陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地沉積期微地貌恢復(fù)方法研究①——以四川盆地磨溪?dú)馓锛味?亞段A層為例

譚秀成 聶 勇 劉 宏 周 彥 李 凌 趙路子 張本健 馮 鈺,5

(1.油氣藏地質(zhì)及開發(fā)工程國家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室西南石油大學(xué) 成都 610500; 2.西南石油大學(xué)資源與環(huán)境學(xué)院 成都 610500;3.西南油氣田分公司勘探處 成都 610051; 4.西南油氣田分公司川西北氣礦 四川江油 621709;5.西南油氣田分公司川中油氣礦 四川遂寧 629000)

陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地沉積期微地貌恢復(fù)方法研究①
——以四川盆地磨溪?dú)馓锛味?亞段A層為例

譚秀成1,2聶 勇2劉 宏2周 彥2李 凌2趙路子3張本健4馮 鈺4,5

(1.油氣藏地質(zhì)及開發(fā)工程國家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室西南石油大學(xué) 成都 610500; 2.西南石油大學(xué)資源與環(huán)境學(xué)院 成都 610500;3.西南油氣田分公司勘探處 成都 610051; 4.西南油氣田分公司川西北氣礦 四川江油 621709;5.西南油氣田分公司川中油氣礦 四川遂寧 629000)

陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地沉積期微地貌起伏差異小,難于確定。分析了沉積期微地貌控制著顆粒灘儲(chǔ)層的發(fā)育及分布,因此,可通過對(duì)顆粒灘儲(chǔ)層的研究,反演微地貌起伏。按此原理,建議具體研究步驟為:顆粒巖沉積為主體的等時(shí)地質(zhì)體選取、儲(chǔ)層成因確定、暴露時(shí)間確定、沉積期地貌恢復(fù),以及成果檢驗(yàn)應(yīng)用。以四川盆地磨溪?dú)馓锛瘟杲M嘉二2亞段A層為例,利用豐富的鉆孔取心資料進(jìn)行了實(shí)例研究,取得良好效果,表明該方法值得推廣應(yīng)用,尤其適用于鉆探程度高、資料老、缺乏三孔隙度測(cè)井系列的盆地老區(qū),這對(duì)于儲(chǔ)層預(yù)測(cè)和新層挖潛具有重要參考意義。

陸表海 碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地 沉積期微地貌 顆粒灘 嘉陵江組 三疊系 磨溪?dú)馓?四川盆地

含油氣盆地沉積期古地貌的恢復(fù)是認(rèn)識(shí)區(qū)域巖相古地理及其油氣地質(zhì)意義的重要關(guān)鍵,對(duì)于相對(duì)高差較大的地貌單元,通?？刹捎没貏兎╗1]、沉積學(xué)分析方法[2,3]、層序地層學(xué)方法[4,5](包括高分辨率層序地層學(xué)方法[6])等實(shí)現(xiàn);相比而言,在陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地內(nèi)部,由于次一級(jí)地貌起伏較小[7],導(dǎo)致在某一時(shí)間段內(nèi)小區(qū)域中形成的地層多為米級(jí)差異[7,8],從而使得應(yīng)用常用的方法難以準(zhǔn)確刻劃這種地貌差異。實(shí)際上,在陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地內(nèi)部,微地貌高地在海退期暴露幾率較高,因此儲(chǔ)層質(zhì)量較之相對(duì)低洼區(qū)要好,據(jù)此理論而言,通過對(duì)儲(chǔ)層的研究,可以反演地層沉積期的古地貌,然而,這在過去的研究中,尚未得到系統(tǒng)工作。

四川盆地磨溪?dú)馓镂挥谂璧卮ㄖ泄怕≈行逼骄彉?gòu)造帶南部,是近年來盆地天然氣勘探開發(fā)的重點(diǎn)地區(qū)之一[9]。在早三疊世嘉陵江期,以發(fā)育陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地為特征,臺(tái)地內(nèi)部具有次一級(jí)的地貌起伏[10],但迄今少有精確的恢復(fù)工作。目前,在磨溪構(gòu)造的主體280 km2內(nèi),揭穿嘉二段鉆井共42口(資料截止2005年),其中嘉二段全取芯井16口,并且在區(qū)內(nèi)分布較均勻,因此,井網(wǎng)合理分布的大量鉆孔資料為沉積期微地貌恢復(fù)研究提供了有利條件[7]。本文以該段為例,開展陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地沉積期微地貌的恢復(fù)研究,主要目的是探索一種具有普遍意義的恢復(fù)方法,以供同類研究類比參考。

