• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Can an Invasive Prey Species Induce Morphological and Behavioral Changes in an Endemic Predator? Evidence from a South Korean Snake (Oocatochus rufodorsatus)

    2014-03-25 02:10:22*
    Asian Herpetological Research 2014年4期

    *

    1Department of Biology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon 200-701, South Korea

    2Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon 200-701, South Korea

    Can an Invasive Prey Species Induce Morphological and Behavioral Changes in an Endemic Predator? Evidence from a South Korean Snake (Oocatochus rufodorsatus)

    Jun-Haeng HEO1#, Heon-Joo LEE1#, Il-Hun KIM1, Jonathan J. FONG2, Ja-Kyeong KIM1, Sumin JEONG1and Daesik PARK1*

    1Department of Biology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon 200-701, South Korea

    2Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon 200-701, South Korea

    Introduction of an invasive prey species into an ecosystem may affect an endemic predator’s fitness by altering the prey-predator system. Successful adaptation may allow the endemic predator to eat and control the invasive species, while unsuccessful adaptation may result in extinction of the predator. We examine the possible effects of the invasive North American bullfrog (Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana) on the endemic Red-backed rat snake (Oocatochus rufodorsatus) in South Korea. We do so by comparing the morphology and behavior of adult and hatchling snakes from bullfrog-exposed (Taean) and bullfrog-unexposed (Hongcheon) populations. Among the seven morphological characteristics investigated, relative tail length (tail length/snout-vent length) of both adults and hatchlings from Taean was significantly greater than that of adults and hatchlings from Hongcheon. Also, adult snakes from Taean had a signifi cantly shorter latency of fi rst tongue fl ick in response to prey compared to adults from Hongcheon. This difference was not observed in hatchlings. In other snake species, a longer relative tail length and shorter latency of fi rst tongue fl ick are known to improve foraging effi ciency, and these characters may be adaptations of O. rufodorsatus to prey on bullfrogs. This study provides preliminary evidence that the presence of an invasive prey species may cause morphological and behavioral changes in an endemic predator.

    invasive prey, bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana, Oocatochus rufodorsatus, predator response

    1. Introduction

    Invasive species can disrupt an ecosystem (Gurevitch and Padilla, 2004; Strauss et al., 2006; Vellend et al., 2007; Strayer, 2012) by altering the prey-predator system (Carlsson et al., 2009; Anson et al., 2013). Often, endemic prey are more affected by an altered prey-predator system than endemic predators (Lima, 2002; Johnson and Agrawal, 2003; Nuismer and Thompson, 2006). However, invasive prey can also affect endemic predators (Phillips and Shine, 2004, 2006; De Rivera et al., 2005; King et al., 2006; Langkilde, 2009; Wanger et al., 2011; Harley et al., 2013; Llewelyn et al., 2013).

    Invasive prey species may directly or indirectly decrease the fitness of endemic predators, such as by altering prey composition (Suarez and Case, 2002; Pothoven and Madenjian, 2008; Heinonen and Auster, 2012). As a response, morphological and behavioral changes due to developmental phenotypic plasticity and/ or evolutionary adaptation can appear in the endemic predators (Mittelbach et al., 1999; Aubret et al., 2004; Phillips and Shine, 2004; Langkilde, 2009; Li et al., 2011a; Wanger et al., 2011). Populations of successfully adapted predators often decrease in the early stages of a prey’s invasion, but soon recover to stable levels and play a key role in the long-term control of the invasive prey species (Brodie and Brodie, 1999; Phillips and Shine, 2004; Kishida et al., 2006). On the contrary, populations of unsuccessful endemic predators continuously decline and are often extirpated (Case and Bolger, 1991).

    Bullfrogs (Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana), native

    to North America, are now found in more than 45 countries worldwide. Due to its negative impacts in introduced areas, R. catesbeiana was designated one of the 100 worst invasive species by IUCN (Lowe et al., 2000). R. catesbeiana often causes the decline of endemic insects and frogs directly through predation or indirectly through foraging competition (Kang and Youn, 1994; Kiesecker et al., 2001; Hirai, 2004; Wu et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007; Da Silva and Filho, 2009; Ra et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011a, 2011b; Jancowski and Orchard, 2013). Such effects result in altered prey-predator systems.

    In Korea, R. catesbeiana was first introduced from Japan for commercial purposes in the early 1970s and dispersed to most parts of South Korea in the mid-1990s (Kim, 1972; Kang and Youn, 1994; Choi et al., 1998; Kim and Ko, 1998). R. catesbeiana has been observed feeding on insects, amphibians, fi sh, and juvenile snakes in freshwater habitats (Kim and Ko, 1998; Chung, 2005; Oh and Hong, 2007). The distribution of R. catesbeiana in South Korea was frequently monitored (Kim and Ko, 1998; Jang and Suh, 2010; Figure 1). The Red-backed rat snake, Oocatochus rufodorsatus, is a predator of R. catesbeiana and provides a good opportunity to study the effects of prey introduction on an endemic predator because they share the same habitat (Sung et al., 2006). A negative correlation between the presence of Pelophylax nigromaculatus, a prey item of O. rufodorsatus, and R. catesbeiana (Ra et al., 2010) provides evidence that R. catesbeiana is altering the prey-predator system. In this study, we compared morphological characteristics and prey response behaviors of adult and hatchling O. rufodorsatus from bullfrog-exposed and unexposed populations in South Korea to study the effect of an altered prey-predator system.

