• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Impact of periampullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    2013-07-03 09:20:18

    Thessaloniki, Greece

    Impact of periampullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    Panagiotis Katsinelos, Grigoris Chatzimavroudis, Kostas Tziomalos, Christos Zavos, Athanasios Beltsis, Georgia Lazaraki, Sotiris Terzoudis and Jannis Kountouras

    Thessaloniki, Greece

    BACKGROUND:It is unclear whether the presence of periampullary diverticula (PAD) affects technical success and complication rates during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Moreover, the impact of PAD on fluoroscopy duration is still unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the success rate and difficulty of common bile duct (CBD) cannulation, post-procedure complications and fluoroscopy duration in patients with and without PAD.

    METHODS:Patients from January 2008 to December 2010 with PAD (group A) and without PAD (group B) and similar indications for therapeutic ERCP were prospectively compared. The comparison included patient characteristics, findings of ERCP, and details of procedure and fluoroscopy time. The influence of papilla's location with respect to the diverticulum on procedure was also investigated.

    RESULTS:A total of 428 consecutive patients who had undergone therapeutic ERCP for similar indications were divided in two groups according to the presence (group A, 107 patients) or absence (group B, 321 patients) of PAD. The mean age and ASA score of the patients with PAD were significantly higher than those patients without PAD. The main indication was choledocholithiasis. Successful final CBD cannulation was achieved in 97.20% of the patients in group A vs 99.69% in group B (P=0.05). CBD diameter, number of stones and the largest stone size were significantly higher in group A thangroup B (P<0.001). Complete clearance of the CBD after the first attempt was achieved in 85.86% and 94.75% of the patients in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.03). In both groups, the time needed to complete the procedure and fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in patients with PAD (22.87 vs 18.99 minutes,P<0.001; 76.51 vs 47.42 seconds,P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the complication rate. The type of papilla's location with respect to the diverticulum did not influence the total cannulation rate and post-procedure complications.

    CONCLUSION:The presence of a PAD does not affect the success rate and complications of therapeutic ERCP in expert hands; however, the fluoroscopy time is significantly longer in patients with PAD.

    (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2013;12:408-414)

    endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; anatomy; ampulla of Vater

    Introduction

    Periampullary diverticula (PAD) are located within 2 cm from the major duodenal papilla. The majority of PAD is acquired. Their prevalence increases with age, as they are rarely seen before 40 years of age, and may be as high as 32% in the elderly.[1-8]PAD discovered incidentally during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are frequently asymptomatic, but may be a cause of considerable morbidity.[9]Despite common belief that the presence of PAD makes the procedure technically difficult, and probably increases the risk of post-ERCP complications, the published studies[1-7]demonstrate inconclusive results. In this regard, a technically difficult ERCP is related to prolonged fluoroscopy time and consequently increased radiation exposure of patients and staff.[10-13]Cumulative high doses of ionizing radiation have a harmful effect on health;[14-16]although several studies[10-13]have investigated the factors that affect the fluoroscopy time during therapeutic ERCP, the influence of PAD and the location of the major papilla with respect to the diverticulum on fluoroscopy time is unknown. The present study was undertaken to investigate the impact of PAD and their type on technical success, rate of post-ERCP complications, and fluoroscopy time during the procedure.

    Methods

    Study design

    This was a prospective observational study, conducted between January 2008 and December 2010, in a tertiary referral center of therapeutic endoscopy in Northern Greece. After completion of the study, each patient with PAD and na?ve papilla was compared with those patients without PAD and na?ve papilla, with a similar indication for ERCP. The comparison included patients' characteristics, findings of ERCP, and data for the procedure and fluoroscopy time. The research proposal was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Research and Ethics Committee of our hospital.

    Patients

    Patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP on an inpatient or outpatient basis were eligible for enrollment in the study. Exclusion criteria were: age under 18 years, pregnancy or breast feeding, previous endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), upper gastrointestinal obstruction, Billroth II operation, ampullary cancer, severe hypoxemia with ventilation/perfusion imbalance, acute myocardial infarction within three months prior to the procedure, coagulopathy and platelet count less than 50 ×109/L, and refusal to participate in the study. Patients were also excluded if their papilla was not detectable after a thorough examination of the second part of the duodenum.