1 原理與方法

陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地內(nèi)部浪基面淺,一般小于5 m[7],總體擾動(dòng)深度小,因此在相對(duì)海退時(shí)期,微地貌高地易處于浪基面之上,從而發(fā)育顆粒灘[7]。顆粒灘的沉積速率高于臺(tái)地內(nèi)其它微相區(qū)[11],因此,地貌差異得到強(qiáng)化。此外,顆粒灘沉積之后,由于上覆沉積物的加積,顆粒沉積物在物理壓實(shí)的影響下,形成顆粒格架支撐,壓實(shí)率要遠(yuǎn)低于細(xì)粒沉積物,從而使不同微相區(qū)的地貌差異導(dǎo)致的沉積厚度差異得到進(jìn)一步強(qiáng)化[8],這同時(shí)也表明臺(tái)地內(nèi)部沉積期的微地貌近似恢復(fù)可以不考慮壓實(shí)校正。總而言之,某一時(shí)間段內(nèi)形成的顆粒巖厚度可用于近似恢復(fù)其形成時(shí)的微地貌起伏。

對(duì)于非暴露淺灘區(qū),微地貌高地的顆粒灘始終較其它區(qū)域沉積速率快,其顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度可用來近似表征微地貌起伏(圖1a)。而陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地內(nèi)多數(shù)時(shí)期形成的顆粒灘,發(fā)育深度較小,沉積物的可容空間也相應(yīng)較小,并由于其海平面變化特征為快速海侵-緩慢海退,顆粒灘的快速生長使得微地貌高地的顆粒沉積物極易在同生期暴露(暴露淺灘),使微地貌高地顆粒灘終止發(fā)育,顆粒灘向微地貌低地遷移(圖1b,c)。

圖1 水下及暴露淺灘疊置遷移模式Fig.1 Superposed migration pattern of submarine and exposed shoals

如圖1b,1c,對(duì)于同生期暴露淺灘,可以分為中短期暴露和長期暴露兩種情形。其中,中短期暴露時(shí)間一般小于50 000 a,缺乏巖溶特征,并以發(fā)育選擇性的粒內(nèi)溶蝕和早期淡水膠結(jié)物為特征[12],此時(shí),地貌高地的剝蝕不明顯,連續(xù)取芯見不到明顯的不整合面,顆粒灘在海退時(shí)期向低地遷移,但其厚度仍小于地貌高地(圖1b),因此,顆粒灘中短期暴露形成的大氣成巖透鏡體儲(chǔ)層與顆粒灘的累計(jì)厚度呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系。相比而言,長期暴露的淺灘,其暴露時(shí)間大于130 000 a,以發(fā)育古土壤和不規(guī)則溶溝、溶縫為特征[12],此時(shí),地貌高地的顆粒巖存在不同程度的剝蝕,并且顆粒灘向微地貌低地遷移,低洼處的顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度可能大于微地貌高地,大氣成巖透鏡體的厚度與顆粒灘厚度不具正相關(guān)關(guān)系(圖1c)。因此,若同生期暴露時(shí)間長,就會(huì)干擾顆粒灘累計(jì)厚度對(duì)沉積期地貌的判斷,尤其是等時(shí)地質(zhì)體選取的時(shí)間段越長,越難消除這種因素的影響。因而,暴露時(shí)間的確定成為利用顆粒灘厚度法恢復(fù)微地貌的關(guān)鍵。盡管準(zhǔn)確的年齡界限目前還難以實(shí)現(xiàn),但仍可以根據(jù)成巖組構(gòu)與宏觀地質(zhì)特征區(qū)別暴露的時(shí)間,如具有以下特征的通常反映短期暴露(反之則為長期暴露):①不整合特征不明顯,缺乏古土壤;②缺乏不規(guī)則溶溝、溶縫;③粒內(nèi)溶蝕極其發(fā)育;④早期淡水膠結(jié)物與膠結(jié)不整合的出現(xiàn);⑤大氣成巖透鏡體成因儲(chǔ)層與顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度呈正相關(guān)。