    2. Materials and Methods

    2.1 Collection and housingAnimal handling and experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with guidelines established by the Kangwon National University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For the bullfrog-exposed populations, we selected two sites in Taean County, Chungcheongnam Province, South Korea (populations hereafter referred to as “Taean”), where R. catesbeiana were introduced before 1994 and are currently found (Kim and Ko, 1998; Jang and Suh, 2010; Jang et al., 2011; Figure 1). The two sites in Taean are approximately 40 km apart in Wonbuk (Taean 1) (36°49′17.15" N, 126°14′40.44" E) and Anmyeon (Taean 2) (36°28′53.37" N, 126°20′0.42" E) (Figure 1).

    Figure 1 Locations (black filled circles) of sites where adult Oocatochus rufodorsatus were collected. The frogs used as prey items, Rana (Lithobates) catesbeiana and Pelophylax nigromaculatus, were collected from the same sites. Distribution of R. catesbeiana in South Korea reported in 2010 (Jang and Suh, 2010), represented by gray dots. Three locations where R. catesbeiana was fi rst introduced are indicated by black fi lled circles surrounded by a square.

    For the bullfrog-unexposed population, one site was selected in Hongcheon County, Gangwon Province, South Korea (population hereafter referred to as “Hongcheon”) (37°28′53.37" N, 128°04′33.67" E), where there are neither historical nor modern records of R. catesbeiana (Kim and Ko, 1998; Suh, 2005; Jang and Suh, 2010; Jang et al., 2011; Figure 1).

    All sampling was conducted in July of 2013. At Taean 1, we collected 9 adult snakes (9 females) from an unused rice paddy with an agricultural pond. This rice paddy had other rice paddies on one side and low mountains on the other three sides. The size of the paddy was 2188 m2and the nearest rural town (> 5 houses) was 800 m away. During sampling, we observed one O. rufodorsatus foraging for R. catesbeiana. At Taean 2, we collected 15 adult snakes (10 females, 5 males). The habitat consisted of an agricultural pond adjoined with rice paddies on one

    side and pine tree windbreaks on the other three sides. The size of the pond was 1732 m2and approximately half of the perimeter was occupied by fully-grown Oriental cattails (Typha orientalis). The nearest rural town was 630 m away. Although we did not observe R. catesbeiana during our sampling they have been found in neighboring areas (< 3 km) (Jang et al., 2011). At Hongcheon, we collected 22 adult snakes (15 females, 7 males). This site consisted of an agricultural pond adjoined to rice paddies on two sides and low mountains on the other two sides. The size of the pond was 1675 m2and most of the perimeter was occupied by T. orientalis. The nearest rural town was 170 m away. During the sampling, we did not observe any R. catesbeiana.

    After capture, adult snakes were immediately transported to the laboratory at Kangwon University (37°52′06.06" N, 127°44′33.32" E; 180 km away from Taean and 30 km away from Hongcheon). Individuals were marked by inserting a passive integrated transponder tag (TX1411L, Biomark, Boise, Idaho, USA) under the skin. All snakes were individually kept in plastic boxes (39 cm × 26 cm × 17 cm) and fed one mouse (1.4 g –2.3 g) every two weeks. A bowl with 200 ml of water was placed inside the box and changed every two days. For shelter and effective skin shedding, paper towels and a plastic T-shape pipe were put inside the box. Temperature and light–dark cycles were kept at ambient levels throughout the study. After completing behavioral experiments, adult and hatchling snakes were all released at their respective collection sites after health examination based on skin color, body condition, and locomotion.

    2.2 Morphological characteristics of adult snakesBefore conducting experiments, we measured seven morphological characteristics of 22 adult snakes (18 females and 4 males) from Taean and 21 (15 females and 6 males) from Hongcheon; three snakes with partially damaged tails were excluded (1 female/1 male from Taean, 1 male from Hongcheon). We measured the snoutvent length (SVL; tip of the snout to the posterior of the vent), tail length (TAL; posterior of the vent to the tip of the tail) to the nearest 0.1 cm using a measuring tape and the body weight (BW) to the nearest 0.1 g using a digital balance (SI-132, Excel Precision Co., New Taipei City, the People’s Republic of China). From these data, we calculated the relative tail length (RTL) by dividing the TAL by SVL. In addition, we measured the head length (HL; tip of the snout to the quadrate-articular jaw joint), head width (HW; at the widest point of the head), chin length (CL; tip of low jaw to the line which connects two points of the most posterior end of the mouth) and chin width (CW; width between the two points of the most posterior end of the mouth) to the nearest 0.01 mm using digital vernier calipers (IP66, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan). Using the data of CL and CW, we calculated the gape index (GI) of each snake following GI = π(CL) (CW)/4 (King, 2002).

    2.3 Adult snake response to frog prey

    2.3.1 Preparing preyThree different frog prey were used for trials: 1) metamorphosed R. catesbeiana from Taean 1, 2) P. nigromaculatus from Taean 1, and 3) P. nigromaculatus from Hongcheon. All prey items were caught in rice paddies near where the adult snakes were collected. The frogs were transported to the laboratory and kept at a density of 20 individuals in aquaria (53 cm × 40 cm × 28 cm) that had both aquatic and terrestrial parts. For food, we provided three crickets per frog once every three days. To facilitate successful prey foraging of adult snakes, only recently metamorphosed frogs (~2 weeks) were used.

    2.3.2 Experimental proceduresExperiments were conducted with adult O. rufodorsatus, 16 (12 females, 4 males) from Taean and 16 (11 females, 5 males) from Hongcheon between 10:00 and 19:00 from August 6 to 11, 2013. We presented pithed, unconscious frogs to the snakes. None of the frogs were recovered during the experiment and the uneaten frogs were fi nally sacrifi ced by guillotine.