    Medical history was recorded in all patients, including the indications for ERCP, presence of concomitant diseases, medication and history of acute pancreatitis. Comprehensive physical examination was also performed and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores were recorded for all patients.[17]Each patient or his/her relatives gave written informed consent after receiving verbal and written explanations about ERCP and possible post-procedure complications.

    ERCP procedure

    ERCPs were performed by an experienced pancreatobiliary endoscopist (Katsinelos P) using a standard therapeutic duodenoscope under conscious sedation with midazolam and pethidine. Hyoscine-n-butyl (Buscopan, Boehringer, Ingelheim Ltd., UK) or glucagon was administered as needed. Arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate and blood pressure were monitored using automated devices. For ductal opacification, 50% sodium meglumine amide triazoate diluted in distilled water was used. Pancreatograms were graded according to the extent of pancreatic opacification: the main pancreatic duct, first class branches, secondary branches or acinarization. The cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) was first attempted using a sphincterotome (Clever-Cut, Olympus, Athens, Greece) and if this was not successful within 5 minutes, a hydrophilic guidewire (Jagwire, Microvasive, Athens, Greece) was used for 5 minutes or more. If both techniques failed, precut papillotomy was performed. ES was undertaken using a hydrophilic guidewire to enable controlled cutting and prevent the "zipper cut" phenomenon. It was performed using blended current (cut 45 W, coagulation 30 W) with an Olympus electrosurgical unit (PSD-30, Olympus, Athens, Greece). The length of ES was small in patients undergoing stent placement, and the largest was possible in patients with choledocholithiasis. In patients with non-removable large stones, the placement of a plastic stent was planned.

    The following parameters were recorded: presence of PAD, location of papilla in relation to PAD, time to deep CBD cannulation, CBD diameter, type of precut papillotomy (conventional needle knife, suprapapillary fistulotomy, transpancreatic septotomy), extent of pancreatic opacification, size and number of CBD stones, performed treatment, total procedure time and fluoroscopy duration.

    Definitions

    The CBD diameter was the measured maximal duct diameter within 2 cm from the papilla adjusted for radiographic magnification. The size of stones was measured after correction for the magnification by using the known diameter of the duodenoscope on the same radiograph as a reference. The total procedure time was recorded via screen recording time, from endoscope insertion until its withdrawal. Fluoroscopy time was recorded by a radiologist. The location of the papilla with respect to the diverticulum was recorded in all patients and was divided into the following three categories: type I: papilla located at the rim of the diverticulum (Fig. A); type II: papilla located within 2 cm from the diverticulum (Fig. B); and type III: intradiverticular papilla or papilla located between 2 adjacent diverticula (Fig. C).

    Fig.Endoscopic view of a papilla located at the rim of the diverticulum (type I,A), within 2 cm from the diverticulum (type II,B), an intradiverticular papilla (type III,C).

    Venous blood was drawn from each patient for serologic testing of amylase levels using an automated analyzer at baseline, 6 and 24 hours after the procedure. The definition of post-ERCP complications and the grading of their severity were based on consensus criteria.[18]

    Follow-up and study outcomes

    After ERCP, all patients were monitored in the ward by the endoscopist to assess whether the patient could be discharged. Patients and their escorts were provided with detailed written advice regarding potential post-ERCP complications. The patients' family physicians and local hospitals were also notified and were advised to call the investigators if any complication occurred. When discharged, the patients were instructed to fast (water allowed) until the next morning. Clear liquids could then be consumed, followed by regular diet. Finally, the patients were evaluated at the outpatient clinic or were contacted by the phone call on days 1, 10 and 30 after ERCP, to assess the occurrence of late complications.

    The primary endpoint of the study was to investigate the influence of PAD on technical success, rate of complications and fluoroscopy time in therapeutic ERCP. The secondary endpoint was the effect of papilla's type with respect to the diverticulum on these parameters.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was made using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 13.0, Chicago, IL., USA). Categorical variables were analyzed with the Chisquare test and Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, while continuous variables were expressed as mean±SD and analyzed using Student'sttest. The level of statistical significance was set atP<0.05.