綜上所述,在陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地內(nèi)部,可以通過精細(xì)的宏微觀分析尋找符合條件的等時(shí)地質(zhì)體,利用顆粒巖厚度法對(duì)暴露淺灘期的微地貌進(jìn)行近似恢復(fù)。具體可以分為如下幾個(gè)步驟:①選取以顆粒巖沉積為主體的等時(shí)地質(zhì)體;②確定儲(chǔ)層成因;③暴露時(shí)間確定;④沉積期地貌恢復(fù);⑤成果檢驗(yàn)與應(yīng)用。需要注意的是,根據(jù)以上分析,未暴露和中短期的暴露灘研究效果要比長期的暴露灘研究效果好。

2 實(shí)例應(yīng)用

2.1 等時(shí)地質(zhì)體選擇與儲(chǔ)層成因

磨溪?dú)馓锛味沃饕珊Ｏ嗵妓猁}巖、蒸發(fā)巖和少量陸源碎屑巖組成,鉆厚從104 m到120 m不等,總體上表現(xiàn)出東厚西薄的變化趨勢(shì)。本區(qū)嘉二沉積期的沉積體系為陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地,以發(fā)育局限-蒸發(fā)海臺(tái)地沉積為特征,其中的嘉二2亞段A層以發(fā)育臺(tái)內(nèi)顆粒灘亞相為特征,主要包括灘核及灘核-灘緣微相[13]。灘核微相主要由鮞?；?guī)r組成,具有顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度和單灘體厚度較大的特點(diǎn),是本期沉積最有利的儲(chǔ)集微相帶[7]。因此,以嘉二2亞段A層為例展開重點(diǎn)研究。

如圖2,嘉二2亞段A層下部為藍(lán)灰色泥巖頻夾薄層砂屑灰?guī)r,中上部為淺灰色鮞粒灰?guī)r夾薄層泥晶灰?guī)r或泥晶云巖,局部井區(qū)夾灰黑色塊狀硬石膏巖,上部為深灰色泥晶灰?guī)r,儲(chǔ)層主要發(fā)育于鮞?；?guī)r中[14]。研究表明,磨溪?dú)馓锛味?亞段A小層為近乎等時(shí)的地質(zhì)體,并以顆粒巖沉積為主體[15],儲(chǔ)集空間類型以粒內(nèi)溶孔和鑄?？诪橹?屬同生期巖溶成因[14]。因此,開展沉積期古地貌恢復(fù),嘉二2亞段A層具有翔實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)資料條件。

2.2 暴露時(shí)間確定

通過嘉二段豐富的取心資料觀測(cè)發(fā)現(xiàn),嘉二2亞段A小層各向上變淺序列間未見明顯的不整合現(xiàn)象;巖芯上針孔狀粒內(nèi)溶蝕極其發(fā)育,而未見溶溝溶縫現(xiàn)象(圖3);鏡下可見到大氣水成巖環(huán)境形成的刃狀方解石(圖4)。據(jù)此,對(duì)比前文歸納總結(jié)的判識(shí)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),初步表明顆粒灘的暴露時(shí)間不長。

圖2 研究區(qū)地理位置圖1.硬石膏巖;2.泥晶云巖;3.砂屑云巖;4.粉晶云巖;5.泥晶灰?guī)r;6.瘤狀灰?guī)r;7.鮞?；?guī)rFig.2 Geographical location of the study area

圖3 鮞?；?guī)r,逆粒序,鑄?？?磨206井, 3186.69~3187.01 m,嘉二2 AFig.3 Oolitic limestone,inverse grading,moldic pore,Well Mo206, 3186.69~3187.01 m,the layer A of Jia22 submember.

此外,具有大氣成巖透鏡體成因的儲(chǔ)層與顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度呈正相關(guān),也表明了灘體的暴露時(shí)間不長。研究表明,本區(qū)儲(chǔ)層段隨粒屑灘生長,加上受海平面變化等因素的影響,幾十厘米厚的單灘體也可出露水面,接受大氣淡水的淋濾作用,以顆粒巖的原生粒間孔隙為通道進(jìn)行溶蝕,使得剛沉積不久的顆粒由外向內(nèi)發(fā)生強(qiáng)烈的溶蝕作用,形成粒內(nèi)溶孔發(fā)育的顆粒巖,往往成為良好的孔隙型儲(chǔ)層[16]。通過對(duì)磨溪和鄰區(qū)18口嘉二段全取心井的精細(xì)觀測(cè)統(tǒng)計(jì),發(fā)現(xiàn)粒屑灘的累計(jì)厚度與針孔鮞?；?guī)r的累計(jì)厚度存在明顯的正相關(guān)關(guān)系(圖5)。

圖4 鮞?；?guī)r,兩期方解石膠結(jié)物,磨13井, 3124.71 m,X50(-),嘉二2亞段A層Fig.4 Oolitic limestone,two-period calcite cements,Well Mo13, 3124.71 m,X50(-),the layer A of Jia22 submember

圖5 顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度與針孔巖累計(jì)厚度相關(guān)關(guān)系圖Fig.5 The correlation graph of gross thinkness between grainstones and pinhole rocks.