    To acclimate the snakes, each individual was placed in an opaque experimental box (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm) 1 hour prior to starting the trial. During the experiments, light and temperature followed local, ambient conditions. All behaviors were recorded using a digital video camcorder (DCR-SR65, Sony, Tokyo, Japan) positioned 30 cm above the arena. We presented a frog in the center of the box using forceps (30.5 cm long), and following previous studies (Cooper and Burghardt, 1990; Labra et al., 2001), the trial was complete when the snake ate the frog or after 10 min. The time taken to eat the prey was measured from the snake’s fi rst touch to completely swallowing the frog. The snake and prey type for each trial were randomly assigned using an online random number generator (http://www.random.org/). Each snake was exposed to each type of prey once, and was given two days rest between trials. After each experiment, the experimental boxes were washed with hot water and dried before using again.

    2.4 Hatchling snake response to frog odors

    2.4.1 Obtaining hatchlings and preparing frog odorsAfter the prey response experiments, female adult snakes

    were individually kept in plastic boxes (39 cm × 26 cm × 17 cm) and fed one mouse once a week. Most females gave birth between August 8 and 20. The clutch size of the 13 pregnant females (7 in Taean, 6 in Hongcheon) was 9.6 ± 3.3 SD (range: 5–14). We kept each clutch in separate aquaria (45 cm × 32 cm × 35 cm), placing paper towels and a T-shaped plastic pipe for shelter. We marked each hatchling with a number on the dorsal plate. The birth day and the day of skin shedding were recorded for each individual. After the prey odor experiments, we measured the SVL, BW, TAL, and RTL of the hatchlings using the same method for adult snakes. Since the hatchlings were immature (7– 10 days old), we could not determine their sex.

    In these experiments, we used prey odor instead of frogs, as hatchling O. rufodorsatus have a smaller gape than the body size of metamorphosed R. catesbeiana. To prepare prey odors, individuals of the three prey types (R. catesbeiana Taean, P. nigromaculatus Taean, P. nigromaculatus Hongcheon) were weighed, pithed and sacrificed using a guillotine, and cut into small pieces using scissors. To prevent possible contamination of odor sources, we did not use euthanizing chemicals. The pieces were ground using a mortar and pestle, adding 100 ml distilled water per 10 g BW of the frog. The solution was centrifuged for 5 min at 3500 rpm (NF-80, Hanil Science Co., Seoul, South Korea). The supernatant was decanted into 50 ml tubes and preserved at –20oC until use. As a control odor, we used distilled water.

    2.4.2 Experimental proceduresTo know if exposure to invasive R. catesbeiana affects the response of newborn O. rufodorsatus, prey odors were sequentially presented to the hatchlings. The experiment was conducted with each of the 25 O. rufodorsatus hatchlings from each five adult females from both Taean and Hongcheon, between 10:00 and 19:00 from August 17 to 28, 2013. As five individuals was the smallest clutch size, we arbitrarily selected five hatchlings from each female for experimentation. At approximately 7 days old, O. rufodorsatus hatchlings show tongue-flicking behavior towards prey odors (personal observation), so we used only 7–10 day old hatchlings for this experiment.

    During experiments, light and temperature followed ambient conditions. We recorded all behaviors with a digital video camcorder. For acclimation, each hatchling was placed in an opaque experimental box (10 cm × 10 cm × 10 cm) 1 hour prior to starting each trial. We presented gauze (2 cm × 2 cm) soaked with 1.5 ml frog odor solution in the center of the box using forceps and the trial was considered complete after 10 min. The frog odor type and individual hatchling used were randomly assigned for each trial. As in previous olfactory tests of reptiles (Cooper and Burghardt, 1990; Labra and Niemeyer, 1999), only one odor type was presented per day. After each experiment, the boxes were washed with hot water and dried before using again.

    2.5 Data analyses

    2.5.1 Comparison of the morphological characteristics of adult snakesSVL, BW, TAL, RTL, HL, HW, and GI of adult O. rufodorsatus were compared using a General Linear Model (GLM). In the analysis, we used the locality as the independent variable, sex as a covariable, and the seven morphological characteristics as dependent variables. In each analysis, we assessed the interaction of locality * sex. In addition, we compared the morphological characteristics of the adult female snakes caught from the Taean 1 (8 females) and Taean 2 (10 females) using an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test based on the normal distribution of the data (Shapiro-Wilk test). Since males were only collected from Taean 2, we could not perform any comparison between males.

    2.5.2 Adult snake response to frog preyThe number of adult O. rufodorsatus that responded by tongue fl icking, touching prey, and foraging prey were compared between Taean and Hongcheon using a Chi-square test (Preacher, 2001) and between each pair of prey types within each population using the Fisher exact test (Preacher and Briggs, 2001). The significance of the Fisher exact test was set at P = 0.017 after Bonferroni correction (Zar, 1999). The prey response of adult O. rufodorsatus was analyzed using a GLM. We used locality, sex, and prey type as independent variables, SVL and BW as covariables, and the latency of the fi rst tongue fl ick, time to the first touch of prey, the number of tongue flicks within the fi rst 1 min after the fi rst tongue fl ick, number of tongue flicks during the 10 min experiment, and the time taken to eat a prey item from the fi rst touch of prey as dependent variables (Cowles and Phelan, 1958; Cooper and Burghardt, 1990; Labra et al., 2001; Saviola et al., 2011). In each analysis, we also assessed the interactions of locality * sex, locality * prey type, sex * prey type, and locality * sex * prey type.

    When the prey type signifi cantly affected the dependent variables, a Turkey post-hoc test in the GLM was applied to compare the differences between each pair of prey type. Relationships between the SVL and BW of frog prey and the snake’s response variables were analyzed using a Spearman correlation. We did not compare the responses of the two Taean populations because the sample sizes were too small.

