Dougls Powell,Kurt Clowers,Mri Keefer,Songning Zhng*
aNeuromuscular Biomechanics Laboratory,Fairmont State University,Fairmont,WV,USA
bAnthropometry and Biomechanics Facility,NASA Johnson Space Center,Houston,TX,USA
cUniversity of Texas Health Science Center,Houston,TX,USA
dBiomechanics/Sports Medicine Laboratory,The University of Tennessee,Knoxville,TN,USA
Alterations in neuromuscular activation patterns associated with walking in short-leg walking boots
Douglas Powella,Kurt Clowersb,Maria Keeferc,Songning Zhangd,*
aNeuromuscular Biomechanics Laboratory,Fairmont State University,Fairmont,WV,USA
bAnthropometry and Biomechanics Facility,NASA Johnson Space Center,Houston,TX,USA
cUniversity of Texas Health Science Center,Houston,TX,USA
dBiomechanics/Sports Medicine Laboratory,The University of Tennessee,Knoxville,TN,USA
Background:Short-leg walking boots are a common intervention for acute and chronic lower extremity injury.Few studies have examined the neuromuscular adaptations associated with short-leg walking boots and no previous study has investigated timing characteristics of muscle activation during gait.The purpose of the current study was to examine the timing and amplitudes of muscle activation of the extrinsic ankle musculature during walking in two types of short-leg walking boots.
Methods:Eleven healthy young adults performed five level walking trials at a self-selected pace in each of three conditions:normal walking, GaitWalkerand Equalizershort-leg walking boots.Ground reaction forces were collected from a force platform while surface electromyography (EMG)was collected from the tibialis anterior,peroneus longus and medialgastrocnemius.EMG signals were rectified and smoothed using the rootmean squared with a 20-ms smoothing window and were normalized to the largestmean of the normal walking trials.A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of short-leg walking boots on the onset,duration and amplitude of muscle activation.
Results:Short-leg walking boots were generally associated with earlier onsets of muscle activation and longer durations of muscle activation. However,there was no reduction in EMG amplitude.
Conclusion:The findings of this study show that the induced alterations in muscle activation patterns may limit the short-leg walking boots. Copyright?2012,Shanghai University of Sport.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.
Electromyography;Gait;Short-leg walker;Walking;Walking boot
Short-leg walking boots have become a popular alternative to traditional casting techniques for the treatment of acute injuries to the ankle and foot as well as post-surgicalimmobilization.1—4Walking boots have many advantages over their fiberglass cast counterparts including the cost of use,ease of removal for cleaning,and have fewer mal-effects on gait patterns.3,5A common use of short-leg walking boots is in the diabetic population.Specifically,individuals with a diabetic neuropathy often incur abrasive injuries to the foot which go unnoticed leading to diabetic ulcerations which often result in amputation of the digit or flesh.Short-leg walking boots have been shown to reduce plantar pressures and therefore decrease the risk of diabetic ulcerations.6—9In addition to having advantageous plantar pressure profiles in comparison to traditional casting,short-leg walking boots have been suggested to have fewer mal-effects on kinematic,kinetics and ground reaction force patterns during gait.2—4Previousresearch has revealed that multi-joint mechanical adaptations occur during gait in a short-leg walking boot.4Specifically, short-leg walking boots have been associated with smaller peak ankle eversion angles,greater ankle eversion ranges of motion,greater peak ankle plantarflexor moments,smaller peak ankle dorsiflexor moments and greater ankle inversion moments compared to normal walking.4These data call into question the efficacy of short-leg walking boots in reducing motions and forces acting at the foot and ankle.
In addition to altering joint kinematics and kinetics,shortleg walking boots have been shown to alter neuromuscular activation patterns during gait.Short-leg walking boots are often prescribed to immobilize the ankle joint and to reduce muscle activity in the extrinsic musculature crossing the ankle and subtalar joints.10Previous research has suggested thattotal contact casts and short-leg walking boots both reduce the intensity ofgastrocnemius muscle activation,butthatshort-leg walking boots were more effective in reducing muscle activation of the gastrocnemius compared to the total contact cast.10Decreases in gastrocnemius muscle activation intensity observed by Kadel et al.10are not congruent with increases in plantarflexor moments observed in previous research studies investigating gaitmechanics in short-leg walking boots.4Ithas been suggested that adding a load to the distal end of a segment alters the neuromuscular activation patterns controlling thatlimb including both muscle activation intensity and the timing of muscle activation.11Though Kadel et al.10compared changes in the intensity of muscle activation in response to two methods of ankle immobilization,changes in the timing of muscle activation were not reported.Further, the quantification of muscle activation amplitude was conducted using integrated electromyography(EMG),a measure which is sensitive to changes in signal duration.Thus, a limitation of the study by Kadel et al.10is that temporal data pertaining to the onset and cessation of muscle activation in response to the short-leg walking boot were not reported.
