectively from 0.1 (BEL-QL and BEL-NS) to 0.9 (SMOL-CF;SMOL-NCF; PIAS-QS+NC and PIAS-QLS) (Table5).

    Table4. Basic soil characteristics

    Table5. Values of the sub-indices of mine soil quality index (MSQI) calculated on the basis of mine soil characteristics.

    Discussion

    As one can see from the above characteristics, comparison of soil quality using particle soil properties is difficult. It is an extremely important to use soil quality indices to make objective comparisons of mine soils developed on varied parent rock material and at different post-mining facilities such as external spoil heaps (in sulphur, lignite and hard coal mining) and sand open castpits. Deposits that constitute parent rock in soils on postmining sites are formed from Quaternary, Neogene and Carboniferous deposits with different physical and chemical features.When numerically assessing various features of transformedsoils into sub-indices, what was taken into account was the scale of variability range of these features in the analysed data set.What was also taken into account were the requirements and ecological properties of the tested species, the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), which dominates the afforested post-mining sites in this part of Europe. The species' wide ecological amplitude, its pioneering in ecological succession and good adaptation potential for difficult habitat conditions (Farjon 2005) are the reasons for its widespread use in afforestation of post-mining sites (Knoche 2005; Baumann et al. 2006; Pietrzykowski 2010;Pietrzykowski and Socha 2011).

    Soil texture is one of the most important criteria for the classification of soil deposits. This feature is closely connected and decisive for other soil properties. Among the various fractions,the most important role is played by silt and clay. Silt fraction(0.05?0.002 mm) in sands increases water capacity and capillary conduction, whereas in clays it reduces swelling, viscosity and plasticity. Colloidal clay admixture increases cohesion and plasticity and reduces percolation and water-permeability. Excessive content of the clay fraction, however, adversely affects the air and water properties of soils and water availability for plants.

    When developing the soil quality evaluation scale, the silt index (Isi) was based on the assumption that the larger stock of this fraction is “the better”. When developing the soil quality evaluation scale for the clay index (Icl), increases in the content and stock of the clay fraction was considered favourable only up to a certain limit. It was assumed that it was most beneficial from 3501–4000 Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1, and over this range the Icl value fell. If the clay content in profile exceeds 8500 Mg·ha-1·110-cm-1cm (that is if the clay fraction constituted on average over 60 %in bulk density of the investigated soils), the Icl sub-index value will drop to 0.2. The coarse fragment fraction CFr (fragments of rocks, stones, gravel of >2.0 mm in diameter) in RMS decreased the value of soil texture index (Ist). In determining the partial value of the Is, coarse fraction was not calculated in advance, as in the case of silt and clay fractions, but the valuation was made on the basis of the percentage (% in sample volume). If the content of silt and clay fraction was very small and the CFr very high in tipped mine deposits, the Ist value in the valuation of soil texture could not be negative (Ist ≥0), and in such cases it is assumed that Ist = 0.0.

    Another feature included in the valuation of mine soil was availability of nutrients for plants. This feature obviously has a direct impact on growth and nutrition of the introduced tree stands. Nutrient availability sub-index Ina refers to exchangeable cation form stock (ECS): calcium Ca2+, magnesium Mg2+, potassium K+and sodium Na+. The available phosphorus (Pav) is also included in the group of basic macronutrients which are frequently deficient in mine soils (Heinsdorf 1996; Daniels and Stewart 2000; Pietrzykowski 2010). In natural soils, phosphorus occurs in mineral form and its source is mainly fluoroapatite; in organic form, it is connected with plant and animal remains.

    In initial mine soils, little organic matter has accumulated and apart from its natural content in rock, which forms spoil heaps and excavations, some amounts of phosphorus are provided in the form of mineral fertilising. The impact of fertilising treestands with phosphate may last from several to about a dozen years (Baule and Fricker 1970, Heinsdorf 1996). The scale for IP was estimated assuming that the increase of the index value is linear, that is “the more phosphorus, the better for the plants.” In some cases on sulphurous neogene sands (BEL-NS), neutralisation by bog lime improved the IP sub-index values. Bog lime used for neutralization is a rock containing phosphorus bound with organic residue formed in the course of sedimentation in neogene lakes.