    2.5.3 Hatchling snake response to frog odorsSVL, BW, TAL, RTL, and age of hatchlings were compared between Taean and Hongcheon using an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test based on the normal distribution of the data (Shapiro-Wilk test). Due to the small sample size (n = 5), the characteristics of hatchlings’ mothers were only compared between Taean and Hongcheon using the Mann-Whitney U test.

    The number of the O. rufodorsatus hatchlings that responded by tongue flicking and touching prey odors were compared between Taean and Hongcheon using a Chi-square test (Preacher, 2001) and between each pair of odor type within each population using the Fisher exact test (Preacher and Briggs, 2001). The signifi cance of the Fisher exact test was determined at P = 0.008 after Bonferroni correction (Zar, 1999).

    The responses of the O. rufodorsatus hatchlings to prey odors were analyzed using a GLM. We used the locality and the prey odor type as independent variables, the SVL and BW of the hatchlings and their ages as covariables, and the latency to the first tongue flick, time to the fi rst touch of prey and the number of tongue fl icks during 10 min as dependent variables. In each analysis, we also assessed the interaction of locality * prey odor type.

    We performed the Chi-square test and Fisher exact test online (http://www.quantpsy.org; Preacher, 2001; Preacher and Briggs, 2001). For the remaining analyses, we used software SPSS v. 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) . All data are presented as mean ± SE.

    3. Results

    3.1 Comparison of the morphological characteristics of adult snakesRTL of adult snakes was signifi cantly greater in Taean than Hongcheon (F1,43=14.97, P < 0.01; Table 1; Figure 2A). The remaining six morphological characteristics were not statistically different between Taean and Hongcheon (P > 0.05 for all cases; Table 1). Comparing males and females, all morphological characteristics except TAL (P = 0.97) were signifi cantly different between the sexes (P < 0.01 for all cases; Table 1). RTL was greater in males than that of females, but the remaining fi ve characteristics were greater in females than in males (Table 1). None of the characteristics were signifi cantly different between the two Taean populations (P > 0.05 for all cases; data not shown).

    3.2 Adult snake response to frog preyThe number of adults that responded by tongue fl icking, touching prey, and eating prey was not significantly different between Taean and Hongcheon (Chi-square test, P > 0.05 for all cases; Table 2) and between each pair of prey type within each population (Fisher exact test, P > 0.017 for all cases; Table 2).

    Adults from Taean had a signifi cantly shorter latency to the fi rst tongue fl ick than adults from Hongcheon (F1,69= 8.88, P = 0.004; Figure 3), but the latency time was not different between sexes (F1,69= 0.32, P = 0.58) and among different prey types (F2,69= 0.29, P = 0.75). None of the interactions between locality-sex, locality-prey type, sexprey type, and locality-sex-prey type were signifi cant (P >0.05 for all cases). The number of tongue fl icks within the fi rst 1 min, during the fi rst 10 min, and the time to the fi rst touch of the prey were not signifi cantly different between Taean and Hongcheon (P = 0.78, P = 0.13, and P = 0.76, respectively), between the sexes (P = 0.41, P = 0.14, and P = 0.37, respectively), and among different prey types (P = 0.63, P = 0.31, and P = 0.13, respectively). None of the interactions between variables were signifi cant (P> 0.05 for all cases). The time taken to eat prey was not different between Taean and Hongcheon (F1,45= 0.04, P = 0.84) and between the sexes (F1,45= 0.53, P = 0.47), but was different among different prey types (F2,45= 6.66, P = 0.004). In particular, snakes took more time to eat R. catesbeiana than P. nigromaculatus from both Taean (P< 0.01) and Hongcheon (P = 0.008), but the time to eat P. nigromaculatus from Taean and Hongcheon (P = 0.32). The SVL and BW of adult snakes were not signifi cantly correlated with any of the response measurements (P >0.05 for all cases).

    Table 1 Morphological characteristics of adult Oocatochus rufodorsatus caught from bullfrog-exposed populations at Taean and bullfrogunexposed population at Hongcheon. Data are presented as mean ± SE based on the populations and the sex. Gape index (GI) = π (chin length) (chin width) /4. SVL, snout-vent length; BW, body weight; TAL, tail length; RTL, relative tail length (TAL/ SVL); HL, head length; HW, head width.

    Table 2 The number of adult Oocatochus rufodorsatus from bullfrog-exposed populations at Taean and bullfrog-unexposed population at Hongcheon and their hatchlings that responded in each response measurements to frog prey and to frog prey odors, respectively. CatTA: Rana (Lithobates) catesbeiana or their odors from Taean; NigTA and NigHC: Pelophylax nigromaculatus or their odors from Taean and Hongcheon; DH2O: distilled water-used as control odor.

    The SVL and BW of the prey were positively correlated with the number of tongue flicks during the fi rst 10 min (r = 0.263, P = 0.029 for the SVL; r = 0.265, P = 0.028 for the BW) and the time taken to eat prey (r = 0.609, P = 0.004 for the SVL; r = 0.642, P = 0.002 for the BW), but were not correlated with the time to the fi rst tongue flick and the number of tongue flicks within the fi rst 1 min (P > 0.05 for the cases).

    3.3 Hatchling snake response to frog odorsTAL and RTL of hatchlings from Taean were greater than that from Hongcheon (TAL: t = 2.58, df = 48, P = 0.013; RTL: U = 153.5, P = 0.002; Table 3, Figure 2B), but the SVL, BW, and age were not different (P > 0.05 for the cases, Table 3). Comparing between hatchlings’ mothers, RTL was greater in Taean than Hongcheon (U = 1.00, P = 0.016), but the SVL, BW, TAL and GI were not different (P >0.05 for the cases, Table 3).

