MOOC Spurs Higher Education Reform

By+staff+reporter+LIU+YI

CHEN Hangjie， a sophomore student of Chinese at Zhejiang University of Technology， logged on last April to Coursera， the worlds biggest MOOC website– a chance encounter that transformed his college life. After poring over the impressive array of courses at world famous universities that the website offered， Chen enrolled in the Modern and Post-modern course at Wesleyan University， the History of Art course at Peking University and the ChinaX course at Harvard. He later obtained a certificate endorsed by the supervisor of the Understanding Media by Understanding Google course at Northwest University. Chens university is not in Chinas top tier， but thanks to the Internet he has been able to study courses at the worlds most prestigious universities under the supervision of the most respected academics.

Chinese Colleges Ride the MOOC Tide

MOOC， namely massive， open， online courses， have come to the fore over the past couple of years. In the autumn of 2011， about 160，000 people from 190 countries enrolled in the free online Artificial Intelligence course at Stanford. Among them， those from Lithuania surpassed Stanfords total enrollment， and 248 who were not from Stanford achieved straight-A scores. The course engendered Udacity， the worlds first MOOC website. Later， two Stanford professors created Coursera. As of September 2013， Coursera had cooperated with 80 or more universities throughout the world in offering around 350 online courses. Having chalked up five million or more enrollments， Coursera is the largest MOOC website. In May 2013， MIT and Harvard jointly launched the non-profit edX which， along with Udacity and Coursera， constitutes the MOOC“troika.”

Since MITs groundbreaking provision of online courseware in 2001， the open learning movement has swept the world， giving millions of people access to the best education for free. But MOOC is distinctive in that it entails neither the“video-watch” unidirectional mode， nor the purchase of digital materials for a course. It instead offers a complete syllabus， including participation， feedback， homework， assessment， examination and certification. Strictly on par with real college courses， it involves many multi-media technologies that strengthen interaction between teachers and students as well as among students. It has also designed systems of homework assessment and examinations whereby students that qualify are issued with certificates signed by the tutor.

The cover story of the November 2013 issue of the U.S. wired magazine was about 12-year-old Paloma Noyola Buenom， whose home is beside a garbage dump. Her education having been conducted entirely from online sources， she achieved the highest math score in Mexicos national examinations. Howard A. Lurie， vice president for Content Development of edX， also cited a high-school student in India whom MIT enrolled because his scores were among the first three percent of all participants in the edX Circuits and Electronics course. Since 2012， the so-called “first year of MOOC，” such news items have enlivened the education field. First tier universities of the world， other than those cooperating with the “troika，” are now developing their own platforms. In September 2013， more than 20 British universities， along with the British Council， British Library and British Museum， launched Futurelearn.

Chinese universities naturally do not want to be left behind. Huang Zhen， vice president of Shanghai Jiao Tong University， even voiced the warning， “open， or be abandoned.” Soon after， Shanghai Jiao Tong University， Xian Jiaotong University， Southwest Jiaotong Uni- versity， Beijing Jiaotong University and Taiwan-based National Chiao Tung University jointly launched Ewant， which offers 10 courses. In October 2013， Tsinghua University officially launched XuetangX， whose first 11 courses are among those most reputed at Tsinghua and Peking universities. They include Tsinghuas Principles of Electric Circuits and History of Chinese Architecture， and Peking Universitys Principles and Practice of Computer-assisted Translations. At the launch press conference， vice president Yuan Si of Tsinghua stated that XuetangX would cooperate with the government， universities and companies in exploring new modes of sustainable development and education reform. His speech implied fast-approaching reciprocal recognition among universities of academic credits and cooperation.

Flipped Classrooms Redefine Study Mode

Flip teaching， a main MOOC feature， represents a striking departure from traditional education methods. Under the conventional classroom scenario the teacher instructs students， who listen， take notes and do homework assignments to digest the theory. In flipped classrooms， however， the relevant topic is studied and understood beforehand. Class time is earmarked for discussion and exchanging ideas to encourage deeper thinking.

Chen Hangjie describes this approach as that of an echoing classroom. Students spend the time necessary beforehand listening and digesting knowledge. In the process they pinpoint any problems they have encountered in grasping the subject， which are resolved through exchanges with teachers and fellow students. It is otherwise impossible to pass the weekly tests and final examinations. Students accustomed to “force-fed”teaching have difficulty in adapting to this new study mode. This fact is verified by statistics that the supervisor of the Understanding Media by Understanding Google course published. They show that more than half of the 56，000 students that enrolled in the course quit after the first test， and that only 1，200 students obtained the leaving certificate.