    Soil acidity expressed by pH is a feature very closely connected with other soil properties. The pH in 1MKCl determination is based on an assumption that hydrogen and aluminium ions go into solution in reaction with neutral salt (KCl), and the obtained value is quite sTablein the vegetation season and less dependent on soil humidity, for example. This is of particular importance in the case of mine soils that frequently exhibit significant pH variability in vertical profiles. Forest tree species have different requirements regarding pH for both the optimum range and the tolerated range (ecological amplitude).

    The investigated species, the Scots pine, has a wide range of tolerance for pH variation, even within the soil profile (Farjon 2005). In the valuation of an Iac acidity index, it was assumed that the smaller the accumulation, the better, but only to a certain limit and then the Iac index grew, and subsequently, below 1.0 kg H+ha-1110 cm-1, the Iac index dropped (Table5). This assumption stems from the fact that most forest species grow in natural conditions in soils that are at least slightly acidic and, in the case of mine soils, both extremely low acidity (e.g. mining drainage) and alkalinity are adverse phenomena.

    An important criterion in the evaluation of RMS development in post-mining areas is the extent and dynamics of initial organic horizon formation. One measure of development of these horizons is the accumulation of soil organic Carbon (Corg) and total nitrogen (Nt) and the Corg-to-Ntratio (Anderson 1977; Wali and Freeman 1973; Prosser and Roseby 1995; Li and Daniels 1994,Rumpel et al. 1999, Pietrzykowski 2008). The fresh litter horizon(OL) is clearly developed and the raw humus horizon (Of) is at an early development stage and hence the symbol OLf (fresh litter and raw humus horizon).

    The Corg-to-Ntratio may be interpreted as an indirect index of changes in the developed soil environment, including the intensity of soil organic matter transformation processes (Janssen 1996). With high Corg-to-Ntratio, the stock of mineralised nitrogen may be used by soil micro-organisms, and consequently the accumulation of nitrogen may be stopped. In the sediments freshly deposited on spoil heaps, the phenomenon of nitrogen deficiency (too high Corg-to-Ntratio) may occur periodically(Wali 1999). In the case of RMS, wide Corg-to-Ntratio is connected with slower decomposition of biomass produced by pioneering plant communities (Schafer and Nielsen 1979).

    In the case of initial mine soils, there is however a difficulty in interpreting Corg-to-Ntratio due to the occurrence of origin(“geogenic”) carbon that significantly alters the total balance of carbon and soil nitrogen (Chabbi et al., 2008). And so the proposed MSQI includes the Corg-to-Ntratio in OLf horizon in the Iba partial index, which refers to “biological activity”. From theliterature (Farjon 2005) it follows that in habitats suiTablefor the investigated species (Scots pine), the Corg-to-Ntratio in litter is on average above 60. Series of data indicate, however, that in optimum habitats and with a good supply of nitrogen, the Corg-to-Ntratio in the Scots pine may be lower than 30 and vary dynamically with the decomposition of litter. Usually the amount of nitrogen in comparison to organic carbon increases in the course of litter decomposition.

    MSQI relations with features of vegetation

    As mentioned above, validation of soil quality indices and suitability in habitat classification may be done through correlation with plant community features (Warkentin 1995; Burger and Kelting 1999; Schoenholtz et al. 2000). It is well known that many plant species from succession are good indicators of habitat conditions. Detailed studies conducted 50 years ago allowed to calibrate many plant species with reference to habitat conditions and ecological indicator values for Central Europe (Ellenberg first in 1965 and reprinted in Ellenberg 2009) were used successfully. The values of MSQI correlated significantly with ecological indicator values of vascular plants: moisture (M) and fertility (F). Variants on Carboniferous shales (SMOL-CF and SMOL-NCF), where the values of MSQI were higher while soil fertility (F) values were the lowest, had significant impact on the reduction of the correlation coefficient values between MSQI and ecological indicator of F. This indicates that predictions of site conditions based on plant community features in some cases may be lower than the assessment of potential soil quality. In such cases, it will be necessary to better plan potential habitat conditions for the introduced tree stands.

