• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Fine needle aspirating and cutting is superior to Tru-cut core needle in liver biopsy

    2013-06-01 12:24:36

    Shanghai, China

    Fine needle aspirating and cutting is superior to Tru-cut core needle in liver biopsy

    Guo-Ping Li, Gao-Quan Gong, Xiao-Lin Wang, Yi Chen, Jie-Min Cheng and Chang-Yu Li

    Shanghai, China

    BACKGROUND:Liver biopsy is the "gold standard" for evaluating liver disorders, but controversies over the potential risk of complications and patient discomfort still exist. Using a 21G fi ne needle, we developed a new biopsy procedure, fi ne needle aspirating and cutting (FNAC). Our procedure obtains enough tissue for pathological examination and meanwhile, reduces the risk of biopsy complications. The present study was to determine the safety and eff i ciency of 21G FNAC compared with 18G Tru-cut core needle (TCN) in liver tumor biopsies.

    METHODS:Ninety-four patients with unresectable malignant tumors were included in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 18G TCN and 21G FNAC. The total positive rate (TPR) and safety of both groups were compared.

    RESULTS:TPR was not different between the two groups. Liver puncture track subcapsular hemorrhage and arteriovenous shunt were reported with 18G TCN but not with 21G FNAC. The incidence of pain caused by biopsy was higher for the 18G TCN group compared to the 21G FNAC group (P<0.05). About 82.6% of the patients in the 18G TCN group had a sample length >0.5 cm, but 52.1% in the 21G FNAC group (P<0.05). More than 50% of patients in both groups had suff i cient tissue for immunohistochemical examination.

    CONCLUSIONS:TPR is not different between the 21G FNAC and 18G TCN biopsy procedures, but the safety of 21G FNAC is superior to that of 18G TCN. Tissues obtained by either of these two procedures are suff i cient for a pathological diagnosis.

    (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2013;12:508-511)

    biopsy;tumor; chemoembolization; diagnostic; liver

    Introduction

    Percutaneous liver biopsy is one of the most important and widely used methods for the diagnosis of liver diseases and considered as the most specif i c method to assess the nature, the grade and the stage of certain liver diseases[1,2]and therefore, it is regarded as the "gold standard". Liver biopsy is more reliable than noninvasive modalities. Bialecki et al[3]recommended a greater role for image-guided biopsy of lesions greater than 1 cm that are clinically suspicious for HCC, in order to allow for adequate treatment planning, because the risks of biopsy appear small and the potential benef i ts are signif i cant. However, controversies related to the potential risk of complications and patient discomfort still exist.[4-6]

    To pathologists, a suff i cient biopsy tissue sample length is one of the most important factors in obtaining a reliable pathological diagnosis. Guido and Rugge[7]integrated previous and more recent data, and found that a biopsy sample length of 2 cm that contains at least 11 complete portal tracts should be suff i cient for reliable grading and staging of chronic viral hepatitis. Kugelmas[8]suggested that a reliable sample should be at least 2.5 cm in length, but approximately 3 entries into the tumor tissue are required to obtain this length, which increases the risk of bleeding. More punctures mean a higher rate of bleeding after the procedure. Szymczak and colleagues[4]retrospectively analyzed 1412 percutaneous liver biopsies, and 259 (18.3%) of them had complications, of which pain was the most common one (15.3%). Nine serious biopsy-related complications showed hemorrhage, hemothorax and biliary peritonitis. But there was no liver biopsy-associated fatality. Huang et al[9]reported that the bleeding rate after biopsy was about 0.32%; Own et al[10]reported that the main percutaneous liver biopsy complications were bleeding, bile leakage, hemothorax, and abdominal organ perforation, and that the overall incidence and mortality rates were approximately 3.2% and 0.01% to 0.1%, respectively.

    The development of immunohistochemistry allowedfor a more accurate diagnosis with less tissue. It is not known whether enough tissue can be obtained from tumors using a 21G fi ne needle. We developed a new biopsy procedure using a 21G fi ne needle, which we called fi ne needle aspirating and cutting (FNAC), to obtain enough tissues and meanwhile, to reduce complications. This study aimed to determine the safety and eff i ciency of 21G FNAC and to compare FNAC with 18G Tru-cut core needle (TCN) in tumor biopsies.