上述特征表明,磨溪?dú)馓锛味?亞段A小層顆粒巖早期暴露時(shí)間為中-短期。大氣淡水淋溶形成的針孔狀顆粒巖發(fā)育程度與古地形高低密切相關(guān),位于古地形高處,同生期暴露幾率較大,顆粒巖接受大氣淡水淋溶改造時(shí)間較長,因此,針孔巖發(fā)育區(qū)域即為沉積時(shí)的古地貌高地,如位于現(xiàn)今構(gòu)造高部位的磨151井、磨13井等井,巖心觀察發(fā)現(xiàn)嘉二2A層針孔狀顆粒巖極為發(fā)育。而位于現(xiàn)今構(gòu)造低部位的磨16井、磨47井等巖芯觀察表明該層針孔狀顆粒巖不發(fā)育,面孔率極低,說明這些區(qū)域古地形較低,顆粒巖暴露幾率少,很難接受大氣淡水的淋溶改造。因此,可利用該套顆粒巖厚度變化來表征嘉二2A期沉積期微地貌。

2.3 沉積期地貌恢復(fù)

基于上述原理,用顆粒巖厚度法來恢復(fù)磨溪?dú)馓锛味?亞段A層沉積期古地貌。除磨溪16口全取芯井直接統(tǒng)計(jì)外,其余未取心井則通過測(cè)井相獲取顆粒巖厚度[17],根據(jù)巖芯觀察和測(cè)井相統(tǒng)計(jì)出了42口井嘉二2A層顆粒巖的累計(jì)厚度,繪制出顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度等值線圖,并以此為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)恢復(fù)了嘉二2A沉積期的古地貌起伏形態(tài),形成如圖6的認(rèn)識(shí):①微地貌高地呈近東西向展布;②微地貌高地與現(xiàn)今構(gòu)造具一定協(xié)調(diào)性,說明磨溪構(gòu)造為一同沉積水下高地,只是南部由于后期喜山運(yùn)動(dòng)的改造而沉降;③水下高地內(nèi)部隆、凹分異明顯,出現(xiàn)高地和洼地等次一級(jí)微地貌單元。高地發(fā)育在Mo24-Mo205東井區(qū)、Mo206井南側(cè)、Mo207井周緣、Mo151井-Mo36井區(qū)、Mo208井區(qū)及南部、Mo48井和Mo202井區(qū)北側(cè)等(7個(gè))。洼地發(fā)育在Mo12-Mo201、Mo005-2-Mo150、Mo22井南及Mo206井東等(4個(gè))。

2.4 成果檢驗(yàn)

嘉二2初期四川盆地遭受到一次較強(qiáng)海侵,沉積了一套區(qū)域上穩(wěn)定分布的、富含葉肢介的藍(lán)灰色泥巖,導(dǎo)致嘉二2A期少見蒸發(fā)巖沉積,表明盆內(nèi)海水鹽度基本正常[18]。然而有意義的是,在Mo005-2井-Mo150井一帶,以及Mo207井區(qū)卻出現(xiàn)了較厚的水下膏巖沉積(膏巖為深灰色塊狀,未見暴露標(biāo)志)[7],其周緣是反映微高地的粒屑灘顆粒巖沉積。這反映了由于周緣微高地上灘體的生長,導(dǎo)致相對(duì)低洼的灘間海環(huán)境封閉受限,水體蒸發(fā)濃縮,從而形成膏巖沉積。這表明,利用顆粒巖厚度恢復(fù)出的古地貌得到了巖相沉積的支持,因此是可信的。

2.5 成果應(yīng)用I:指導(dǎo)相鄰層系的沉積微相分析

圖6 磨溪?dú)馓锛味?亞段A期古地貌示意圖Fig.6 The palaeogeomorphic sketch of the layer A of Jia 22 submember,Moxi gas field