Therefore,the purpose of the currentstudy was to examine changesin the timing and amplitudesofmuscle activation of the extrinsic ankle musculaturewhen walking in two differenttypes of short-leg walking boots.Due to previous research findings, it was hypothesized that short-leg walking boots would be associated with(1)earlier onsets of muscle activation, (2)longer durations of muscle activation,and(3)smaller amplitudes of muscle activation when compared to normal walking.
2.1.Participant information
Eleven healthy subjects(6 males;5 females)participated in the currentstudy(age:27.4±7.8 years;mass:72.0±13.4 kg; height:1.76±0.08 m).All participants were free of lower extremity injury at the time of testing and had no history of major lower extremity injury or neurological disorder.All participants signed an informed consent statement approved by the Institutional Review Board prior to participating in the study.
2.2.Experimental protocol
Each participant performed five levelwalking trials across a 10-m walkway in each condition(Fig.1):normalshoes,Gait Walker short-leg walker(DeRoyal Industries,Inc.,Powell, TN,USA)and Equalizer short-leg walker(Royce Medical Co.,Camarillo,CA,USA).Preferred walking speed was determined using a pair of photocells(1000 Hz,63501 IR, Lafayette Instrument Inc.,Lafayette,IN,USA)from three walking trials at a self-selected speed in a randomly selected walker.4Photocells were placed 1.5 m before and after the force platform and were approximately shoulder height. Walking speed was monitored and maintained within 10%of the self-selected speed during the data collection.The walker conditions were randomized and followed by the lab shoe condition.
An EMG system(600 Hz,Noraxon USA,Inc.,Scottsdale, AZ,USA)and force platform(1200 Hz,American Mechanical Technology Inc.,Watertown,MA,USA)were used to simultaneously collect surface EMG(sEMG)and ground reaction forces from the right limb during walking trials.Surface electrodes were placed over the muscle belly of the m.Tibialis Anterior(TA),m.Peroneus Longus(PL)and medial head of the m.Medial Gastrocnemius(MG).The skin beneath the electrodes was shaved,cleansed and abraded to minimize skin resistance.Force platform data were used to determine heel strike and toe off of stance phase.Ground reaction force and joint kinematic and kinetic data were reported elsewhere.4
2.3.Data analysis
Fig.1.The Gait Walker(A)and Equalizer(B)short-leg walking boots used in the currentstudy.
EMG signals were rectified first and then smoothed using a root mean squared method with a 20-ms moving window.For each muscle,onset of muscle activation was defined as a rise in the EMG signal amplitude greater than the baseline plus two standard deviations during quiet standing,lasting longer than 50 ms.Offset of muscle activation was defined as the decrease in EMG signalamplitude below the baseline plus two standard deviations lasting longerthan 50 ms.Onsets were temporally normalized to the duration of the stance phase starting from heel strike(Eq.(1)).Therefore,the onset of muscle activation prior to heel strike is represented as a negative percent.Duration of muscle activity was calculated as the difference between onset and offset of muscle activity and was normalized to the duration of the stance phase (Eq.(2)).M.TA activation onsets and durations were calculated for the load response(TA-LR)and pre-swing(TA-PS) portions of the stance phase.12Mean EMG(mEMG)was calculated across the entirety of the stance phase and normalized to the maximum value during normal walking. where tEMGOnsetdenotes time of EMG onset,tEMGOffsetdenotes time of EMG offset,TimeHSdenotes time at heel strike,and TimeTOdenotes time of toe off.
2.4.Statistical analysis
A two-factor(3×3,muscle×condition)repeated measures analysis of variance(ANOVA)was used to compare the effects ofshort-leg walking boots on the onsetand duration of muscle activation as well as the mEMG of the TA,PL and MG.In the presence of a muscle by condition interaction, a post-hoc test was conducted using t tests.For all statistical tests,differences were considered significant when p<0.05. A Bonferroni adjustment was used to correct the alpha level for multiple post-hoc comparisons.The statisticalanalysis was conducted using SPSS 18.0(SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL,USA).
Fig.2 shows representative EMG signals and vertical ground reaction forces during normal walking(A)and when walking in the Gait Walker short-leg walking boot(B).Level walking trials were performed at 1.24±0.18 m/s (mean±SD)and were maintained across conditions.