    The biomass of plant communities and the rate of production of biomass per unit area are other factors important for soil quality and productivity validation. The quantity and spatial distribution of biomass layers and plant constituents is of crucial significance in describing ecosystem productivity (Krebs, 1994). However, the plant biomass of the undergrowth is important from a nutritional viewpoint for reclaimed post-mining site stand stability (Hüttl and Weber, 2001, Knoche et al. 2002; Pietrzykowski and Socha 2011).

    Tree stand features, such as biomass and growth parameters(mean diameter and height), on the investigated sites may be more significantly altered by age and forest management operations such as thinning directly affecting the density and competitiveness of trees. Thus, as mentioned in method description (see Section 2), the correlations with these parameters were not considered. The values of MSQI correlated significantly with aboveground biomass of forest floor species. What follows is that MSQI well describes the growth conditions of vegetation that appears by way of natural succession under the canopy of the introduced tree stands.

    Proposal of final habitat classification and recommendation for species composition

    Based on the results of Tukey's HSD test, homogeneous subsets in terms of index values MSQI were distinguished (Table6 and 7). Mean MSQI values for three homogenous subsets (with low,medium, and high MSQI values) were used to determine the range of MSQI values for the grid with site classification (Table7 and Fig.2). Based on this grid, the investigated soils developing on different types of rock overburden may be grouped from the poorest to the most fertile soils. Thus, the poorest habitats were found on the Szczakowa sand pit on quaternary sands(SCZ-QS) (MSQI = 0.270), whereas the most fertile ones were found on Piaseczno spoil heap on quaternary sandy loams mixed with neogene clays (PIAS-QS+NC) (MSQI = 0.720) (Fig.2).

    Eventually, the following predicted habitats were classified for the MSQI value ranges: below 0.403 – Coniferous Forests (CF);from 0.404 to 0.505 - Mixed Coniferous Forests (MCF); from 0.506 to 0.602 – Mixed Deciduous Forest (MDF); above 0.602 –Deciduous Forests (DF). It must be noted however that the MSQI ranges for some soils overlapped within the groups. This was due to significant micro-habitat variability and mosaic-like character of sediments that form post-mining sites. In such cases,transition units (e.g., CF/MCF) may additionally be distinguished.

    For individual groups of habitat classes distinguished according to similarity in substrates (parent rock), optimal species composition for afforestation and conversion of pine monocultures would be recommended.

    For the poorest habitats of coniferous forest (CF) on quaternary sands (e.g., Szczakowa sand pit SCZ-QS) and carboniferous deposits on unfertilized fragments of spoil heaps (Smolnica SMOL-NCF), the Scots pine should be still the main afforestation species in the next generation of tree stands. For mixed coniferous forest sites (MCF) on quaternary loamy sands (on Piaseczno spoil heap PIAS-QLS) and neogene sands (on Be?chatów spoil heap BEL-NS) the dominant species should again be the Scots pine, but the addition deciduous trees (e.g., common birch and some sessile oak) is recommended. For transitional habitats, from mixed coniferous to mixed deciduous forest sites(MCF/MDF) classified on quaternary loamy sands (on Szczakowa sand quarry SZC-QLS), the dominant species in the next generation should be the Scots pine, but the introduction of more deciduous trees (e.g. sessile oak) is strongly recommended.

    Mixed deciduous forest sites classified on carboniferous deposits of fertilized fragments of a spoil heap (Smolnica SMOLCF), the conversion of pine monoculture is recommended. The main species on these sites should be deciduous trees (sessile oak with some other deciduous species, e.g., hornbeam, linden,common maple) and only a small percentage of the Scots pine.Transitional habitats, from mixed deciduous to deciduous forest sites (MDF/DF) were classified on a mix of quaternary sands with neogene clays (on Piaseczno sulphur mine spoil heap PIASQS+NC). The main species on these sites should be deciduous trees as well (e.g., sessile oak with admixture of hornbeam, linden, common maple) and a very small percentage of the Scots pine.

    Fig.2. A grid of predicted groups of forest habitat units for the study sites and substrate (parent rock) variants, based on the range of MSQI: CF - poorest habitats of coniferous forests; MCF - mixed coniferous forest; MDF - mixed deciduous forest; DF - deciduous forest.