對(duì)于以中短期的早期暴露為主的陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地內(nèi)部古地貌,利用此方法恢復(fù)的沉積期地貌在較長時(shí)間內(nèi)具有一定的繼承性,并控制其沉積微相的展布。如以嘉二2A沉積期后的嘉二2A期為例,圖7給出了根據(jù)實(shí)際取心資料繪制的沉積相圖,如圖可見,云坪、云坪和潮上膏云坪夾坪洼微相的沉積微地貌更高[14],沉積微相分布表明海水鹽度向北東增加,導(dǎo)致蒸發(fā)礦物含量增高,對(duì)比圖6,可見這種地貌特征是對(duì)嘉二2A期的繼承發(fā)展,說明該方法恢復(fù)的地貌可以指導(dǎo)相鄰層系的沉積微相研究。

圖7 磨溪嘉二2 B期沉積微相平面分布特征(據(jù)文獻(xiàn)[13])Fig.7 Microfacies distributional characteristics of the layer B of Jia22 submember,Moxigas field

圖8 磨溪?dú)馓锛味? B期孔隙度>6%的儲(chǔ)層累計(jì)厚度等值線圖Fig.8 Gross thinkness contourmap of reservoirs(porosity is higher than 6%) in the layer B of Jia22 submember,Moxigas field

2.6 成果應(yīng)用II:指導(dǎo)儲(chǔ)層精細(xì)研究及勘探開發(fā)部署

巖芯實(shí)測(cè)物性統(tǒng)計(jì)表明,位于古地貌高處的區(qū)域,儲(chǔ)層孔隙度值在5%～18%之間,平均孔隙度在9%左右,儲(chǔ)層有效厚度大;相比而言,位于古地貌低處的區(qū)域,水動(dòng)力條件弱,顆粒巖不發(fā)育,儲(chǔ)層質(zhì)量差,孔隙度值僅在3%左右,儲(chǔ)層有效厚度小。

圖9 磨溪嘉二氣田產(chǎn)能分布圖Fig.9 Capacity distribution of Moxi gas field

考慮到微地貌具有繼承性發(fā)展特征,因此微地貌高地也會(huì)控制相鄰時(shí)期優(yōu)質(zhì)儲(chǔ)層的分布格局,如根據(jù)嘉二2B期孔隙度大于6%的儲(chǔ)層累計(jì)厚度,優(yōu)質(zhì)儲(chǔ)層的分布與嘉二2B期的古地貌高地具明顯的相關(guān)性,雖然由于嘉二2B晚期向北東方向鹽度增加,膏質(zhì)沉淀充填導(dǎo)致儲(chǔ)層相對(duì)變差,但不改變其分布格局(圖8),該期的優(yōu)質(zhì)儲(chǔ)層相應(yīng)發(fā)育于磨151-磨22及磨207等高地。

受沉積期鹽度向北東增加的影響,儲(chǔ)層質(zhì)量和厚度與之相適應(yīng),東北部的高地相對(duì)儲(chǔ)層較差,而中部高地鹽度較低,儲(chǔ)層質(zhì)量好,實(shí)際試油資料也表明嘉二氣藏產(chǎn)能高的井基本上都位于中部磨151-磨22、磨160這兩個(gè)古地貌高地及附近,氣井日產(chǎn)能一般在十幾萬立方米/日～幾十萬立方米/日(圖9)。因此,古地貌恢復(fù)結(jié)果可對(duì)生產(chǎn)提供指導(dǎo)。

3 結(jié)論

(1)陸表海碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地沉積期古地貌的恢復(fù)可利用等時(shí)地質(zhì)體內(nèi)的顆粒巖累計(jì)厚度來近似恢復(fù),特別是對(duì)于未暴露和中短期暴露灘效果尤佳,具體研究步驟為:顆粒巖沉積為主體的等時(shí)地質(zhì)體選取、儲(chǔ)層成因確定、暴露時(shí)間確定、沉積期地貌恢復(fù),以及成果檢驗(yàn)應(yīng)用。

(2)在磨溪?dú)馓锛味?B期的應(yīng)用結(jié)果表明,陸表海臺(tái)地內(nèi)沉積期微地貌在較長時(shí)間內(nèi)可繼承發(fā)展,并控制相鄰層序沉積、儲(chǔ)層的分布格局,其生產(chǎn)應(yīng)用效果良好,說明對(duì)于井網(wǎng)密度大的開發(fā)階段氣田的沉積、儲(chǔ)層精細(xì)描述是一種有效輔助手段。