Fig.2.Representative electromyography(EMG)tracings of m.Tibialis Anterior,m.Peroneus Longus and m.Gastrocnemius activation and vertical ground reaction force(GRF)during levelwalking in the normalwalking(A)and Gait Walker conditions(B).The stance phase was defined as the period oftime between heelstrike(HS)and toe off(TO).
3.1.Onset ofmuscle activation
Short-leg walking boots were associated with an earlier onset of muscle activation compared to normal walking (Table 1).Around heel strike,the TA muscle activation was not significantly different in the Gait Walker(F=2.599, p=0.135)or Equalizer conditions(F=3.032,p=0.219) compared to normal walking(Table 1).No differences were observed between the Gait Walker and Equalizer conditions (F=2.570,p=0.101).The PL muscle had significantly earlier activation in the Gait Walker condition than the normal walking condition(F=30.812,p=0.001);however,no differences were observed between the normal walking and Equalizerconditions(F=0.362,p=1.000).The GaitWalker condition was also associated with a significantly earlier PL activation than the Equalizer condition(F=4.621, p=0.031).Earlieronsetof MG activation was observed in the GaitWalker(F=28.806,p=0.001)and Equalizerconditions (F=5.493,p=0.006)compared to the normal walking condition.No difference in onset of MG activation was observed between the Gait Walker and Equalizer conditions (F=2.599,p=0.174).In push-off,the onsetof TA activation was not significantly different between the normal walking and Gait Walker conditions(F=2.984,p=0.109);however, the Equalizer condition was associated with significantly earlier onset of muscle activation than the normal walking condition(F=10.654,p=0.006).
3.2.Duration of muscle activation
Short-leg walking boots were generally associated with increases in the duration of muscle activation(Table 2). During load response,the TA was activated for a longer duration in the Gait Walker(F=15.465,p=0.004)and Equalizer(F=10.865,p=0.005)conditions than in the normal walking condition(Table 2).The durations of TA muscle activation between Gait Walker and Equalizer conditions were not different(F=0.093,p=0.083).The Gait Walker condition was associated with significantly longer PL activation than the normal walking condition(F=19.396, p=0.001);however,no differences were observed between the normal walking and Equalizer conditions(F=0.214, p=1.000).Furthermore,the Gait Walker condition had significantly longer durations of PL activation than theEqualizer condition(F=15.795,p=0.002).Both the Gait Walker(F=32.505,p=0.001)and Equalizer(F=24.958, p=0.002)conditions had longer durations of MG activity than the normal walking condition.The Gait Walker and Equalizer conditions did not have significantly different durations of MG activation(F=0.532,p=0.606).During push-off,TA activation was significantly longer in both Gait Walker(F=13.077,p=0.003)and Equalizer(F=39.266, p=0.001)than the normalwalking condition(Table 2).There were no differences in TA activation between the Gait Walker and Equalizer conditions during the pre-swing phase of gait (F=0.142,p=1.000).
Table 2The duration ofmuscle activity of the TA,PL,and MG expressed as a percent of the stance phase:(mean±SD).Duration of the TA was calculated during the load response(TA-LR)and pre-swing(TA-PS)portions of the stance phase.
3.3.Activation intensity
Generally,mEMG values during stance were not changed when subjects performed levelwalking while wearing a shortleg walking boot compared to normal walking(Table 3). Specifically,there was no condition effect of the short-leg walking boots on mEMG values of the TA(F=0.026, p=0.975),PL(F=1.195,p=0.351)or MG(F=3.093, p=0.101).
The purpose of the study was to examine the differences in timing and amplitude of muscle activation of the extrinsic ankle musculature during walking between short-leg walking boots and the control shoe.Onset of muscle activation was significantly different in the short-leg walker conditionscompared to the lab shoe condition in all muscles.Short-leg walking boots were associated with an earlier onset of all muscles.However,there were no consistent differences between the two short-leg walker conditions.These data lead to the rejection of the first hypothesis that no differences in onset of muscle activation would exist between the lab shoe condition and the two walker conditions.Only a single study has previously examined muscle activation in short-leg walkers,however timing of muscle activation was not investigated.10Previous researches have investigated the neuromuscularadaptations associated with added load applied to the ankle11,13,14and wrist.13These research studies,however, examined neuromuscular activation patterns associated with controlling the motion of a limb in space.The current study investigated muscle activation patterns in ankle musculature when the joint was acutely immobilized via the short-leg walking boots.Earlier onset of muscle activation in the ankle musculature may be a resultof resistance to the normalmotion of the ankle prior to and during the stance phase of the gait cycle as a result of resisted motion by the short-leg walking boots.It has been shown that a method of responding to increased resistance to motion results in earlier activation of musculature responsible for that motion in healthy young adults.11
Table 1The onset of muscle activity of the TA,PL,and MG expressed relative to heel strike and as a percent of the stance phase(mean±SD).Onset of the TA was calculated during the load response(TA-LR)and pre-swing(TA-PS)portions of the stance phase.
