Down syndrome and the molecular pathogenesis resulting from trisomy of human chromosome 21

Arti Rupreli, Frnces Wisemn, Olivi Shepprd,Victor L.J. Tyulewicz, Elizeth M.C. Fisher*

aDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK bMRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, London, UK

INTRODUCTION

Down Syndrome (DS) is the consequence of trisomy of human chromosome 21 (Hsa21) and is the most common genetic form of intellectual disability,occurring in approximately 1 in 700 live births[1]. DS is characterised by invariant features that are common to all affected individuals, including mild-to-moderate learning disabilities, craniofacial abnormalities and hypotonia[2,3]. In addition, at least 80 other variable phenotypes that affect only a proportion of DS individuals have been described, such as an earlyonset of Alzheimer's disease, atrioventricular septal heart defects, acute megakaryoblastic leukemia and a decrease in the incidence of some solid tumours[4-7].Significant advances in medical treatment and social care have increased the average life span of people with DS to greater than 60 years[8].

The additional copy of Hsa21 results in elevated expression of many of the genes encoded on this chromosome, with varying expression levels in different tissues[9-11]. The increased dosage of Hsa21 genes, and the dosage imbalance between Hsa21 and non-Hsa21 genes has been proposed to cause the plethora of phenotypic alterations that characterize DS. The gene-rich distal part of Hsa21, identified as the 'Down syndrome critical region' (DSCR), was initially proposed to be sufficient to cause most of these DS phenotypes[12-14]. However, accumulating evidence points against a single DSCR[14,15]. Current data suggest that a number of 'susceptibility regions'located on Hsa21, which are modified by other loci on Hsa21 and elsewhere in the genome, increase the risk of developing specific DS associated phenotypes[14,15].

Mouse models of DS are instrumental in identifying which genes contribute to DS phenotypes, and unraveling the mechanisms by which these phenotypes arise[16-24]. Hsa21 is syntenic to three regions of the mouse genome. Most of the genes on Hsa21 have homologous genes on mouse chromosome 16(Mmu16), but two smaller gene rich regions have synteny on Mmu10 and Mmu17 (Fig. 1). The majority of mouse models used for DS research are either trisomic for large regions of Mmu16, 10, 17 or are transgenic animals used to investigate overexpression of a single gene[16-32]. The Tc1 mouse model, with which we mainly work, carries a freely segregating almost complete copy of Hsa21, in addition to a normal complement of the mouse chromosome[33].

In this review, we highlight recent developments in understanding how overexpression of Hsa21 genes leads to many of the features of DS. We focus on key areas including brain, heart and cancer, as these are currently the most developed in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of DS.

RECENT BREAKTHROUGHS IN OUR UNDERSTANDING OF PHENOTYPES ARISING FROM TRISOMY HSA21

Learning and Memory

Fig. 1 Mouse models of Hsa21 trisomy. Hsa21 (purple) is syntenic with regions of mouse chromosomes 16 (Mmu16, blue), 17(Mmu17, orange) and 10 (Mmu10, green). The positions of some Hsa21 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of DS and mentioned in this text are shown on the human chromosome. The transchromosomic Tc1 model carries a freely segregating copy of Hsa21 and is trisomic for the majority of genes on Hsa21[33]. Several mouse models are syntenic with a proportion of genes on Hsa21 and are segmentally trisomic for regions of Mmu16, such as the Dp1Yu[18], Ts65Dn[25], Ts2Cje[23], Ts1Cje[24], and Ts1Rhr[19] models. The Ts1Yah mouse model[22] is syntenic to Mmu17 and is trisomic for the sub-telomeric region of Hsa21.

People with DS have learning and memory problems and exhibit differences in brain structure compared to the euploid population[34-39]. Mouse models of DS recapitulate these neuroanatomical changes and behavioural deficits, and thus can be used to further our understanding of learning and memory in people with DS[25]. The Ts65Dn mouse model of DS is trisomic for approximately 136 genes on Mmu16 that have homologues on Hsa21[25](Fig. 1). These mice have learning and memory phenotypes and it has been proposed that excess inhibition of synaptic transmission may contribute to their deficits[25,40]. Recent papers have shown that the structure of receptors and their abundance at inhibitory synapses is altered in the hippocampus of Ts65Dn mice, which provides insight into the neurological changes that may underlie their DS-associated memory problems[41,42]. In addition, impaired synaptic plasticity was recently demonstrated in Ts65Dn striatal cholinergic interneurons[43], highlighting a potentially novel and important role for the interstriatal cholinergic system in the pathophysiology of DS-associated motor and cognitive defects. The Tc1 mouse model of DS, which is trisomic for approximately 80% Hsa21 genes, has short-term but not long-term deficits in hippocampal-dependent learning and abnormalities in long-term potentiation(LTP), which is proposed to be a physiological correlate of learning[33,44]. Interestingly, although Tc1 mice display major deficits in cerebellum-dependent learning tasks, no abnormalities in synaptic function or in cerebellar long-term depression can be detected in this model[45].

In the Ts1Rhr mouse model (Fig. 1), trisomy of 33 Mmu16 genes that are syntenic to the DSCR and include dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylationregulated kinase 1A (Dyrk1A), potassium inwardlyrectifying channel, subfamily J, member 6 Gene(Girk2) and single-minded homologue 2 (Sim2), cause alterations in dendritic spine morphology and deficits in some behavioural tests[46](Table 1). Trisomy of these genes is necessary but not sufficient to elicit Morris water maze learning deficits in mouse DS models[13].These data indicate that interactions of Hsa21 trisomic genes may contribute to DS-associated learning and memory problems. Trisomy of 12 genes (Abcg1-U2af1) found on the Hsa21 sub-telomeric region in Ts1Yah mice (Fig. 1), produced cognitive defects in working and short-term recognition memory, but an enhancement of hippocampal-dependent spatial learning[22]. This study is pivotal in showing that variation in copy number is not always deleterious.

The over-expression of a number of Hsa21 genes has been implicated in learning and memory deficits in single gene transgenic mouse models, suggesting that trisomy of these genes may contribute to learning disability in DS individuals. These genes include DYRK1A, synaptojanin 1(SYNJ1) and SIM2[26,28-32,47,48].Recent evidence has emerged for a possible role in brain function of dopey family member 2 (DOPEY2)[49]and Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DSCAM)[50],two Hsa21 genes known to be involved in learning and memory.