    Table6. The result of Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) test on the significance of mean MSQI (Mine Soil Quality Index) values for soil substrate variants

    Table7. Homogeneous subsets of soil-substrate variants in terms of MSQI values based on Tukey’s HSD test.

    The most fertile habitats of deciduous forest sites (DF) were classified mostly on Quaternary loam (on ‘Be?chatów’ spoil heap BEL-QL) (Table6). On these deposits the conversion of pine monoculture and afforestation with hard wood species is strongly recommended.

    Conclusions

    Reclaimed mining soils developing on post-mining sites are made up of very diverse lithological deposits that exhibit considerable variability. The main factor that affected the variability of MSQI for quaternary and neogene soils (BEL-QL, BEL-NS,SCZ-QLS and SCZ-QS PIAS-QS+NC and PIAS-QLS) was soil texture, which resulted in the value of soil texture index (Ist).Moreover, in the case of soils developed on shales and Carboniferous deposits of Smolnica spoil heap (SMOL-CF and SMOLNCF), the features that also had an impact were fertility and the resulting sub-indices, including nutrient availability index, Ina,and phosphorus availability index IP.

    On this basis, it may be concluded that, with little lithological diversification of sediments on the Smolnica spoil heap, the impact of mineral fertilization was highlighted. The analysis and habitat classification results lead to the conclusion that prediction of plant habitat based solely on lithology and genesis of sediments made of parent rock, in the case of developing mine soils,provides results that are too general. Often the predicted potential fertility of weathering rock overburden based on an analogy with the parent rocks of natural soils, (e.g., shale, and sandstone) may be erroneously interpreted and ultimately give overestimated final results of habitat classification. The conducted habitat classification, especially the examples provided, show that the developed MSQI index is universal and can objectively assess the quality of mine soils in contrast to assessments based solely on soil properties that are typically highly variable.

    Moreover, the reliability of the developed MSQI index is confirmed by statistically significant correlations with the tested features of plant communities from succession (ecological indicator values and plant biomass). This indicates the accuracy of the selected components of soil quality assessment included in MSQI and determines fertility of the soils and ability to meet nutritional requirements of plants. As a result of the habitat classification and an indication of the trend that habitats will follow in the process of becoming similar to natural forest habitats, the MSQI index can be useful in designing species composition and pine monoculture transformation in the next generation of “new forests” on mining sites. The MSQI can by applied to describe the variability of mine soils and to classify habitats developed on mine overburden deposits, similar to the investigated substrates,which are dominant in this part of Europe.

    I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Wojciech Krzaklewski for his advice at the research phase and for valuable discussions about the results. I would also like thank to Dr.Jaros?aw Socha from the Department of Forest Mensuration,University of Agriculture in Krakow for his assistance with statistical analysis and Iwona Skowrońska, MSc. from the laboratory of the Department of Forest Ecology for laboratory analysis.This study was financially supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education Grant N 309 013 32/2076 and partly by statutory financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education RP (DS-3420 in 2012 and 2013, Department of Forest Ecology University of Agriculture in Krakow). I would also like to thank Klara Laudańska for critical text correction. This paper was finalized during author’s Fulbright Scholar Advanced Senior Grant in academic year 2013-2014 at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Publication was developed during the 60th anniversary of the University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

    Anderson DW. 1977. Early stages of soil formation of glacial ill mine spoils in semiarid climate. Geoderma, 19: 11–19.

    Andrews JA, Johnson JE, Torbert JL, Burger JA, Kelting DL. 1998. Minesoil and site properties associated with early height growth of Eastern White Pine. J Environ Qual, 27: 192–199.

    Baule H, Fricker C. 1970. The fertilizer treatment of forest trees. Munchen,Germany: BLV-Verlagsges, p.259.

    Baumann K, Rumpelt A, Schneider BU, Marschner P, Hüttl RF. 2006. Seedling biomass and element content of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus nigra grown in sandy substrates with lignite. Geoderma, 136: 573–578.

    Bro?ek S, Lasota J, Zwydak M, Wanic T, Gruba P, B?ońska E. 2011.Application of the trophic soil index (SIG) in the diagnosis of forest site types. Soil Sci Annual, 62(4): 133–149. (In Polish, English Summary)

    Buczko U, Bens O, Fischer H, Hüttl RF. 2002. Water repellency in sandy luvisols under diffrent forest transformation stages in Northest-Germany.Geoderma, 109: 1–18.