    Figure 2 Relative tail length (tail length/snout-vent length) of (A) adult female Oocatochus rufodorsatus and (B) hatchlings used in the study. Females and hatchlings from bullfrog-exposed populations in Taean had a greater relative tail length than those from bullfrog-unexposed population in Hongcheon (P < 0.01 for females; P = 0.002 for hatchlings).

    Table 3 Morphological characteristics of hatchling Oocatochus rufodorsatus used in the behavioral experiment and their mothers caught from bullfrog-exposed populations at Taean and bullfrog-unexposed population at Hongcheon. Data are presented as mean ± SE. GI (Gape index) = π(chin length) (chin width) /4. SVL, snout-vent length; BW, body weight; TAL, tail length; RTL, relative tail length (TAL/ SVL).

    The number of hatchlings that responded by tongue flicking and touching odor gauze was not different between the two populations (Chi-square test, P > 0.05 for all cases) and between each pair of prey odor types (Fisher exact test, P > 0.008 for all cases; Table 2).

    The latency time to the first tongue flick, time to the first touch of prey odor gauze, and number of tongue flicks during 10 min were not different between hatchlings from Taean and Hongcheon (P = 0.53, P = 0.10, P = 0.99, respectively) and among different prey odor types (P = 0.33, P = 0.38, P = 0.17, respectively). None of the interactions between locality and odor type were signifi cant (P > 0.05 for all cases).

    4. Discussion

    Adult and hatchling O. rufodorsatus from bullfrogexposed populations in Taean had a signifi cantly greater relative tail length (RTL) than those from bullfrogunexposed population in Hongcheon. In addition, adult snakes from Taean responded more rapidly to prey with tongue flicking compared to Hongcheon. These differences tentatively demonstrate that invasive R. catesbeiana affect the morphology and behavior of endemic predator snakes. In the case of O. rufodorsatus, both of these changes may be adaptations to increased foraging effi ciency. Discussion of both characters follows below.

    Figure 3 Comparison of time to the first tongue flick of adult Oocatochus rufodorsatus from bullfrog-exposed populations in Taean and bullfrog-unexposed population in Hongcheon. Experiments were run with three different prey types: Rana (Lithobates) catesbeiana from Taean (CatTA), Pelophylax nigromaculatus from Taean (NigTA), and P. nigromaculatus from Hongcheon (NigHC). Snakes from Taean always had faster times compared to Hongcheon (P = 0.004). The numbers on the bars are the number of the snakes which responded to tongue fl icking of the frogs out of a total of 16 snakes investigated.

    A snake’s tail causes forward propulsive forces and balances the body during movement, and the loss of tail tip significantly decreased the burst speed of snakes in aquatic habitats (Aubret et al., 2005). In our study, adult snakes from Taean had a greater RTL than those from Hongcheon. RTL is probably heritable as female snakes in our study with greater RTL gave birth to hatchlings with a greater RTL. We propose three main explanations for the greater RTL in Taean: 1) an adaptation for prey capture (Clark, 1966; King, 1986)—bullfrogs are more agile and common than endemic frogs in Taean, 2) an adaptation

    to habitat (Clark, 1966; King, 1986)—aquatic habitats are more common in Taean, or 3) pre-existing geographic variation between Taean and Hongcheon before bullfrog introductions. When comparing the two adaptation explanations, we believe RTL variation due to habitat is less likely than prey capture. Although the absolute and percentage area of marsh habitat was greater in Taean County (23 978 055 m2, 4.6% of total county area; Taean, 2013) than Hongcheon County (1 597 040 m2, 0.9% of total county area; Hongcheon, 2012), the time an individual O. rufodorsatus is exposed to aquatic habitats should be similar across sites because except hibernating on land in winter, O. rufodorsatus stays in or near aquatic habitats (Lee et al., 2011). Our results suggest that a greater RTL in Taean improves foraging efficiency of preying upon frogs and freshwater fi sh (Kang and Yoon, 1975; Ji et al., 1997), through better burst locomotion. To evaluate this preliminary finding and contrast it against the alternative of pre-existing intraspecific variation, a time-series comparison of historical specimens is still needed.

    Rapid response to prey in adult snakes from bullfrogexposed populations at Taean might also increase foraging effi ciency. Snakes smell by fl icking their tongue to deliver airborne odors to the vomeronasal organ (Halpern, 1992; Cooper, 1994). Snakes that have an earlier as opposed to late tongue flicking response can detect odor sources sooner (Cowles and Phelan, 1958) and at farther distance (Burghardt and Abeshaheen, 1971). In our study, adult snakes from Taean had a significantly shorter latency to the first tongue flick than those from Hongcheon, regardless of prey type. We propose two hypotheses for the shorter latency in Taean populations. First, a shorter latency could be due to increased motivation to capture prey. This phenomenon was observed in the lizard Liolaemus bellii and explained by decreased prey availability (Labra et al., 2001). The same phenomenon may be possible in O. rufodorsatus if endemic prey (frogs and fish) are reduced by bullfrogs (Wu et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007; Ra et al., 2010; Da Silva et al., 2011; Jancowski and Orchard 2013). Second, a changed preference for prey may infl uence latency. In China, the Red-banded snake (Dinodon rufozonatum) preferred the introduced bullfrogs over native frog species because bullfrogs showed less avoidance behaviors (Li et al., 2011a). Data supporting each hypothesis should differ—if the shorter latency to fi rst tongue fl ick is due to a shift in prey preference, we expect O. rufodorsatus response time to differ for R. catesbeianus and P. nigromaculatus.