    Methods

    The study population comprised 94 patients (69 males and 25 females, aged 18 to 74 years) diagnosed with malignant tumors using CT/MRI or other tumor biomarkers. All of the tumors were unresectable and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was planned for palliative treatment. All patients were hospitalized in the Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2009 to December 2011. To prepare for the procedure, a coagulation parameter assessment, blood morphology tests, liver and kidney function tests, and a chest X-ray were performed. The liver function grade (Child-Pugh classif i cation) was also assessed, and patients who had a Child-Pugh grade of "C" were excluded. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. All patients gave informed consent before the liver biopsy.

    Patients were divided into 2 groups: 18G TCN (Trucut core needle, COOK, USA,n=46) and 21G FNAC (f i ne needle aspirating and cutting, HAKKO, Japan,n=48). A 2% lidocaine solution was administered for local anesthesia. In some cases, intramuscular diazepam was administered as premedication. An arterial angiography was performed before every liver biopsy, and the catheter was placed in a liver tumor artery. All biopsies were punctured transhepatically and guided by B-ultrasound (BUS). Every biopsy in the 18G TCN group was completed with an 18G TCN. All biopsies were performed by skillful senior physicians with more than 4 years of experience in manipulating and diagnosing of BUS. In the FNAC group, a 21G fi ne needle was used to puncture into the targeted mass, and then the inner stylet was pulled out. The core needle was pushed and pulled 3-5 times in the targeted mass so that the tumor tissues were cut off and fi lled the needle core. At the same time, a negative pressure was maintained by a syringe concatenated with the needle. All tissues and puncture fl uids underwent pathological and cytological examination. After biopsy, another arterial angiography was carried out to roll out bleeding in needle tracks. TACE was performed according to the patient's situation. The needle was sterilized using an absolute alcohol gauze before every repeated puncture into the same patient's lesion. After the procedure, the patient's vital signs were closely monitored and symptomatic and supportive treatments were given. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied in assessing post-biopsy pain. Analgesia was administrated to patients according to the intensity of pain. After recovered, the patients were discharged and followed as outpatients.

    Data collected from archived medical documentation included age, sex, tumor biomarkers, laboratory test results, complications and outcomes, success of procedures, results of histological or cytological tissue sample evaluation, and records of biopsy processes. Assessing the procedure success and obtaining a representative sample was based on the pathologist's experience.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was made using the SPSS 13.0 package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The biopsy total positive rate (TPR) was obtained by counting the number of positive histological and cytological examinations. The TPR and the safety of both groups were statistically analyzed and compared. All samples were evaluated by a single pathologist. The Chi-square test and Student'sttest were used for statistical analysis. APvalue of <0.05 was considered statistically signif i cant.

    Results

    No signif i cant difference was noted in gender, mean age and tumor diameter between the 18G TCN and 21G FNAC groups (P>0.05, Table 1). All biopsy procedures were completed successfully. All tumors were diagnosed as malignant. The 18G TCN TPR was 89.1% and the 21G FNAC TPR was 81.3%; there was no statistically signif i cant difference in the TPRs between the two groups (P>0.05, Table 2).

    Table 1.Demographics of patients

    About 82.6% (38/46) of sample's length was greater than 0.5 cm in the 18G TCN group, while 52.1% (25/48) in the 21G FNAC group. Forty (87.0%) of the samples in the 18G TCN group and 36 (75.0%) in the 21G FNAC group are enough for immunohistochemistry. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the main pathologic type in more than 50% of these patients. Broken cellular structure was the main reason for negative results in the 21G FNAC group, and other negative results included inf l ammatory lesions, necrotic tissue, sludged blood, and liver tissue (Table 2).