    Burger JA, Johnson JE, Andrews JA., Torbert JL. 1994. Measuring mine soil productivity for forests. In: International Land Reclamation and Mine Drainage Conference on Reclamation and Revegetation. USDOI, Bureau of Mines, Special Publication, SP 06C-94. p. 48–56.

    Burger JA, Kelting DL, 1998. Soil qualitymonitoring for assessing sustainable forest management. In: M.B. Adams, K. Ramakrishna, E.A. Davidson(eds.) The Contribution of Soil Science to the Development and Implementation of Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. Soil Sci Soc Am, Special Publication, 53: 17–52.

    Burger JA, Kelting DL. 1999. Using soil quality indicators to assess forest stand management. For Ecol Manage, 122: 155–166.

    Chabbi A, Sebilo M, Rumpel C, Schaaf W, Mariotti A. 2008. Origin of Nitrogen in reforested lignite-rich mine soils revealed By STableIsotope Analysis. Environ Sci Technol, 42: 2787–2792.

    Daniels WL, Genthner MH, Hodges RL. 1992. Soil development in sandy tailings derived from mineral sands mining in Florida. In: Proceedings, National Meeting of the American Society for Surface Mining and Reclamation. Duluth MN, 14-18 June 1992. Lexington, KY: ASMR, pp. 37?47.

    Daniels WL, Stewart BR. 2000. Reclamation of Appalachian coal refuse disposal areas. In: R. I. Barnhisel, R.G. Darmody, W. Lee Daniels (eds.), J.Bartels (Manag. ed.), Reclamation of drastically disturbed lands. Agron.Monogr. 41. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, p. 433–459.

    De Vos B, Van Meirvenne M, Quataert P, Deckers J, Muys B. 2005. Predictive quality of pedotransfer functions for estimating bulk density of forest soils. Soils, Soil Sci Am J, 69: 500–510.

    Doran JW, Parkin TB. 1996. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum data set. In: J.W. Doran, A.J. Jones (eds.), Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Sci Soc Am Special Publication, 49: 25-37.

    Dzwonko Z. 2001. Assesment of light and soil conditions in ancient and recent woodlands by Ellenberg indicator values. J App Ecol, 38(5): 942–951.

    Ellenberg, H. 2009. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. p. 756.

    Farjon A. 2005. Pines: Drawings and Descriptions of the Genus Pinus. 2nd rev. ed. Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers, p. 236.

    Fischer H, Bens O, Hüttl RF. 2002. Changes in humus form, humus stocks and soil organic matter distribution caused by forest transformation in the northeastern lowlands of germany. Forstwiss Centralblatt, 121: 322–334.

    Gale MR, Grigal DF, Harding RB. 1991. Soil productivity index: predictions of site quality for white spruce plantations. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 55:1701?1708.

    Harris RF, Karlen DL, Mulla DJ. 1996. A conceptual framework for assessment and management of soil quality and health. In: J.W. Doran, A.J. Jones(eds.), Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Sci Soc Am Special Publication, 49: 61–82.

    Heinsdorf D, 1996. Development of forest stands in the Lusatian Lignite Mining District after mineral fertilization adapted to site and tree species.Water, Air, Soil Pollut, 91: 33?42.

    Henderson GS. 1995. Soil organic matter: a link between forest management and productivity. In: W.W. McFee, J.M. Kelly (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th North American Forest Soils Conference on Carbon Forms and Function in Forest Soils. Madison, WI: Soil Sci. Am, pp. 419?435.

    Hüttl RF, Weber E, 2001. Forest ecosystem development in post-mining landscapes, a case study of the Lusatian lignite district. Naturwissenschaften, 88: 322?329.

    Jackson ML. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Verlag: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. p. 498.

    Janssen BH. 1996. Nitrogen mineralization in relation to C:N ratio and decomposability of organic materials. Plant Soil, 181: 39?45.

    Katzur J, Haubold-Rosar M. 1996. Amelioration and Reforestation of sulfurous mine soils in Lusatia (Eastern Germany). Water, Air Soil Pollut, 91:17?32.