    We did not find a difference in response to the two prey species, making the second explanation less likely. However it is still possible that a common, fast response to different prey may be learned. Our results suggest that bullfrog presence has influenced the foraging behavior of snakes from Taean. The faster reaction of individuals to prey in Taean may increase foraging success, allowing them to detect frog prey faster and at farther distances.

    Unlike adult O. rufodorsatus, hatchlings did not show any difference in prey odor response. These results might be explained in four ways. First, frog odor sources used might be less stimulating than frog prey, resulting in less distinctive olfactory responses. It is possible that some of airborne odor stimulus might be lost during odor preparing process. Second, as shown in the study of Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) (Saviola et al., 2011), both olfactory and visual cues are needed. Third, hatchlings used in this study may be still undergoing olfactory developments. In general, olfactory development in hatchling snakes are modulated over time based on early odor exposure and genetically determined factors (Mushinsky and Lotz, 1980). Finally, frogs may not be a major prey of O. rufodorsatus hatchlings, resulting in low responses to frog odors. As far as we know, detailed diets of the hatchlings have not been studied.

    In summary, our results suggest that invasive R. catesbeiana can affect the morphological characteristics and behaviors of the endemic predator O. rufodorsatus. When we compared bullfrog-exposed and unexposed populations, we found signifi cant differences in characters that may increase foraging effi ciency—relative tail length and time to fi rst tongue fl ick. Studies of more populations, O. rufodorsatus prey items, and time series comparisons of characters during the history of bullfrog-exposed and unexposed populations are needed to elucidate the full effect of invasive prey species on endemic predators.

    Anson J. R., Dickman C. R., Boonstra R., Jessop T. S.2013. Stress triangle: Do introduced predators exert indirect costs on native predators and prey? PLoS ONE, 8: e60916.doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0060916

    Aubret F., Bonnet X., Maumelat S.2005. Tail loss, body condition and swimming performances in Tiger snakes, Notechis ater occidentalis. J Exp Zool, 303A: 894–903

    Aubret F., Shine R., Bonnet X.2004. Evolutionary biology: adaptive developmental plasticity in snakes. Nature, 431: 261–262

    Brodie III E. D., Brodie Jr.E. D.1999. Costs of exploiting poisonous prey: Evolutionary trade-offs in a predator–prey arms race. Evolution, 53: 626–631

    Burghardt G. M., Abeshaheen J. P.1971. Response to chemical stimuli of prey in newly hatched snakes of the genus Elaphe. Anim Behav, 19: 486–489

    Carlsson N. O., Sarnelle O., Strayer D. L.2009. Native predators and exotic prey–an acquired taste? Front Ecol Environ, 7: 525–532

    Case T. J., Bolger D. T.1991. The role of introduced species in shaping the distribution and abundance of island reptiles. Evol Ecol, 5: 272–290

    Choi D. S., Ko S. K., Chung H. H.1998. Report on the use of and on the ecological characteristics and capture of American Bullfrogs. Gwacheon, South Korea: Ministry of Environment of Korea (In Korean)

    Chung M. H.2005. Factors involved in the decline of the Bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Gwacheon, South Korea: Ministry of Environment of Korea (In Korean)

    Clark Jr D. R.1966. Notes on sexual dimorphism in tail-length in American snakes. Trans Kans Acad Sci, 69: 226–232

    Cooper Jr W. E., Burghardt G. M.1990. A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles. J Chem Ecol, 16: 45–65

    Cooper Jr W. E.1994. Chemical discrimination by tongueflicking in lizards: A review with hypothesis on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationships. J Chem Ecol, 20: 439–487

    Cowles R. B., Phelan R. L.1958. Olfaction in rattlesnakes. Copeia, 1958: 77–83

    Da Silva E. T., Filho O. P. R.2009. Predation on juveniles of the invasive American Bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus (Anura, Ranidae) by native frog and snake species in South-eastern Brazil. Herpetol Notes, 2: 215–218

    Da Silva E. T, Filho O. P. R., Feio R. N.2011. Predation of native anurans by invasive Bullfrogs in Southeastern Brazil: Spatial variation and effect of microhabitat use by prey. S Amer J Herpetol, 6: 1–10

    De Rivera C. E., Ruiz G. M., Hines A. H., Jivoff P.2005. Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology, 86: 3364–3376

    Gurevitch J., Padilla D. K.2004. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol, 19: 470–474

    Halpern M.1992. Nasal chemical senses in reptiles: structure and function. pp. 423–523 In Gans C., Crews D. (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 18, Physiology E: Hormones, Brain, and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 423–523

    Harley C. D. G., Anderson K. M., Lebreton C. A. M., MacKay A., Ayala-Díz M., Chong S. L., Pond L. M., Amerongen Maddison J. H., Hung B. H. C., Iverson S. L., Wong D. C. M.2013. The introduction of Littorina littorea to British Columbia, Canada: potential impacts and the importance of biotic resistance by native predators. Mar Biol, 160: 1529–1541

    Heinonen K. B., Auster P. J.2012. Prey selection in crustaceaneating fishes following the invasion of crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus in a marine temperate community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 413: 177–183

    Hirai T.2004. Diet composition of introduced bullfrog Rana catesbeiana the Mizorogaike pond of Kyoto, Japan. Ecol Res, 19: 375–380

    Hongcheon.2012. Hongcheon statistical yearbook. Hongcheon County, Kangwon Province, South Korea; Hongcheon County (In Korean)

    Jancowski K., Orchard S. A.2013. Stomach contents from invasive American Bullfrogs Rana catesbeianus (Lithobates catesbeianus) on southern Vancouver island, British Columbia, Canada. Neo Biota, 16: 17–37

    Jang H. J., Suh J. H.2010. Distribution of amphibian species in South Korea. Korean J Herpetol, 2: 45–51 (In Korean)