    The incidence rate of liver puncture track subcapsular hemorrhage (according to arterial angiography) and an arteriovenous shunt (A-V shunt) incidence rate was 6.5% (3/46) and 8.7% (4/46) in the 18G TCN group, while there were no detectable hemorrhage and A-V shunt in the 21G FNAC group. The incidence of pain (VAS≥1) caused by biopsy was 78.3% (36/46) in the 18G TCN group and 22.9% (11/48) in the 21G FNAC group. The average VAS score in the 21G FNAC group was signif i cantly lower than that in the 18G TCN group (0.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.2±0.7). All patients felt slight pain (VAS<3) atpuncture points and recovered 2 to 3 days later without analgesia or intervention. No patient in either group suffered from pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and peritonitis, or had severe complications such as massive bleeding or exsanguine shock. No tumor implantation was found in puncture tracks in any patient after 3 months of follow-up (Table 3).

    Table 2.Pathological diagnosis of 94 patients with liver masses (n, %)

    Table 3.Liver biopsy complications in the two groups (n, %)

    Discussion

    Many studies in the last decade evaluated the safety and risk of complications in liver biopsy.[11-13]The patients analyzed varied in indications, underlying conditions, methods, needles used, and guiding techniques. These studies demonstrated that percutaneous liver biopsy is commonly accepted as an eff i cient and safe way to diagnose liver masses. However, because biopsy is an invasive method, there are inevitable risks of complications.[14-17]These complications can be reduced by using currently available instruments and by choosing a proper process. New biopsy procedures need to be developed in order to minimize complications and to increase biopsy eff i ciency.

    Currently, the 18G TCN is used most commonly in liver biopsy and it has shown a high degree of safety and eff i ciency. However, an 18G needle can cause bleeding especially in the aff l uent blood supply or perivascular masses. In patients with Chilaiditi syndrome, a liver biopsy should avoid puncturing the colon, a thin biopsy needle is preferred. When the lesions are deep-seated or close to vital structures, such as pancreatic cancer, retroperitoneal tumor or mediastinal masses, a thick needle with a diameter of more than 18G means a greater risk of bleeding and of other complications.[18-20]Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is safer for these tumors, but the tissues obtained from FNA are usually only suitable for cytological examination.[21]FNAC may partially resolve the above-mentioned drawbacks of 18G TCN and FNAC. A core fi ne needle, by "pushing and pulling", cut off the tissue and left a cavity behind. If the needle punctures throughout the tumor, there is a chance of obtaining the tissue from the whole puncture track. Additionally, if the fi ne needle is punctured into the tumor for 3-5 times at different angles, enough tissue may be obtained for histology.

    TPR did not reach signif i cant difference between the two groups which implied that the eff i ciency of 21G FNAC was similar to that of 18G TCN. Furthermore, tissues obtained by 21G FNAC were comparable to those by 18G TCN in term of immunohistochemical staining, suggesting that 21G FNAC could harvest enough tissue for a pathological diagnosis as did 18G TCN. In termsof tissue length, 18G TCN is superior to 21G FNAC. However, less complication may compensate this shortness: no hemorrhage and A-V shunts in the 21G FNAC group, while 8.7% (4/46) of 18-TCN patients had A-V shunts and 6.5% (3/46) subcapsular hemorrhage. The pain complaint (VAS≥1) rate was signif i cantly lower in the 21G FNAC group than that in the 18G TCN group. The biopsy needle diameter is an important factor in causing complications, and the results of this study suggest that 21G FNAC is safer than 18G TCN.

    The operator's experience and skill plays an important role in the safety and the success rate of liver biopsy.[22,23]In our study, all biopsies were performed by senior physicians who were skillful at BUS. During FNAC procedure, the actions of "pushing and pulling" were guided under ultrasonography. The cutting speed and force power could be controlled well by a skillful operator, and therefore, complications could be reduced.

    We also found some drawbacks of FNAC: less tissue for histology, especially when the tumors were hard or rich in connective tissues; blood clots in the sample could also disturb the examination results.

    In conclusion, tissues obtained using either of 21G FNAC or 18G TCN in liver biopsy are enough for a pathological diagnosis. There is no statistical difference in the TPR between the two biopsy procedures. However, the safety of 21G FNAC may be superior to that of 18G TCN biopsy.

    Contributors:GGQ and WXL proposed the study. LGP wrote the fi rst draft. LGP and GGQ collected and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. GGQ is the guarantor.

    Funding:This study was supported by a grant from the Project of Shanghai Health Bureau (2010022).