Table 3Mean EMG amplitude of the TA,PL,and MG calculated during the stance phase of gait and normalized to peak EMG value during the No Walker condition(mean±SD).
The current data also show that the extrinsic ankle musculature was generally activated for a longer period of time when subjects walked with the short-leg walking boots. Though severalresearch studies have investigated the changes in the amplitude of muscle activation,no previous study has presented the duration of activation of extrinsic ankle musculature.Thus,these findings are novel and may provide insight into the mechanism of function and the efficacy of short-leg walking boots.Clinically,a longer duration of muscle activation may increase the duration of muscle tension applied to the injured musculoskeletal and ligamentous structures of the foot and ankle.Some advantages of short-leg walking boots over traditional cast include shorter periods required for immobilization and rehabilitation as well as ease of removalfor examination and cleaning.A longer duration of muscle activation applied to the injured site during each gait cycle may seem to limit the efficacy of the short-leg walking boots in returning the individual to normal activity levels earlier than traditional casting.Conversely,the observed increase in the duration of muscle activity may be the result of an acute application of the short-leg walking boots which may be associated with the need to increase muscles’response to the increased inertia in the walker conditions.The longer activations of the peroneus longus and gastrocnemius in the walkerconditions supportprevious research data thatreported increased plantarfl exor moments found in these the short-leg walking boot conditions.4Patients in the current study were given severalminutes to adjustto gaitin the short-leg walking boots prior to actual testing trials;however,neuromuscular adaptations to gait in the short-leg walking boot is likely to continue for a longer period of time than the duration of these data collections.Previous research has shown thatthe addition of an inertialload focused at the ankle results in longer periods of muscle activation in the lower extremity.11It can be postulated thatthe observed changes in the duration ofmuscle activation are in response to the increased load and thatthese changes would be muted with greater time of adjustment, similar to that experienced by injured patients.It is,however, unclear if a patient with ankle or foot injury would respond similarly in the walker conditions.
Short-leg walking boots are a common treatment method for acute and chronic injuries to the lower extremity.1,3,4Short-leg walkers have been demonstrated to have many advantages over traditionalcasting techniques as evidenced by previous research studies.3,9,10One reported advantage of short-leg walkers is decreased muscle activation intensity.10However,the findings of the current study exhibited no change in muscle activation intensity associated with the short-leg walking boots as previously reported.These contradictory findings may be the result of methodological differences between the currentstudy and previous research.A variety ofmethods has been used to determine the intensity of muscle activity including mEMG,peak RMS EMG and integrated EMG.Kadel et al.10reported muscle activation using integrated EMG signals compared to mEMG values used in the current study to report muscle activation intensity. Furthermore,the previous study normalized to the mEMG of the control condition10compared to peak EMG of the control condition used in the current study.An investigation of methods used to quantify electromyography signals revealed that integrated and mEMG values are similar within a given data set15;however a limitation of this study is that it examined only a single condition and did not investigate the effect of changes in the duration of muscle activity.Therefore,the use of these two methodologies may lead to different numericalresults and thus the interpretation of EMG results requires caution.The findings of the current study suggest that the amplitude of muscle activation remains unchanged when subjects wore short-leg walking boots.The findings of the current study seemingly contradict previous research that demonstrated a decrease in EMG amplitude.A possible reason for these differences in research findings includes the acute nature of the observed adaptation.Though each subject was offered severalminutes to acclimate to each short-leg walking boot condition and reported their comfort,a longer period of time may have been required to adapt to walking in the shortleg walking boots.Further,in motor learning increased variability is associated with skill acquisition or response to perturbation.16It is likely that the increased variabilityassociated with the perturbation created by the short-leg walking boot resulted in statistically non-significantfindings.
A second possible reason that no differences were found between conditions in the currentstudy pertains to the method of normalization.Though previous research has suggested that the normalization used in the current study is a robust normalization method thataccounts for differences in levels of activation based on contraction type,it is plausible that normalization to a maximum voluntary isometric contraction would have produced statistically different EMG amplitudes in response to the short-leg walking boots.