    Jang M. H., Koo K. S., Song J. Y.2011. The list of amphibian species in 66 islands in Korea. Korean J Herpetol, 3: 19–24 (In Korean)

    Ji X., Xie Y. Y., Sun P. Y., Zheng X. Z.1997.Sexual dimorphism and female reproduction in a viviparous snake, Elaphe rufodorsata. J Herpetol, 31: 420–422

    Johnson M. T. J., Agrawal A. A.2003.The ecological play of predator-prey dynamics in an evolutionary theatre. Trends Ecol Evol, 18: 549–591

    Kang Y. S., Yoon I. B.1975. Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and fl ora of Korea, Vol.17, Amphibia-Reptilia. Seoul, South Korea: Samhwa Publisher (In Korean)

    Kang E. J., Youn C. H.1994.The settlement and distribution of the introduced Bullfrog, Rana catesbeianus, in Korea. Korean Assoc Conserv Nat, 13: 231–250 (In Korean)

    Kiesecker J. M., Blaustein A. R., Miller C. L.2001. Potential mechanisms underlying the displacement of native Red-legged frogs by introduced Bullfrogs. Ecology, 82: 1964–1970

    Kim H. K.1972. Biology of the Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). J Korean Res Ins Better Living (Ewha Womans University), 8: 67–92 (In Korean)

    Kim H. S., Ko S. K.1998. Distribution, food habit and seasonal cycles of germ cell activity in the introduced Bullfrog, Rana catesbeianus in Korea. FRI J Forest Sci, 57: 165–177 (In Korean)

    King R. B.1986. Population ecology of the Lake Erie water snakes, Nerodia sipedon insularum. Copeia, 1986: 757–772

    King R. B.2002. Predicted and observed maximum prey size-snake size allometry. Funct Ecol, 16: 766–772

    King R. B., Ray J. M., Stanford K. M.2006. Gorging on gobies: Benefi cial effects of alien prey on a threatened vertebrate. Can J Zool, 84: 108–15

    Kishida O., Mizuta Y., Nishimura K.2006. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator–prey interaction between larval amphibians. Ecology, 87: 1599–1604

    Labra A., Beltrán S., Niemeyer H. M.2001.Chemical exploratory behavior in the lizard Liolaemus bellii. J Herpetol, 35: 51–55

    Langkilde T.2009. Invasive fire ants alter behavior and morphology of native lizards. Ecology, 90: 208–217

    Lee H.J., Lee J.H., Park D.2011. Habitat use and movement patterns of the viviparous aquatic snake, Oocatochus rufodorsatus, from Northeast Asia. Zool Sci, 28: 593-599

    Li Y., Ke Z., Wang S., Smith G. R., Liu X.2011a. An exotic species is the favorite prey of a native enemy. PLoS ONE, 6(9): e24299. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0024299

    Li Y., Zhunwei K. E., Wang Y., Blaackburn T. M.2011b. Frog community responses to recent American Bullfrog invasions. Curr Zool, 57: 83–92

    Lima S. L.2002. Putting predators back into behavioral predatorprey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol, 17: 70–75

    Llewelyn J., Schwarzkopf L., Phillips B. L., Shine R.2013. After the crash: How do predators adjust following invasion of a novel toxic prey type? Austral Ecol, doi:10.1111/aec.12058

    Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S., De Poorter M.2000. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species a selection from the global invasive species database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN)

    Mittelbach G. G., Osenberg C. W., Wainwright P. C.1999. Variation in feeding morphology between pumpkinseed populations: phenotypic plasticity or evolution? Evol Ecol Res, 1: 111–128

    Mushinsky H. R., Lotz K. H.1980. Chemoreceptive responses of two sympatric water snakes to extracts of commonly ingested prey species. J Chem Ecol, 6: 523–535

    Nuismer S. L., Thompson J. N.2006. Coevolutionary alternation in antagonistic interactions. Evolution, 60: 2207–2217

    Oh H. S., Hong C.2007. Current conditions of habitat for Rana catesbeianus and Trachemys scripta elegans imported to Jejudo, including proposed management plans. Korean J Env Eco, 21: 311–317 (In Korean)

    Phillips B. L., Shine R.2004. Adapting to an invasive species: Toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101: 17150–17155

    Phillips B. L., Shine R.2006. An invasive species induces rapid adaptive change in a native predator: Cane toads and Black snakes in Australia. P R Soc B, 273: 1545–1550

    Pothoven S. A., Madenjian C. P.2008. Changes in consumption by alewives and lake Whitefi sh after Dreissenid mussel invasion in lakes Michigan and Huron. N Am J Fish Manag, 28: 308–320

    Preacher K. J.2001. Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fi t and independence [Computer software]. Retrieved from http:// quantpsy.org.

    Preacher K. J., Briggs N. E.2001. Calculation for Fisher’s exact test: An interactive calculation tool for Fisher’s exact probability test for 2 × 2 tables [Computer software]. Retrieved from http:// quantpsy.org

    Ra N. Y., Park D., Cheong S., Kim N. S., Sung H. C.2010. Habitat associations of the endangered Gold-spotted pond frog (Rana chosenica). Zool Sci, 27: 396–401

    Saviola A. J., Lamoreaux W. E., Opferman R., Chiszar D.2011. Chemosensory response of the threatened Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) to chemical and visual stimuli of Mus musculus. Herpetol Conserv Biol, 6: 449–454

    Strayer D. L.2012. Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett, 15: 1199–1210

    Strauss S. Y., Lau J. A., Carroll S. P.2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: What do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol Lett, 9: 357–374

    Suarez A. V., Case T. J.2002. Bottom-up effects on persistence of a specialist predator: Ant invasions and Horned lizards. Ecol Appl, 12: 291–298