    Ethical approval:This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (2010-105).

    Competing interest:No benef i ts in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    1 Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 2001;344:495-500.

    2 Campbell MS, Reddy KR. Review article: the evolving role of liver biopsy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:249-259.

    3 Bialecki ES, Ezenekwe AM, Brunt EM, Collins BT, Ponder TB, Bieneman BK, et al. Comparison of liver biopsy and noninvasive methods for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:361-368.

    4 Szymczak A, Simon K, Inglot M, Gladysz A. Safety and effectiveness of blind percutaneous liver biopsy: analysis of 1412 procedures. Hepat Mon 2012;12:32-37.

    5 West J, Card TR. Reduced mortality rates following elective percutaneous liver biopsies. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1230-1237.

    6 Younossi ZM, Teran JC, Ganiats TG, Carey WD. Ultrasoundguided liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease: an economic analysis. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:46-50.

    7 Guido M, Rugge M. Liver biopsy sampling in chronic viral hepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 2004;24:89-97.

    8 Kugelmas M. Liver biopsy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1416-1417.

    9 Huang JF, Hsieh MY, Dai CY, Hou NJ, Lee LP, Lin ZY, et al. The incidence and risks of liver biopsy in non-cirrhotic patients: An evaluation of 3806 biopsies. Gut 2007;56:736-737.

    10 Own A, Balzer JO, Vogl TJ. Bleeding hepatic pseudoaneurysm complicating percutaneous liver biopsy with interventional treatment options. Eur Radiol 2005;15:183-185.

    11 Bateson MC, Hopwood D, Duguid HL, Bouchier IA. A comparative trial of liver biopsy needles. J Clin Pathol 1980; 33:131-133.

    12 Lindor KD, Bru C, Jorgensen RA, Rakela J, Bordas JM, Gross JB, et al. The role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology 1996;23:1079-1083.

    13 de Man RA, van Buuren HR, Hop WC. A randomised study on the eff i cacy and safety of an automated Tru-Cut needle for percutaneous liver biopsy. Neth J Med 2004;62:441-445.

    14 Colombo M, Del Ninno E, de Franchis R, De Fazio C, Festorazzi S, Ronchi G, et al. Ultrasound-assisted percutaneous liver biopsy: superiority of the Tru-Cut over the Menghini needle for diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1988;95:487-489.

    15 Pasha T, Gabriel S, Therneau T, Dickson ER, Lindor KD. Costeffectiveness of ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Hepatology 1998;27:1220-1226.

    16 Songür N, Songür Y, Bircan S, Kapucuo?lu N. Comparison of 19- and 22-gauge needles in EUS-guided fi ne needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal masses and lymph nodes. Turk J Gastroenterol 2011;22:472-478.

    17 Amin Z, Theis B, Russell RC, House C, Novelli M, Lees WR. Diagnosing pancreatic cancer: the role of percutaneous biopsy and CT. Clin Radiol 2006;61:996-1002.

    18 Cavanna L, Lazzaro A, Vallisa D, Civardi G, Artioli F. Role of image-guided fi ne-needle aspiration biopsy in the management of patients with splenic metastasis. World J Surg Oncol 2007;5:13.

    19 Swischuk JL, Castaneda F, Patel JC, Li R, Fraser KW, Brady TM, et al. Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: review of 612 lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:347-352.

    20 Thanos L, Zormpala A, Papaioannou G, Malagari K, Brountzos E, Kelekis D. Safety and eff i cacy of percutaneous CT-guided liver biopsy using an 18-gauge automated needle. Eur J Intern Med 2005;16:571-574.

    21 B?cking A. Cytological vs histological evaluation of percutaneous biopsies. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1991;14:5-12.

    22 van der Poorten D, Kwok A, Lam T, Ridley L, Jones DB, Ngu MC, et al. Twenty-year audit of percutaneous liver biopsy in a major Australian teaching hospital. Intern Med J 2006;36: 692-699.

    23 Froehlich F, Lamy O, Fried M, Gonvers JJ. Practice and complications of liver biopsy. Results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1480-1484.