The clinical significance of this study pertains to the application of short-leg walking boots as a treatment and rehabilitation tool.The current data suggest that acute adaptations to the short-leg walking boots resultin greater volumes of loading to the structures of the footand ankle due to muscle activation,which may limit the short-term efficacy of walking boots.Therefore,it is suggested that walking boots be used in the long term treatment of foot and ankle injuries.It is postulated that with longer exposure to the short-leg walking boots,motor control would be optimized and internal loading would be minimized in response to the added structural stability provided by the walking boots.However,the long term neuromuscular adaptations to short-leg walking boots have not been directly investigated.
In conclusion,short-leg walking boots are associated with adaptations in neuromuscular activation patterns of the extrinsic ankle musculature.Specifically,an earlier onset and longer durations of muscle activation are key acute responses to shortleg walking boots.However,the intensity ofmuscle activation was notreduced in the currentstudy.These alterationsin muscle activation patterns may limit the efficacy of the short-leg walking boots.Future research is warranted to examine long term neuromuscularadaptations to short-leg walking bootsand to the biomechanicalresponses to imposed leg length discrepancies associated with short-leg walking boots.
This study was funded in part by a grant from DeRoyal Industries,Inc.,Powell,TN,USA.
1.Crincoli MG,Trepman E.Immobilization with removable walking brace for treatment of chronic foot and ankle pain.Foot Ankle Int 2001;22:725—30.
2.Keefer M,King J,Powell D,Krusenklaus JH,Zhang S.Effects of modified short-leg walkers on ground reaction force characteristics.Clin Biomech(Bristol,Avon)2008;23:1172—7.
3.Pollo FE,Gowling TL,Jackson RW.Walking bootdesign:a gaitanalysis study.Orthopedics 1999;22:503—7.
4.Zhang S,Clowers KG,Powell D.Ground reaction force and 3D biomechanical characteristics of walking in short-leg walkers.Gait Posture 2006;24:487—92.
5.Neumann H,O’Shea P,Nielson JP,Climstein M.A physiological comparison of the short-leg walking castand an ankle-footorthosiswalker following 6 weeks of immobilization.Orthopedics 1989;12:1429—33. discussion 1433—4.
6.Baumhauer JF,Wervey R,McWilliams J,Harris GF,Shereff MJ.A comparison study of plantar foot pressure in a standardized shoe,total contact cast,and prefabricated pneumatic walking brace.Foot Ankle Int 1997;18:26—33.
7.Crenshaw SJ,Pollo FE,Brodsky JW.The effect of ankle position on plantar pressure in a short leg walking boot.Foot Ankle Int 2004;25:69—72.
8.NawoczenskiDA,Birke JA,Coleman WC.Effectofrockersole design on plantar forefoot pressures.J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1988;78:455—60.
9.Pollo FE,Brodsky JW,Crenshaw SJ,Kirksey C.Plantar pressures in fiberglass total contact casts vs.a new diabetic walking boot.Foot Ankle Int 2003;24:45—9.
10.Kadel NJ,Segal A,Orendurff M,Shofer J,Sangeorzan B.The efficacy of two methods of ankle immobilization in reducing gastrocnemius,soleus, and peroneal muscle activity during stance phase of gait.Foot Ankle Int 2004;25:406—9.
11.Powell D,DeVita P,Hortobagyi T.Inertial loading during gait evokes unique neuromuscular adaptations in old adults.Percept Mot Skills 2008;107:881—92.
12.Perry J,Burnfield J.Gaitanalysis:normaland pathologicalfunction.2nd ed.Thorofare,NJ:SLACK,Inc,2010.
13.Donker SF,Mulder T,Nienhuis B,Duysens J.Adaptations in arm movements for added mass to wrist or ankle during walking.Exp Brain Res 2002;146:26—31.
14.Haddad J,van Emmerik RE,Whittlesey SN,Hamill J.Adaptations in interlimb and intralimb coordination to asymmetrical loading in human walking.Gait Posture 2006;23:429—34.
15.Renshaw D,Bice MR,Cassidy C,Eldridge J,Powell D.A comparison of three copmuter-based methods used to determine EMG signalamplitudes. Int J Exerc Sci 2010;3:43—8.
16.Muller H,Sternad D.Motor learning:changes in the structure of variability in a redundant task.Adv Exp Med Biol 2009;629:439—56.
Received 27 October 2011;revised 17 January 2012;accepted 19 February 2012
*Corresponding author.
E-mailaddress:szhang@utk.edu(S.Zhang)
Peer review under responsibility of Shanghai University of Sport
Production and hosting by Elsevier
2095-2546/$-see front matter Copyright?2012,Shanghai University of Sport.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.
10.1016/j.jshs.2012.02.003
Journal of Sport and Health Science2012年1期