    Knoche D. 2005. Effects of stand conversion by thinning and underplanting on water and element fluxes of a pine ecosystem (P. sylvestris L.) on lignite mine spoil. For Ecol Manage, 212 (1-3): 214?220.

    Knoche D, Embacher A, Katzur J. 2002. Water and element fluxes of red oak ecosystems during stand development on post-mining sites (Lusatian Lignite District). Water, Air Soil Pollut, 141: 219?231.

    Knoepp JD, Coleman DC, Crossley DA, Clark JS. 2000. Biological indices of soil quality: an ecosystem case study of their use. For Ecol Manage, 138:357?368.

    Krzaklewski W, Pietrzykowski M. 2007. Site classification in post?mining areas reclaimed for forest use with special focus on phytosociological-soil method. Sylwan, 151(1): 51?57. (in Poilsh, English summary)

    Krebs CJ. 1994. The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance (4th edition). New York: Harper-Collins College Publishers, p. 801.

    Li RS, Daniels WL. 1994. Nitrogen Accumulation and form over time in young mine soils. J Environ Qual, 23(1): 166?172.

    Mchaina DM. 2001. Environmental planning considerations for the decommissioning, closure and reclamation of a mine site. International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 15(3): 163?176.

    Nambiar EKS. 1997. Sustained productivity of forests as a continuing challenge to soil science. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 60: 1629?1642.

    Ostrowska S, Gawlinski Z, Szczubialka Z. 1991. Procedures for soil and plants analysis. Warsaw: Institute of Environmental Protection (In Polish),p. 334.

    Pietrzykowski M. 2008. Soil and plant communities development and ecological effectiveness of reclamation on a sand mine cast. J For Sci, 54(12):567?578.

    Pietrzykowski M. 2010. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ecosystem macronutrients budget on reclaimed mine sites - stand trees supply and stability. Nat Sci, 2(6): 590?599.

    Pietrzykowski M, Krzaklewski W. 2007. An assessment of energy efficiency in reclamation to forest. Ecol Eng, 30: 341?348.

    Pietrzykowski M, Socha J. 2011. An estimation of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ecosystem productivity on reclaimed post-mining sites in Poland (Central Europe) with using of allometric equations. Ecol Eng, 37: 381?386.

    Powers RF, Tiarks AE, Boyle JR. 1998. Assessing soil quality: practicable standards for sustainable forest productivity in the United States. In: M.B.Adams, K. Ramakrishna, Davidson, E.A. (eds.), The Contribution of Soil Science to the Development and Implementation of Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. Soil Sci Soc Am Special Publication, 53:53?80

    Prosser IP, Roseby SJ. 1995. A chronosequence of rapid leaching of mixed podzol soil materials following sand mining. Geoderma, 64: 297?308.

    Reganold JP, Palmer AS. 1995. Significance of gravimetric versus volumetric measurements of soil quality under biodynamic, conventional, and continuous grass management. J Soil Water Conserv, 50 (3): 298?305.

    Rumpel C, K?gel-Knabner I, Hüttl RF. 1999. Organic matter composition and degree of humification on lignite-rich mine soils under a chronosequence of pine. Plant and Soil, 213: 161?168.

    Schafer WM, Nielsen GA. 1979. Soil development and plant succession on 1-to 50-year old strip mine spoils in southeastern Montana. In: M.K. Wali(ed.), Ecology and Coal Resources Development. Vol. 2. New Yourk, NY,USA: Pergamon Press, pp. 541?649.

    Schoenholtz SH, Van Miegroet H, Burger JA. 2000. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. For Ecol Manage, 138: 335?356.

    StatSoft, Inc. 2008. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.1.Wali MK. 1999. Ecological succession and the rehabilitation of disturbed terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Soil, 213: 195?220.

    Wali MK, Freeman PG. 1973. Ecology of some mined areas in North Dakota.In: M.K. Wali (ed.), Some environmental aspects of strip mining in North Dakota. Education Series 5, Grand Froks, North Dakota Geological Survey.pp. 25?47.

    Warkentin BP. 1995. The changing concept of soil quality. J Soil Water Conserv, 50: 226?228.