Neurodevelopment

Neurodevelopment is known to be altered in people with DS. Already by mid-gestation the brains offetuses with DS are smaller than those which do not have the condition. Cerebellar granule cells in Ts65Dn mice have reduced proliferation rates and elongation of the cell cycle length which could potentially result in a decrease in brain mass[51]; the number of these cells is also reduced in the Tc1 mouse model[33].Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from the Ts1Cje mouse model also exhibit similar defects as well as an increase in cell death[52]. The Ts1Cje and Ts2Cje mouse models have smaller brains, hypoplasia of the cerebellum, enlarged ventricles and decreased neurogenesis compared to euploid littermates[53].The common region that is trisomic between these two mouse models contains approximately 86 genes(Fig.1), suggesting that this trisomic segment contains the causal dosage-sensitive genes for these detrimental developmental phenotypes[53,54]. The decreased proliferation of cerebellar granule cells observed in the Ts65Dn mice has been attributed to a deficient mitotic response to the Sonic hedgehog (Shh) growth factor[55].An altered response to Shh has also been demonstrated in Ts65Dn neural crest progenitor cells, and this may contribute to the craniofacial dysmorphology that is associated with DS[56,57].

Table 1 Chromosome 21 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of DS phenotypes

Elevated rates of neuronal apoptosis related to oxidative stress have been reported in DS[58]. Recent work suggests that Hsa21-encoded proteins PREP1,a transcription factor involved in the regulation of organism size[59], and tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3 (TTC3), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets AKT,a serine/threonine-protein kinase, may contribute to this phenotype[60]. Moreover, recent research provides evidence that oxidative stress is elevated in the Ts1Cje mouse, suggesting that one or more genes trisomic in this model, likely contribute to DS-associated oxidative stress[61]. Interestingly, aneuploidy of chromosomes other than Hsa21 also results in elevated apoptosis and reduced cellular proliferation[62,63].

Recently, it was proposed that DYRK1A contributes to DS neural phenotypes, such as impaired dendritic growth, by disturbing neuron-restrictive silencer factor (REST/NRSF) levels[27,64]. MicroRNAs encoded by Hsa21 may also influence development of the brain; specifically trisomy of miR-155 and miR-802 has been suggested to regulate the expression of the methyl-CpG-binding-protein gene (MECP2), which is known to be important in neurodevelopment[65].

Pharmacological interventions to tackle brain and cognition in DS

This is a relatively new area of research in DS that is rapidly gaining momentum, and which arises from experiments carried out in mouse models in which behavioural, neurophysiological and cellular biology changes can be quantitatively assessed during development and ageing, and then modified through pharmacological intervention.

Several pharmacological interventions to enhance cognition in people with DS have been suggested, based upon efficacy in the Ts65Dn mouse (Table 2). Chronic treatment with gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor antagonists,picrotoxin or pentylenetetrazole, improved hippocampal-based learning and LTP deficits in Ts65Dn animals[40,66,67]. The GABA-ergic system regulates neuronal excitability throughout the nervous system and plays a significant role in cognition.Memantine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, has also been documented to improve learning in Ts65Dn mice[68],and is currently undergoing a clinical trial in a large group of DS patients[69]. Some clinical trials of Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that is proposed to improve cholinergic neurotransmission,have reported small improvements in a subset of measures of cognition in people with DS[70-72];however, not all Donepezil trials have demonstrated a statistically significant effect[73-76].

Recently, other pathways that modulate learning and memory have been examined with interest.Norepinephrine signaling in the hippocampus has been suggested to be impaired in the Ts65Dn mice because of degeneration of the locus coeruleus[77,78].In this model, learning deficits were reversed by treatment with a norepinephrine prodrug, L-DOPS, orxamoterol, a β1-adrenergic receptor partial antagonist.Interestingly, epigallocatechin gallate (ECGC), a natural polyphenol found in green tea leaves and is a specific inhibitor of DYRK1A, has been shown to attenuate cognitive defects arising from DYRK1A over-expression in transgenic mice[79]. Therapeutic interventions aimed at targeting oxidative imbalance report promising effects. Long-term supplementation with the antioxidant Vitamin E has been reported to partially rescue cognitive and morphological abnormalities in Ts65Dn mice[80], and reduce the oxidation state of S100 calcium binding protein beta(S100β), an Hsa21-encoded protein that is neurotoxic when in a reduced state[81].

Table 2 Pharmacological interventions to tackle cognitive deficits in DS

Neurogenesis impairments in the Ts65Dn mice have been rescued by prenatal treatment with the mood-stabiliser, lithium, and by use of the antidepressant, fluoxetine[82,83]. Developmental delays and glial deficits in the Ts65Dn mouse model have been demonstrated to be partially reversed through prenatal treatment with neuroprotective peptides NAPVSIPQ+SALLRSIPA[84]. These results indicate that therapies during pregnancy could potentially improve developmental and glial deficits in DS.

The current findings are based on a thorough understanding of neuronal and cognitive deficits in mouse models of DS and are exciting in the therapeutic opportunities they offer. However, as with all pharmacological interventions, caution must be taken in translating findings from mice to humans.

Alzheimer Disease in DS

A high incidence of early-onset Alzheimer Disease(AD) occurs in people with DS, with 30-70% of DS individuals developing dementia by the age of 60[4,85-87]. AD pathology is characterized by brain atrophy, extracellular β-amyloid (Aβ) deposits and the accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs)that are composed of hyperphosphorylated Tau. The amyloid precursor protein, amyloid precursor protein(APP), from which Aβ is produced, is encoded on Hsa21. In DS, the triplication of APP is proposed to be the underlying mechanism through which trisomy 21 individuals demonstrate an increased frequency of dementia[88-90].

Neurodegenerative phenotypes have also been observed in animal models of DS[77,91-94]. In particular,loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs)occurs early in AD and is also observed in the Ts65Dn mouse[92,93,95]. Degeneration of these cells is related to a failure in the retrograde transport of nerve growth factor (NGF), and may arise from trisomy of APP[92]. Increased APP expression is also linked to enlargement of early endosomes . Recently, it was reported that lowering the expression of APP or beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1), reversed endocytic abnormalities in fibroblasts derived from people with DS, and the over-expression of APP alone resulted in early endosome enlargements[100]. These data suggest that triplication of APP is sufficient to cause endosomal deficits, in contrast to previous reports[97]. Hsa21 genes other than APP may also contribute to endosomal phenotypes, in particular,overexpression of Hsa21 gene homologues in Drosophila, dap160/ITSN1 (intersectin1), synj/SYNJ1 and nla/RCAN1 (runt-related tremscripthon factor 1),results in abnormal synaptic morphology and impaired vesicle recycling[92,101].