    Results

    A total of 483 consecutive patients who had undergone an ERCP in the period between January 2008 andDecember 2010 were included in the study. From these patients, 55 were excluded for the following reasons: undetectable papilla (18 patients), upper gastrointestinal obstruction (9), ampullary malignancy (7), previous ES (7), previous Billroth II operation (5), and refusal to participate in the study (9). Finally, 428 patients who had undergone therapeutic ERCP were divided into two groups according to the presence (group A, 107 patients) or absence (group B, 321 patients) of PAD. Patients' characteristics and indications for ERCP are shown in Table 1. Patients with PAD (group A) were older (77.36 vs 68.06 years,P<0.001) and had a worse general condition. The main indication for therapeutic ERCP was choledocholithiasis in both groups, and there was no significant difference in history of cholecystectomy.

    Table 1.Patients' clinical characteristics

    Table 2.Technical characteristics of therapeutic ERCP (n, %)

    Technical characteristics of ERCP are shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in final CBD cannulation rates (P=0.05), nor in the effort anddifficulty in achieving CBD cannulation (as estimated by using different techniques to cannulate).

    The results of endoscopic treatment according to the indications for ERCP in the two groups are shown in Table 3. Complete clearance of the CBD was achieved more easily in group B than in group A (P=0.003), and this difference remained with all the techniques used (basket/balloon, mechanical lithotripsy, mechanical lithotripsy plus stent, allP<0.05). In two patients (2.02%) of group A and five patients of group B (1.64%) with choledocholithiasis, plastic stents were placed because of inability to use mechanical lithotripsy due to the presence of very large CBD stones (P=0.902). The time needed to complete the procedure and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in patients with PAD (P<0.001) (Table 3).

    The rates of complications are not significantly different between the two groups (Table 4). Hemorrhage and post-ERCP pancreatitis were mild or moderate in all patients and they were treated conservatively. One patient in group A and two patients in group B presented basket impaction during extraction of CBD stones and were treated endoscopically.

    The effect of papilla's location with respect to PAD on technical characteristics of ERCP and patients treatment is shown in Table 5. Type III was associated with statistically significant smaller CBD diameter and stones' size in relation to types I and II. The total procedure and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter in type III than in types I and II. The rate of post-procedure complications was not different among the three types of papilla's location.

    Table 3.Results of the endoscopic treatment in the two groups according to indications for ERCP (n, %)

    Table 4.Association of PAD with the complications of therapeutic ERCP (n, %)

    Table 5.Effect of the three types of papilla's location with respect to PAD on ERCP technical characteristics and treatment (n, %)

    Discussion

    In the present study, no significant differences were observed in final CBD cannulation rate and use of different techniques to achieve CBD cannulation between patients with (97.20%) and those without PAD (99.69%). In previous studies, CBD cannulation could be achieved in only 61% of the patients with PAD.[2-5]However, more recently, CBD cannulation rates as high as 95.4% have been reported.[1,6-8]These conflicting results might be partly due to differences in study design, study population, operator's experience and the use of new duodenoscopes, special accessories and techniques that facilitate CBD cannulation even in patients with a papilla within a PAD or a floppy papilla on the edge of a diverticulum. We also observed no difference with respect to post-procedure complication between patients with and those without PAD. Even though, some studies suggested that the presence of PAD is associated with increased risk for post-ES bleeding and perforation,[4,7,19]and that the majority of existing data does not support this association.[1-3,6,8]

    Furthermore, the classification of PAD into three types in the present study showed no difference in final CBD cannulation rate, and different techniques to achieve CBD cannulation. A higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding in type I papilla vs types II and III was observed even if it was not significantly different. A study[1]showed that paradiverticular papilla (PAD types I or II) are usually easy to cannulate; however, when the papilla is located deep inside the diverticulum (PAD type III), often lying at the bottom, the cannulation used to be difficult,[20]and one has to use techniques that may help in this situation,[21]thus increasing the risk for complications. Interestingly, in our series it was in type I papilla not in type III, in which there was a trend to higher complication rate, although it was not statistically significant. It remains to be seen in future studies with large samples whether this observation was random. The procedure was performed by an experienced endoscopist; this explains excellent results despite anatomical difficulties posed by a papilla located inside or on the edge of a diverticulum, or between two diverticula. But this might not be the case in the hands of an endoscopist with less experience.