    Wikum DA, Shanholtzer GF. 1978. Application of the Braun-Blanquet coverabundance scale for vegetation analysis in land development studies.Environ Manage, 2(4): 323?329.

    Zarzycki K, Trzcińska-Tacik H, Ró?ański W, Szel?g Z, Wo?ek J, Korzeniak U.2002. Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland. In: Z. Mirek(ed.), Biodiversity of Poland,, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków. p. 184.

    午夜福利在线观看吧| av免费在线看不卡| 免费av观看视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 色吧在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 两个人视频免费观看高清| av国产免费在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 色视频www国产| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 嫩草影院精品99| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 欧美潮喷喷水| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 乱人视频在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 色哟哟·www| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产成人精品婷婷| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产在线男女| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲国产最新在线播放| www.色视频.com| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 日本黄大片高清| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 最新中文字幕久久久久| www.av在线官网国产| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产淫语在线视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 色综合色国产| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国产av不卡久久| 久久精品人妻少妇| 免费观看av网站的网址| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 97热精品久久久久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 岛国毛片在线播放| 在线播放无遮挡| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 直男gayav资源| a级毛色黄片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 777米奇影视久久| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 人妻一区二区av| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国产乱来视频区| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产在视频线在精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲综合精品二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 日韩av免费高清视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费看不卡的av| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 免费少妇av软件| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 一夜夜www| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 久久久国产一区二区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲在线观看片| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 中文字幕制服av| 少妇熟女欧美另类| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚州av有码| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 黄色一级大片看看| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产老妇女一区| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 深夜a级毛片| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久这里只有精品中国| 精品一区二区免费观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 天美传媒精品一区二区| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 色视频www国产| 久久久久久久国产电影| 91精品国产九色| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品第二区| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲最大成人av| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产91av在线免费观看| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 黄色一级大片看看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 午夜福利高清视频| eeuss影院久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 高清毛片免费看| av在线老鸭窝| 午夜视频国产福利| 伦精品一区二区三区| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 特级一级黄色大片| 黄色一级大片看看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 男女边摸边吃奶| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| freevideosex欧美| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| videossex国产| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 如何舔出高潮| 国产在视频线在精品| 午夜视频国产福利| 内射极品少妇av片p| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 高清av免费在线| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 三级经典国产精品| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产综合精华液| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 深夜a级毛片| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚州av有码| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 观看免费一级毛片| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 国产视频内射| 亚洲不卡免费看| kizo精华| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚州av有码| 六月丁香七月| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日本免费在线观看一区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产精品久久视频播放| 精品久久久久久成人av| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久久久网色| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 97热精品久久久久久| 精品久久久久久成人av| 九草在线视频观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 在线观看人妻少妇| 黄色日韩在线| 少妇丰满av| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲av.av天堂| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 中文欧美无线码| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 成人av在线播放网站| av在线老鸭窝| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 在线观看一区二区三区| 色播亚洲综合网| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美bdsm另类| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 直男gayav资源| 日本免费在线观看一区| www.色视频.com| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 天堂网av新在线| 午夜福利高清视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品一及| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 69人妻影院| 美女高潮的动态| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 男女那种视频在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久久久久久久久成人| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产高清三级在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲在线观看片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 插逼视频在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 久久草成人影院| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 午夜激情欧美在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 午夜激情欧美在线| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 美女主播在线视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 一级毛片电影观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲不卡免费看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 伦精品一区二区三区| 色吧在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚州av有码| 免费看日本二区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日本午夜av视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 欧美性感艳星| 99热这里只有是精品50| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久久色成人| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| kizo精华| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 极品教师在线视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 韩国av在线不卡| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 91久久精品电影网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 免费看光身美女| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产91av在线免费观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久这里只有精品中国| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 亚洲国产av新网站| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产高潮美女av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 在现免费观看毛片| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 久久97久久精品| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 色综合色国产| 久久97久久精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚州av有码| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 热99在线观看视频| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 欧美另类一区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 热99在线观看视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产在视频线在精品| 99热网站在线观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 午夜福利在线在线| 久久久久性生活片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产视频内射| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 搡老乐熟女国产| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 免费av毛片视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| .国产精品久久| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 色哟哟·www| 18+在线观看网站| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看|