Other Hsa21 trisomic genes may also contribute to AD through different mechanisms. DYRK1A,an Hsa21 encoded kinase, phosphorylates Tau at a key priming site which may mediate its AD-related hyperphosphorylation in people with DS[102].DYRK1A can also phosphorylate APP[103]. Indeed,increased phosphorylation of Tau has been reported in the Ts1Cje mouse model of DS that is not trisomic for APP[104](Fig. 1). Mis-regulated splicing of Tau may contribute to NFT formation in AD[105,106]. PCBP3,an Hsa21 protein, modifies splicing of Tau and may contribute to the expression of AD associated Tau isoforms in people with DS[107]. Recently, degeneration of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum of aged Ts65Dn mice, proximal to deposits of Aβ and Tau, has been observed[94,108].

Other neurological disorders

Six percent of children and adolescents with DS have epileptic seizures[109]. Children with DS are also susceptible to infantile spasms, however little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying this. Treating Ts65Dn mice with GABA(B) receptor agonists induced a phenotype reminiscent of infantile spasms, providing a model to further understand the pathogenesis of this phenotype[110]. Moyamoya syndrome, a cerebrovascular condition that is characterized by reduced blood flow predisposing to stroke[111], has been reported to occur with a higher frequency in people with DS than in the general population[112]. Recently, the expression of β-catenin was found to be increased in brain capillary endothelial cells in the Ts65Dn mouse model,however whether this finding is linked to Moyamoya syndrome is as yet unclear[113,114].

People with DS have been reported to experience disturbed sleeping patterns. Studies of circadian activity in the Ts65Dn mouse model have reported conflicting results of both intact and disturbed rhythms[117]. Future studies of this phenotype in alternative mouse models of DS will thus be of value.

Cancer and leukemia

Children with DS have a greatly elevated risk of developing the otherwise very rare transient myeloproliferative disorder (TMD), as well as acute megakaryocytic leukemia (AMKL) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)[6,118,119]. Trisomy of Hsa21 leads to an expansion of the megakaryocyteerythroid progenitor population[120,121], which precedes the development of TMD. The development of TMD and AMKL is almost always associated with stereotypical mutations in exon 2 of the GATA binding protein 1 (GATA1) gene resulting in the synthesis of a truncated GATA1 protein termed GATA1s[6,122,123].Mutations in Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) have also been reported by several groups to be associated with AMKL[119,124-128]. Additionally, one fifth of DS-ALL cases have been associated with janus kinase 2 (JAK2)point mutations[129,130]. DS-ALL is also associated with aberrant expression of cyto kine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2) linked to genomic rearrangements[130-132].Trisomy of an Hsa21-encoded gene, v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ERG),is required for development of the myeloproliferation defect in the Ts65Dn model[133]. The Hsa21 gene runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) has also been proposed to regulate hematopoiesis via the phosphoinositide 3 (PI3)-kinase/AKT pathway[134-136].

Despite perturbations of hematopoietic development in the Ts1Cje, Ts65Dn and Tc1 models of DS,these mice do not develop leukaemia, even when the trisomic models also express disease-associated GATA1 mutations[137-139]. It is possible that trisomy of Hsa21 genes other than those encoded in these models,in concert with mutations in non-Hsa21 encoded genes such as GATA1, JAK3 or CRLF2, may be required for the development of leukemia.

Although DS is associated with a predisposition to leukemia, people with DS have a reduced risk of developing most solid tumours[7,140]. Crossing a mouse model of colon cancer, Apcmin, with mouse models of DS resulted in reduced formation of tumors,dependent on the trisomy of the Hsa21-encoded ETS2 gene[141]. Recently overexpression of the Hsa21 gene,regulator of calcineurin (RCAN1), was shown to be sufficient to suppress tumour growth by attenuating angiogenesis via the regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling[142]. However, in a Ts65Dn trisomic background removal of one copy of Rcan1 did not completely abrogate the effect of trisomy on tumour formation, suggesting that other Hsa21 genes also contribute to this phenotype[142].

Heart defects

Congenital heart defects (CHD) are prevalent in 40% of children with DS and over 50% of all atrioventricular septal heart defects (AVSDs) in infancy are attributed to trisomy Hsa21[5,143]. Mutations in cysteine-rich with EGF-like domains 1(CRELD1),a non-Hsa21 gene, contribute to the occurrence of AVSD in DS[144]. Several DS mouse models exhibit heart defects reminiscent of those in DS[18,33,63,145],suggesting that trisomic genes common to these models influence the development of the heart.Analysis of the occurrence of CHD in people who have partial trisomies of Hsa21 has suggested that trisomy of genes within a 1.77 Mb region [DSCAMZNF295 (zinc finger protein 295)] of Hsa21 may be sufficient for the development of CHD[14].

CONCLUSION

DS is complex disorder and dissecting the genetic and molecular processes underlying the syndrome requires many different complementary approaches,including the study of human data and mouse and other model organisms. However, several recent breakthroughs have increased our understanding of the effects of Hsa21 trisomy. Combining information from studies of people with DS with the power of mouse models of trisomy has enabled genetic associations to be tested and continues to lead to the identification of genes that cause DS-associated pathology. Significant advances in basic research have been instrumental in determining the molecular mechanisms underlying these phenotypes leading to useful therapeutic interventions. However, many aspects of DS crucial to the health and well-being of people with the condition remain to be investigated and require study at all levels.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Brain Research Trust, the Wellcome Trust, the UK Medical Research Council and the AnEUploidy grant from Framework Programme 6 from the European Union Commission for funding.We thank Ray Young for graphics.

[1] Gardiner K.J. Molecular basis of pharmacotherapies for cognition in Down syndrome. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010; 31： 66-73.

[2] Hassold T, Abruzzo M, Adkins K, Griffin D, Merrill M,Millie E, et al. Human aneuploidy： incidence, origin, and etiology. Environ Mol Mutagen 1996;28：167-75.

[3] Antonarakis SE, Lyle R, Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A., Deutsch S. Chromosome 21 and down syndrome：from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5：725-38.

[4] Johannsen P, Christensen JE, Mai J. The prevalence of dementia in Down syndrome. Dementia 1996;7：221-5.

[5] Freeman SB, Bean LH, Allen EG, Tinker SW, Locke AE, Druschel C, et al. Ethnicity, sex, and the incidence of congenital heart defects： a report from the National Down Syndrome Project. Genet Med 2008;10：173-80.