(3)由于臺(tái)地內(nèi)灘相薄儲(chǔ)層厚度小于地震的垂直分別率,因此采用沉積期古地貌恢復(fù)這一方法間接預(yù)測(cè)儲(chǔ)層發(fā)育概率,尤其適用于鉆探程度高、資料老、缺乏三孔隙度測(cè)井系列的老區(qū),對(duì)于儲(chǔ)層預(yù)測(cè)和新層挖潛具有重要意義。

References)

1 代金友,何順利。鄂爾多斯盆地中部氣田奧陶系古地貌研究[J]。石油學(xué)報(bào),2005,26(3):37-43[Dai Jinyou,He Shunli.Ordovician paleokarst landform of central gas field in Ordos basin[J].cta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(3):37-43]

2 趙俊興,陳洪德,時(shí)志強(qiáng)。古地貌恢復(fù)技術(shù)方法及其研究意義——以鄂爾多斯盆地侏羅紀(jì)沉積前古地貌研究為例[J]。成都理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2001,28(3):260-261[Zhao Junxing,Chen Hongde,Shi Zhiqiang.The way and implications of rebuilding palaeogeomorphology-taking the research of palaeogeomorphology of the Ordos ba-sin before Jurassic deposition as example[J].hengdu University of Technology News,2001,28(3):260-261]

3 吳麗艷,陳春強(qiáng),江春明,等。淺談我國油氣勘探中的古地貌恢復(fù)技術(shù)[J]。石油天然氣學(xué)報(bào),2005,27(4):559-563[Wu Liyan, Chen Chunqiang,Jiang Chunming,et al.Paleogeomorphic restoring techniques in China's hydrocarbon exploration[J].ournal of Oil and Gas Technology,2005,27(4):559-563]

4 王家豪,王華,趙忠新,等。層序地層學(xué)應(yīng)用于古地貌分析——以塔河油田為例[J]。地球科學(xué),2003,28(4):426-430[Wang Jiahao,Wang Hua,Zhao Zhongxin,et al.Sequence stratigraphy in paleogeomorphy analysis:An example from the Tahe oilfield[J].arth Science,2003,28(4):426-430]

5 樊太亮,李衛(wèi)東。層序地層應(yīng)用于陸相油藏預(yù)測(cè)的成功實(shí)例[J]。石油學(xué)報(bào),1999,20(2):12-20[Fan Tailiang,LiWeidong.A successful case on sequence stratigraphy applied to the prediction of non marine oil reservoir[J].cta Petrolei Sinica,1999,20(2):12-20]

6 趙俊興,陳洪德,向芳。高分辨率層序地層學(xué)方法在沉積前古地貌恢復(fù)中的應(yīng)用[J]。成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào):自然科學(xué)版,2003,30 (1):76-82[Zhao Junxing,Chen Hongde,Xiang Fang.The possibility of rebuilding paleogeomorphy before basin deposition by high resolution sequence stratigraphy[J].hengdu University of Technology News:Science Edition,2003,30(1):76-82]

7 譚秀成,劉曉光,陳景山,等。磨溪?dú)馓锛味侮懕砗Ｌ妓猁}巖臺(tái)地內(nèi)灘體發(fā)育規(guī)律[J]。沉積學(xué)報(bào),2009,27(5):56-62[Tan Xiucheng,Liu Xiaoguang,Chen Jingshan,et al.Shoal development within the epicontinental carbonate platform,Jia2 Member,Lower Triassic,Moxigas field,central Sichuan Basin[J].cta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(5):56-62]

8 趙路子。碳酸鹽巖隱蔽灘相儲(chǔ)層特征及預(yù)測(cè)模型[D]。成都:成都理工大學(xué)博士論文,2008[Zhao Luzi.Characteristics and Forecast Model of Carbonate Subtle Shoal Reservoir[D].hengdu:Doctoral Dissertation for Chengdu University of Technology,2008]

9 李鷺光。立足新起點(diǎn),再創(chuàng)新輝煌-寫在四川油氣田建成千萬噸級(jí)大油氣田之際[J]。天然氣工業(yè),2007,27(1):1-3[Li Luguang.Standing on the jumping-off point,looking forward to a new success: Written by the time 10 million tons-level Sichuan oil and gas field was built up[J].atural Gas Industry,2007,27(1):1-3]

10 四川油氣區(qū)石油地質(zhì)編寫組。中國石油地質(zhì)志(卷10。四川油氣區(qū))[M]。北京:石油工業(yè)出版社,1989:87-109[Petroleum Geology Compiling Panel of Sichuan Oil and Gas Field.Petroleum Geologyof China(volume 12,Sichuan Oil and gas field)[M].eijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1989:87-109]