    This study demonstrated an association of choledocholithiasis with PAD. The association of PAD with primary and recurrent choledocholithiasis before[22,23]or after ES has been described.[24,25]Proposed theories included an increased bacterial load in the duodenum[26]and bile duct[27]with a subsequent increase in lithogenic b-glucuronidase activity,[28]a decrease of biliary clearance,[29]or a mechanical obstruction of the CBD.[30,31]We also observed a significant association of PAD with larger CBD stones, a number of stones and CBD dilation on cholangiogram. Our findings are consistent with those of other studies[21,23]that enrolled patients for an ERCP as an indication for choledocholithiasis. In contrast, a study[8]on patients undergoing ERCP for a wider range of indications showed that the presence of PAD was not associated with the higher incidence of larger stones or CBD dilation. We also found an association of type III PAD with smaller CBD diameter and stones' size. No altered CBD anatomy (angulations, strictures) was noted in these patients except for the mild dilation (10.3 mm), indicating smaller CBD stones in this subgroup of patients. Since the incidence of stone disease is similar to that reported, it is impossible to make any other comment since no information is available on the relation among CBD dilation, stone size and papilla location within or near the diverticula. However, a group of patients with the papilla located within the PAD had a lower occurrence of biliary tract stone diseases than the other two groups.[32]

    The present study revealed a higher rate of type I PAD (the papilla located at the rim of the diverticulum). The published data on the prevalence of papilla location with respect to PAD are contradictory. A prospective study[8]in a Greek cohort reported that PAD was most commonly located within 2 cm from the papilla. However, another two studies[7,32]found that PAD was rarely located within 2 cm from the papilla. These studies reported a slightly higher incidence of PAD with the papilla.

    In this series, we investigated their classification and their relationship to fluoroscopy time. An audit[33]of radiation exposure to personnel performing ERCP found that both patients and staff are exposed to significant radiation. This was equivalent to an estimated additional lifetime fatal cancer risk of between 1 in 300 and 1 in 700. Radiation dose has a direct linear relationship with fluoroscopy time and is theoretically dependent on many factors including the type of procedure (diagnostic or therapeutic), the skills of the endoscopist, the presence of an altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy (i.e., Billroth II operation), stent insertion, lithotripsy, biopsies, use of a needle-knife, guidewire, additional wires other than a standard balloon catheter, and involvement of a gastroenterology fellow, thereby prolonging fluoroscopy duration.[9-13,34]We observed that the presence of a diverticulum was associated with a significant increase in fluoroscopy time because increased size and number of stones, use of mechanical lithotripsy and mechanical lithotripsy plus stent placement were encountered in patients with PAD to a significantly greater extent. TypeI diverticulum was associated with longer fluoroscopy time than types II and III, and this finding could be explained by larger stone size and more frequent use of mechanical lithotripsy plus stent placement in patients with type I diverticulum.

    Our study has shown the following advantages. Firstly, the cohort of patients is more homogenous than those in previous studies, who have similar indications for ERCP. Secondly, prospective design allows accurate recording of the procedure, fluoroscopy duration and post-ERCP complications. Thirdly, all procedures were performed by an experienced pancreatobiliary endoscopist in a single center, eliminating the procedure's factors influencing the procedure and fluoroscopy duration. The limitation of our study is that these excellent results must be viewed in context of a single endoscopist with a high degree of expertise and cannot be extrapolated to less-experienced endoscopists.

    In conclusion, a periampullary diverticulum, independently of type, does not affect the success rate of therapeutic ERCP in expert hands; however, its presence, especially type I diverticulum, is associated with a higher radiation exposure.

    Contributors:KP proposed the study. KP, ZC and LG performed research and wrote the first draft. CG, BA and TS collected and analyzed the data. TK and KJ were major contributors in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. KP is the guarantor.

    Funding:None.

    Ethical approval:The research proposal was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Research and Ethics Committee of G. Gennimatas General Hospital (Thessaloniki, Greece).

    Competing interest:No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    1 Chang-Chien CS. Do juxtapapillary diverticula of the duodenum interfere with cannulation at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1987;33:298-300.

    2 Vaira D, Dowsett JF, Hatfield AR, Cairns SR, Polydorou AA, Cotton PB, et al. Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy? Gut 1989;30:939-942.

    3 Lobo DN, Balfour TW, Iftikhar SY. Periampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80: 326-331.

    4 Zoepf T, Zoepf DS, Arnold JC, Benz C, Riemann JF. The relationship between juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and disorders of the biliopancreatic system: analysis of 350 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:56-61.