[6] Wechsler J, Greene M, McDevitt MA, Anastasi J, Karp JE, Le Beau MM, et al. Acquired mutations in GATA1 in the megakaryoblastic leukemia of Down syndrome.Nat Genet 2002;32：148-52.

[7] Hasle H. Pattern of malignant disorders in individuals with Down's syndrome. Lancet Oncol 2001;2： 429-36.

[8] Bittles AH, Glasson EJ. Clinical, social, and ethical implications of changing life expectancy in Down syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46：282-6.

[9] Prandini P, Deutsch S, Lyle R, Gagnebin M, Delucinge VC, Delorenzi M, et al. Natural gene-expression variation in Down syndrome modulates the outcome of gene-dosage imbalance. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81：252-63.

[10] Ait Yahya-Graison E, Aubert J, Dauphinot L, Rivals I, Prieur M, Golfier G, et al. Classification of human chromosome 21 gene-expression variations in Down syndrome： impact on disease phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81：475-91.

[11] Sultan M , Piccini I, Balzereit D, Herwig R, Saran NG,Lehrach H, et al. Gene expression variation in Down's syndrome mice allows prioritization of candidate genes.Genome Biol 2007;8：R91.

[12] Pritchard MA, Kola I. The "gene dosage effect"hypothesis versus the "amplified developmental instability" hypothesis in Down syndrome. J Neural Transm Suppl, 1999;57：293-303.

[13] Olson LE, Roper RJ, Sengstaken CL, Peterson EA,Aquino V, Galdzicki Z, et al. Trisomy for the Down syndrome 'critical region' is necessary but not sufficient for brain phenotypes of trisomic mice. Hum Mol Genet 2007;16：774-82.

[14] Korbel JO, Tirosh-Wagner T, Urban AE, Chen XN,Kasowski M, Dai L, et al. The genetic architecture of Down syndrome phenotypes revealed by highresolution analysis of human segmental trisomies. PNAS 2009;106：12031-6.

[15] Lyle R, Bena F, Gagos S, Gehrig C, Lopez G, Schinzel A, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in Down syndrome identified by array CGH in 30 cases of partial trisomy and partial monosomy chromosome 21. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17：454-66.

[16] Brault V, Besson V, Magnol L, Duchon A, Herault Y.Cre/loxP-mediated chromosome engineering of the mouse genome. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2007;178：29-48.

[17] Duchon A, Besson V, Pereira PL, Magnol L, Herault Y.Inducing segmental aneuploid mosaicism in the mouse through targeted asymmetric sister chromatid event of recombination. Genetics 2008;180：51-9.

[18] Li Z, Yu T, Morishima M, Pao A, LaDuca J, Conroy J, et al. Duplication of the entire 22.9 Mb human chromosome 21 syntenic region on mouse chromosome 16 causes cardiovascular and gastrointestinal abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet 2007;16：1359-66.

[19] Olson LE, Richtsmeier JT, Leszl J, Reeves RH. A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 2004;306：687-90.

[20] Brault V, Pereira P, Duchon A, Herault Y. Modeling chromosomes in mouse to explore the function of genes,genomic disorders, and chromosomal organization. PLoS Genet 2006;2：e86.

[21] Besson V, Brault V, Duchon A, Togbe D, Bizot JC,Quesniaux VF, et al. Modeling the monosomy for the telomeric part of human chromosome 21 reveals haploinsufficient genes modulating the inflammatory and airway responses. Hum Mol Genet 2007;16：2040-52.

[22] Pereira PL, Magnol L, Sahun I, Brault V, Duchon A,Prandini P, et al. A new mouse model for the trisomy of the Abcg1-U2af1 region reveals the complexity of the combinatorial genetic code of down syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18：4756-69.

[23] Villar AJ, Belichenko PV, Gillespie AM, Kozy HM, Mobley WC, Epstein CJ. Identification and characterization of a new Down syndrome model,Ts[Rb(12.1716)]2Cje, resulting from a spontaneous Robertsonian fusion between T(171)65Dn and mouse chromosome 12. Mamm Genome 2005;16：79-90.

[24] Sago H, Carlson EJ, Smith DJ, Kilbridge J, Rubin EM,Mobley WC, et al. Ts1Cje, a partial trisomy 16 mouse model for Down syndrome, exhibits learning and behavioral abnormalities. PNAS 1998;95：6256-61.

[25] Reeves RH, Irving NG, Moran TH, Wohn A, Kitt C,Sisodia SS, et al. A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behaviour deficits. Nat Genet 1995;11：177-84.

[26] Ahn KJ, Jeong HK, Choi HS, Ryoo SR, Kim YJ, Goo JS, et al. DYRK1A BAC transgenic mice show altered synaptic plasticity with learning and memory defects.Neurobiol Dis 2006;22：463-72.

[27] Lepagnol-Bestel AM, Zvara A, Maussion G, Quignon F, Ngimbous B, Ramoz N, et al. DYRK1A interacts with the REST/NRSF-SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex to deregulate gene clusters involved in the neuronal phenotypic traits of Down syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18：1405-14.

[28] Best TK, Siarey R J, Galdzicki Z. Ts65Dn, a mouse model of Down syndrome, exhibits increased GABAB-induced potassium current. J Neurophysiol 2007;97：892-900.

[29] Voronov SV, Frere SG, Giovedi S, Pollina EA, Borel C,Zhang H, et al. Synaptojanin 1-linked phosphoinositide dyshomeostasis and cognitive deficits in mouse models of Down's syndrome. PNAS 2008;105：9415-20.

[30] Altafaj X, Dierssen M, Baamonde C, Marti E, Visa J,Guimera J, et al. Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down's syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10：1915-23.

[31] Chrast R, Scott HS, Madani R, Huber L, Wolfer DP,Prinz M, et al. Mice trisomic for a bacterial artificial chromosome with the single-minded 2 gene (Sim2) show phenotypes similar to some of those present in the partial trisomy 16 mouse models of Down syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9：1853-64.

[32] Ema M, Ikegami S, Hosoya T, Mimura J, Ohtani H,Nakao K, et al. Mild impairment of learning and memory in mice overexpressing the mSim2 gene located on chromosome 16： an animal model of Down's syndrome.Hum Mol Genet 1999;8：1409-15.

[33] O'Doherty A, Ruf S, Mulligan C, Hildreth V, Errington ML, Cooke S, et al. An aneuploid mouse strain carrying human chromosome 21 with Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 2005;309：2033-7.