    Suh J. H.2005. Natural resource survey in Taean coastal national park: Herpetofauna. Seoul: Korea National Park Research Institute (In Korean)

    Sung H. C., Kim S. K., Cheong S. W., Park S. R., Roh D. C., Baek K. W., LeeJ. H., Park D.2006.Estimating detection probabilities and site occupancy rates of three anuran species using call surveys in Haenam Gun. Korean J Ecol Field Biol, 29: 331–335

    Taean.2013. Taean statistical yearbook. Taean County, Chungnam Province, South Korea; Taean County (In Korean)

    Vellend M., Harmon L. J., Lockwood J. L., Mayfield M. M., Hughes A. R., Wares J. P., Sax D. F.2007. Effects of exotic species on evolutionary diversification. Trends Ecol Evol, 22: 481–488

    Wang Y. P., Guo Z. W., Pearl C. A., Li Y. M.2007. Body size affects the predatory interactions between introduced American Bullfrogs Rana catesbeianus and native anurans in China: An experimental study. J Herpetol, 41: 514–520

    Wanger T. C., Wielgoss A. C., Motzke I., Clough Y., Brook B. W., Sodhi N. S., Tschamtke T.2011. Endemic predators, invasive prey and native diversity. P R Soc B, 278: doi: 10.1098/ rspb.2010.1512

    Wu Z., Li Y., Wang Y., Adams M. J.2005. Diet of introduced Bullfrogs Rana catesbeianus: predation on and diet overlap with native frogs on Daishan island, China. J Herpetol, 39: 668–674

    Zar J. H.1999. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall

    #These authors contributed equally to this work.

    *Corresponding author: Dr. Daesik PARK, from Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea, with his research focusing on the basic and conservation ecology of Korean amphibians and reptiles.

    E-mail: parkda@kangwon.ac.kr

    Received: 11 April 2014 Accepted: 25 August 2014

    高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产三级中文精品| 中文欧美无线码| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产乱人视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| av天堂在线播放| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| .国产精品久久| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频 | 国产成人91sexporn| 美女黄网站色视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 波多野结衣高清作品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 伦理电影大哥的女人| 午夜福利高清视频| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 精品久久久久久久末码| 韩国av在线不卡| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 91精品国产九色| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 只有这里有精品99| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 黑人高潮一二区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产精品一及| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 看黄色毛片网站| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 日韩强制内射视频| 一夜夜www| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 免费看日本二区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 九九在线视频观看精品| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产高清激情床上av| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频 | 国产成人精品久久久久久| 级片在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 观看美女的网站| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久久久九九精品影院| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 嫩草影院精品99| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久中文| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久中文看片网| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 一级毛片我不卡| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 在线播放无遮挡| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 黄色日韩在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 免费观看人在逋| av在线播放精品| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久午夜福利片| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 51国产日韩欧美| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| ponron亚洲| av国产免费在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 一级毛片我不卡| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲色图av天堂| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| eeuss影院久久| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | avwww免费| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 免费观看人在逋| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区 | 国产极品天堂在线| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 久久热精品热| 欧美性感艳星| 老司机福利观看| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 成人二区视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 美女黄网站色视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产精品,欧美在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 成人欧美大片| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 舔av片在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产日本99.免费观看| 99久国产av精品| 成人欧美大片| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久久久久久久大av| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 悠悠久久av| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产综合懂色| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 精品一区二区免费观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 日本一本二区三区精品| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 成人二区视频| 日韩成人伦理影院| ponron亚洲| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久精品影院6| 舔av片在线| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 91av网一区二区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产视频内射| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 黄色一级大片看看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲av熟女| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 中国美女看黄片| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 国产一区二区激情短视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩中字成人| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 中文欧美无线码| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久人妻av系列| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产不卡一卡二| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日韩中字成人| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产精华一区二区三区| 老女人水多毛片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 美女黄网站色视频| 老司机影院成人| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 99久久精品热视频| 精品久久久久久久末码| 老司机影院成人| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 熟女电影av网| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 欧美激情在线99| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 中文字幕久久专区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 一本久久精品| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲五月天丁香| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 欧美3d第一页| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 精品久久久噜噜| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 夜夜爽天天搞| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | www日本黄色视频网| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 99热全是精品| 麻豆成人av视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| a级毛片a级免费在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产精品久久视频播放| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲av成人av| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 九草在线视频观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲在线观看片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产成人福利小说| 韩国av在线不卡| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 观看美女的网站| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| av视频在线观看入口| 国产精品永久免费网站| av在线蜜桃| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产在线男女| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 尾随美女入室| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 在线免费十八禁| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| www日本黄色视频网| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲第一电影网av| 午夜福利在线在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美潮喷喷水| 日日撸夜夜添| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产成人影院久久av| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 嫩草影院精品99| 天堂网av新在线| 草草在线视频免费看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| av在线播放精品| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 午夜久久久久精精品| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 色吧在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| av在线天堂中文字幕| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 精品一区二区免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 波多野结衣高清无吗| 热99re8久久精品国产| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 久久久久九九精品影院| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 午夜精品在线福利| 91久久精品电影网| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| .国产精品久久| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 成人三级黄色视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 热99在线观看视频| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 久久久久久伊人网av| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 男女那种视频在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 免费看光身美女| 69人妻影院| 国产成人freesex在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 免费搜索国产男女视频| av福利片在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| ponron亚洲| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 极品教师在线视频| 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日本五十路高清| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 一本精品99久久精品77| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| videossex国产| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产精品无大码| 日本三级黄在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久精品影院6| 麻豆成人av视频| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 99久国产av精品| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 18+在线观看网站| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 久久热精品热| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 插逼视频在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网|