    5 Rajnakova A, Goh PM, Ngoi SS, Lim SG. ERCP in patients with periampullary diverticulum. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50:625-628.

    6 Tham TC, Kelly M. Association of periampullary duodenal diverticula with bile duct stones and with technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 2004;36:1050-1053.

    7 Boix J, Lorenzo-Zú?iga V, A?a?os F, Domènech E, Morillas RM, Gassull MA. Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16:208-211.

    8 Panteris V, Vezakis A, Filippou G, Filippou D, Karamanolis D, Rizos S. Influence of juxtapapillary diverticula on the success or difficulty of cannulation and complication rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:903-910.

    9 Tyagi P, Sharma P, Sharma BC, Puri AS. Periampullary diverticula and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1342-1345.

    10 Uradomo LT, Lustberg ME, Darwin PE. Effect of physician training on fluoroscopy time during ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 2006; 51:909-914.

    11 Larkin CJ, Workman A, Wright RE, Tham TC. Radiation doses to patients during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53: 161-164.

    12 Buls N, Pages J, Mana F, Osteaux M. Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatog raphy. Br J Radiol 2002;75:435-443.

    13 Campbell N, Sparrow K, Fortier M, Ponich T. Practical radiation safety and protection for the endoscopist during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:552-557.

    14 Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004;363:345-351.

    15 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-2284.

    16 Colang JE, Killion JB, Vano E. Patient dose from CT: a literature review. Radiol Technol 2007;79:17-26.

    17 American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Relative Value Guide 2002. Code 99140. Park Ridge, IL: ASA; 2002: xii.

    18 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393.

    19 Chapman RW. Complications of ERCP. In: Green J. Guidelines on complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. London: British Society of Gastroenterology;2006:20-25.

    20 Shemesh E, Klein E, Czerniak A, Coret A, Bat L. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder in situ: the influence of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surgery 1990;107:163-166.

    21 Sherman S, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. A new approach to performing endoscopic sphincterotomy in the setting of a juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:353-355.

    22 Chandy G, Hart WJ, Roberts-Thomson IC. An analysis of the relationship between bile duct stones and periampullary duodenal diverticula. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997;12:29-33.

    23 Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Tsalis K, Dadoukis I. The role of juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula in biliary stone disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:543-547.

    24 Cheon YK, Lehman GA. Identification of risk factors forstone recurrence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:461-464.

    25 Kim DI, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Choi WB, Lee SS, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:42-48.

    26 Skar V, Skar AG, Osnes M. The duodenal bacterial flora in the region of papilla of Vater in patients with and without duodenal diverticula. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24:649-656.

    27 Sandstad O, Osnes T, Skar V, Urdal P, Osnes M. Structure and composition of common bile duct stones in relation to duodenal diverticula, gastric resection, cholecystectomy and infection. Digestion 2000;61:181-188.

    28 Skar V, Skar AG, Bratlie J, Osnes M. Beta-glucuronidase activity in the bile of gallstone patients both with and without duodenal diverticula. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24:205-212.

    29 Tzeng JJ, Lai KH, Peng NJ, Lo GH, Lin CK, Chan HH, et al. Influence of juxtapapillary diverticulum on hepatic clearance in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:772-776.

    30 san Román AL, Moreira VF, García M, Merono E, Boixeda D. Direct compression by a duodenal diverticulum causing common bile duct obstruction. Endoscopy 1994;26:334.

    31 van der Linde K, van der Linden GH, Beukers R, Cleophas TA. Food impaction in a duodenal diverticulum as an unusual cause of biliary obstruction: case reports and review of the literature. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997;9:635-639.

    32 Yildirgan MI, Ba?o?lu M, Yilmaz I, Atamanalp SS, Balik AA, Aydinli B, et al. Periampullary diverticula causing pancreaticobiliary disease. Dig Dis Sci 2004;49:1943-1945.

    33 Naidu LS, Singhal S, Preece DE, Vohrah A, Loft DE. Radiation exposure to personnel performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Postgrad Med J 2005;81:660-662.

    34 Kim E, McLoughlin M, Lam EC, Amar J, Byrne M, Telford J, et al. Prospective analysis of fluoroscopy duration during ERCP: critical determinants. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72: 50-57.