[34] Vicari S, Carlesimo GA. Short-term memory deficits are not uniform in Down and Williams syndromes.Neuropsychol Rev 2006;16：87-94.

[35] Carlesimo GA, Marotta L, Vicari S. Long-term memory in mental retardation： evidence for a specific impairment in subjects with Down's syndrome. Neuropsychologia 1997;35：71-9.

[36] Weis S, Weber G, Neuhold A, Rett A. Down syndrome：MR quantification of brain structures and comparison with normal control subjects. AJNR 1991;12：1207-11.

[37] Aylward EH, Habbak R, Warren AC, Pulsifer MB, Barta PE, Jerram M, et al. Cerebellar volume in adults with Down syndrome. Arch Neurol 1997;54：209-12.

[38] Pearlson GD, Breiter SN, Aylward EH, Warren AC,Grygorcewicz M, Frangou S, et al. MRI brain changes in subjects with Down syndrome with and without dementia. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40：326-34.

[39] Aylward EH, Li Q, Honeycutt NA, Warren AC, Pulsifer MB, Barta P E, et al. MRI volumes of the hippocampus and amygdala in adults with Down's syndrome with and without dementia. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156：564-8.

[40] Kleschevnikov AM, Belichenko PV, Villar AJ, Epstein CJ, Malenka RC, Mobley WC. Hippocampal long-term potentiation suppressed by increased inhibition in the Ts65Dn mouse, a genetic model of Down syndrome. J Neurosci 2004;24：8153-60.

[41] Belichenko PV, Masliah E, Kleschevnikov AM, Villar AJ, Epstein CJ, Salehi A, et al. Synaptic structural abnormalities in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down Syndrome. J Comp Neurol 2004;480：281-98.

[42] Belichenko PV, Kleschevnikov AM, Masliah E, Wu C, Takimoto-Kimura R, Salehi A, et al. Excitatoryinhibitory relationship in the fascia dentata in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. J Comp Neurol 2009;512：453-66.

[43] Di Filippo M, Tozzi A, Ghiglieri V, Picconi B, Costa C, Cipriani S, et al. Impaired plasticity at specific subset of striatal synapses in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. Biol Psychiatry, DOI：10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.071.(2009)

[44] Morice E, Andreae LC, Cooke SF, Vanes L, Fisher EM,Tybulewicz VL, et al. Preservation of long-term memory and synaptic plasticity despite short-term impairments in the Tc1 mouse model of Down syndrome. Learn Mem 2008;15：492-500.

[45] Galante M, Jani H, Vanes L, Daniel H, Fisher EM,Tybulewicz VL, et al. Impairments in motor coordination without major changes in cerebellar plasticity in the Tc1 mouse model of Down syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18：1449-63.

[46] Belichenko NP, Belichenko PV, Kleschevnikov AM, Salehi A, Reeves RH, Mobley WC. The "Down syndrome critical region" is sufficient in the mouse model to confer behavioral, neurophysiological, and synaptic phenotypes characteristic of Down syndrome. J Neurosci 2000;29：5938-48.

[47] Best TK, Cho-Clark M, Siarey RJ, Galdzicki Z.Speeding of miniature excitatory post-synaptic currents in Ts65Dn cultured hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett 2008;438：356-61.

[48] Meng X, Shi J, Peng B, ZouX, Zhang C. Effect of mouse Sim2 gene on the cell cycle of PC12 cells. Cell Biol Int 2006;30：349-53.

[49] Rachidi M, Delezoide AL, Delabar JM, Lopes C. A quantitative assessment of gene expression (QAGE)reveals differential overexpression of DOPEY2, a candidate gene for mental retardation, in Down syndrome brain regions. Int J Dev Neurosci 2009;27：393-8.

[50] Yu HH, Yang JS, Wang J, Huang Y, Lee T. Endodomain diversity in the Drosophila Dscam and its roles in neuronal morphogenesis. J Neurosci 2009;29：1904-14.

[51] Contestabile A, Fila T, Bartesaghi R, Ciani E. Cell cycle elongation impairs proliferation of cerebellar granule cell precursors in the Ts65Dn mouse, an animal model for Down syndrome. Brain Pathol 2009;19： 224-37.

[52] Moldrich RX, Dauphinot L, Laffaire J, Vitalis T, Herault Y, Beart PM, et al. Proliferation deficits and gene expression dysregulation in Down's syndrome (Ts1Cje)neural progenitor cells cultured from neurospheres. J Neurosci Res 2009;87：3143-52.

[53] Ishihara K, Amano K, Takaki E, Shimohata A, Sago H,Epstein J, et al. Enlarged brain ventricles and impaired neurogenesis in the Ts1Cje and Ts2Cje mouse models of Down syndrome. Cereb Cortex DOI：10.1093/cercor/bhp176. (2009)

[54] Laffaire J, Rivals I, Dauphinot L, Pasteau F, Wehrle R,Larrat B, et al. Gene expression signature of cerebellar hypoplasia in a mouse model of Down syndrome during postnatal development. BMC Genomics 2009;10：138.

[55] Roper RJ, Baxter LL, Saran NG, Klinedinst DK,Beachy PA, Reeves RH. Defective cerebellar response to mitogenic Hedgehog signaling in Down [corrected]syndrome mice. PNAS 2006;103：1452-6.

[56] Roper RJ, VanHorn JF, Cain CC, Reeves RH. A neural crest deficit in Down syndrome mice is associated with deficient mitotic response to Sonic hedgehog. Mech Dev 2009;126;212-9.

[57] Richtsmeier JT, Baxter LL, Reeves RH. Parallels of craniofacial maldevelopment in Down syndrome and Ts65Dn mice. Dev Dyn 2000;217：137-45.

[58] Busciglio J, Yankner BA. Apoptosis and increased generation of reactive oxygen species in Down's syndrome neurons in vitro. Nature 1995;378：776-9.

[59] Micali N, Longobardi E, Iotti G, Ferrai C, Castagnaro L, Ricciardi M, et al. Down syndrome fibroblasts and mouse Prep1-overexpressing cells display increased sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Nucleic Acids Res DOI：10.1093/nar/gkq019.(2010)

[60] Suizu F, Hiramuki Y, Okumura F, Matsuda M, Okumura AJ, Hirata N, et al. The E3 ligase TTC3 facilitates ubiquitination and degradation of phosphorylated Akt.Dev Cell 2009;17：800-10.