11 Wilson J L.Carbonate Facies in Geologic History[C].ew York: Springer-Verlag,1986:471。

12 Arthur H Sallerdeng,Dickson J A D,Fumiaki Matsuda.Evolution and distribution of porosity associated with subaerialexposure in Upper Paleozoic platform limestones,West Texas[J].APG Bulletin, 1999,83(11):1835-1854

13 譚秀成,鄒娟,李凌,等。磨溪?dú)馓锛味侮懕砗Ｐ团_(tái)地內(nèi)沉積微相研究[J]。石油學(xué)報(bào),2008,29(2):219-225[Tan Xiucheng, Zou Juan,Li Ling,et al.Research on sedimentarymicrofacies of the epicontinental sea platform of Jia 2 Member in Moxigas field[J].cta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(2):219-225]

14 周彥,譚秀成,劉宏,等。磨溪?dú)馓锛味熙b?；?guī)r儲(chǔ)層特征及成因機(jī)制[J]。西南石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2007,29(4):30-33[Zhou Y, Tan Xiucheng,Liu Hong,et al.Oolitic limestone reservoir characteristics and its genetic mechanism of Jia 2 Member in Moxi gas field [J].outhwest Petroleum University Acta,2007,29(4):30-33]

15 譚秀成,羅冰,李凌,等。碳酸鹽巖臺(tái)地多旋回沉積小層精細(xì)劃分對(duì)比方法研究——以川中磨溪構(gòu)造嘉二段為例[J]。地層學(xué)雜志,2008,32(2):207-212[Tan Xiucheng,Luo Bing,Li Ling,et al.Fine subdivision and correlation ofmulti-cycle carbonate platform successions:A case study of the second member of the Jialingjiang Formation in the Moxi structure,central Sichuan province[J].ournal of Stratigraphy,2008,32(2):207-212]

16 Laboratory simulation ofmoldic porosity formation(in AAPG 2006 annual convention;abstracts volume,Anonymous,)[C].bstracts: Annual Meeting-American Association of Petroleum Geologists,2006: 15-46

17 劉宏,譚秀成,周彥,等。顆粒碳酸鹽巖測(cè)井相及其對(duì)灘相儲(chǔ)層的指示意義[J]。天然氣地球科學(xué),2007,18(4):30-33[Liu Hong,Tan Xiucheng,Zhou Yan,et al.Logging facies of granular carbonate rocks and its implication on reservoir evaluation[J].atural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(4):30-33]

18 譚秀成。多旋回復(fù)雜碳酸鹽巖儲(chǔ)層地質(zhì)模型——以川中磨溪構(gòu)造嘉二氣藏為例[D]。成都:成都理工大學(xué)博士論文,2008[Tan Xiucheng.Geological Model of Complicated Carbonate Reservoir with Multi-cycle[D].hengdu:Doctoral Dissertation for Chengdu University of Tecnology,2008]

Research on the M ethod of Recoverying M icrotopography of Epeiric Carbonate Platform in Depositional Stage:A case study from the layer A of Jia 22Member in Moxi Gas Field,Sichuan Basin

TAN Xiu-cheng1,2NIE Yong2LIU Hong2ZHOU Yan2LILing2ZHAO Lu-zi3ZHANG Ben-jian4FENG Yu4
(1.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exp loitation,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500; 2.College of Resovoir and Environment,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu,610500; 3.Exp loration Department Southwest Oil and Gas Field Com pany,Chengdu,610051; 4.Northwest Sichuan M ining District,Southwest Oil and Gas Filed Com pany,PetroChina Jiangyou,Sichuan 621700; 5.Central Sichuan M ining District,Southwest Oil and Gas Field Com pany,PetraChina Suining,Sichuan 629000)