    Received August 30, 2012

    Accepted after revision January 15, 2013

    AuthorAff i liations:Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China (Li GP, Gong GQ, Wang XL, Chen Y, Cheng JM and Li CY)

    Gao-Quan Gong, MD, Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China (Fax: 86-21-64037258; Email: gong.gaoquan@zs-hospital.sh.cn)

    ? 2013, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. All rights reserved.

    10.1016/S1499-3872(13)60080-6

    在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 黄色配什么色好看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 成人二区视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 五月天丁香电影| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久久久国产网址| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产成人精品福利久久| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 中文天堂在线官网| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产1区2区3区精品| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久热在线av| 香蕉精品网在线| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一级黄片播放器| 赤兔流量卡办理| 电影成人av| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久久久精品性色| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| www.av在线官网国产| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| av福利片在线| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产成人精品福利久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 考比视频在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 久久热在线av| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 在线观看人妻少妇| 一区二区三区激情视频| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产精品免费视频内射| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久久久网色| 丝袜美足系列| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 永久网站在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 18+在线观看网站| 日本av免费视频播放| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产av国产精品国产| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 色94色欧美一区二区| 性少妇av在线| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 在线观看三级黄色| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| kizo精华| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 久久这里有精品视频免费| freevideosex欧美| 丝袜美足系列| 午夜影院在线不卡| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 99久久综合免费| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 色哟哟·www| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| av网站在线播放免费| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久av网站| av福利片在线| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 美女中出高潮动态图| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 色吧在线观看| a 毛片基地| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 尾随美女入室| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 黄色一级大片看看| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 黄色一级大片看看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲在久久综合| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久久国产网址| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 美女国产视频在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产成人精品在线电影| 人人澡人人妻人| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产精品 国内视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 我的亚洲天堂| 一区福利在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品免费大片| av在线app专区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 嫩草影院入口| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久婷婷青草| 中国三级夫妇交换| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 我的亚洲天堂| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 秋霞在线观看毛片| www日本在线高清视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 18禁观看日本| 香蕉国产在线看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 多毛熟女@视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久久精品区二区三区| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 免费观看在线日韩| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 九草在线视频观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| a 毛片基地| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产麻豆69| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 熟女电影av网| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产成人精品婷婷| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 有码 亚洲区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 自线自在国产av| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 飞空精品影院首页| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 成人影院久久| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 人人澡人人妻人| av在线老鸭窝| xxx大片免费视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 成年av动漫网址| av免费观看日本| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| av卡一久久| videos熟女内射| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久av网站| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 超碰成人久久| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日本wwww免费看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 午夜av观看不卡| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久狼人影院| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 在现免费观看毛片| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 伦理电影免费视频| 一级黄片播放器| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 咕卡用的链子| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 99热全是精品| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 午夜福利视频精品| 日本欧美视频一区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产麻豆69| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 永久网站在线| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 一区二区三区精品91| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 飞空精品影院首页| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日韩av免费高清视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产成人一区二区在线| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产片内射在线| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲av福利一区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 性色av一级| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 五月开心婷婷网| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| freevideosex欧美| 美国免费a级毛片| 尾随美女入室| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| av在线老鸭窝| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日韩电影二区| 人人澡人人妻人| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| a级毛片在线看网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产又爽黄色视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 搡老乐熟女国产| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| av一本久久久久| h视频一区二区三区| 人人澡人人妻人| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲国产av新网站| 日韩视频在线欧美| 综合色丁香网| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲内射少妇av| 熟女av电影| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品免费视频内射| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 七月丁香在线播放| 熟女av电影| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲图色成人| 夫妻午夜视频| av有码第一页| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 高清av免费在线| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲国产精品999| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| av在线app专区| 久久影院123| 熟女电影av网| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲综合色网址| www.av在线官网国产| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 婷婷色综合www| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 久久久久久人妻| 国产片内射在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 99热全是精品| 久久久久视频综合| 看免费成人av毛片| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲综合色惰| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| freevideosex欧美| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产综合精华液| 男女免费视频国产| 飞空精品影院首页| 久久久精品94久久精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久久久视频综合| 五月开心婷婷网| 人妻系列 视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 岛国毛片在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 最黄视频免费看| kizo精华| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久|