[61] Ishihara K, Amano K, Takaki E, Ebrahim AS, Shimohata A, Shibazaki N, et al. Increased lipid peroxidation in Down's syndrome mouse models. J Neurochem 2009;110：1965-76.

[62] Kai Y, Wang CC, Kishigami S, Kazuki Y, Abe S,Takiguchi M, et al. Enhanced apoptosis during early neuronal differentiation in mouse ES cells with autosomal imbalance. Cell Res 2009;19：247-58.

[63] Williams AD, Mjaatvedt CH, Moore CS.Characterization of the cardiac phenotype in neonatal Ts65Dn mice. Dev Dyn 2008：237：426-35.

[64] Canzonetta C, Mulligan C, Deutsch S, Ruf S, O'Doherty A, Lyle R, et al. DYRK1A-dosage imbalance perturbs NRSF/REST levels, deregulating pluripotency and embryonic stem cell fate in Down syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2008;83：388-400.

[65] Kuhn DE, Nuovo GJ, Terry AV, Jr, Martin MM,Malana GE, Sansom SE, et al. Chromosome 21-derived microRNAs provide an etiological basis for aberrant protein expression in human Down syndrome brains. J Biol Chem 2010;285：1529-43.

[66] Fernandez F, Morishita W, Zuniga E, Nguyen J, Blank M, Malenka RC, et al. Pharmacotherapy for cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Nat Neurosci 2007;10：411-3.

[67] Rueda N, Florez J, Martinez-Cue C. Chronic pentylenetetrazole but not donepezil treatment rescues spatial cognition in Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome. Neurosci Lett 2008;433：22-7.

[68] Costa AC, Scott-McKean JJ, Stasko MR. Acute injections of the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine rescue performance deficits of the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome on a fear conditioning test.Neuropsychopharmacology 2008;33：1624-32.

[69] Mohan M, Bennett C, Carpenter PK. Memantine for dementia in people with Down syndrome. Cochrane.Database.Syst.Rev., DOI： 10.1002/14651858.CD007657. (2009)

[70] Spiridigliozzi GA, Heller JH, Crissman BG, Sullivan-Saarela JA, Eells R, Dawson D, et al. Preliminary study of the safety and efficacy of donepezil hydrochloride in children with Down syndrome： a clinical report series.Am J Med Genet A2007;143A：1408-13.

[71] Heller JH, Spiridigliozzi GA, Sullivan JA, Doraiswamy PM, Krishnan RR, Kishnani PS, Donepezil for the treatment of language deficits in adults with Down syndrome： a preliminary 24-week open trial. Am J Med Genet A 2003;116A：111-6.

[72] Heller JH, Spiridigliozzi GA, Doraiswamy PM, Sullivan JA, Crissman BG, Kishnani PS. Donepezil effects on language in children with Down syndrome： results of the first 22-week pilot clinical trial. Am J Med Genet A 2004;130A：325-6.

[73] Johnson N, Fahey C, Chicoine B, Chong G, Gitelman D.Effects of donepezil on cognitive functioning in Down syndrome. Am J Ment Retard 2003;108：367-72.

[74] Lott IT, Osann K, Doran E, Nelson L. Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease： response to donepezil. Arch Neurol 2002;59：1133-6.

[75] Prasher VP, Huxley A, Haque MS. A 24-week, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease--pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 2002;17：270-8.

[76] Kishnani PS, Sommer BR, Handen BL, Seltzer B,Capone GT, Spiridigliozzi GA, et al. The efficacy,safety, and tolerability of donepezil for the treatment of young adults with Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A：1641-54.

[77] Salehi A, Faizi M, Colas D, Valletta J, Laguna J, Takimoto-Kimura R, et al. Restoration of norepinephrine-modulated contextual memory in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Science Translational Medicine 1, 7ra17. DOI：10.1126/scitranslmed.3000258(2009).

[78] Wiseman FK. Cognitive enhancement therapy for a model of Down syndrome. Science Translational Medicine 1, 7ps9. DOI：10.1126/scitranslmed.3000449.(2009)

[79] Guedj F, Sebrie C, Rivals I, Ledru A, Paly E, Bizot JC, et al. Green tea polyphenols rescue of brain defects induced by overexpression of DYRK1A. PLoS.One 4,e4606. DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0004606.(2009)

[80] Lockrow J, Prakasam A, Huang P, Bimonte-Nelson H,Sambamurti K, Granholm AC. Cholinergic degeneration and memory loss delayed by vitamin E in a Down syndrome mouse model. Exp Neurol 2009;216：278-89.

[81] Bialowas-McGoey LA, Lesicka A, Whitaker-Azmitia PM. Vitamin E increases S100B-mediated microglial activation in an S100B-overexpressing mouse model of pathological aging. Glia 2008;56：1780-90.

[82] Bianchi P, Ciani E, Contestabile A, Guidi S, Bartesaghi R. Lithium restores neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of the Ts65Dn mouse, a model for Down syndrome.Brain Pathol DOI： 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00246.x.(2009).

[83] Clark S, Schwalbe J, Stasko MR, Yarowsky PJ, Costa AC. Fluoxetine rescues deficient neurogenesis in hippocampus of the Ts65Dn mouse model for Down syndrome. Exp Neurol 2006;200：256-61.

[84] Toso L, Cameroni I, Roberson R, Abebe D, Bissell S, Spong CY. Prevention of developmental delays in a Down syndrome mouse model. Obstet.Gynecol 2008;112：1242-51.

[85] Holland AJ, Hon J, Huppert FA, Stevens F. Incidence and course of dementia in people with Down's syndrome： findings from a population-based study. J Intellect Disabil Res 2000;44 ( Pt 2)：138-46.

[86] Holland AJ, Hon J, Huppert FA, Stevens F, Watson P. Population-based study of the prevalence and presentation of dementia in adults with Down's syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 1998;172：493-8.

[87] Coppus A, Evenhuis H, Verberne GJ, Visser F, van Gool P, Eikelenboom P, et al. Dementia and mortality in persons with Down's syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res 2006;50：768-77.

[88] Rovelet-Lecrux A, Hannequin D, Raux G, Le Meur N,Laquerriere A, Vital A, et al. APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nat Genet 2006;38：24-6.

[89] Sleegers K, Brouwers N, Gijselinck I, Theuns J,Goossens D, Wauters J, et al. APP duplication is sufficient to cause early onset Alzheimer's dementia with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain 2006;129：2977-83.