    February 20, 2012

    Accepted after revision October 10, 2012

    Correction

    10.1016/S1499-3872(13)60064-8)

    Author Affiliations: Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital (Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, Beltsis A, Lazaraki G and Terzoudis S), and 2nd Department of Internal Medicine (Zavos C and Kountouras J), School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Panagiotis Katsinelos, MD, PhD, Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54635, Greece (Tel: 0030-2310-963341; Fax: 0030-2310-963341; Email: gchatzimav@ yahoo.gr)

    ? 2013, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. All rights reserved.

    doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(13)60063-6

    In the article entitled "Silencing phospholipid scramblase 1 expression by RNA interference in colorectal cancer and metastatic liver cancer" (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int2012;11(4):393-400), the affiliations of Dr. Wei Cui, the first author, should have been the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China and the Department of General Surgery, General Surgery Center of the PLA, General Hospital of Beijing Military Command, Beijing 100700, China.

    午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 成人国语在线视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 看免费成人av毛片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产视频首页在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产av精品麻豆| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| h视频一区二区三区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 性色av一级| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 性少妇av在线| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲成人手机| 中国国产av一级| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产成人一区二区在线| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产野战对白在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| av卡一久久| 日韩中字成人| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲伊人色综图| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 天美传媒精品一区二区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产在视频线精品| 在线观看国产h片| 成人国语在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 成人国产av品久久久| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 在线观看人妻少妇| av线在线观看网站| 自线自在国产av| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲内射少妇av| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 成人手机av| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产成人精品福利久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久久国产一区二区| 色吧在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 一个人免费看片子| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 欧美日韩av久久| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 久久午夜福利片| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成人国产av品久久久| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 中国三级夫妇交换| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产又爽黄色视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 宅男免费午夜| 精品一区二区三卡| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 一级黄片播放器| 另类精品久久| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| videossex国产| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲国产色片| videossex国产| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 色播在线永久视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 18禁观看日本| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 永久网站在线| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 深夜精品福利| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产片内射在线| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 免费av中文字幕在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲四区av| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 九草在线视频观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产在线视频一区二区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产 一区精品| 午夜久久久在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 色哟哟·www| 中国国产av一级| 丝袜美足系列| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 老司机影院毛片| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 大香蕉久久成人网| 18在线观看网站| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 99热网站在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 性少妇av在线| 777米奇影视久久| av一本久久久久| www.精华液| 高清av免费在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲中文av在线| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| av片东京热男人的天堂| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 午夜激情av网站| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| av.在线天堂| 七月丁香在线播放| 美女福利国产在线| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 欧美在线黄色| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 美女主播在线视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久青草综合色| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 中国国产av一级| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 午夜91福利影院| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| av视频免费观看在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产 精品1| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 欧美成人午夜精品| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 在线天堂中文资源库| 成人国产麻豆网| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品一区在线观看国产| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产在线免费精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 黄色配什么色好看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 制服诱惑二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 精品一区二区三卡| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产麻豆69| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久久久人人人人人| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久久久久久精品精品| 成人二区视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 成人国语在线视频| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 在线观看国产h片| 曰老女人黄片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久热在线av| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 18在线观看网站| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久精品夜色国产| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产在线免费精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 一级黄片播放器| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 在线观看三级黄色| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 免费看不卡的av| 人妻一区二区av| 桃花免费在线播放| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 9色porny在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 有码 亚洲区| 国产一级毛片在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 久久久精品94久久精品| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 免费观看在线日韩| 97在线视频观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 99九九在线精品视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日本wwww免费看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 丝袜美足系列| 久久婷婷青草| 午夜日本视频在线| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲四区av| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| www.精华液| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久久久视频综合| 成年av动漫网址| 两性夫妻黄色片| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲国产欧美网| av.在线天堂| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产综合精华液| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 黄色一级大片看看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| 成人国产麻豆网| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 中国国产av一级| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 如何舔出高潮| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产 精品1| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| av在线播放精品| 国产探花极品一区二区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 另类精品久久| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 麻豆av在线久日| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 性色avwww在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 国产男女内射视频| 丁香六月天网| 成人国产麻豆网| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产在线免费精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 日本欧美视频一区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 性少妇av在线| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日韩伦理黄色片| 香蕉精品网在线| 香蕉国产在线看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 性少妇av在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 极品人妻少妇av视频| videos熟女内射| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产片内射在线| 午夜福利,免费看| 我的亚洲天堂| 捣出白浆h1v1|