Yu Jingsong， vice dean of the Department of Computational Linguistic Engineering of Peking University， is one of the pioneer Chinese MOOC teachers. He established the Principles and Practice of the Computer-assisted Translation course on XuetangX last October. Every week， Yu uploads the latest videos， materials and resources onto the website. After watching and reading these materials， students think about the teachers questions and later discuss them in the interaction zone. They then carry out their homework assignments.

“This method imposes high demands on students，” Yu said. “Each video is only a few minutes long， but as a condensed version of dozens of standard class hours， constitutes the core of the class.” Yu finds from a survey he conducted that students usually fastforward the video to save time， but need to watch it time and again to grasp the points it raises. This auto-didactic approach enables students to finish a class at their own pace. Although it seems a flexible and free method of learning， it requires strict self-discipline and the pinpointing of specific targets.

Flipped classrooms also demand more from teachers than the conventional approach. They must condense a two-hour class into a few minutes， and also master multi-media technologies that succinctly present the course content online. Some teachers have designed games to help students grasp the flip learning mode. Ping-Cheng Yeh， associate professor at National Taiwan University， established Probability， the first Chinese course on Coursera. To attract students， he designed a multi-student social game intended to enhance the learning experience. It requires students to both raise and answer one anothers questions， similar to storming a fortress. The winner receives an Internet badge. Teachers need to make meticulous preparation for classroom discussions. They entail both answering and raising questions to encourage students to think more deeply about the subject. The ample time set aside for exchanges also makes it possible for teachers to instruct students according to their different characteristics via careful observation.

Flipped classrooms have thus changed the educational mode and also redefined the concept of “study.” It no longer denotes listening to teachersinstructions and doing homework， but proactive thinking and discussion. It also extends the students role to a teaching context.

Explorations of Interactive Education

Succeeding via MOOC， however， requires much more than a strong will and desire to learn. Upon discovering MOOC， Chen Hangjie registered for five courses but completed none of them. Lack of time， the language barrier and， most important， a feeling of isolation， were the main reasons why. He found that the short duration of online exchanges with unfamiliar teachers and fellow students was no substitute for actual interpersonal communication.

Professor Yu also believes that MOOC interaction is far from perfect. Having used the same syllabus for flipped classrooms and the conventional classroom scenario， he was able to make relevant observations about the two teaching modes. He found that students in a real classroom who watched the same videos and did the same preparation held comparatively lively and edifying discussions. Those held online， however， were comparatively loose and random. “The nature of education lies in interaction， namely exchanges between teachers and students，” Yu concluded. He believes that MOOC， in applying Internet technologies to transform conventional education modes， effectively simulates a real university and provides a special zone for discussion. But in his view it cannot replace actual interpersonal communication.

Chen Hangjie got over his MOOC teething problems by establishing an MOOC study team on campus last October – the first offline MOOC team in China. It soon mustered 200 or more members， spread among such categories as human society， English， science and engineering. Members organize real clubs every two weeks in which to communicate and exchange problems and suggestions. Teachers are also invited to these discussions. Many freshmen have been encouraged to enroll for certain courses as a group， some of whom have finished and obtained certificates. Chen has set up a translation department that enlists volunteers to translate subtitles for English courses like Harvards ChinaX and Duke Universitys Introduction to Astronomy， and a publicity department to popularize excellent courses.

MOOC College acts as a “warm” interactive platform for many non-student enrollees. At the end of 2012， MOOC students established an online study lounge at Guokr.com. It later developed into the Guokr MOOC College， which has 50，000 participants. MOOC students on different courses exchange notes， discuss problems， and share suggestions. In 2013， they organized more than 50 offline activities. Some teachers even went to them for syllabus suggestions before establishing an online course.

Professor Yu is a proactive practitioner of online education. A couple of years ago he developed his own online course website， UUcampus， which is now being trialed in certain schools at Peking and Tsinghua universities. “The hot Coursera and edX is not the be-all and end-all of online education，” he said frankly. “Developing an online product with the best interactive function is what every university is striving towards.”

It seems that although MOOC is not the last word in online education， it has at least provided food for thought on conventional methods of high education. The online education mode， with its open and interactive features， makes it possible for people around the world to access the best higher education resources at low cost， and also makes possible personalized， lifelong study.