[90] Cabrejo L, Guyant-Marechal L, Laquerriere A,Vercelletto M, De la Fourniere F, Thomas-Anterion C,et al. Phenotype associated with APP duplication in five families. Brain 2006;129：2966-76.

[91] Hunter CL, Bimonte HA, Granholm AC. Behavioral comparison of 4 and 6 month-old Ts65Dn mice： agerelated impairments in working and reference memory.Behav. Brain Res 2003;138：121-31.

[92] Salehi A, Delcroix JD, Belichenko PV, Zhan K, Wu C,Va;;etta JS, et al. Increased App expression in a mouse model of Down's syndrome disrupts NGF transport and causes cholinergic neuron degeneration. Neuron 2006;51：29-42.

[93] Granholm AC, Sanders LA, Crnic LS. Loss of cholinergic phenotype in basal forebrain coincides with cognitive decline in a mouse model of Down's syndrome. Exp Neurol 2000;161：647-63.

[94] Necchi D, Lomoio S, Scherini E. Axonal abnormalities in cerebellar Purkinje cells of the Ts65Dn mouse. Brain Res 2008;1238：181-8.

[95] Seo H, Isacson O. Abnormal APP, cholinergic and cognitive function in Ts65Dn Down's model mice. Exp Neurol 2005;193：469-80.

[96] Cataldo AM, Barnett JL, Pieroni C, Nixon RA.Increased neuronal endocytosis and protease delivery to early endosomes in sporadic Alzheimer's disease：neuropathologic evidence for a mechanism of increased beta-amyloidogenesis. J Neurosci 1997;17：6142-51.

[97] Cataldo AM, Petanceska S, Peterhoff CM, Terio NB,Epstein CJ, Villar A, et al. App gene dosage modulates endosomal abnormalities of Alzheimer's disease in a segmental trisomy 16 mouse model of Down syndrome.J Neurosci 2003;23：6788-92.

[98] Cataldo AM, Mathews PM, Boiteau AB, Hassinger LC,Peterhoff CM, Jiang Y, et al. Down syndrome fibroblast model of Alzheimer-related endosome pathology：accelerated endocytosis promotes late endocytic defects.Am J Pathol 2008;173：370-84.

[99] Cooper JD, Salehi A, Delcroix JD, Howe CL, Belichenko PV, Chua-Couzens J, et al. Failed retrograde transport of NGF in a mouse model of Down's syndrome： reversal of cholinergic neurodegenerative phenotypes following NGF infusion. PNAS 2001;98：10439-44.

[100] Jiang Y, Mullaney KA, Peterhoff CM, Che S, Schmidt SD, Boyer-Boiteau A, et al. Alzheimer's-related endosome dysfunction in Down syndrome is Abetaindependent but requires APP and is reversed by BACE-1 inhibition. PNAS 2010;107：1630-5.

[101] Chang KT, Min KT. Upregulation of three Drosophila homologs of human chromosome 21 genes alters synaptic function： implications for Down syndrome.PNAS 2009;106：17117-22.

[102] Ryoo SR, Jeong HK, Radnaabazar C, Yoo JJ,Cho HJ, Lee HW, et al. DYRK1A-mediated hyperphosphorylation of Tau. A functional link between Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem 2007;282：34850-7.

[103] Ryoo SR, Cho HJ, Lee HW, Jeong HK, Radnaabazar C, Kim YS, et al. Dual-specificity tyrosine (Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A-mediated phosphorylation of amyloid precursor protein： evidence for a functional link between Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem 2008;104：1333-44.

[104] Shukkur EA, Shimohata A, Akagi T, Yu W, Yamaguchi M, Murayama M, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and tau hyperphosphorylation in Ts1Cje, a mouse model for Down syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15： 2752-62.

[105] Liu F, Liang Z, Wegiel J, Hwang YW, Iqbal K, Grundke-Iqbal I, et al. Overexpression of Dyrk1A contributes to neurofibrillary degeneration in Down syndrome. FASEB J 2008;22：3224-33.

[106] Woods YL, Cohen P, Becker W, Jakes R, Goedert M, Wang X, et al. The kinase DYRK phosphorylates protein-synthesis initiation factor eIF2Bepsilon at Ser539 and the microtubule-associated protein tau at Thr212：potential role for DYRK as a glycogen synthase kinase 3-priming kinase. Biochem J 2001;355：609-15.

[107] Wang Y, Gao L, Tse SW, Andreadis A. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein E3 modestly activates splicing of tau exon 10 via its proximal downstream intron, a hotspot for frontotemporal dementia mutations. Gene 2010;451：23-31.

[108] Lomoio S, Scherini E, Necchi D. Beta-amyloid overload does not directly correlate with SAPK/JNK activation and tau protein phosphorylation in the cerebellar cortex of Ts65Dn mice. Brain Res 2009;1297：198-206.

[109] Smigielska-Kuzia J, Sobaniec W, Kulak W, Bockowski L. Clinical and EEG features of epilepsy in children and adolescents in Down syndrome. J Child Neurol 2009;24：416-20.

[110] Cortez MA, Shen L, Wu Y, Aleem IS, Trepanier CH, Sadeghnia HR, et al. Infantile spasms and Down syndrome： a new animal model. Pediatr Res 2009;65：499-503.

[111] Scott RM, Smith ER. Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009;360：1226-37.

[112] Fukushima Y, Kondo Y, Kuroki Y, Miyake S, Iwamoto H, Sekido K, et al. Are Down syndrome patients predisposed to Moyamoya disease? Eur J Pediatr 1986;144：516-7.

[113] Ramakrishna N, Meeker HC, Li S, Brown WT, Rao R,El Idrissi A. Upregulation of beta-catenin expression in Down syndrome model Ts65Dn mouse brain.Neuroscience 2009;161：451-8.

[114] Vorbrodt AW, Li S, Brown WT, Ramakrishna N. Increased expression of beta-catenin in brain microvessels of a segmentally trisomic (Ts65Dn) mouse model of Down syndrome. Brain Cell Biol 2008;36：203-11.

[115] Ruby NF, Fernandez F, Zhang P, Klima J, Heller HC,Garner CC. Circadian locomotor rhythms are normal in Ts65Dn "down syndrome" mice and unaffected by pentylenetetrazole. J Biol Rhythms 2010;25：63-6.

[116] Martinez-Cue C, Baamonde C, Lumbreras M, Paz J,Davisson MT, Schmidt C, et al. Differential effects of environmental enrichment on behavior and learning of male and female Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome. Behav Brain Res 2002;134：185-200.