Themicrotopography difference of the epeiric carbonate platform in the depositional stage is so tiny,as a result,it is too hard to identify.This paper is then,firstly,mainly based on the development dominating factors of the grain shoal within the platform,and then points out that the microtopography highland tends to be beyond the wave base in the relative-regression stage,where the grain shoal develops.The depositional rate is higher than any othermicrofacies area within the platform,hence,the topography differencewas enhanced at that stage.Besides,after the sedimentation of the grain shoal,the grain-supported framework forms under the influence of physical compaction,where the compaction rate ismuch lower than the finer sediments,so the depositional thickness resulted from the topography difference of variousmicrofacies areas is also further enhanced,which shows that the grainstone thicknesswithin a certain period of time can be used,approximately,in recovering itsmicrotopography prominence when it began to present,and that the compaction correction can be ignored when approximately recovering themicrotopography within the platform at the depositional stage.It then further analyses the effects on the grain shoal construction and reservoir development by the exposure process during the depositional stage,and it divides the shoalwithin the epeiric platform into three genetic types:unexposed shoal,short-medium-term exposed shoal and long-term exposed shoal,meanwhile, pointing out that themethod of grainstone gross-thicknesswhich is used,approximately,in recovering the depositional palaeogeomorphology of epeiric carbonate platform is preferable for the unexposed and short-medium-term exposed shoals,where themain characteristics of the short-medium term exposed shoal can be concluded as follows(contrarily be long-term exposure):①unconformity characteristic limited,palaeosol lacks;②irregular karren and corroded fissure lack;③intargranular solution extremely develops;④the freshwater cements in early stage and cementunconformity exist;⑤lens-diagenesis reservoir of atmospheric genesis positively associates with the grainstone gross-thickness.Based on this,the paper then takes the view thatmicrotopography prominence can be inverted by the reservoir study of the grain shoal.Followed by that principle,italso suggestes that the concrete study procedure can be like this:the isochronous geologic body to be chosen as themain body of grainstone deposition,the confirmation of reservoir genesis and exposured time,the topography recovering during depositional stage and the application of achievement verification.

Sichuan Basin was characterized by developing epeiric carbonate platform during the period of Jialingjiang in early Triassic.The basin was also hit by an fierce transgression in the period of early Jia 22,which made the salinity of the seawater normal on the whole.Moxi gas field locates in the south of gentle-oblique tectonic zone of the palaeohigh in the central of the basin,where the tectonic body is about 280 km2,and the exploration wells penetrating the Jia 2 member sum up to42(data by 2005),ofwhich the total cored wells of Jia 2member sum up to 16,besides,the distribution is relatively uniform.Hence,the gas field was used in the case study,where the result indicates that highland mainly develop in the well areas of eastern side of Mo 24-Mo 205,southern side of Mo 206,the rim of Mo 207,Mo 151-Mo 36,Mo 208 and its southern part,Mo 48,Northern part of Mo 202(7 in all),which distribute in the direction of southwest-northeast,swalesmainly develop in Mo 12-Mo 201,Mo 005-2-Mo 150,southern part ofMo 22 and eastern part of Mo 206.here is thick deposition of underwater-gypsum(dark-gray and massive gypsum,no exposed marks found)developing in the well areas of Mo 005-2-Mo 150,Mo 207,which has come into being by the shoal development around themicro-highland,resulting in the sealing restrict of the low-lying environment of interbank sea and the evaporation and concentation of the waterbody,the gypsum deposition therefore comes into being.It can be believed from the above that the recovery of the palaeogeomorphology by taking advantage of the grainstone thickness can be supported by the lithofacies deposition。

According to the graph of sedimentary facies compiled by actual cored data of B Formation,Jia 22Sub-member, the palaeogeomorphology during early sedimentary stage carries on developing in the stage of Jia 22B.dominating the distributing framework of its sedimentation and reservoir.The result indicates that this sort ofmethod used in recovering themicrotopography during depositional stage is applied to the characteristics of lithofacies and so on。,besides, the recovered microtopography in the sedimentary stage can not only continue to successively develop over a long period of time and can also dominate the deposition of adjacent stratigraphy and the framework of reservoir distribution, furthermore,relatively speaking,its production application effect is good,which also indicates that dedicate description of sedimentation and reservoir is an effective and adjuvantmeasure for those gas fields at developing stage with high density ofwell pattern and that this kind ofmethod should be widely popularized,especially for those maturing basin fieldswith high level ofwell exploration,data that is out of date,rare tri-porosity logging series,all of these are significant and also has referenced significance for the reservoir prediction and tapping the new potential formation。

Epeiric Sea;carbonate platform;microtopography during depositional stage;grain shoal;Jialingjiang Formation;Triassic,Moxi Gas Field;Sichuan Basin

譚秀成 男 1970年出生 博士 副教授 儲(chǔ)層沉積學(xué) E-mail:tanxiucheng70@163.om

P512.2

A

1000-0550(2011)03-0486-09

①四川省重點(diǎn)學(xué)科建設(shè)項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):SZD0414)資助。

2010-05-26;收修改稿日期:2010-08-20