[117] Stewart RE, Woodhouse JM, Cregg M, Pakeman VH. Association between accommodative accuracy,hypermetropia, and strabismus in children with Down's syndrome. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84：149-55.

[118] Izraeli S, Rainis L, Hertzberg L, Smooha G, Birger Y.Trisomy of chromosome 21 in leukemogenesis. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2007;39：156-9.

[119] Malinge S, Ben Abdelali R, Settegrana C, Radford-Weiss I, Debre M, Beldjord K, et al. Novel activating JAK2 mutation in a patient with Down syndrome and B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2007;109：2202-4.

[120] Chou ST, Opalinska JB, YaoY, Fernandes MA, Kalota A, Brooks JS, et al. Trisomy 21 enhances human fetal erythro-megakaryocytic development. Blood 2008;112：4503-6.

[121] Tunstall-Pedoe O, Roy A, Karadimitris A, de la Fuente J,Fisk NM, Bennett P, et al. Abnormalities in the myeloid progenitor compartment in Down syndrome fetal liver precede acquisition of GATA1 mutations. Blood 2008;112：4507-11.

[122] Groet J, McElwaine S, Spinelli M, Rinaldi A, Burtscher I, Mulligan C, et al. Acquired mutations in GATA1 in neonates with Down's syndrome with transient myeloid disorder. Lancet 2003;361：1617-20.

[123] Stepensky P, Brooks R, Waldman E, Revel-Vilk S,Izraeli S, Resnick I, et al. A rare case of GATA1 negative chemoresistant acute megakaryocytic leukemia in an 8-month-old infant with trisomy 21. Pediatr Blood Cancer , DOI： 10.1002/pbc.22331.(2010)

[124] Sato T, Toki T, Kanezaki R, Xu G, Terui K, Kanegane H,et al. Functional analysis of JAK3 mutations in transient myeloproliferative disorder and acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia accompanying Down syndrome. Br J Haematol 2008;141：681-8.

[125] Klusmann JH, Reinhardt D, Hasle H, Kaspers GJ,Creutzig U, Hahlen K, et al. Janus kinase mutations in the development of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia in children with and without Down's syndrome. Leukemia 2007;21：1584-7.

[126] Kiyoi H, Yamaji S, Kojima S, Naoe T. JAK3 mutations occur in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia both in Down syndrome children and non-Down syndrome adults.Leukemia 2007;21：574-6.

[127] Walters DK, Mercher T, Gu TL, O'Hare T, Tyner JW,Loriaux M, et al. Activating alleles of JAK3 in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell 2006;10：65-75.

[128] De Vita S, Mulligan C, McElwaine S, Dagna-Bricarelli F, Spinelli M, Basso G, et al. Loss-of-function JAK3 mutations in TMD and AMKL of Down syndrome. Br J Haematol 2007;137：337-41.

[129] Gaikwad A, Rye CL, Devidas M, Heerema NA, Carroll AJ, Izraeli S, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of JAK2 mutations in Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2009;144：930-2.

[130] Hertzberg L, Vendramini E, Ganmore I, Cazzaniga G, Schmitz M, Chalker J, et al. Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a highly heterogeneous disease in which aberrant expression of CRLF2 is associated with mutated JAK2： a report from the International BFM Study Group. Blood 2010;115：1006-17.

[131] Russell LJ, Capasso M, Vater I, Akasaka T, Bernard OA, Calasanz MJ, et al. Deregulated expression of cytokine receptor gene, CRLF2, is involved in lymphoid transformation in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2009;114：2688-98.

[132] Mullighan CG, Collins-Underwood JR, Phillips LA,Loudin MG, Liu W, Zhang J, et al. Rearrangement of CRLF2 in B-progenitor- and Down syndrome-associated acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Nat Genet 2009;41：1243-6.

[133] Ng AP, Hyland CD, Metcalf D, Carmichael CL,Loughran SJ, Di Rago L, et al. Trisomy of Erg is required for myeloproliferation in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Blood DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-09-242107.(2009)

[134] Lutterbach B, Hiebert SW. Role of the transcription factor AML-1 in acute leukemia and hematopoietic differentiation. Gene 2000;245：223-35.

[135] Okuda T, van Deursen J, Hiebert SW, Grosveld G,Downing JR. AML1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoiesis. Cell 1996;84：321-30.

[136] Edwards H, Xie C, LaFiura KM, Dombkowski AA, Buck SA, Boerner JL, et al. RUNX1 regulates phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway： role in chemotherapy sensitivity in acute megakaryocytic leukemia. Blood 2009;114：2744-52.

[137] Carmichael CL, Majewski IJ, Alexander WS, Metcalf D, Hilton DJ, Hewitt CA, et al. Hematopoietic defects in the Ts1Cje mouse model of Down syndrome. Blood 2009;113：1929-37.

[138] Alford K, Slender A, Vanes L, Li Z, Fisher EM,NizeticD, et al. Perturbed hematopoiesis in the Tc1 mouse model of Down Syndrome. Blood, In press.

[139] Kirsammer G, Jilani S, Liu H, Davis E, Gurbuxani S,Le Beau MM, et al. Highly penetrant myeloproliferative disease in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.Blood 2008;111：767-75.

[140] Yang Q, Rasmussen SA, Friedman J M. Mortality associated with Down's syndrome in the USA from 1983 to 1997： a population-based study. Lancet 2002;359：1019-25.

[141] Sussan TE, Yang A, Li F, Ostrowski MC, Reeves RH.Trisomy represses Apc(Min)-mediated tumours in mouse models of Down's syndrome. Nature 2008;451：73-5.

[142] Baek KH, Zaslavsky A, Lynch RC, Britt C, Okada Y, Siarey RJ, et al. Down's syndrome suppression of tumour growth and the role of the calcineurin inhibitor DSCR1. Nature 2009;459：1126-30.

[143] Delom F, Burt E, Hoischen A, Veltman J, Groet J,Cotter FE, et al. Transchromosomic cell model of Down syndrome shows aberrant migration, adhesion and proteome response to extracellular matrix. Proteome Sci 2009;7： 31.

[144] Maslen CL, Babcock D, Robinson SW, Bean LJ, Dooley KJ, Willour VL, et al. CRELD1 mutations contribute to the occurrence of cardiac atrioventricular septal defects in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140：2501-5.

[145] Moore CS. Postnatal lethality and cardiac anomalies in the Ts65Dn Down syndrome mouse model. Mamm.Genome 2006：17：1005-12.